It now appears I was indeed wrong.
As you said that you would consider, you cannot and do not speak for all punters
Where have I ever claimed to be speaking on behalf of all punters ?
and now you are being rude to people who have never been rude to you, that's up to you of course this is not PN, you can call me a cunt if you wish I could not care less. However this unnecessary rudeness, may be the reason people think you are a troll.
Can you quote a single instance whereby I initiated rudeness or cast aspersions on any individual.
On every single instance I have been the retaliating party.
To add credibility to my statement there are several profiles who I have engaged with without being rude and others that I have thanked for the respectful approach they have taken when addressing post to or about me.
Its more than a coincidence that everyone I have been negative towards have initiated negativity towards me
FIRST Personally I still do not think that, I just think you are a person who does not listen to the views of others and have entrenched your position so much, that you cannot back down without losing face.
I have no issue with being proven wrong but in the case it wouldnt be
me thats being proven wrong, it would be the
PRINCIPLE ECONOMICS that is being applied.
Sooner or later someone may just figure out I am not responsible for this
PRINCIPLE after I have said so for perhaps 10-15 times.
Even if somebody said yes the principle is correct but it doesnt apply in this situation because WG's dont conform to the laws of demand and they could prove it.
The principle would still be correct.
For the record I believe the likely hood of WG falling into the category of veblen goods is as close as an entire company shop staff each claiming to have a USP because they are all different in someway.
Even you have to chuckle at the comments supporting the USP of WG's lol lol