Author Topic: English Anabella - June (Gloucester Road) and December 2019 (Earl's Court)  (Read 30563 times)


80 review(s) for English Anabella (55 positive, 8 neutral, 17 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
80 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6434590) (55 positive, 9 neutral, 16 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]
80 review(s) for British Elite Paris (55 positive, 9 neutral, 16 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]
86 review(s) for BRITISH DOLLY GFE (59 positive, 9 neutral, 18 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I have nothing against this SP at all.

My brain dragged me in when I saw the unrelentless defence by @GLM stating it is unlikely this SP would use the N word with nothing to back it up. All most of us said it was a possibility and we gave our reasons. I don't think that is to hard to understand.

We are on lockdown lol ... it's been a good debate.

It has reached an interrsting point.

The SP is a member of this forum she has an opportunity to put the record straight.

I put it to you if she chooses not to then her blog post on AW was filled with untruths and she did indeed use the N word.

If something is unlikely it is still possible, so I’m not at odds with anyone who said it’s possible.

If you said it’s probable then I would be at odds with that statement.

Again I didn’t defend the SP.

On your last point although it would be best for this thread to reach a conclusion by having her input it’s not reasonable to deduce that her blog post (which I haven’t seen) is untrue and she did say the N word.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 11:23:59 am by Gentlelovemaking »


Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
If something is unlikely it is still possible, so I’m not at odds with anyone who said it’s possible.

If you said it’s probable then I would be at odds with that statement.

Again I didn’t defend the SP.

On your last point although it would be best for this thread to reach a conclusion by having her input it’s not reasonable to deduce that her blog post (which I haven’t seen) is untrue and she did say the N word.

I leave you with this.

All the circumstantial evidence points towards the accused using the N word.

The accused has an opportunity to speak and so far not only has she removed the blog post but it has now been revealed she is a member of this forum.

I am sure counsel for the crown (UKP) would have no problems convincing the jury (punting community) that she is guilty as charged (OP's review) :D

I rest my case.

ps next time apraise yourself with all the facts. I and others and indeed one of my replies to you we mentioned the AW blog post. I even mentioned I found it fishy that you both hung onto OP's phone being sold on eBay/going missing. You should have at least taken time out to read her blog. You may then have arrived at a different conclusion ... maybe not.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 11:44:47 am by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I disagree that all the evidence points to the fact the N word was used as I don’t think there is any evidence....it’s a Statement from OP and opinions of members of this forum.

I’ve read your opinions and they are your opinions which is fine. The only issue I’ve had with your comments are the use of insults when referring to me which you’ve addressed and I’m fine with.   


Offline unus669

just ignore Anus669 he just loves to start others off against this particular SP even though he has never met her.. obviously he has nothing better to do in his sad prick of an existence sad little life..
I don't know what JC has against her??? she has really got his back up for some reason..
This thread has gone haywire.. there is no clear cut evidence from the OP and SP... as to regards who is wrong and who is right..


You’re the smelly guy that follows the Katalina threads, to claim she’s a druggy because she saw through your attention seeking farcade  :rolleyes:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I disagree that all the evidence points to the fact the N word was used as I don’t think there is any evidence....it’s a Statement from OP and opinions of members of this forum.

I’ve read your opinions and they are your opinions which is fine. The only issue I’ve had with your comments are the use of insults when referring to me which you’ve addressed and I’m fine with.

I did say Circunstantial evidence there is a difference

Circumstantial evidence for you to mull over.

- She posted an AW blog 1/4/20 denying OP's account was true but conveniently failed to attach the screen grabs showing what was said -  Fact
- She is a member of this forum - fact
- She deactuvated her AW profile yesterday following 3 days of debate on here - fact
- she was caught reading this thread today - fact
- She has been publicaly invited to post the evidence on UKP by way of screen grabs to clear her name. So far she has failed to do - fact.

Rest assured mate she will read this very post. And will remain silent. Sometimes we don't have to wait for something to slap us in the face before we are reasonably certain it is true.

It's been a good debate.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 01:05:39 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I did say Circunstantial evidence there is a difference

Circumstantial evidence for you to mull over.

- She posted a AW blog denying OP's account was true 1/4/20 - Fact
- She is a member of this forum - fact
- She deactuvated her AW profile yesterday - fact
- she was caught reading this thread this morning - fact
- She has been publicaly invited to post the evidence on UKP by way of screen grabs to clear her name. So far she has failed to do - fact.

Rest assured mate she will read this very post. And will remain silent. Sometimes we don't have to wait for something to slap us in the face before we are reasonably certain it is true.

It's been a good debate.

I haven’t looked at her profile so I’ll take your world for it.

I don’t agree her actions would be deemed to prove guilt (if that’s what’s being established)

Your approach is what’s known as Abductive reasoning. I don’t follow that school of thought but I will entertain Deductive reasoning to come to a conclusion. 

Offline The Film Director

Very entertaining reading chaps!  :hi:

I must admit that based solely on one punt with her about 2 and a half years back I was siding with GLM on this one, but now the weight of 'evidence' does seem to have swung the other way.  Nice work, JC :thumbsup:

Offline mightymunce

Oh no - her profile is gone.

You bullied her out of business  :D

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,545
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
24 hrs away and what a mini-epic.  Well done keeping off the streets lads!

I'm still waiting for @GLM's spirited take down of KT's continued racism.  :bomb:

BTW A guy doesn't sell his cell to get rid of the texts, he deletes them.  He sells his cell to sell his cell, perhaps to buy another cell.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

24 hrs away and what a mini-epic.  Well done keeping off the streets lads!

I'm still waiting for @GLM's spirited take down of KT's continued racism.  :bomb:

BTW A guy doesn't sell his cell to get rid of the texts, he deletes them.  He sells his cell to sell his cell, perhaps to buy another cell.

The saga had nothing to do with me, only expressed opinions and I don’t throw around insults I won’t go into this again.

Has KT made racist remarks ? If so I will call it out and so should everyone else and where possible advise admin.

I agree about the Mobile phone comment, you wouldn’t sell it to get rid of a message. Shame he didn’t keep it as then this debate wouldn’t be necessary.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1

You’re the smelly guy that follows the Katalina threads, to claim she’s a druggy because she saw through your attention seeking farcade  :rolleyes:

i actually saw her and can say it..
you are a piece of shit who keeps following a service provider and yet has not ever seen her..

Big difference!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 25

The SP is a member of this forum she has an opportunity to put the record straight. OP has allegedly sold the phone on eBay. She has the keys to solve the mystery. She can use them to open the door. Debate over.

I put it to you if she chooses not to then her blog post on AW was filled with untruths and she did indeed use the N word hence removing her profile yesterday so no AW searches can uncover a link to this thread.

Hang on Luitenant before I go off for a bit.

If I may just ask is there  another 'big leap of faith'?

Since she may have deleted the texts etc. I was gonna crack a joke but it would have affected the point which I am trying to get at.

But I  am sure you get the gist

Nice One

You forgot your hat  :hi:
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 03:07:35 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline unus669

i actually saw her and can say it..
you are a piece of shit who keeps following a service provider and yet has not ever seen her..

Big difference!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

You’re the certified stinker, attention seeker. Thing is some of us don’t feel the need to review every wg we’ve paid for. Obviously your ego is such, you think that makes you , some kinda top dog :lol: At least SPs clocked you a while ago, with a whole thread of your imbecile like behaviour.

You’re a clown, that can’t string a reasonable debate , even if your life depended on it.


Offline SamLP

I am not white and i saw megan and nancy, no problems at all, and to be honest Annabelle is a very sweet hottie, she does not have a shitty stuck up attitude as you put it... anyways each to there own opinions..
YLF probably told them to make an exception. They still mocked you afterwards. Says it all.

Beg to differ.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
YLF probably told them to make an exception. They still mocked you afterwards. Says it all.

Beg to differ.

i don't know about the exception... yes i was mocked.. could i care..nope.. it was laughable nonsense..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
You’re the certified stinker, attention seeker. Thing is some of us don’t feel the need to review every wg we’ve paid for. Obviously your ego is such, you think that makes you , some kinda top dog :lol: At least SPs clocked you a while ago, with a whole thread of your imbecile like behaviour.

You’re a clown, that can’t string a reasonable debate , even if your life depended on it.

you just carry on as the piece of shit that you are.. a complete waste of space... :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline unus669

you just carry on as the piece of shit that you are.. a complete waste of space... :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

You’re describing yourself🖕🏾

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,084
  • Likes: 103
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
I think that the WG in question will most likely not comment any further on what has happened, as her AW blog which I posted in the thread already explained how she felt about the situation and elaborating anymore or defending herself on this thread may lead to her digging a hole for herself/more headache.

I think that it is likely she will just wait till this dies down and once the lockdown is over.... her lovely sweetheart regulars and punters who do not frequent this site or have not seen this will return to see her. So if by chance she did comment to clear it up, it would be soley to try and recover her reputation on this site, which it seems that she did not have a good rep anyway, so why would she go out of her way to do that?

On a side note, I hope this lockdown ends soon. No punting for anyone seems to have increased led to hostility in posts recently all over the forum  :lol:
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 05:35:43 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I think that the WG in question will most likely not comment any further on what has happened, as her AW blog which I posted in the thread already explained how she felt about the situation and elaborating anymore or defending herself on this thread may lead to her digging a hole for herself/more headache.

I think that it is likely she will just wait till this dies down and once the lockdown is over.... her lovely sweetheart regulars and punters who do not frequent this site or have not seen this will return to see her. So if by chance she did comment to clear it up, it would be soley to try and recover her reputation on this site, which it seems that she did not have a good rep anyway, so why would she go out of her way to do that?

On a side note, I hope this lockdown ends soon. No punting for anyone seems to have increased led to hostility in posts recently all over the forum  :lol:.

after lockdown we still have tread carefully on egg shells moment which also could last a while too..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline unus669

no shitface 100% you :hi: :hi:


But you’re the certified stinker :lol: Who writes with emojis, pays a score for a test :dash:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1

But you’re the certified stinker :lol: Who writes with emojis, pays a score for a test :dash:

look your such a piece of shit waste of space loser i can't be bothered to waste my energy on you.. so fuck off bye bye... :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,060
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
look your such a piece of shit waste of space loser i can't be bothered to waste my energy on you.. so fuck off bye bye... :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Enough I think.. just put each other on ignore if you can’t behave.

I don’t want to see either of you banned... but am sure you’ll both get a 7 day one to cool off if you need it.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Enough I think.. just put each other on ignore if you can’t behave.

I don’t want to see either of you banned... but am sure you’ll both get a 7 day one to cool off if you need it.

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline unus669

look your such a piece of shit waste of space loser i can't be bothered to waste my energy on you.. so fuck off bye bye... :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Stop describing yourself mango man🖕🏾


Offline unus669

Enough I think.. just put each other on ignore if you can’t behave.

I don’t want to see either of you banned... but am sure you’ll both get a 7 day one to cool off if you need it.

Good advise

Offline Crackanut

What's the point of making it so personal. There's no point in anyone vouching for a SPs personality or character. They're women that are paid to give the impression that you're the biggest stud in town. They might or might not be racist.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

What's the point of making it so personal. There's no point in anyone vouching for a SPs personality or character. They're women that are paid to give the impression that you're the biggest stud in town. They might or might not be racist.

Did anyone vouch for her character ?

Offline Crackanut

Did anyone vouch for her character ?

King Tarzan certainly been implying there's no way she can be a racist.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,545
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Enough I think.. just put each other on ignore if you can’t behave.

I don’t want to see either of you banned... but am sure you’ll both get a 7 day one to cool off if you need it.

Of all the things to break your silence for.
Glad to hear you're still about shame it isn't to swap stories about punting.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,545
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
What's the point of making it so personal. There's no point in anyone vouching for a SPs personality or character. They're women that are paid to give the impression that you're the biggest stud in town. They might or might not be racist.

Sadly I find too many who have no such inclination to delude me about my studly stature.   :dash:

I think your paradigm is broke.  :cry:

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
I think that the WG in question will most likely not comment any further on what has happened, as her AW blog which I posted in the thread already explained how she felt about the situation and elaborating anymore or defending herself on this thread may lead to her digging a hole for herself/more headache.

I think that it is likely she will just wait till this dies down and once the lockdown is over.... her lovely sweetheart regulars and punters who do not frequent this site or have not seen this will return to see her. So if by chance she did comment to clear it up, it would be soley to try and recover her reputation on this site, which it seems that she did not have a good rep anyway, so why would she go out of her way to do that?

On a side note, I hope this lockdown ends soon. No punting for anyone seems to have increased led to hostility in posts recently all over the forum  :lol:.

Not necessarily! Here I agree with JC's contention if she has the evidence on her text still available, then I feel she will be vindicated posting it here.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 10:40:12 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,084
  • Likes: 103
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Not necessarily! Here I agree with JC's contention if she has the evidence on her text still available, then I feel she will be vindicated posting it here.

Perhaps so, but then what happens if a couple members pop out the woodworks and have a pop at her, she responds in kind and causes more drama on this thread  :lol:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Perhaps so, but then what happens if a couple members pop out the woodworks and have a pop at her, she responds in kind and causes more drama on this thread  :lol:.

If she is telling the truth as per her blog post then I truly fail to see how any forum member can have an issue with the truth. I also feel she has no reason to delete the text messages.

Human psychology and behavioural patterns are remarkably similar when one feels they have been wronged. You saw how quickly she posted her defence after OP's review, mocked OP for not able to show the screen grabs but now she is being openly asked to do the same she can't. Where she went wrong is she didn't figure some on here would see holes in her version of events.

I recall a similar dust-up with the ex WG Priya on the Indian girl thread with a member who claimed he met her and she had a fishy pussy. He is now banned. It ran for a while. When she challenged him to post his evidence that he met her he went around the houses but couldn't produce it. She felt so incensed by his accusations she was prepared to disclose her evidence to admin that she had never accepted a booking from him. Many members have also post screen grabs from time to time of text messages to prove a point.

But yeah I agree with you she will let it blow over and no doubt resurface at some point in the future and as it has been said a "stiff cock" can be very forgiving.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 11:02:32 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
i actually saw her and can say it..
you are a piece of shit who keeps following a service provider and yet has not ever seen her..

Big difference!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

And I punted Katalina many times over many years and never saw her off her head on drugs, though as ever that doesn't mean she doesn't take drugs as ANY WG could be for all I know when I am not their.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Perhaps so, but then what happens if a couple members pop out the woodworks and have a pop at her, she responds in kind and causes more drama on this thread  :lol:.

I do not think they would tbh - though I do not know. What I have seen here is if the WG is right, no-one comes out criticising I think of the situation with Charissa and I had forgotten about Priya as mentioned by JC as examples.

I forgot to add if anything the  :angry: :mad: will be directed at the reviewer for misleading the forum. We are a fair lot here!!   :hi:
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 11:51:17 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline DOUGLAS56

What's the point of making it so personal. There's no point in anyone vouching for a SPs personality or character. They're women that are paid to give the impression that you're the biggest stud in town. They might or might not be racist. 

Well said  :hi:
« Last Edit: April 05, 2020, 10:15:38 am by DOUGLAS56 »

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,084
  • Likes: 103
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Bumping this review as her profile now states she does not see black men. GLM you were fighting so hard in her corner aswell  :lol:.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline mace-window

Bumping this review as her profile now states she does not see black men. GLM you were fighting so hard in her corner aswell  :lol:.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Most of the time, WG's who don't see blacks tend to have mixed reviews of positive/negative or have tons of negative. Either way, most punters on this site will not want to see her due to her attitude problem and now her being a racist.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Most of the time, WG's who don't see blacks tend to have mixed reviews of positive/negative or have tons of negative. Either way, most punters on this site will not want to see her due to her attitude problem and now her being a racist.

Still very yummy yum yum though 😋😋😋👅👅👅
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Owl

Most of the time, WG's who don't see blacks tend to have mixed reviews of positive/negative or have tons of negative. Either way, most punters on this site will not want to see her due to her attitude problem and now her being a racist.

When I see an escort with this bad a reputation I view any racist or ageist booking policies as a positive for the punters that have been banned due to their ethnicity or age, they won't waste money on a shit prostitute.

Offline Gambitman92

Bumping this review as her profile now states she does not see black men. GLM you were fighting so hard in her corner aswell  :lol:.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Big difference between being an actual racist (which is what he was defending) and not seeing black men NOW. It's due to negative experiences, she used to see black men, something clearly happened recently.
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
Big difference between being an actual racist (which is what he was defending) and not seeing black men NOW. It's due to negative experiences, she used to see black men, something clearly happened recently.
How do you know this exactly? Had a little private chat?

By the way, excluding all black men because of a bad experience is actually racist. Quite a while back, I had a black guy take the piss and not give me the rest of my fee when the meeting was extended to an overnight. I didn't think, "Oh no, all black men are not to be trusted."
:rolleyes:

Offline Gentlelovemaking

Bumping this review as her profile now states she does not see black men. GLM you were fighting so hard in her corner aswell  :lol:.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I wasn’t fighting anyone’s corner, I genuinely believe the punter added some spice to his review. The language he used wasn’t congruent with someone of her age.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I wasn’t fighting anyone’s corner, I genuinely believe the punter added some spice to his review. The language he used wasn’t congruent with someone of her age.

Mango spice? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mightymunce


Offline mace-window

How do you know this exactly? Had a little private chat?

By the way, excluding all black men because of a bad experience is actually racist. Quite a while back, I had a black guy take the piss and not give me the rest of my fee when the meeting was extended to an overnight. I didn't think, "Oh no, all black men are not to be trusted."
:rolleyes:

Exactly. I wanted to comment on Gambitman92 comment on the "no white men" thread about WG's doing so mostly from bad experiences (sexual assault, theft, trying to get discounts etc) and it's a business move but forgot. I used to believe such things that GAmbitman92 pointed out above but after doing some logically thinking, I don't believe in such a thing anymore. I will say while I agree a that blacks have a high crime/arrest rate in the UK (mostly London) one must think how many of those black criminals will bother to see a WG or do such crimes such as sexual assault, thieving or etc.. WG in the first place? While we will never know how many blacks are punters, we can all agree that most punters are white.

And most of the black punters are likely got a job, a degree, more intelligent than typical black criminal, likely a geek during his high school days or never have a criminal record in their life or committed a crime. Most of the black criminals are rather to busy doing criminal stuff and likely have a girlfriend or two (or a side piece) to think about seeing a WG in the first place. Also if black criminal would want to rob a WG place/money would he get that much money as to oppose robing a shop or a rival gang trap house? Likely those type of guys would bother rob the later as they will likely get more money from those places than a regular WG's place. And finally being a punter in most black communities is frowned upon. So very unlikely we will see a good amount of black punters behaving in such a manner.

Finally the blacks that would even entertain sexual assault, theft, trying to get discounts and etc..... would be a very small % even (like 0.5%). So personally when I see WG's (a good amount of them these days) saying "I don't see blacks due to bad experience" - it's totally bullshit. As they know god damm well that most black punters are clean, polite, friendly and don't do such behaviors. Frankly WG's will have more bad experiences from whites punters than blacks punters (I will even say that Wg's experiencing bad experience from white punters is small as well). But will hardly see "I don't see white" as that would not be convenient for them. But one black guy tries to get discounts of a WG or dare I say tried rob her, then all black punters are painted with the same brush. And mind you very convenient as blacks make up 13% of the UK population so hardly get enough back lash from others as they can get their money from non blacks. It is annoying to see this with WG's and behave like this is fine. Why not be honest that you don't like black people period. But hi it would not be good for business and your white daddy won't bother to pay you a visit. 

And most these WG's who do this have a shitty attitude and have bad reviews. Don't get me wrong, these WG's can do what ever they want. It is a free country but I and other punters have to right to not bother seeing such a terrible WG.




Offline last_days_of_logan

How do you know this exactly? Had a little private chat?

By the way, excluding all black men because of a bad experience is actually racist. Quite a while back, I had a black guy take the piss and not give me the rest of my fee when the meeting was extended to an overnight. I didn't think, "Oh no, all black men are not to be trusted."
:rolleyes:

Do you have a preference of who you see? or is everyone equal irrespective of Age, race, occupation, nationality or creed?