Search the name mcfly and read the blacklist under blackmail.
I'm beginnining to think you're misunderstanding my point on purpose
I'm semi familiar with McFlygate & this proves my point, all the sensitive info revealed were what he was naive enough to reveal himself or too careless with ergo leaving himself open.
If you say you're Dave the plumber or Mark the Gas Man who punts every other month they'll have nothing on you.
However if you say you're billy big bollocks bigshot punter trying too hard to impress them with tales of your high power job, sexual prowess namedrops etc (heaven knows why the £200-£300 fee is more than enough) you can't blame the WG for being careless it's on you.
I & others like me are the punters that see the girls after those types & they do talk about them, never mentioning names but the way some punters act online it's not difficult to speculate who, the ones who review themselves & not the girls are prime examples.
Not directed at any individual in particular but anyone would be naive to think it doesn't occur.
& to reiterate my point again generally the only info a WG can be indiscreet with is that which the punter voluntarily discloses whether intentional or not