There is nothing inconsistent with the posts here regarding OP's review and subsequent comments including my own that fall foul of Rule No 5. Further I don't see how anything mentioned so far meets "the things not to say criteria" Some punters on this thread are simply saying her value remains good whilst others are saying nah I will pass now there is a price hike.
You really do make me laugh. I don't want to put you off posting, you last review looks like an excellent find. Unfortunately, there are so many comments that you have made in the past that force me to place you into one or all of the following categories:
1) Struggles with reading
2) Struggles with thinking
3) Fluffy White Knight
4) Very Sly Tout.
Seeing as you seem to need it spelled out for you every time, here goes:
This comment...
This guide needs to be updated to reflect the current site rules but still those points under the section "Things NOT to Say" are still valid. Check point no 5.
External Link/Members Only
was directing you to the following wiki statement:
"Things NOT to Say:
…
5.
"She is so good she should raise her prices" You do not know an escort's business model, you are a punter. Raising prices might not help her. Also,
UKP represents the interests of punters and any statement that encourages price rises is counter to the principles of the board."
Granted you have not said that quote word for word. But you have supported the sentiment in a number of posts, including doing it early on in this very thread:
To be fair I thought £100 including CIM/Swallow was cheap, especially as she has a great body despite being a bit passive, not many offering all services for £100, even if it goes up a bit I still think it’s VFM, just my view anyway 🤷♂️
+1... based on her reviews to date.
To be fair, a few others have made similar comments. But the difference is you have made at least 9 further posts trying to support your argument. Including this, even though you admit you have never even seen the SP in question:
Looking at her reviews I would rather pay Natalie the extra £20 than have a bite from Angelica. Some of her reviews are shocking! I maintain you will be hard pushed to get CIM n Swallow for £120 I should have added from a decent SP.
You haven't even acknowledged how ironic it is that just over a week after you started pushing this argument that this same SP has reprofiled with increased rates. Maybe she has gone independent, maybe not. In either case someone, either her or her pimp, has noticed the opportunity to remarket what she's selling. It probably would have happened eventually anyway, but the timing is interesting, don't you think?
Personally, I have already seen her and reviewed her. I have no intention of returning. But I'm not surprised the guys that haven't got round to her yet are annoyed that they will now have to fork out more for her, or look elsewhere. Only WG's, Touts and Pimps benefit from encouraging price increases. So how about you be a bit more mindful of comments like these in future, as people keep trying to tell you, this is a site for the benefit of punters.
