Sugar Babies

Author Topic: EnglishTeen_Amy (Heathrow) ~ Fit Aussie bird ~ sex, multiple CIM/ swallow TOFTT!  (Read 11084 times)


5 review(s) for Leah_TeenEnglish (3 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]

Online kasamaa

:dancegirl: Fucking hell!! She went up £10 a short while ago and is now £180PH!! Looks like she's getting a lot of traffic.

Prossie Logic  :unknown:

Offline king tarzan

If it was a profile and BB was listed and later removed then there's still issue..

As it's recycled phone number and escort is 100% pro rubber john then there's no issue..
Can't tarnish escort with BB because previous different escort used same number for shagging unprotected..

As for bad smelly mango washing can rectify that anti bacterial washing constantly..


So looks overall above board

Maybe munch time 👅👅👅👅
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 02:55:43 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PatMacGroin

Woah, this one kicked off a bit.

For what it's worth my impression was that OP's review was genuine (would a WK/Tout mention a fishy minge?).

Looked at all together, the re-used number, lies about nationality (English but actually Australian), the smell comment, plus her apparent no holes barred, cum guzzling attitude it's not surprising many of us got the impression she might have too much of a carefree attitude. Making BB a possibility.

OP's responses defending the girl seemed as much in his self interest as on her behalf. Trying to distance himself from any suggestion he would visit barebackers.

Personally, I felt the images from the two profiles looked like different girls but I did want the OP top confirm that for certain. (I also enjoyed teasing him about his Taylor Swift comment). The review definitely peaked my interest for a moment, but the price hike and those niggling concerns puts her of my hot list.

Offline ttv1

This gal got accused of BB and she decides to up the price. fs ppl on this site disappoint me :dash:

Offline david_mason

Saving you lot a few quids - here is her private gallery with face pics

fyi - she works with Chantelle (External Link/Members Only). Also, works with an Indian Sikh Sergei who I clocked before punting Chantelle in the lounge area of Holiday Innn in Bath road, sittinng with Amy. However, looks like the pimp is “good” as he sources decent WGs who provide decent service, unlike the other Asian gang in the area.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline king tarzan

Saving you lot a few quids - here is her private gallery with face pics

fyi - she works with Chantelle (External Link/Members Only). Also, works with an Indian Sikh Sergei who I clocked before punting Chantelle in the lounge area of Holiday Innn in Bath road, sittinng with Amy. However, looks like the pimp is “good” as he sources decent WGs who provide decent service, unlike the other Asian gang in the area.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Just to be 100% sure this is teen Amy?
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline v I r G I n

Woah, this one kicked off a bit.

For what it's worth my impression was that OP's review was genuine (would a WK/Tout mention a fishy minge?).

Looked at all together, the re-used number, lies about nationality (English but actually Australian), the smell comment, plus her apparent no holes barred, cum guzzling attitude it's not surprising many of us got the impression she might have too much of a carefree attitude. Making BB a possibility.

OP's responses defending the girl seemed as much in his self interest as on her behalf. Trying to distance himself from any suggestion he would visit barebackers.

Personally, I felt the images from the two profiles looked like different girls but I did want the OP top confirm that for certain. (I also enjoyed teasing him about his Taylor Swift comment). The review definitely peaked my interest for a moment, but the price hike and those niggling concerns puts her of my hot list.
+1 Also, looking back, I think Taylor Swift would be a slight exaggeration now comparing her to the recently posted PG pics but at the time that's who she reminded me of. But still pobably the best looking chick I have yet punted with.
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline dubhcarr

She's now upped her prices, no doubt due to all this talk. Maybe I should have kept quiet.

this is a stupid little girl tactic.....thanks for the review OP...I will not be visiting....too many questions....and a price hike when there are so many clean reliable girls to choose from.....stupid........ :hi:

Offline don222

Lol I see no resemblance to Taylor whatsoever :lol:

Offline ttv1

As a punting community can I suggest that we should not see her until she realises her prices are way too high. No customers for her would result to a drop down in price. just a suggestion :angelgirl:

Offline v I r G I n

Lol I see no resemblance to Taylor whatsoever :lol:
You'd be surprised what full make up can do with your brain!
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac


Offline dubhcarr

If it was a profile and BB was listed and later removed then there's still issue..

As it's recycled phone number and escort is 100% pro rubber john then there's no issue..
Can't tarnish escort with BB because previous different escort used same number for shagging unprotected..

As for bad smelly mango washing can rectify that anti bacterial washing constantly..


So looks overall above board


Maybe munch time 👅👅👅👅

she needs treatment if she has BV............over washing can be the cause.....
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 10:39:40 pm by dubhcarr »

Offline king tarzan

Lol I see no resemblance to Taylor whatsoever :lol:

+1

Though a half decent looker...nice juicy 🍋 🍋too...
« Last Edit: January 07, 2019, 11:11:43 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Online PLeisure

Cheers for posting her selfies, david_mason - she does look good (although 'Taylor Swift' is a bit ambitious; good backtrack there, OP  :sarcastic: )

Too bad that her pimp-wallah has gotten greedy and bumped up prices for his stock. No way am I schlepping to Heathrow at those prices  :thumbsdown:

Offline king tarzan

Cheers for posting her selfies, david_mason - she does look good (although 'Taylor Swift' is a bit ambitious; good backtrack there, OP  :sarcastic: )


Too bad that her pimp-wallah has gotten greedy and bumped up prices for his stock. No way am I schlepping to Heathrow at those prices  :thumbsdown:

Or pimp wali
Or dhali
Or dhalla

 :lol: :lol:

Greedy bastards...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline rushpanda

Lol I see no resemblance to Taylor whatsoever :lol:

You just have to take comments on looks with a pinch of salt.

Too many times I've seen the phrase "9/10 face" or "model looks" been batted about..  :timeout:
Banned reason: Multiple accounts (Jatp, Thejazman_1, jatpmc, rushpanda)
Banned by:

DylanPerry

  • Guest
You just have to take comments on looks with a pinch of salt.

Too many times I've seen the phrase "9/10 face" or "model looks" been batted about..  :timeout:

+1

I think a lot of punters view young (pre 25) WGs in particular with rose tinted glasses.

All I'm seeing here with this Amy is an average looking bird facially for sure. I'll give her the slim & fit body, with a (seemingly natural) juicy rack despite said slender frame-- a God's gift combo  :thumbsup:.
Smelly vag, at best means unhygeinic skank running conveyor belt. At worst it's something contagious that she should not be working with.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Oh, I also reckon I've seen (some of) her pics before. Maybe I can jog the memory of someone who can pinpoint her old profile...

Offline king tarzan

Oh, I also reckon I've seen (some of) her pics before. Maybe I can jog the memory of someone who can pinpoint her old profile...

I agree
Looked familiar
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline david_mason

Just to be 100% sure this is teen Amy?

Yes that’s the girl. I didn’t punt her but clocked her with the pimp in the hotel lobby

Online Tokidoe

Oh, I also reckon I've seen (some of) her pics before. Maybe I can jog the memory of someone who can pinpoint her old profile...

I remember having hotlisted an “irish” girl a year back called delilah or something. Bears a little resemblance with hair and face. I’m sure theres a review on this site somewhere.

Offline PatMacGroin

Oh, I also reckon I've seen (some of) her pics before. Maybe I can jog the memory of someone who can pinpoint her old profile...

I also thought she looked familiar (particularly from the 4th pic down of her looking over her shoulder). But I didn't think I'd seen these photo's, just one of those "where have I seen her before?" moments.


Robert Mueller

  • Guest
Taylor Swift?

Looks like she might be good fun, in the £130-£150 bracket.

Offline king tarzan

So everything a pro$$ie tells you is 100% true is it  :dash:

Don't otherwise Robert Mueller will get upset and offended.
He trusts the words of escorts..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Robert Mueller

  • Guest
Don't otherwise Robert Mueller will get upset and offended.
He trusts the words of escorts..
Eh? Cretin.

Offline atruegent

Does she talk with a  really posh English accent by any chance?

Offline LLPunting

:dancegirl: Fucking hell!! She went up £10 a short while ago and is now £180PH!! Looks like she's getting a lot of traffic.

She's getting loads of attention for 3 shitty photos out of West Drayton/Hounslow?   :dash:

The profile reeks of driving business from urgent, desperate punters sniffing at anything (whiffy) that's "British".

Glad you enjoyed your romp.  As others have said, you should drop your snowflake 'tude and quit defending what you can't vouch for.

Blew your load 4 times for 4 swallows in an hour... are you even 20?  :lol:

Offline LLPunting

+1

I think a lot of punters view young (pre 25) WGs in particular with rose tinted glasses.

All I'm seeing here with this Amy is an average looking bird facially for sure. I'll give her the slim & fit body, with a (seemingly natural) juicy rack despite said slender frame-- a God's gift combo  :thumbsup:.
Smelly vag, at best means unhygeinic skank running conveyor belt. At worst it's something contagious that she should not be working with.

+100  :thumbsup:


Offline LLPunting

Saving you lot a few quids - here is her private gallery with face pics

fyi - she works with Chantelle (External Link/Members Only). Also, works with an Indian Sikh Sergei who I clocked before punting Chantelle in the lounge area of Holiday Innn in Bath road, sittinng with Amy. However, looks like the pimp is “good” as he sources decent WGs who provide decent service, unlike the other Asian gang in the area.

Hidden Image/Members Only   Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only   Hidden Image/Members Only

Thanks fro the PG pics D_M!  ;)

Tits look like they could be fake too.

Offline v I r G I n

She's getting loads of attention for 3 shitty photos out of West Drayton/Hounslow?   :dash:

The profile reeks of driving business from urgent, desperate punters sniffing at anything (whiffy) that's "British".

Glad you enjoyed your romp.  As others have said, you should drop your snowflake 'tude and quit defending what you can't vouch for.

Blew your load 4 times for 4 swallows in an hour... are you even 20?  :lol:
It's the 'teen' in the profile name that's drawing all the attention. If she dropped the English bit it would still probably draw nearly the same amount of attention.

And no, I'm not 20, I've been on the punting scene since the mid-nineties when I was 17 so go figure.
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

It's the 'teen' in the profile name that's drawing all the attention. If she dropped the English bit it would still probably draw nearly the same amount of attention.

And no, I'm not 20, I've been on the punting scene since the mid-nineties when I was 17 so go figure.

As long as you yummied!! 👍👍👍👍
Perfecto!!!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline v I r G I n

As long as you yummied!! 👍👍👍👍
Perfecto!!!
Agreed Jungle Boy. :D
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Meursault

To be honest she looks hot but £150 is the tops I'm willing to pay. Nevermind.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 04:49:29 pm by Meursault »

Offline king tarzan

To be honest she looks hot but £150 is the tops I'm willing to pay. Nevermind.

Your price point is correct.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Online PLeisure

To be honest she looks hot but £150 is the tops I'm willing to pay. Nevermind.
+1
£150/hr would keep a steady flow of custom her way... it’s Heathrow, ffs

Offline king tarzan

+1
£150/hr would keep a steady flow of custom her way... it’s Heathrow, ffs

Also depending on qaulity of the hotel.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sunnyj


Offline v I r G I n

OP, do you know if this is her new active profile?
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Yes, that's her I believe. HL off as her pimp pushed up the prices and this I think had a knock on affect with many girls in the area charging a lot more than they used to. Wish I never wrote this review to be honest, she's not worth £180/hr I can tell you that.
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sunnyj

Yes, that's her I believe. HL off as her pimp pushed up the prices and this I think had a knock on affect with many girls in the area charging a lot more than they used to. Wish I never wrote this review to be honest, she's not worth £180/hr I can tell you that.
Thanks for the confirmation.  :hi:

Offline tantric talents

+1
£150/hr would keep a steady flow of custom her way... it’s Heathrow, ffs

I agree re the pricing but I still don’t get the whole Heathrow thing. If you’re  flying in or out there’s never enough time. Other than that who the hell lives near Heathrow besides deaf people and airport workers?
It’s a faff to get to if you’re a Londoner. Why not just book a decent cheap  London hotel and guarantee the throughput?
« Last Edit: July 07, 2019, 04:47:05 pm by tantric talents »

Offline Jerk Chicken

The £180 is more because she is an Aussie. How many of them around whoring? ... She is just following the long established trend is the pussy world. That is to say if my race and/or country of origin is significantly different from the masses then that is reflected in the price. To rub salt in the wounds they don't even have to be a great fuck punters will come running simply because they are different!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Heph

I agree re the pricing but I still don’t get the whole Heathrow thing. If you’re  flying in or out there’s never enough time. Other than that who the hell lives near Heathrow besides deaf people and airport workers?
It’s a faff to get to if you’re a Londoner. Why not just book a decent cheap  London hotel and guarantee the throughput?

When a gent is flying in or out, esp. on business, he has cash and can credibly claim hard-to-trace time either side, where 90 minutes may unaccountably get lost - delayed flights, baggage, taxi etc.

Offline tantric talents

When a gent is flying in or out, esp. on business, he has cash and can credibly claim hard-to-trace time either side, where 90 minutes may unaccountably get lost - delayed flights, baggage, taxi etc.
That all sounds feasible except getting to and back from a Bath road hotel with or without luggage could add a lot more than 30 mins to your journey time. I personally wouldn’t bother. Paddington area near the Heathrow Express terminal would seem a lot easier.

I must admit to having done a Gatwick Hotel outcall once way back when I had a free evening.

Would be interested to hear from other members experiences of punting en route to or from the plane

Not sure it’s worth a separate thread though?
« Last Edit: July 08, 2019, 11:23:07 am by tantric talents »

Offline Heph

That all sounds feasible except getting to and back from a Bath road hotel with or without luggage could add a lot more than 30 mins to your journey time. I personally wouldn’t bother. Paddington area near the Heathrow Express terminal would seem a lot easier.

I must admit to having done a Gatwick Hotel outcall once way back when I had a free evening.

Would be interested to hear from other members experiences of punting en route to or from the plane

Not sure it’s worth a separate thread though?

I can vouch that it is very doable. Bus is probably quickest (the taxi drivers who have queued for 1/2hr won't thank you for the £6 fare) - though depending on her choice of incall hotel, the monorail pod from T5 to the car park, and then a short walk, could work - if you haven't overpacked.

Best of all is the Sofitel which is connected directly to T5 (especially if she has booked it)- and they do also have part day-use rates.

The biggest evidence of why airports are good for this is because so many woman ply their trade there.

« Last Edit: July 08, 2019, 02:39:41 pm by Heph »