Nataliee_X - Heathrow

[Jammer5011]

External Link/Members Only

Location: Serviced apartment near Heathrow, 10mins bus ride from Hayes Harlington station.

Comms: Not too bad but handled by a maid, replied within an hr.

Girl: Early 30’s I guess, pretty lady and looked better in real life than photos, gorgeous toned slim body, soft skin, she works out and it shows, fantastic legs as well, really friendly.

Services: OWO, CIM with Swallow, DFK, multiple positions

Punt: 1hr @ £100, no extra charges.

Greeted me wearing a sexy short tight red dress, showing off her lovely legs, looked amazing, I was turned on straight away 😜

Offered shower which I took, back to the bedroom and started some soft FK whilst feeling her sexy body, kissing got more passionate and soon had her stripped out her dress.
She then knelt down and started giving a really fantastic BJ, took it quite deep with firm suction, lovely soft lips.

I could feel myself getting close and she sped up towards the end where I eventually came in her pretty mouth, she kept going and swallowed everything, really felt amazing, best I had in ages! 😊

Fell back on the bed and she rested her head in my chest, nice touch, felt like a proper GF. Had a brief chat to recover then started kissing her to start things up again.
She was responsive and soon had me in her mouth again, once I was hard enough on with the rubber and started in doggy, lovely sight, she has a fantastic ass and nicely toned back.
Then switched to mish and started really going for it, she seemed to be enjoying it with some nice FK throughout, felt so good caressing her sexy toned body, soon enough I couldn’t hold out much longer and shot in the rubber, felt great!

Really great session, really genuine girl who wants you have a good time, was much more of a GFE experience which is my preference, will definitely return! 

[tantraman]

Girl: Early 30’s I guess, pretty lady and looked better in real life than photos, gorgeous toned slim body, soft skin, she works out and it shows, fantastic legs as well, really friendly.

Hidden Image/Members Only

She's one of my all-time favs!

[JonasG]

She's always tough to book.

Tried a few times and got no reply. 😢

[Jammer5011]

She's always tough to book.

Tried a few times and got no reply. 😢

Don’t think the maid is great, but she did mention something about possibly going independent so that might help if she does 🤷‍♂️

[unus669]

Don’t think the maid is great, but she did mention something about possibly going independent so that might help if she does 🤷‍♂️

Wonder how good her English is, for Comms, if she goes Indy 

If she does go Indy, there might be a price hike I guess?

[dubhcarr]

her english was good before she took the break a couple of years back     if she hikes her price Ill no bother revisiting      plenty of sweets out there..  an she is cute but passive so I would think she would need to up her game........offer the extra services that others do...

[unus669]

her english was good before she took the break a couple of years back     if she hikes her price Ill no bother revisiting      plenty of sweets out there..  an she is cute but passive so I would think she would need to up her game........offer the extra services that others do...

Yes, many reviewers have mentioned the passiveness, which is off putting. I did try to see her once and was fucked about. Due to the passiveness, if I do try again, it will just be for a good CIM/SWALLOW combo

[Jammer5011]

To be fair I thought £100 including CIM/Swallow was cheap, especially as she has a great body despite being a bit passive, not many offering all services for £100, even if it goes up a bit I still think it’s VFM, just my view anyway 🤷‍♂️

[Jerk Chicken]

To be fair I thought £100 including CIM/Swallow was cheap, especially as she has a great body despite being a bit passive, not many offering all services for £100, even if it goes up a bit I still think it’s VFM, just my view anyway 🤷‍♂️

+1... based on her reviews to date.

[unus669]

To be fair I thought £100 including CIM/Swallow was cheap, especially as she has a great body despite being a bit passive, not many offering all services for £100, even if it goes up a bit I still think it’s VFM, just my view anyway 🤷‍♂️

She probably gets 40/50% of what she earns, as it seems the pimp (maid) provides accommodation and bookings 

Now, if/when she becomes Indy, those overheads will be hers, hence I can see an extra 2-5 ‘Lizzies’

[Lorachoop]

Don't think we should be urging/supporting WGs to put prices up. Everyone's situation is different. I personally think her price is just right, anymore and i would look for alternatives.
If its VFM for a punter, or will still be if it goes up £20 then great, no need to advertise and tell the WG

[pepsicolaboy]

Don't think we should be urging/supporting WGs to put prices up. Everyone's situation is different. I personally think her price is just right, anymore and i would look for alternatives.
If its VFM for a punter, or will still be if it goes up £20 then great, no need to advertise and tell the WG

+1

Part of the appeal of 'Czech Sasha' before she hit the wall was the price remained a flat £100 (for 1 hour?) IMO which in market terms was OK value, despite being in a good hotel BUT in the back of beyond Heathrow (coincidence)

I feel the market is already too high price wise generally with eg lots of East Eurpoean SP wanting £70.00 for half and hour...and Bait & Switch everywhere and tonnes of other examples of over prices SP all over the intel on this forum IMO.

[unus669]

Don't think we should be urging/supporting WGs to put prices up.

That’s not what I’m implying and I don’t think anyone else is.

[Lorachoop]

That’s not what I’m implying and I don’t think anyone else is.

The comments above do say that it's still VFM if price goes up. Such comments don't help any punters. Only fills the pockets of WG and their pimps.

The Sergies around Heathrow and WGs have been known to read these forums and often raise prices, the recent examples being 30 mins rate go up from an initial 60/70 to £100 and often lead to back to back bookings too.

So not pointing any fingers, but if you have a nice time, do mention your experience but stay away from comments saying I expect prices to go up, I will happily pay more or its VFM even if prices go up etc etc

[JonasG]

Yeah defo.

Especially this year, the amount of girls who used to be £70/£80 for 30 minutes who are now £100 is a joke.

It doesn't need encouraging.

We're getting screwed as it is.

[pepsicolaboy]

Yeah defo.

Especially this year, the amount of girls who used to be £70/£80 for 30 minutes who are now £100 is a joke.

It doesn't need encouraging.

We're getting screwed as it is.

+1
Apart from any Sergei reading these forums and getting ideas..

I would guess its because (quality) supply is low and demand of course remains high. Its a sellers market to some degree IMO

Notwithstanding that, its a smaller pool of SP and the percentage of rubbish service given has gone up at a massive rate.

Edit: A much higher % of Romanians SP than ever and they dont seem motivated to provide a quality service at all, overall IMO

[Cooldick]

How was her pussy tight or normal

[Jerk Chicken]

Sorry got to disagree with the last few comments regarding encouraging WGs/Sergeis to put up prices as a result of this forum.

Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it. It is simply called market forces. The pussy market is the same as any other market which is your price is only as good as a willing buyer is prepared to pay and at some point the market dictates what you are worth.

Pussy has always been a sellers market so if a service insofar as this review/thread is concerned is described as VFM that to me simply means when you take all factors into account it's a good punt. If the price rises then the same punter may no longer describe it as VFM. Equally the WG may start to realise that her phone does not ring as often as it use to.

[JonasG]

Sorry got to disagree with the last few comments regarding encouraging WGs/Sergeis to put up prices as a result of this forum.

Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it. It is simply called market forces. The pussy market is the same as any other market which is your price is only as good as a willing buyer is prepared to pay and at some point the market dictates what you are worth.

Pussy has always been a sellers market so if a service insofar as this review/thread is concerned is described as VFM that to me simply means when you take all factors into account it's a good punt. If the price rises then the same punter may no longer describe it as VFM. Equally the WG may start to realise that her phone does not ring as often as it use to.

Tbh from my POV no sex with a whore is worth £100 for 30 minutes.

Hence any girl in that bracket isn't VFM.

[pepsicolaboy]

Sorry got to disagree with the last few comments regarding encouraging WGs/Sergeis to put up prices as a result of this forum.

Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it. It is simply called market forces. The pussy market is the same as any other market which is your price is only as good as a willing buyer is prepared to pay and at some point the market dictates what you are worth.

Pussy has always been a sellers market so if a service insofar as this review/thread is concerned is described as VFM that to me simply means when you take all factors into account it's a good punt. If the price rises then the same punter may no longer describe it as VFM. Equally the WG may start to realise that her phone does not ring as often as it use to.

But the forum reports almost instant changes to profile prices, IIRC, when comments are made about a price too high or too low, so evidence suggests otherwise and Sergeis do traffic the forum.

[Jerk Chicken]

Tbh from my POV no sex with a whore is worth £100 for 30 minutes.

Hence any girl in that bracket isn't VFM.

I hear ya!

However as you already know the market dictates otherwise for a veristy of reasons hence why there are plenty of WGs charging those rates (£100/30 mins) and even higher in some cases. They could not do so unless the market was healthy!   

[Jerk Chicken]

But the forum reports almost instant changes to profile prices, IIRC, when comments are made about a price too high or too low, so evidence suggests otherwise and Sergeis do traffic the forum.

UKP consists of a tiny % of punters who report back so is not representative of the punting market. The price rises not because of what we say here but because both WG and/or Sergei can see how popular the product that is being sold.

I have seen girls come in at one price get popular test a higher price only to put it back down again to the original price. That means the market has spoken. Conversely if the price rise is sustained it also means the market has spoken to the detriment of the minority as demand as clearly indicated the price increase for that WG can be sustained. Of course we don't like it but it is what it is.

[unus669]

UKP consists of a tiny % of punters who report back so is not representative of the punting market. The price rises not because of what we say here but because both WG and/or Sergei can see how popular the product that is being sold.

I have seen girls come in at one price get popular test a higher price only to put it back down again to the original price. That means the market has spoken. Conversely if the price rise is sustained it also means the market has spoken to the detriment of the minority as demand as clearly indicated the price increase for that WG can be sustained. Of course we don't like it but it is what it is.

 

[pepsicolaboy]

UKP consists of a tiny % of punters who report back so is not representative of the punting market. The price rises not because of what we say here but because both WG and/or Sergei can see how popular the product that is being sold.

I have seen girls come in at one price get popular test a higher price only to put it back down again to the original price. That means the market has spoken. Conversely if the price rise is sustained it also means the market has spoken to the detriment of the minority as demand as clearly indicated the price increase for that WG can be sustained. Of course we don't like it but it is what it is.

'Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it.'

This specifically I was disagreeing with, the forum does hold weight with some Sergei's/SP.

[Jerk Chicken]

'Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it.'

This specifically I was disagreeing with, the forum does hold weight with some Sergei's/SP.

I respectfully disagree.

[monkey nuts]

No sure when the OP saw her as phone has been ringing out since last week and then doesn't even connect now, on holiday perhaps?

[Jammer5011]

Hi, I saw her about 2 weeks ago, I think she said mentioned she leaving a few days after and might return next month 🤷‍♂️

[monkey nuts]

Jammer, thanks, some hope then, 

[sunnyj]

'Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it.'

This specifically I was disagreeing with, the forum does hold weight with some Sergei's/SP.

+1
I have seen prices go up once positive reviews are posted here.

[king tarzan]

If they talk too much it's frowned upon..
Too passive it's frowned upon...

Fucks sake just get the leg over and piss off and get the next hottie..
Not there to make or receive conversations..
To fuck and enjoy!!!
Pants up zip up and go...

I've see her.. enjoyed myself..
Her goal and enjoyment is the MONEY
not us!!

[LLPunting]

If your conversation and seduction skills aren't up to getting this woman going then best move on to easier/fakier ladies.

Saw her around beginning of year and she wasn't a starfish then, she may not have been screaming her passions til the cops came but she was responsive and appreciative for the full hour.  If she weren't so freakin' far away and her gatekeepers so goddam awful I might see her again, but in the meantime there're plenty of other ladies to consider.

[PatMacGroin]

Sorry got to disagree with the last few comments regarding encouraging WGs/Sergeis to put up prices as a result of this forum.

Frankly IMO  UKP has got nothing to do with it. It is simply called market forces. The pussy market is the same as any other market which is your price is only as good as a willing buyer is prepared to pay and at some point the market dictates what you are worth.

Pussy has always been a sellers market so if a service insofar as this review/thread is concerned is described as VFM that to me simply means when you take all factors into account it's a good punt. If the price rises then the same punter may no longer describe it as VFM. Equally the WG may start to realise that her phone does not ring as often as it use to.

UKP consists of a tiny % of punters who report back so is not representative of the punting market. The price rises not because of what we say here but because both WG and/or Sergei can see how popular the product that is being sold.

I have seen girls come in at one price get popular test a higher price only to put it back down again to the original price. That means the market has spoken. Conversely if the price rise is sustained it also means the market has spoken to the detriment of the minority as demand as clearly indicated the price increase for that WG can be sustained. Of course we don't like it but it is what it is.

It's not totally clear. Are you saying UKP has no influence on the prices charged by WG's because either:

A) If any Sergei's/WG's read UKP they do not pay any attention to comments posted here?

OR

B) The number of people reading and contributing to UKP is so small it has a negligible effect on those market forces you mentioned?

OR

C) Both of the above?

Personally, in my short time using UKP I have observed it's direct effect on how many WG's have advertised themselves.

From simple changes to the content of their profile. Such as correcting a spelling mistake or adjusting how they advertise themselves. By, for example changing the services offered, both on their likes list and in the text content of their profile. Changes that have clearly occurred in reaction to a post on here joking or making an unfavourable observations. Changes often occurring before a post has had a chance to sit on the boards for more than an hour, definitely within a day.

Up to and including price increases that can be tracked in line with the number of positive reviews received. Not simply because they are aware they have received a positive review, but because that review has encouraged at least a few more punters to visit that WG.

These are both examples of the "market forces" impact UKP has on how many WG's operate. Granted many WG's are oblivious to UKP or have no intention of reacting to the comments they see. But it's naïve to suggest UKP "has got nothing to do with it". Just take a look at the reviews boards/summaries. As an example the reviews for this WG Natalie have been viewed a total of over 56,000 times. In comparison her AW profile has been viewed just over 82,000 times. So her reviews on UKP are being viewed nearly 70% as much as her AW profile. That alone has to be a good example of market forces in action .

Finally, consider then, even if only 1% of the UKP views is converted into visiting punters any WG will still struggle to get through over 5,000 cocks, especially a part time girl like Natalie. So even a tiny percentage of punters influenced by UKP has to have an recognisable impact on their demand.

Do you still think UKP is a tiny insignificance?

[LLPunting]

It's not totally clear. Are you saying UKP has no influence on the prices charged by WG's because either:

A) If any Sergei's/WG's read UKP they do not pay any attention to comments posted here?

OR

B) The number of people reading and contributing to UKP is so small it has a negligible effect on those market forces you mentioned?

OR

C) Both of the above?

Personally, in my short time using UKP I have observed it's direct effect on how many WG's have advertised themselves.

From simple changes to the content of their profile. Such as correcting a spelling mistake or adjusting how they advertise themselves. By, for example changing the services offered, both on their likes list and in the text content of their profile. Changes that have clearly occurred in reaction to a post on here joking or making an unfavourable observations. Changes often occurring before a post has had a chance to sit on the boards for more than an hour, definitely within a day.

Up to and including price increases that can be tracked in line with the number of positive reviews received. Not simply because they are aware they have received a positive review, but because that review has encouraged at least a few more punters to visit that WG.

These are both examples of the "market forces" impact UKP has on how many WG's operate. Granted many WG's are oblivious to UKP or have no intention of reacting to the comments they see. But it's naïve to suggest UKP "has got nothing to do with it". Just take a look at the reviews boards/summaries. As an example the reviews for this WG Natalie have been viewed a total of over 56,000 times. In comparison her AW profile has been viewed just over 82,000 times. So her reviews on UKP are being viewed nearly 70% as much as her AW profile. That alone has to be a good example of market forces in action .

Finally, consider then, even if only 1% of the UKP views is converted into visiting punters any WG will still struggle to get through over 5,000 cocks, especially a part time girl like Natalie. So even a tiny percentage of punters influenced by UKP has to have an recognisable impact on their demand.

Do you still think UKP is a tiny insignificance?

 
Well put, the idiot has no idea about market analysis or the fundamentals of business.

[JonasG]

It's not totally clear. Are you saying UKP has no influence on the prices charged by WG's because either:

A) If any Sergei's/WG's read UKP they do not pay any attention to comments posted here?

OR

B) The number of people reading and contributing to UKP is so small it has a negligible effect on those market forces you mentioned?

OR

C) Both of the above?

Personally, in my short time using UKP I have observed it's direct effect on how many WG's have advertised themselves.

From simple changes to the content of their profile. Such as correcting a spelling mistake or adjusting how they advertise themselves. By, for example changing the services offered, both on their likes list and in the text content of their profile. Changes that have clearly occurred in reaction to a post on here joking or making an unfavourable observations. Changes often occurring before a post has had a chance to sit on the boards for more than an hour, definitely within a day.

Up to and including price increases that can be tracked in line with the number of positive reviews received. Not simply because they are aware they have received a positive review, but because that review has encouraged at least a few more punters to visit that WG.

These are both examples of the "market forces" impact UKP has on how many WG's operate. Granted many WG's are oblivious to UKP or have no intention of reacting to the comments they see. But it's naïve to suggest UKP "has got nothing to do with it". Just take a look at the reviews boards/summaries. As an example the reviews for this WG Natalie have been viewed a total of over 56,000 times. In comparison her AW profile has been viewed just over 82,000 times. So her reviews on UKP are being viewed nearly 70% as much as her AW profile. That alone has to be a good example of market forces in action .

Finally, consider then, even if only 1% of the UKP views is converted into visiting punters any WG will still struggle to get through over 5,000 cocks, especially a part time girl like Natalie. So even a tiny percentage of punters influenced by UKP has to have an recognisable impact on their demand.

Do you still think UKP is a tiny insignificance?

Good research. 👍

[pepsicolaboy]

It's not totally clear. Are you saying UKP has no influence on the prices charged by WG's because either:

A) If any Sergei's/WG's read UKP they do not pay any attention to comments posted here?

OR

B) The number of people reading and contributing to UKP is so small it has a negligible effect on those market forces you mentioned?

OR

C) Both of the above?

Personally, in my short time using UKP I have observed it's direct effect on how many WG's have advertised themselves.

From simple changes to the content of their profile. Such as correcting a spelling mistake or adjusting how they advertise themselves. By, for example changing the services offered, both on their likes list and in the text content of their profile. Changes that have clearly occurred in reaction to a post on here joking or making an unfavourable observations. Changes often occurring before a post has had a chance to sit on the boards for more than an hour, definitely within a day.

Up to and including price increases that can be tracked in line with the number of positive reviews received. Not simply because they are aware they have received a positive review, but because that review has encouraged at least a few more punters to visit that WG.

These are both examples of the "market forces" impact UKP has on how many WG's operate. Granted many WG's are oblivious to UKP or have no intention of reacting to the comments they see. But it's naïve to suggest UKP "has got nothing to do with it". Just take a look at the reviews boards/summaries. As an example the reviews for this WG Natalie have been viewed a total of over 56,000 times. In comparison her AW profile has been viewed just over 82,000 times. So her reviews on UKP are being viewed nearly 70% as much as her AW profile. That alone has to be a good example of market forces in action .

Finally, consider then, even if only 1% of the UKP views is converted into visiting punters any WG will still struggle to get through over 5,000 cocks, especially a part time girl like Natalie. So even a tiny percentage of punters influenced by UKP has to have an recognisable impact on their demand.

Do you still think UKP is a tiny insignificance?

Glad someone more clever and eloquent than myself put this down on paper. An intelligent thought out response.
 

[sunnyj]

It's not totally clear. Are you saying UKP has no influence on the prices charged by WG's because either:

A) If any Sergei's/WG's read UKP they do not pay any attention to comments posted here?

OR

B) The number of people reading and contributing to UKP is so small it has a negligible effect on those market forces you mentioned?

OR

C) Both of the above?

Personally, in my short time using UKP I have observed it's direct effect on how many WG's have advertised themselves.

From simple changes to the content of their profile. Such as correcting a spelling mistake or adjusting how they advertise themselves. By, for example changing the services offered, both on their likes list and in the text content of their profile. Changes that have clearly occurred in reaction to a post on here joking or making an unfavourable observations. Changes often occurring before a post has had a chance to sit on the boards for more than an hour, definitely within a day.

Up to and including price increases that can be tracked in line with the number of positive reviews received. Not simply because they are aware they have received a positive review, but because that review has encouraged at least a few more punters to visit that WG.

These are both examples of the "market forces" impact UKP has on how many WG's operate. Granted many WG's are oblivious to UKP or have no intention of reacting to the comments they see. But it's naïve to suggest UKP "has got nothing to do with it". Just take a look at the reviews boards/summaries. As an example the reviews for this WG Natalie have been viewed a total of over 56,000 times. In comparison her AW profile has been viewed just over 82,000 times. So her reviews on UKP are being viewed nearly 70% as much as her AW profile. That alone has to be a good example of market forces in action .

Finally, consider then, even if only 1% of the UKP views is converted into visiting punters any WG will still struggle to get through over 5,000 cocks, especially a part time girl like Natalie. So even a tiny percentage of punters influenced by UKP has to have an recognisable impact on their demand.

Do you still think UKP is a tiny insignificance?

[JonasG]

It's actually pretty mad how active this forum is.

In 2019, when supposedly forums are dying because of other social media, in the last 30 minutes they've been 1056 users online!

[Slowjoe]

It's actually pretty mad how active this forum is.

In 2019, when supposedly forums are dying because of other social media, in the last 30 minutes they've been 1056 users online!

Yep. Cause it is great and it works    Thank you old and new admin.

On a note related to the original post, I saw Natalie a few weeks back and she also told me she was thinking of going independant. And that she only plans two more sessions (of 2-3 weeks each) in UK before October, when she will retire. Could be bollocks to encourage me back quickly, but she seemed genuine. I certainly didn't suggest she puts her prices up, cause that is not a good idea. If the price goes up, I won't return for a farewell session.

And yes sorry, I haven"t written up a review yet, but wouldn't add much to what others have already said. It will be positive.

[unus669]

And that she only plans two more sessions (of 2-3 weeks each) in UK before October, when she will retire.

Hasn’t she allegedly retired once already 

[tantraman]

Hasn’t she allegedly retired once already 

Yep, back on 7th Dec 2017 ...

So, onedivergent’s review put _Natalie_x on to my AW Hot List back in October. Then, I read that this WG had rocketed up to 7th position in Hotmat’s “Hall of Fame” in November. Finally, last week, mrhappypants warned “WIGIG” (When It’s Gone, It’s Gone) by 7th December, so I knew I could waste no more time … and got in there … and twice over the last few days!

[samh1231]

Her profile is gone. Maybe retired?

[VladtheImpaleHer]

Her profile is gone. Maybe retired?

Yeah she was on my HL and I noticed her profile disappeared. Hopefully she'll return!

[PatMacGroin]

Her profile is gone. Maybe retired?

One of the OP's earliest comments on this thread mentioned she was talking about going independent. If that's the case I'm sure one of the eagle eyed UKP members will spot her new profile when it pops up.

[king tarzan]

One of the OP's earliest comments on this thread mentioned she was talking about going independent. If that's the case I'm sure one of the eagle eyed UKP members will spot her new profile when it pops up.

Eye of the 🐅🥊

[xiǎo lóng]

Just spotted this when trying her old link (above). It doesn't seem to work, but she could just have set it up - the text seems very familiar and it references her previous ID

Hidden Image/Members Only

[xiǎo lóng]

Apologies - try again

Hidden Image/Members Only

[tantraman]

Apologies - try again

Hidden Image/Members Only

Well-spotted, sir!

That is defo her!

But the profile doesn't connect, due to ...

"The following problem(s) were detected:

    Sorry, this member's profile information cannot be presented at this time."

[Jammer5011]

Yes she is back 

Saw her yesterday, fab experience as previously, think I was her first client, woo hoo, she is independent now as expected, review to follow, slight hike in prices but ok for me 🤷‍♂️

Review to follow

External Link/Members Only

[Fully Sated]

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

[Muff licker]

independent and price goes up i would have thought without Sergies cut it would go down?