Seeking.com (London)

[wdnah]

If you are new to Seeking, are ugly, very old, married, little discretionary money, you will have. a .hard. time. Eespecially if you treat all the girls like its AW. Calibrate accordingly.

[wdnah]

i'm not as confident as you that is what she means by "Please don’t bother if you’re looking for paid sex"! haha.

Let's translate that... "Please don't bother if you aren't going to woo me enough to help me rationalise that I am not seeling my body for sex."

[rafathegaffa]

i'm not as confident as you that is what she means by "Please don’t bother if you’re looking for paid sex"! haha.

There's a fair number of women there who expect to be wined and dined but are like "you must respect me i dont have sex for money"

Sugar cuck would be the correct term for what she's seeking i reckon.

[southcoastpunter]

Let's translate that... "Please don't bother if you aren't going to woo me enough to help me rationalise that I am not seeling my body for sex."

There's a fair number of women there who expect to be wined and dined but are like "you must respect me i dont have sex for money"

Sugar cuck would be the correct term for what she's seeking i reckon.

my comment was a light hearted response to a light hearted posting. 

But some ladies will do PPM's, some won't - i took it from her comment that she won't so if i was wanting a ppm, i wouldn't contact her.  Many ladies didn't like to think think are providing paid sexual services - lets not go round that discussion again (its been done a few times) as mainly it doesn't matter what we think - but more its what they think of themselves and how they perceive our treatment of them.

[Hobbit]

my comment was a light hearted response to a light hearted posting. 

But some ladies will do PPM's, some won't - i took it from her comment that she won't so if i was wanting a ppm, i wouldn't contact her.  Many ladies didn't like to think think are providing paid sexual services - lets not go round that discussion again (its been done a few times) as mainly it doesn't matter what we think - but more its what they think of themselves and how they perceive our treatment of them.

I think a lot of those girls are delusional. They provide a paid service and don't think they are prostitutes. Even hookers find them delusional.

A perfect example is one girl that I was seeing who saw me for several months and then later says that she can't see me anymore as feels like a hooker. Even though, she was the one that was restricting the time and clock watching plus all the things that most hookers do.

They know what they're doing and will manipulate along the way until they find someone that pays them ridiculous amounts of money. This may not apply to all but significantly most, and especially the younger ones.

[Hobbit]

If you are new to Seeking, are ugly, very old, married, little discretionary money, you will have. a .hard. time. Eespecially if you treat all the girls like its AW. Calibrate accordingly.

It doesn't matter if you are ugly. As long as you have lots of money then you will find plenty of girls.

[NuruGuru]

Yes! She was quite pushy for a “first date”. I chanced it and got her onto WhatsApp but she wanted £150 for the first platonic lunch. I said no and she went into a tirade saying I was on the site and why on earth would she go and meet an old ugly man for nothing. “Just look at you”. Really insulting!

Blocked her and moved on. Avoid!!

I know this girl personally....She's here for investigative purposes. Not sure how much info I can disclose publicly, but happy to private message

[pantywetter]

It takes a lot of time and hard work, and I’ve been pretty unsuccessful there in 5 or 6 goes.

I would write it off as a total waste of time personally, though I know some guys on the thread have some success.

[dmitrybulgakov]

I know this girl personally....She's here for investigative purposes. Not sure how much info I can disclose publicly, but happy to private message

Does not sound very professional, or has her head in the right place if she is using such kind of language with the other gentleman.
You need to have a neutral balanced head to do any investigation....

[NightKid]

There's an existing thread on the London board that's dedicated to Seeking. You'll find all your answers there 

Err, isn't that this thread? 

[90125]

Err, isn't that this thread? 

The threads were merged.

[alwaysamazing]

FlirtyLover - External Link/Members Only - 38 - very direct and most likely pro - there is per hourly rate and some discount on 3 hours.

Miralondon - External Link/Members Only - 28 - Initial platonic dates followed by ppm if intimacy is at 500.

Purplelabel - External Link/Members Only - 40 - based in Wales, not in London. Although nice to talk to spin lots of stories.

They are reasonably fit ladies but not for me so this info help someone or if anyone had any interaction feel free to share your experience.

[stampjones]

If you are new to Seeking, are ugly, very old, married, little discretionary money, you will have. a .hard. time. Eespecially if you treat all the girls like its AW. Calibrate accordingly.

What a load of shit. You have zero idea what the majority of people on there are like or what success rate they have. Talk to your own experience and let others talk to theirs and then everyone gets useful information rather than speculative bollocks

[Manstead]

External Link/Members Only

Anyone knows anything about her?

[Big_Al]

I know this girl personally....She's here for investigative purposes. Not sure how much info I can disclose publicly, but happy to private message

Interested in any background on this. The nastiness out of nowhere was a little weird!

[SpaceRaiderDave]

If you are new to Seeking, are ugly, very old, married, little discretionary money, you will have. a .hard. time. Eespecially if you treat all the girls like its AW. Calibrate accordingly.

What a load of shit. You have zero idea what the majority of people on there are like or what success rate they have. Talk to your own experience and let others talk to theirs and then everyone gets useful information rather than speculative bollocks

wdnah's post may be speculative but it's true. That's based on my own seven years experience and also simple logic. Not sure why Stampjones would take such an aggressive position

new to Seeking - If you are new you will be less likely to spot a fake or be as good at negotiating

are ugly, very old - Lots of girls will have a different financial expectation based on looks. Some are very picky and won't see old ugly people
 
married - If you are married you will have less flexibility in respect of time

little discretionary money - kind of obvious but SA can be very expensive
 
if you treat all the girls like its AW - Unlike AW the transaction has to be negotiated and better deals are obtained with humour and good manners and selling yourself approached that get you nowhere on AW

Like all generalisations there may be exceptions but as a statement I don't believe it deserves a response of "What a load of shit"

[newbie2014]

Gents, could someone please post the latest discount code link?

Cheers

[Manstead]

Gents, could someone please post the latest discount code link?

Cheers

External Link/Members Only

[newbie2014]

External Link/Members Only

Thanks, still showing 79.95 though.... is there another one or this is it?

[stampjones]

wdnah's post may be speculative but it's true. That's based on my own seven years experience and also simple logic. Not sure why Stampjones would take such an aggressive position

new to Seeking - If you are new you will be less likely to spot a fake or be as good at negotiating

are ugly, very old - Lots of girls will have a different financial expectation based on looks. Some are very picky and won't see old ugly people
 
married - If you are married you will have less flexibility in respect of time

little discretionary money - kind of obvious but SA can be very expensive
 
if you treat all the girls like its AW - Unlike AW the transaction has to be negotiated and better deals are obtained with humour and good manners and selling yourself approached that get you nowhere on AW

Like all generalisations there may be exceptions but as a statement I don't believe it deserves a response of "What a load of shit"

Again you have your experience others have theirs. Any generalisations like these are exactly that and have no value at all unless the intention is to put people off joining.

Your point on marriage for example is the exact opposite of my personal experience. Its never been a problem for me. Im also a lot older than most girls I see. Never a problem for me. I dont treat it like AW but there are people on here that do who seem to be successful enough.

The point is everyone has their own experience and its certainly useful to post about that but making sweeping generalisations when you have no idea whether they are true or not is just a waste of time imo, especially when it is stated as fact. Maybe it was more aggressive than it needed to be but people who think their way is the only way are just a waste of space imo.

FWIW my advice to people thinking of joining is read the threads, join up and find out what works for you.

[SpaceRaiderDave]

My post was based on seven years of experience of SA and I agreed there will be exceptions but if your experience/knowledge suggests the opposite is true then we just have had different experiences. Looking at your posting history, you don't seem immune from making generalisations yourself on other subjects

[stampjones]

My post was based on seven years of experience of SA and I agreed there will be exceptions but if your experience/knowledge suggests the opposite is true then we just have had different experiences. Looking at your posting history, you don't seem immune from making generalisations yourself on other subjects

You can have 7 months of experience or 7 years but it doesnt change that its the experience of one person. So if you say in that 7 years you’ve found X thats useful info. Maybe I found the opposite in my 7 years. Thats perfectly plausible too and both of our experiences are useful info.

Thats not what the guy you’re defending said though. He said (to take one part), if you are married you’ll find it harder on seeking. Thats not a personal statement. Thats a declaration about a supposed general truth. Now if he’d posted that he’d surveyed a thousand SDs of which 500 were married and found that 70% of single SDs reported finding seeking an easy ride whereas only 30% of married ones reported the same thing - that would be a statement with some basis in reality. Still not sure what use it would be, but at least it would be based on something real as opposed to pulling some random statement from his arse and posting it as a fact.

That’s important imo as if some married dude decides to not try seeking because of that then he might be missing out on a good experience.

As to my posting generalisations, I try not to post stupid statements, but Ive probably done it plenty of times and sometimes been called out for it. So the fuck what 🤷‍♂️ Doesnt change that the post I responded to here was bollocks.

[puntingpumping1920]

Any Intel - External Link/Members Only

[Heph]

...that would be a statement with some basis in reality. Still not sure what use it would be, but at least it would be based on something real as opposed to pulling some random statement

If someone is married, they WILL generally find it harder going on Seeking because -

1/ a significant number of SBs actively declare they want no interaction with married guys
2/ a larger contingent have undeclared reservations about infidelities
3/ the seeking trade-off vs AW et al is time>money. SB relationships are generally much more time intensive, and long duration stolen hours are harder to account for
4/ single people have less accountability with regard to the use of their time and resources

No 'cite your sources' is required or possible here. Seeking activity is socially semi-illicit for all manner of reasons - and a survey would as likely be misleading as insightful. There is no "evidence" that a spear through the skull represents a significant danger, since I never saw a peer-reviewed paper to that effect.

Few people post 'supposed statements of truth' on a punting website - most people grasping that much of the content here is members' opinion, perspective and hearsay, and they treat generalisations accordingly. There will doubtless always be exceptions, but that doesn't usually require stating, it being so tedious to require it.

[Heph]

Any Intel - External Link/Members Only

She looks most unlike your more usual pursuits. No?

At least she thinks she's a catch 

[Manstead]

If someone is married, they WILL generally find it harder going on Seeking because -

1/ a significant number of SBs actively declare they want no interaction with married guys
2/ a larger contingent have undeclared reservations about infidelities
3/ the seeking trade-off vs AW et al is time>money. SB relationships are generally much more time intensive, and long duration stolen hours are harder to account for
4/ single people have less accountability with regard to the use of their time and resources

No 'cite your sources' is required or possible here. Seeking activity is socially semi-illicit for all manner of reasons - and a survey would as likely be misleading as insightful. There is no "evidence" that a spear through the skull represents a significant danger, since I never saw a peer-reviewed paper to that effect.

Few people post 'supposed statements of truth' on a punting website - most people grasping that much of the content here is members' opinion, perspective and hearsay, and they treat generalisations accordingly. There will doubtless always be exceptions, but that doesn't usually require stating, it being so tedious to require it.

Lol. None of the above apply. I am much married and in 3 affairs at the moment. It's all about how one balances things. Chill.

[Heph]

None of the above apply. I am much married and in 3 affairs at the moment. It's all about how one balances things. Chill.

With the exceptions that you -

• have an open relationship
  
• are currently going through divorce* and/or
  
• your wife is currently in a vegetative state
  

...you'd almost certainly find the experience of conducting three simultaneous affairs even easier still, if you weren't married.


*or she is currently having your assets appraised without your knowledge with a view to divorcing you

[Manstead]

With the exceptions that you have an open relationship; are currently going through divorce* and/or your wife is currently in a vegetative state; you'd almost certainly find the experience of conducting three simultaneous affairs even easier still, if you weren't married.


*or she is currently having your assets appraised without your knowledge with a view to divorcing you

I agree they would be easier if I wasn't married but they run very well as is.

*Her assets being more than mine makes it safer.

[Heph]

I agree they would be easier if I wasn't married but they run very well as is.

*Her assets being more than mine makes it safer.

*Good for you    ...it would

Yes: I wasn't claiming it is not possible - it's just more difficult. There are only so many hours, and it gets increasingly hard not to slip up somewhere. Credit to you for keeping your balls in the air.

[NightKid]

Any Intel - External Link/Members Only

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=259378.msg3539142#msg3539142

Tho I haven't engaged with her directly, I'd agree with the seemingly formed view of her here on the basis of my personal instincts - defo semi pro if not outright pro at least, but likely good value at the same time given what she's been said to accept for an overnight especially if you like her looks.

[Steve2]

Gents, could someone please post the latest discount code link?

Cheers

There is one a few pages back

[stampjones]

If someone is married, they WILL generally find it harder going on Seeking because -

You have zero basis for saying that. Your facts backing it up may be true but are irrelevant. Some MAY find it harder. I know that I never did. You may have experience of one or even a few cases but neither of us KNOW what the majority opinion is without some kind of survey.

My experience: Im married and it had either no or a slightly positive effect. I live/operate in London so it may be different in other parts of the country but, hey, this is a london thread.

While its true there are girls who say no married men and others (fewer in my experience) who dont state it on profiles but wont meet married men, the effect is negligible. For me seeking is a numbers game. I go through searches and choose who I’ll message. I dismiss most of those for many reasons. If she says no married men its just another reason to move on, just like “princess” or platonic. Has negligible impact on me. I still have more girls than I ever could meet.

Some girls I’ll only find out after I’ve started chatting. But its pretty quick as I have my married status on my profile and I state it pretty quickly in a chat too. In the hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of girls Ive chatted to I cant think of more than a handful that have bugged out at this stage. But even if they do it changes nothing. Most girls I chat to, I never see. For lots of reasons, some theirs, some mine. Being married is way down at the bottom of that list of reasons for me so much so as to be insignificant.

Note that all of that is because I CHOOSE to tell them Im married. If it was a problem I simply wouldnt tell them In fact when I started on seeking I never mentioned it and no-one asked. It went just fine.

Time to do it? Its the same as punting which I did for years before SA. No problem at all. I cant recall ever spending any time worrying about it tbh. Late home tonight babe. Thats it. Of course if I wanted an overnight or to go on holiday with an SB it would be harder but I have no interest in those things. Again no impact.

Money. Well if I had a bigger budget I would have more choice etc but my budget is my choice and has nothing to do with being married. I have plenty of fun within the choices I make.

So all of that has next to no impact on me. Maybe it tips the scales a fraction but its unnoticable. On the other hand there are plus points to being open about my married status. Girls respect it and dont call you out of nowhere or whine when you dont reply for a while. They accept your time is limited and are less on your case for a time to meet. Its also a great excuse if you want to end it with a long term SB. Sorry my wife and I are giving it another go.

So that is my experience. Others will have different experiences. Maybe Im an exception, maybe not. I know there are other married guys with similar experiences. Whether that is the most common or the least I have no clue, but neither do you or anyone else.

For me I experienced both sides - being married and not being married (in the sense described above) and I didnt find much difference. I chose to state openly on there that Im married because it makes my life easier. So in at least one case you are wrong.

[Ron89]

Anyone got any active discount codes? Cheers.

[ik8133]

You have zero basis for saying that. Your facts backing it up may be true but are irrelevant. Some MAY find it harder. I know that I never did. You may have experience of one or even a few cases but neither of us KNOW what the majority opinion is without some kind of survey.

My experience: Im married and it had either no or a slightly positive effect. I live/operate in London so it may be different in other parts of the country but, hey, this is a london thread.

While its true there are girls who say no married men and others (fewer in my experience) who dont state it on profiles but wont meet married men, the effect is negligible. For me seeking is a numbers game. I go through searches and choose who I’ll message. I dismiss most of those for many reasons. If she says no married men its just another reason to move on, just like “princess” or platonic. Has negligible impact on me. I still have more girls than I ever could meet.

Some girls I’ll only find out after I’ve started chatting. But its pretty quick as I have my married status on my profile and I state it pretty quickly in a chat too. In the hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of girls Ive chatted to I cant think of more than a handful that have bugged out at this stage. But even if they do it changes nothing. Most girls I chat to, I never see. For lots of reasons, some theirs, some mine. Being married is way down at the bottom of that list of reasons for me so much so as to be insignificant.

Note that all of that is because I CHOOSE to tell them Im married. If it was a problem I simply wouldnt tell them In fact when I started on seeking I never mentioned it and no-one asked. It went just fine.

Time to do it? Its the same as punting which I did for years before SA. No problem at all. I cant recall ever spending any time worrying about it tbh. Late home tonight babe. Thats it. Of course if I wanted an overnight or to go on holiday with an SB it would be harder but I have no interest in those things. Again no impact.

Money. Well if I had a bigger budget I would have more choice etc but my budget is my choice and has nothing to do with being married. I have plenty of fun within the choices I make.

So all of that has next to no impact on me. Maybe it tips the scales a fraction but its unnoticable. On the other hand there are plus points to being open about my married status. Girls respect it and dont call you out of nowhere or whine when you dont reply for a while. They accept your time is limited and are less on your case for a time to meet. Its also a great excuse if you want to end it with a long term SB. Sorry my wife and I are giving it another go.

So that is my experience. Others will have different experiences. Maybe Im an exception, maybe not. I know there are other married guys with similar experiences. Whether that is the most common or the least I have no clue, but neither do you or anyone else.

For me I experienced both sides - being married and not being married (in the sense described above) and I didnt find much difference. I chose to state openly on there that Im married because it makes my life easier. So in at least one case you are wrong.

Good post!  I am married as well and have met a few SB's.  I too tell them/admit to being married, for one it shows that you are willing to be honest and most come back saying that it doesn't bother them.  As for the time factor, yes you have to juggle things about, and have to plan things in advance a bit more, but where there's a will there's a way!

[Heph]

You have zero basis for saying that. Your facts backing it up may be true but are irrelevant...

My "There will doubtless always be exceptions..." line, would've saved you all the time writing that. Yes: we know.

Though, of course, logically, since you are/were married, you can't know that it wasn't harder than it might otherwise have been. But, assuming you don't operate according to entirely different sets of interpersonal relationships to most (though, I concede you might), we are probably correct to infer that not being accountable to anyone but oneself, will invariably give a person the greatest possible latitude. That is my basis for saying it.

C/f - 'I may not be a vet, but I do know what a dog is'

I am married as well and have met a few SB's.  I too tell them/admit to being married, for one it shows that you are willing to be honest and most come back saying that it doesn't bother them. As for the time factor, yes you have to juggle things about, and have to plan things in advance a bit more, but where there's a will there's a way!

This is no contradiction. Of course being married is not a general bar to success on Seeking (though, as you will doubtless know, about 10-20% SBs, if not more, will screen marrieds out). As you acknowledge, it is simply far less convenient than being single and unaccountable to anyone but oneself. Even the loosest, most open marriage will have some mutual obligations to attend to, and which will be obstacles in some way.

[stampjones]

My "There will doubtless always be exceptions..." line, would've saved you all the time writing that. Yes: we know.

Though, of course, logically, since you are/were married, you can't know that it wasn't harder than it might otherwise have been. But, assuming you don't operate according to entirely different sets of interpersonal relationships to most (though, I concede you might), we are probably correct to infer that not being accountable to anyone but oneself, will invariably give a person the greatest possible latitude. That is my basis for saying it.

You said it is generally harder. I gave an example (me) where it is not. I dont think Im in a particularly unusual marriage but I dont find it any more difficult than when I was single. Granted I didnt do seeking when I was single but I did punt and the comparison there is good. I literally have to say that Im working late or Im going out. Now I guess you could argue that is “harder” than not saying it, but its not a difference that would have the slightest impact on anything real. The plus points I mentioned more than balance out the minuses for me.

Other people may well have other, opposite experience which I fully accept. But your facile “logic” simply does not apply in my reality. You already concede that there are “exceptions” but if the number of such exceptions approaches or even exceeds the number of non-exceptions then you can hardly label them such. Given you have no way of knowing what the balance is your “point” is clearly based on nothing more than your opinion.

Show me some actual data and Im happy to agree with you. Simply stating some pseudo-logical view of how you think the world should be is no different to making shit up.

[anonman2]

Seeking is a numbers game so I think it's pretty obvious that being married/in a relationship is unquestionably going to make it harder than if you're single where you have much more freedom for the whole messaging part, let alone arranging meets.

[stampjones]

Seeking is a numbers game so I think it's pretty obvious that being married/in a relationship is unquestionably going to make it harder than if you're single where you have much more freedom for the whole messaging part, let alone arranging meets.

And yet it hasnt for me. Who’d have guessed 

[anonman2]

Yes there are obviously exceptions. It's really not that controversial thing to say is generally true.

[rafathegaffa]

Since I've started punting more the last few months and started using some agencies I hadn't previously, I've noticed that the overlap between the 'higher end' girls on seeking in London and the "high end" agencies is  staggering.

I can't find this girl's profile on seeking anymore but I spoke to her and have her number from a chat around 3 weeks ago. Interestingly, she claimed she was looking for just one SD etc,etc. Her price range of 10k a month for 4-5 "non-rushed" meets was out of my range. As was her demand for an initial meet at Sexy Fish + 500 cash gift to get to know her at dinner. Similar experience with a couple of other girls who I have noticed are also on blacklabel, dollsandroses and aprov, in particular, a few on Diva/Babylon too.

Instead I'm going to save myself the headache and just punt before christmas cause I really fancy this type of look via External Link/Members Only . Benefit of never sharing face pics till the day of a meet on seeking when I facetime the person  prior to meeting. And I'm certainly not feeding her sushi at sexy fish and paying 500 pounds for the privelege, when i could punt her for that total  .

I miss the days of seeking being reasonable 4-5 years ago. Had a girl this level at 4k p/month who I saw 5-6 times a month including a few overnights.

[flamingice]

I can't find this girl's profile on seeking anymore but I spoke to her and have her number from a chat around 3 weeks ago. Interestingly, she claimed she was looking for just one SD etc,etc. Her price range of 10k a month for 4-5 "non-rushed" meets

Absolutely ridiculous.  Guess you can demand she remove her seeking profile at that price - I’d be demanding she remove herself from social media and the internet in general.

The problem is you should be getting a discount for more sessions.  Let’s assume 5 meets over a month, so it’s basically £2k per meet (yes I’m good at maths).  Well that’s the same as a few hours with a very high end girl.  So you are not getting any benefit here for buying in bulk, and you are then stuck with this one chick.  If I wanted to waste £10k on high end girls, I could try out 5 different providers for the same price, which is a massive advantage, and on top of that avoid the boredom of a meet and greet £500 cash Sexy Fish cash trap.

[Manstead]

Absolutely ridiculous.  Guess you can demand she remove her seeking profile at that price - I’d be demanding she remove herself from social media and the internet in general.

The problem is you should be getting a discount for more sessions.  Let’s assume 5 meets over a month, so it’s basically £2k per meet (yes I’m good at maths).  Well that’s the same as a few hours with a very high end girl.  So you are not getting any benefit here for buying in bulk, and you are then stuck with this one chick.  If I wanted to waste £10k on high end girls, I could try out 5 different providers for the same price, which is a massive advantage, and on top of that avoid the boredom of a meet and greet £500 cash Sexy Fish cash trap.

If some dad had 10k to spare then he is probably taking 100k a month. If I had 100k a month to spare I wouldn't be looking on SB
 There are much better options at The Arts Club and they will do some really dirty stuff.

[rafathegaffa]

Absolutely ridiculous.  Guess you can demand she remove her seeking profile at that price - I’d be demanding she remove herself from social media and the internet in general.

The problem is you should be getting a discount for more sessions.  Let’s assume 5 meets over a month, so it’s basically £2k per meet (yes I’m good at maths).  Well that’s the same as a few hours with a very high end girl.  So you are not getting any benefit here for buying in bulk, and you are then stuck with this one chick.  If I wanted to waste £10k on high end girls, I could try out 5 different providers for the same price, which is a massive advantage, and on top of that avoid the boredom of a meet and greet £500 cash Sexy Fish cash trap.

Yep, this is the precise issue I'm finding. I do the exact same calculations you do (maths wizard myself    ).

I punt/sugardate/whatever you want to call it to experience as many stunners as I can and make epic memories 

But, with seeking I think there is an echelon of folks in London who can actually pay 10-15k a month for a girl to have her on 'retainer'. But really she's never really on retainer is she 

As i found out when I had a setup like this, albeit at 3.5k a month (5 year ago) with a total smokeshow, which isn't possible anymore, she was seeing others + the dinners etc in fancy places added up quite a bit. I spend less now when I punt, and get to see more hot girls

Somehow all the places these birds want to go to have crap food. Forgive me, but sexy fish and nobu have atrocious service and pretty blah food for the price. And if I'm paying 500 for someone's company at dinner, you best believe I expect my shrimp to be inside their mouth at some point in the evening 

[rafathegaffa]

If some dad had 10k to spare then he is probably taking 100k a month. If I had 100k a month to spare I wouldn't be looking on SB
 There are much better options at The Arts Club and they will do some really dirty stuff.

The girls at the arts club/soho hosue are the girls on insta with 50-100k followers and believe me plenty of them are on the high end escort sites under the "elite hidden model" tabs. I've only recently acquired the ability to see these incognito galleries at some agencies, and my mind is blown. Basically every time i see a hot girl with a designer bag in central london, i think she's got to be on one of these sites hire-able for xxx GBP an hour  .

[DiamondDogs]

Gents, could someone please post the latest discount code link?

Cheers

External Link/Members Only

I used one from here and it worked

[southcoastpunter]

If some dad had 10k to spare then he is probably taking 100k a month. If I had 100k a month to spare I wouldn't be looking on SB
 There are much better options at The Arts Club and they will do some really dirty stuff.

didn't understand your first sentence!!  - but the bit about The Arts Club - can i ask...how do you know that? are you a member? have you personally experienced this with a lady (or ladies) you met in there?

[Heph]

QED: 'if it hadn't been so white, it probably would've been black' 

"Granted I didnt do seeking when I was single..."

No, you didn't, which is precisely why you couldn't know. And yes, they are significantly different pursuits.

Yes there are obviously exceptions. It's really not that controversial thing to say is generally true.

Indeed. Most people will experience or acknowledge this is so. How could it not be?

[flamingice]

Somehow all the places these birds want to go to have crap food. Forgive me, but sexy fish and nobu have atrocious service and pretty blah food for the price. And if I'm paying 500 for someone's company at dinner, you best believe I expect my shrimp to be inside their mouth at some point in the evening 

You side tracked me.  It’s no new phenomenon, but I do not understand why every high end hot girl seems to think it has to be sushi.  Sexy Fish, Nobu, Zuma, etc… I absolutely loathe sushi in general and just don’t get it.

On the topic, I never understand why you are expected to pay for company ON TOP OF picking up the tab.  The pitch is, the dinner/drinks are on me, and you get to go to a nice place.  To expect payment on top is totally wank.  In any other line of work, a business lunch or dinner would likely be picked up by the party seeking business (and in this case, the girl).  We continue to get mugged over.

[flamingice]

The girls at the arts club/soho hosue are the girls on insta with 50-100k followers and believe me plenty of them are on the high end escort sites under the "elite hidden model" tabs. I've only recently acquired the ability to see these incognito galleries at some agencies, and my mind is blown. Basically every time i see a hot girl with a designer bag in central london, i think she's got to be on one of these sites hire-able for xxx GBP an hour  .

Everyone has their price

[Manstead]

didn't understand your first sentence!!  - but the bit about The Arts Club - can i ask...how do you know that? are you a member? have you personally experienced this with a lady (or ladies) you met in there?

To answer your question one by one
Personal experience
Yes
Yes, more than once.