Sheffield's Melissa - touring - Leicester

[peiyee]

So she’s in LE2 on tour, we arrange a time; I drive down and send a msg 2 mins before appointment time - ‘what’s the number’.  As the msg is incomplete via siri I send another typed msg.  ‘What’s your room number?’  Then she gets testy and msgs me back in anger that I am presurring her ....wtf???  She then cancels with me in the hotel lobby, saying my ‘pressure’ is making her uncomfortable. Wasted 1.5 hr return journey.

This one has serious personality issues. Beware

External Link/Members Only

[mrfishyfoo]

WTF !!!!

FFS I had lasses cancel on me with notice BUT never when I'm in the hotel lobby.

A deserved red card card IMHO.

[HailWood]

Oh dear! Another one on my HL and sliding down it fast. Won’t be making the trip to Sheffield to see her any time soon.

Thanks for letting us know Peiyee.

[Donkey]

I was also going to see her but probably won’t bother now.

I’ve been following her reviews. They were very positive when she started, then she got neutrals saying ‘not my type’ or ‘we didn’t click’ and now a negative.

She’s on UKE so I think we’ll probably hear her side of the story soon.

[peiyee]

I'm on UKE too... anyway I am not angry or pissed, it's just bad business. She maybe should not be in the sex work industry, or even the service industry.... I enjoyed the drive in the rain - got to use my new wipers from Halfords, but it is bad form on her part. Maybe her time of month came early...She was good in comms generally until literally the appointment time. I wasn't late, I was bang on...and sent her two texts.

Perhaps there should be a thread about Siri and punting... saw Isla Brooks not long ago, had a great time, and laughed with her that Siri doesn't do "Isla".... no use in trying to msg her whilst driving.... you'd get Eiler....Ayler...

[Bangers and Gash]

Cheers Mister    I noticed earlier that she was in town. Glad I didn't bother pursuing the matter and wasting my time and money on a diva. 

[streetfighter1975]

I'd of been tempted to say she owes you travel expenses! Or told the hotel management who they have staying there....


Did you manage to see anyone else?

[monkeybucket]

Disappointing.

[monkeybucket]

I'd of been tempted to say she owes you travel expenses! Or told the hotel management who they have staying there....


Did you manage to see anyone else?

Please don't tell hotel management lol although this maybe a poor example of a wg working from a hotel I've had very many more excellent meets at hotels and without the occasional management blind eye less wgs will tour the Midlands.

[peiyee]

Or told the hotel management who they have staying there....

Why would I do that???

[NigelF]

So she’s in LE2 on tour, we arrange a time; I drive down and send a msg 2 mins before appointment time - ‘what’s the number’.  As the msg is incomplete via siri I send another typed msg.  ‘What’s your room number?’  Then she gets testy and msgs me back in anger that I am presurring her ....wtf???  She then cancels with me in the hotel lobby, saying my ‘pressure’ is making her uncomfortable. Wasted 1.5 hr return journey.

This one has serious personality issues. Beware

External Link/Members Only

Cheers for the review. I've actually had similar issues in the past with her too, particularly in regard to her anger. Aside from leaving mostly unfair AW feedback, on SAAFE she also massively exaggerated about me, if not just made stuff up but it wasn't too bad so I wasn't really bothered (another WG told me about it and she found it hilarious  ). It's also not exactly unsurprising, even though it does undermine their warnings sections.

I didn't review though because the failed meet was mostly my fault for being late.

[mrfishyfoo]

I'd of been tempted to say she owes you travel expenses! Or told the hotel management who they have staying there....


Did you manage to see anyone else?

You are deluded aren't you. 

[sheffieldm]

Hi. I’m not here to get into a discussion so this is the only response I will leave,  as I respect that this forum is a place for the punters.
I’m not disputing the negative, at all. The OP is completely in the right to do so.

There were what I personally felt to be a couple of warning signs between the couple of hours it took to get a booking in place and then the OP’s arrival. I did feel uncomfortable with the situation, yes, and I’m not prepared take what I felt were added risks with my safety, particularly whilst I’m touring on my own and away from home. The OP offered to leave so at that point, I said yes, I would cancel as I felt at that time it would be best.

I’ve had an ongoing issue completely unrelated to the OP which has lasted the entire duration of the time I’ve been here and it as has put me extremely on guard. With hindsight, maybe that clouded my judgement in the situation with Peiyee. For that, I can only apologise and learn from the situation in the future.

If this negative review prevents prospective clients from booking me in the future, then it’ll be a shame as I do take what I do seriously and take pride in my service, but from a punter’s perspective, I understand and I can’t dispute it unfortunately.

I have contacted the OP in an attempt to ‘resolve’ this (for want of a better word) so hopefully we can come to an agreement on the matter.

Melissa

[peiyee]

You take care Melissa, I sensed here was something going on which is why I offered to leave, thought actually your prior punt was going so good you didn’t want it to end 😂

[CoolTiger]

Cheers for the review. I've actually had similar issues in the past with her too, particularly in regard to her anger. Aside from leaving mostly unfair AW feedback, on SAAFE she also massively exaggerated about me, if not just made stuff up but it wasn't too bad so I wasn't really bothered (another WG told me about it and she found it hilarious ). It's also not exactly unsurprising, even though it does undermine their warnings sections.

I didn't review though because the failed meet was mostly my fault for being late.

Hi Melissa, thank you for taking the time to come here to put your side of the story for this negativew review.

Whilst here, would you care to explain NigleF's comments regarding his meet with you?

[NigelF]

Hi Melissa, thank you for taking the time to come here to put your side of the story for this negativew review.

Whilst here, would you care to explain NigleF's comments regarding his meet with you?

+1

Attempted meet was early this year if it helps.

[HailWood]

Melissa - it was an intelligent ‘mea culpa’ response from you and I would still consider seeing you were it not for Nigel’s comments.
The impression I get is that you are a good service provider but have a over-sensitive disposition which means a long trip to Sheffield could result in the meeting not happening.

[gbyld87]

I also visited Melissa when in Leicester and my experience was excellent.  I'll see about a review in due course, but I felt the need to add to this thread.  I had no issues at all - comms, service or otherwise.

[mrfishyfoo]

I also visited Melissa when in Leicester and my experience was excellent.  I'll see about a review in due course, but I felt the need to ATTEMPT TO DEVALUE THIS JUSTIFIED NEGATIVE BY ADDING MY WHITE KNIGHT SHITE to this thread.  I had no issues at all - comms, service or otherwise.

CORRECTED !!! 

Did she send you to post your fanboy shite ?? 

[Placebo88]

I'd of been tempted to say she owes you travel expenses! Or told the hotel management who they have staying there....


Did you manage to see anyone else?

Telling the hotel management puts them on the defensive and lookout for any other escorts who might use the same place in the future. Why ruin in for everyone else, how many escort friendly hotels are there in Leicester.

The negative review is fair and does the job. Anything more is plain spiteful.

Thanks to the reviewer. I was considering this as her pictures and most of her reviews are very tempting. A negative reaction as over the top as that over nothing is an ill omen that I'm going to heed.

[gbyld87]

CORRECTED !!! 

Did she send you to post your fanboy shite ?? 

I didn't realise the point of this thread was only to be negative towards the SP.  I was just providing a balanced view based on my own experience.

I also don't think that my experience devalues or invalidates OP's.  I'd give a straight negative if i'd had the same.

Did you see her in Leicester?

[Stoking]

CORRECTED !!! 

Did she send you to post your fanboy shite ?? 

Really now?

People have posted their negative experiences, someone post their positive experiences.

The very fact she has one bad reviews, one neutral and 7 positive probably would suggest to you that some punters on this site may have had positive experiences that aren't in line with the OP's and seeing that people are far more likely to leave a negative than bother writing a positive review, that would also suggest something.

Anyway without commenting on Sheffield Melissa, her actions and current reviews any further, I think your response to gbyld87 is a bit unwarranted. You wouldn't demean someone's opinion if they agreed with the OP and was encouraging a forum review circle jerk, now would you?

[Bangers and Gash]

…. and seeing that people are far more likely to leave a negative than bother writing a positive review, that would also suggest something.

No. It's the opposite which is true. Far too many punters fear losing face on forums and decline to do negatives. That's why shit and dishonest providers have glowing feedback on AW.

Even on UKP, as a golden rule I always x 10 a pro$$ies negative feedback to counter the imbalance. 

[Picti]

I didn't realise the point of this thread was only to be negative towards the SP.  I was just providing a balanced view based on my own experience.

I also don't think that my experience devalues or invalidates OP's.  I'd give a straight negative if i'd had the same.

Did you see her in Leicester?

It invalidates the OP to the extent that you made a counter claim actually on his review. You should've also respected that Melissa had previously verified that his account of events was true.

I'm glad to hear that you had a more positive experience but the correct form would've been to write a separate review accurately and objectively describing your experience.

The variety of punters' experiences and the collective information they yield is a primary strength of the site. So far as Melissa is concerned I can see that some punters confirm good service / performance, but also that some raise questions about reliability and  flaky responses. I part inform and base my punting decisions on the balance of others' opinions and I appreciate their honesty.

[mrfishyfoo]

I didn't realise the point of this thread was only to be negative towards the SP.  I was just providing a balanced view based on my own experience.

I also don't think that my experience devalues or invalidates OP's.  I'd give a straight negative if i'd had the same.

Did you see her in Leicester?

 

[mrfishyfoo]

No. It's the opposite which is true. Far too many punters fear losing face on forums and decline to do negatives. That's why shit and dishonest providers have glowing feedback on AW.

Even on UKP, as a golden rule I always x 10 a pro$$ies negative feedback to counter the imbalance. 

Hammer !! Nail !! Head !!

Even I won't leave a neg on Awank as I know full well I'll get one in return.

[mrfishyfoo]

Really now?

People have posted their negative experiences, someone post their positive experiences.

The very fact she has one bad reviews, one neutral and 7 positive probably would suggest to you that some punters on this site may have had positive experiences that aren't in line with the OP's and seeing that people are far more likely to leave a negative than bother writing a positive review, that would also suggest something.

Anyway without commenting on Sheffield Melissa, her actions and current reviews any further, I think your response to gbyld87 is a bit unwarranted. You wouldn't demean someone's opinion if they agreed with the OP and was encouraging a forum review circle jerk, now would you?

I'd be interested to know who these "review circle jerks" are that you mention.

As for Mrgbyld87 he's been here long enough as have you to know that countering a negative review and attempting to address the perceived inbalance that negative causes, in their eyes, is white knighting.

[HailWood]

Even I won't leave a neg on Awank as I know full well I'll get one in return.

Pussy!!!!!!! 

[HailWood]

No. It's the opposite which is true. Far too many punters fear losing face on forums and decline to do negatives. That's why shit and dishonest providers have glowing feedback on AW.

Even on UKP, as a golden rule I always x 10 a pro$$ies negative feedback to counter the imbalance. 

Spot on Bangers. There are some things which are, IMO, automatic red cards - shit attitude, B&S, left hanging / termination on arrival, threats, misleading profiles, ‘don’t do that’ scams amongst them.

[gbyld87]

It invalidates the OP to the extent that you made a counter claim actually on his review. You should've also respected that Melissa had previously verified that his account of events was true.

I'm glad to hear that you had a more positive experience but the correct form would've been to write a separate review accurately and objectively describing your experience.

The variety of punters' experiences and the collective information they yield is a primary strength of the site. So far as Melissa is concerned I can see that some punters confirm good service / performance, but also that some raise questions about reliability and  flaky responses. I part inform and base my punting decisions on the balance of others' opinions and I appreciate their honesty.

Fair enough.  I might leave a review separately once the dust settles on this thread.

[Stoking]

No. It's the opposite which is true. Far too many punters fear losing face on forums and decline to do negatives. That's why shit and dishonest providers have glowing feedback on AW.

Even on UKP, as a golden rule I always x 10 a pro$$ies negative feedback to counter the imbalance. 

I'm sorry now but really? I get awork feedback is pointless... but on here where you should have a completely different username to awork and in the case of a negative leave details vague enough that you can't be singled out? (unless it was so bad that you can't really do that) I thought that would be lesson 101 in this scene.

If you're afraid of losing face on a forum, just grow up, leaving honest reviews and feedback is better appreciated in the long run.

I thought this forums was rather good at rooting out fake reviews and fluffies anyway?

I'd be interested to know who these "review circle jerks" are that you mention.

As for Mrgbyld87 he's been here long enough as have you to know that countering a negative review and attempting to address the perceived imbalance that negative causes, in their eyes, is white knighting.

Aka when people only bring up negative experiences, months if not years later, despite not leaving a review. It's completely pointless as those individuals could of helped the OP prior but chose not to and only added to the discussion for the aforementioned circle jerk. It's something 'all' forums have problem with. Admittedly you can say the opposite is true as well, but more seasoned members know not to for the precise reason you stated. I'm not saying this review is an example, but they're not too uncommon. 

My main point however is if you accept people will post on a review saying that their experience was also bad, you have to accept people will also post saying if their experience was not the same. Would you complain if someone posted something negative in a positive review? I doubt it!

I get gbyld87 is not the most active or seasoned members, but hardly seems like a fake or white knight account. If she was a east midland regular, and everyone joined the thread saying 'uh that's weird etc' it gives the OP's review more context and helps other users make an informed decision. I would much rather a user state on a positive or negative review if their 'recent' experiences doesn't match the OP's than say nothing at all. Obviously reviews are best, but a good review a day or two after a negative usually gets the same white night response (admittedly sometimes rightly so).

Mini rant over, I think I have a bit too much spare time on my hands! 

FYI I think this review certainly is a red card, cancelling once in the hotel lobby is a definite automatic no!

[mrfishyfoo]

I'm sorry now but really? I get awork feedback is pointless... but on here where you should have a completely different username to awork and in the case of a negative leave details vague enough that you can't be singled out? (unless it was so bad that you can't really do that) I thought that would be lesson 101 in this scene.

If you're afraid of losing face on a forum, just grow up, leaving honest reviews and feedback is better appreciated in the long run.

I thought this forums was rather good at rooting out fake reviews and fluffies anyway?

Aka when people only bring up negative experiences, months if not years later, despite not leaving a review. It's completely pointless as those individuals could of helped the OP prior but chose not to and only added to the discussion for the aforementioned circle jerk. It's something 'all' forums have problem with. Admittedly you can say the opposite is true as well, but more seasoned members know not to for the precise reason you stated. I'm not saying this review is an example, but they're not too uncommon. 

My main point however is if you accept people will post on a review saying that their experience was also bad, you have to accept people will also post saying if their experience was not the same. Would you complain if someone posted something negative in a positive review? I doubt it!

I get gbyld87 is not the most active or seasoned members, but hardly seems like a fake or white knight account. If she was a east midland regular, and everyone joined the thread saying 'uh that's weird etc' it gives the OP's review more context and helps other users make an informed decision. I would much rather a user state on a positive or negative review if their 'recent' experiences doesn't match the OP's than say nothing at all. Obviously reviews are best, but a good review a day or two after a negative usually gets the same white night response (admittedly sometimes rightly so).

Mini rant over, I think I have a bit too much spare time on my hands! 

FYI I think this review certainly is a red card, cancelling once in the hotel lobby is a definite automatic no!

I don't have an issue with a punter who has ALREADY positively reviewed a lass stating his experience was different on a negative as long as it's not OTT or fanboy shite. What "annoys" me, and it would seem to me many others on here, is when the "she weren't like that for me" brigade jump in and they haven't reviewed the lass. I also have no issue with negative comments on positive reviews if the poster can back it up be that with their own negative or references to other negatives about the lass.

As for punters that CBA to post a negative and then post "she were shite for me as well" they are IMHO cunts.

Good rant by the way. 

[streetfighter1975]

You are deluded aren't you. 

Wow. You are SO right..as per...

[mrfishyfoo]

Wow. You are SO right..as per...

Come on then smartarse tell us how was OP to recoup his travel expenses from her after he'd grassed her to the hotel if you would please. 

[streetfighter1975]

In Primark gift vouchers. 

But hopefully now she has replied and the OP and her can sorry  something out. We all love a happy ending.....Infact I'll having one myself on houseboat tommorow night! 

[mrfishyfoo]

In Primark gift vouchers. 

But hopefully now she has replied and the OP and her can sorry  something out. We all love a happy ending.....Infact I'll having one myself on houseboat tommorow night! 

Funny guy. 

Shame you don't put in as much effort to writing reviews as what you do trolling and taking the piss. 

[Picti]

I know and respect that personal safety rather than profit is a WG's absolute priority. I was part influenced by that on my original reading of your post, and partially suspended my cynicism on that basis. However, I have read this again and I have some questions I think will be important to punters considering meeting you. 

There were what I personally felt to be a couple of warning signs between the couple of hours it took to get a booking in place and then the OP’s arrival. I did feel uncomfortable with the situation, yes, and I’m not prepared take what I felt were added risks with my safety, particularly whilst I’m touring on my own and away from home.

This sounds like punter-blaming, rather than you being wrong! What were these "warning signs" (so other punters know your thresholds) and at what point did you become concerned? Did you communicate your concerns to Peiyee to allow him to respond? If not, then why did you allow him to travel to your location when you were unsure whether you would actually meet him?

I’ve had an ongoing issue completely unrelated to the OP which has lasted the entire duration of the time I’ve been here and it as has put me extremely on guard.

You have had a positive review from the same visit to Leicester that portrays you offering a routine service / performance seemingly unaffected by the above. Another punter indicated a positive experience and will presumably leave a good review. On your AW profile you state "Thank you for having me Leicester, it's been a pleasure! I'll be back in the new year xo". So presumably you met a sufficient number of punters to result in a profitable tour.

So why did this issue specifically effect Peiyee?

If this negative review prevents prospective clients from booking me in the future, then it’ll be a shame as I do take what I do seriously and take pride in my service, but from a punter’s perspective, I understand and I can’t dispute it unfortunately.

It will not be the negative review that discourages punters; it will be your behaviour as described within the review. I think it is disgraceful that you allowed him to travel to the punt and turned him away in the hotel foyer. It seems that you found him demanding by asking for your room number when he arrived on time, but that is normal punter behaviour. A punter visiting a hotel wants the room number before he enters the hotel. That way he can walk directly to the lifts as that is the most discreet behaviour for punter and WG.  He also wants to know that a WG will be professional and reliable, as he will have taken the time to prepare himself and travel to the in-call location. Some will also have taken their little blue pill in preparation. Etc. We do not want to be treated like this and will not tolerate it.

[streetfighter1975]

Funny guy. 

Shame you don't put in as much effort to writing reviews as what you do trolling and taking the piss. 

I give reccomendations. And l don't troll anyone who doesn't do reviews.........unlike yourself.
Please move along.

[teddy3]

I give reccomendations. And l don't troll anyone who doesn't do reviews.........unlike yourself.
Please move along.

Reccomendations? On reporting to hotel’s management? Only jealous prossy would do that.. Are you posing on here?
One thread suggest you tried to arrange a meet and it didnt work out, no wonder even prossies dont want to have anything to do with you Pr perhaps you never even tried just put your bollocks on here.

[HailWood]

I give reccomendations. And l don't troll anyone who doesn't do reviews.........unlike yourself.
Please move along.

Streetfighter - I don’t know what to make of you TBH. Your recommendations seem sensible and would indicate that you have, in all probability, met quite a number of WGs in the area. Having been a member for almost a year, you must be aware that the contributions members really value are reviews. Reviews also establish punter credibility. So until you actually post a review, you can expect other members to challenge you. So may I suggest you do yourself a favour and write a review. Does not have to be a Fishy-style War and Peace or an MTB Mills & Boon - a review containing all relevant information can be written in 5mins.

[streetfighter1975]

Reccomendations? On reporting to hotel’s management? Only jealous prossy would do that.. Are you posing on here?
One thread suggest you tried to arrange a meet and it didnt work out, no wonder even prossies dont want to have anything to do with you Pr perhaps you never even tried just put your bollocks on here.

Wasn't even talking to you. And really dont intend too. Go run along mr 1 review now go and rim FF!

Might have to do a review soon. To get rid of the haters and doubters.

But the amount of crap l get makes me think why should l help?

[streetfighter1975]

Streetfighter - I don’t know what to make of you TBH. Your recommendations seem sensible and would indicate that you have, in all probability, met quite a number of WGs in the area. Having been a member for almost a year, you must be aware that the contributions members really value are reviews. Reviews also establish punter credibility. So until you actually post a review, you can expect other members to challenge you. So may I suggest you do yourself a favour and write a review. Does not have to be a Fishy-style War and Peace or an MTB Mills & Boon - a review containing all relevant information can be written in 5mins.

Noted. Thanks Mike.

[James999]

Fishy, by all means have a spat with the guy, but FFS why the need to start running to Admin 

[mrfishyfoo]

Wasn't even talking to you. And really dont intend too. Go run along mr 1 review now go and rim FF!

Might have to do a review soon. To get rid of the haters and doubters.

But the amount of crap l get makes me think why should l help?

 

If you aren't here to contribute why are you here ??

[mrfishyfoo]

Fishy, by all means have a spat with the guy, but FFS why the need to start running to Admin 

 

[vw]

If you aren't here to contribute why are you here ??

He's not.   

[mrfishyfoo]

He's not.   

Yeah I spotted the Boss  had booted him.