EnglishTeen_Amy (Heathrow) ~ Fit Aussie bird ~ sex, multiple CIM/ swallow TOFTT!

[v I r G I n]

Just back from a really decent punt with EnglishTeen_Amy in Heathrow. Premises is a well known hotel, Jct.4/ M4.

I was in the area to meet a regular but unfortunately she cancelled so I needed a plan B. A quick search and I found EnglishTeen_Amy, who was advertising a very wide range of services. Decided on 1hr at £150, which is slightly above the rate that I normally pay but decided to take a chance and was rewarded with a girl who is FAF (she has a remarkable resemblance to Taylor Swift I kid you not!) and is also a very good SP. Lookswise I would give 8.75/ 10, body a 9.25/ 10 so overall a 9/10.

Comms were prompt and once arrived at the hotel I was given the room number without delay, no faffing about.

I was then greeted by an absolute stunner, she is exactly as per her profile photos, about 5.6" with lovely brunette hair, and a smashing body, there was no fat anywhere and her tits are about a C or a D cup and are a real handful. Her eyes are like gemstones and I guess her age is accurate, she looked no older than 20.

So once the business side of things was sorted I started off with some FK, which was slightly disappointing as she advertises DFK but in reality it's only FK as let's you snog her but there was no tongue action from her, you can put your tongue down her throat but there's not much action.

We then moved on to OWO which was very pleasant and she does a good job, with some DT thrown into the mix. I then proceeded to reverse oral but did notice a slight whiff, which was slightly distracting, even though I enjoyed it. More OWO followed and some fingers in her tight pussy and I eventually came (more than twice) in her mouth and she lapped it up like a lost puppy. 

Sex followed soon after and she's a comfortable in any position you ask her and can also take a really good pounding. Her body was built for fucking. Soon I came in her mouth again and she swallowed every drop, what a good girl! Had a quick glass of water as I was now sweating and then straight back for more sex, fingered her lubed tight arse while I fucked her like a toy. I cum in her mouth one more time and again she duly swallowed. Superb!

Afterward got dressed and had a nice post punt conversation in which I discovered she is actually Australian (she speaks with an accent) but now lives in the UK.

Conclusion: Overall a very solid punt with a filthy, fit young chick. Did all services (except FK) to a really high standard. No signs of any clockwatching (left after exactly an hour). Hygiene could be a bit better but wasn't a real issue (have had a lot worse). Expensive but definitely worth visiting if you are looking for a good time with a teen stunner. 

External Link/Members Only

[HeadChef]

Great review. Just the thought of a teenage Taylor Swift lookalike makes my knees wobble.

[Meursault]

Thanks OP.
She looks great, but I'm worried about the whiff. Bacterial vaginosis (fishy) or just a bit sweaty/pissy do you reckon?

[king tarzan]

Thanks OP.
She looks great, but I'm worried about the whiff. Bacterial vaginosis (fishy) or just a bit sweaty/pissy do you reckon?

agreed..

[v I r G I n]

Thanks OP.
She looks great, but I'm worried about the whiff. Bacterial vaginosis (fishy) or just a bit sweaty/pissy do you reckon?

Possible bacteria vaginosis as I believe I was her first client of the day. It wasn't sweat, and definitely not a piss odour...it's a shame otherwise would have been an almost perfect punt (if such a thing exists).

[king tarzan]

Possible bacteria vaginosis as I believe I was her first client of the day. It wasn't sweat, and definitely not a piss odour...it's a shame otherwise would have been an almost perfect punt (if such a thing exists).

That is nasty.. no excuses

Should of been prestine sweet at that time of morning..

[Meursault]

Possible bacteria vaginosis as I believe I was her first client of the day. It wasn't sweat, and definitely not a piss odour...it's a shame otherwise would have been an almost perfect punt (if such a thing exists).

Cheers OP. Shame, because I like RO and really liked the look of this one.

[v I r G I n]

That is nasty.. no excuses

Should of been prestine sweet at that time of morning..

Punt was taken late afternoon, early evening. But this time it was more of a distraction because normally something like this is a real turn off for me and could have affected my level of performance (I normally avoid sex altogether) but she's so fucking fit that it didn't matter.

[K09an]

Thanks for the review.

The phone number she uses matches one posted in the London BB thread posted a few months ago, but different profile.

+447538932555 07538932555
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128980.850

Might just be a coincidence...?

[PatMacGroin]

Profile Captured for Reference:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
+447538932555

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[PatMacGroin]

Thanks for the review.

The phone number she uses matches one posted in the London BB thread posted a few months ago, but different profile.

+447538932555 07538932555
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128980.850

Might just be a coincidence...?

Good spot.

OP, does this look like the Taylor Swift look-a-like that you met?

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Previously in Hertffordshire

Profile now gives a London location as
 Paris_Teen
External Link/Members Only
+447538932555 07538932555
Bareback & unprotected sex listed

Quote/V-Pic courtesy of Magnetico

Current pics....

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[Kev40ish]

Good spot.

OP, does this look like the Taylor Swift look-a-like that you met?

Fuck Taylor Swift has let herself go

[v I r G I n]

Just to clarify, I did use condoms for sex. And no, that other profile is separate and the only link with regards to the phone no. is that it's actually an agency number.

I didn't find out till afterwards myself when I chatted to Amy, you don't get to speak to her, it's someone else who handles the calls. I think I may have stumbled across this agency before without realising, but I would relax, there's no chance of bareback.

EDIT: I have just looked back at the phone conversation and yes I did use this agency before in October last year (but didn't stay that time).




Hidden Image/Members Only

[bigone]

this all sounds fishy to me

[king tarzan]

this all sounds fishy to me

+1...
Dodgy mango...    Possible barebacker...

[stuart.]

this all sounds fishy to me

 

[king tarzan]

Review in my opinion is 100% legitimate..

But the escort herself dodgy 
And bad mango...

[v I r G I n]

+1...
Dodgy mango...    Possible barebacker...

You're mistaken jungle boy, 100% she doesn't provide bareback sex 

[Fuzzyduck]

You're mistaken jungle boy, 100% she doesn't provide bareback sex 

How do you know 100%? Only the SP knows that for sure.

[v I r G I n]

How do you know 100%? Only the SP knows that for sure.

Because I asked her at the start of the punt before monies were exchanged for the exact services, she confirmed OWO, CIM, swallow, and sex with protection.

[Fuzzyduck]

Because I asked her at the start of the punt before monies were exchanged for the exact services, she confirmed OWO, CIM, swallow, and sex with protection.

That's not the same as explicitly asking if she offers bareback. Even if you had asked and she said no, that still doesn't mean she hasn't done it in the past or currently offers it to "special' clients or regulars. Only the girl or a punter who has barebacked her know for sure.

To say she 100% does not offer bareback could suggest you're defending the SP for a reason unknown or know more about the SP than any regular punter would.

KT's point was that she is associated (through the agency number) with girls who have advertised bareback. This will raise a flag with some people, but we all make choices and judgement on the information we have. Personally the association is not strong enough to raise concerns for me, although her hygiene issues are. In any case, thanks for the review.

[king tarzan]

That's not the same as explicitly asking if she offers bareback. Even if you had asked and she said no, that still doesn't mean she hasn't done it in the past or currently offers it to "special' clients or regulars. Only the girl or a punter who has barebacked her know for sure.

To say she 100% does not offer bareback could suggest you're defending the SP for a reason unknown or know more about the SP than any regular punter would.

KT's point was that she is associated (through the agency number) with girls who have advertised bareback. This will raise a flag with some people, but we all make choices and judgement on the information we have. Personally the association is not strong enough to raise concerns for me, although her hygiene issues are. In any case, thanks for the review.

How do we know it's angency number?
The number is associated with her regards to bareback.
Obviously she would have a on the spot cover story of denial.

[v I r G I n]

That's not the same as explicitly asking if she offers bareback. Even if you had asked and she said no, that still doesn't mean she hasn't done it in the past or currently offers it to "special' clients or regulars. Only the girl or a punter who has barebacked her know for sure.

To say she 100% does not offer bareback could suggest you're defending the SP for a reason unknown or know more about the SP than any regular punter would.

KT's point was that she is associated (through the agency number) with girls who have advertised bareback. This will raise a flag with some people, but we all make choices and judgement on the information we have. Personally the association is not strong enough to raise concerns for me, although her hygiene issues are. In any case, thanks for the review.

No, it's not the same as asking, so yes you are correct. But to suggest possible bareback is on the menu is wrong, regardless of the associated profiles beforehand.

When I asked if she did oral without she said with condom! And we can to clear that up at the start because she thought I was talking about sex. But obviously the information on this current profile does not mention bareback sex and I would have thought this topic would be buried by now as I myself do not use barebackers.

[Kev40ish]

How do we know it's angency number?
The number is associated with her regards to bareback.
Obviously she would have a on the spot cover story of denial.

The pictures in no way match, so its more likely the new girl is using a recycled number through a pimp, agency, friend, purchased..

Who knows it happens all the time.

[Fuzzyduck]

How do we know it's angency number?
The number is associated with her regards to bareback.
Obviously she would have a on the spot cover story of denial.

Agency, pimp, manager... I didn't bother to check out the number. There's clearly a 3rd party involved if 2 different girls have been available on the same number. As I said, it just raises a flag that punters should consider when they make any decisions.

[Fuzzyduck]

Just to clarify, I did use condoms for sex. And no, that other profile is separate and the only link with regards to the phone no. is that it's actually an agency number.

I didn't find out till afterwards myself when I chatted to Amy, you don't get to speak to her, it's someone else who handles the calls. I think I may have stumbled across this agency before without realising, but I would relax, there's no chance of bareback.

EDIT: I have just looked back at the phone conversation and yes I did use this agency before in October last year (but didn't stay that time).

Who did you try to see before from this "agency"? Why didn't you stay?

[king tarzan]

Could dodgy mango smell be associated with barebacking various men?
A clue maybe.

[v I r G I n]

Could dodgy mango smell be associated with barebacking various men?
A clue maybe.

OMG. You really have it in for her don't you. What's the reason? Just let it lie please FFS.

[v I r G I n]

Who did you try to see before from this "agency"? Why didn't you stay?

Can't remember the name but it wasn't the one posted on here and deffo no bareback on the profile at the time because like I said I don't use barebackers. Didn't stay because I didn't find her attractive enough and she wasn't English so I walked.

Some of the girls advertised by this agency as being English but are in fact either mixed nationality or simply not English so I would be more concerned with this than possible bareback services being offered.

[king tarzan]

OMG. You really have it in for her don't you. What's the reason? Just let it lie please FFS.

Nothing personal..
Dodgy mango a foul fishy off day..
Associated with barebacking is an OFFENCE that has to be fully clarified...
As it dangerous...
And extremely non acceptable...

[king tarzan]

Can't remember the name but it wasn't the one posted on here and deffo no bareback on the profile at the time because like I said I don't use barebackers. Didn't stay because I didn't find her attractive enough and she wasn't English so I walked.

Some of the girls advertised by this agency as being English but are in fact either mixed nationality or simply not English so I would be more concerned with this than possible bareback services being offered.

Fuck off... barebacking is major major super super concern..
Fuck the nationality
Big time secondary..

[lebon121]

Just to clarify, I did use condoms for sex. And no, that other profile is separate and the only link with regards to the phone no. is that it's actually an agency number.

I didn't find out till afterwards myself when I chatted to Amy, you don't get to speak to her, it's someone else who handles the calls. I think I may have stumbled across this agency before without realising, but I would relax, there's no chance of bareback.

EDIT: I have just looked back at the phone conversation and yes I did use this agency before in October last year (but didn't stay that time).




Hidden Image/Members Only

Who you met in October 2018?
Paris- teen ?
As her profile on AW was created in october 2018.

[v I r G I n]

Nothing personal..
Dodgy mango a foul fishy off day..
Associated with barebacking is an OFFENCE that has to be fully clarified...
As it dangerous...
And extremely non acceptable...

I think you must be confused. Anyway I'll let other people make their own minds up but I'm done with this subject.

[v I r G I n]

Who you met in October 2018?
Paris- teen ?
As her profile on AW was created in october 2018.

No, it was someone else but profile is obviously long gone.

[Fuzzyduck]

Can't remember the name but it wasn't the one posted on here and deffo no bareback on the profile at the time because like I said I don't use barebackers. Didn't stay because I didn't find her attractive enough and she wasn't English so I walked.

Some of the girls advertised by this agency as being English but are in fact either mixed nationality or simply not English so I would be more concerned with this than possible bareback services being offered.

It sounds like you have had quite a lot of dealings with this "agency". Where are all the other girl's advertised with this same agency number? Im starting to doubt your crediblity, mate.

Also, I feel the complete opposite to you regarding misreprestation of nationality vs possible bareback but that's my personal view.

[king tarzan]

I think you must be confused. Anyway I'll let other people make their own minds up but I'm done with this subject.

Something's not adding up.
I'm not doubting you or your honesty..

It's the escort association with a number associated with barebacking..
Obviously I don't have to point out the dangers of that..
Just need hardcore clarification that this escort is and has always been 100% protected penetration from day 1 of her escorting life..

[v I r G I n]

It sounds like you have had quite a lot of dealings with this "agency". Where are all the other girl's advertised with this same agency number? Im starting to doubt your crediblity, mate.

Also, I feel the complete opposite to you regarding misreprestation of nationality vs possible bareback but that's my personal view.

No, this would be my second dealing with this agency. Both times are on AW. Listen, I don't give a shit what KT says, this current girl does not provide bareback sex so end of story for me.

[Kev40ish]

No, this would be my second dealing with this agency. Both times are on AW. Listen, I don't give a shit what KT says, this current girl does not provide bareback sex so end of story for me.

But who was the previous girl you saw from the agency, that’s the concern..

[king tarzan]

No, this would be my second dealing with this agency. Both times are on AW. Listen, I don't give a shit what KT says, this current girl does not provide bareback sex so end of story for me.

Bloody hell stop having time of the month over it!!
Fucks sake just trying to fully clarify something frighteningly dangerous and you've got hot chilli in your pants over it!

[king tarzan]

But who was the previous girl you saw from the agency, that’s the concern..

The agency must be fucked up then!

[v I r G I n]

But who was the previous girl you saw from the agency, that’s the concern..

Who gives a shit? Profile is GONE and I WALKED at the time.

[king tarzan]

No, it's not the same as asking, so yes you are correct. But to suggest possible bareback is on the menu is wrong, regardless of the associated profiles beforehand.

When I asked if she did oral without she said with condom! And we can to clear that up at the start because she thought I was talking about sex. But obviously the information on this current profile does not mention bareback sex and I would have thought this topic would be buried by now as I myself do not use barebackers.

It's fair to say because of many many years of punting, sure number can be recycled..profiles I've noticed are swapped carrying same feedback, different pictures..

What OP says above does assure me anyway that this escort isn't doing bareback..
Is just associated with a tarnished number..
To be fair not her fault on that.

Then again I could be wrong..

Benefit of the doubt goes to escort from my point of view..

[Fuzzyduck]

Who gives a shit? Profile is GONE and I WALKED at the time.

People are challenging this because YOU are making a number questionable, at best naive, statements, e.g. "the SP 100% doesn't offer BB". This damages your credibility and people wonder if they can trust what you say.

You introduced the idea it was an "agency" (i.e. multiple girls available on the same number at the same time) and talked about "Some of the girls advertised by this agency as being English but are in fact either mixed nationality or simply not English"

This suggests you are aware of several girls, some who are English and some who are not. The reality is you've only dealt with only 2, neither of whom are english. Also it's probably not an agency but a pimp, who manages a number of girls on different numbers that are recycled.

You also say that lying about nationality is a bigger deal than possible BB. I like to think you didn't actually mean that, but the attempt to deflect the conversation away from BB does you no favours.

[kasamaa]

People are challenging this because YOU are making a number questionable, at best naive, statements, e.g. "the SP 100% doesn't offer BB". This damages your credibility and people wonder if they can trust what you say.

You introduced the idea it was an "agency" (i.e. multiple girls available on the same number at the same time) and talked about "Some of the girls advertised by this agency as being English but are in fact either mixed nationality or simply not English"

This suggests you are aware of several girls, some who are English and some who are not. The reality is you've only dealt with only 2, neither of whom are english. Also it's probably not an agency but a pimp, who manages a number of girls on different numbers that are recycled.

You also say that lying about nationality is a bigger deal than possible BB. I like to think you didn't actually mean that, but the attempt to deflect the conversation away from BB does you no favours.

Agreed, the forum is there for all to discuss and with everyone having different needs, different info is going to appeal to different people. Theres no benefit from making it go away just because the OP wishes it to.

If there was a chance had been with a WG that BB previously without my knowledge I too would like to know if there is any additional info I wasnt aware of (not saying this WG has of course). The over protective stance from OP seems strange to me........

[v I r G I n]

I've told you, I'm done with this subject. If anywone wants to punt with this girl then that's their choice, I had a decent time and thoroughly enjoyed the punt.

[Fuzzyduck]

If I had been with a WG that BB previously without my knowledge I too would like to know if there is any additional info I wasnt aware of. The over protective stance from OP seems strange to me........

To be fair, BB was only associated with another SP who had used the same phone number in the past. KT was perhaps a touch overzealous in his conclusions.
That said, I agree that OP was taking a very defensive stance, the kind that a tout or a WK might use. Though I think he's neither.

[v I r G I n]

She's now upped her prices, no doubt due to all this talk. Maybe I should have kept quiet.

[Fuzzyduck]

She's now upped her prices, no doubt due to all this talk. Maybe I should have kept quiet.

[kasamaa]

She's now upped her prices, no doubt due to all this talk. Maybe I should have kept quiet.

How would she know about this forum? Sounds like a pimp or agency could indeed be involved.....

I appreciate the review OP, she will no doubt appeal to some and you've put her on their radar.

I would be less emotionally attached next time though and just let it play out. Stick to the facts and leave out the assumptions, people can fill in the blanks themselves.

[v I r G I n]

  Fucking hell!! She went up £10 a short while ago and is now £180PH!! Looks like she's getting a lot of traffic.