Author Topic: Woofie35 & MissKDD (Gang Bang) - Shepherds Bush  (Read 9798 times)


59 review(s) for Woofie35 (58 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
195 review(s) for MissKDD (191 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Complete Novice


Overall all I thought that this was well organised and professionally run.

My rating, however, is based on how I felt on leaving and after spending what has been an inordinate amount of time mulling this over, I stand by my original opinion.  It is perhaps harsh, as in their defence, this is due to circumstance outside of the WG's influence, nonetheless, I found this encounter disappointing.

COST: £300
DURATION: 2 hours

COMMS
All handled by Woofie35.  Minimal fuss, initial contact by AW email with the final run in by text.

LOCATION
Mid-range and 'popular' hotel around 5 minutes walk from Shepherd's Bush underground.  As I've found is usual here, no issues with reception.  The room itself was clean and tidy but a little on the small side.  I suspect that if all 6 punters had turned up it might have felt a little cramped, fyi the actual ratio was 5:2.

The Girls had done a good job of laying on plenty of refreshments, soft drinks, water, prosecco etc.  Clean towels (x 2) were issued and I don't recall seeing so many different toiletries available on a hotel booking.

THE WGs
Woofie35 ("Woofie"):
Mid 30s, 5'3"
Long straight brunette hair
Facially fairly average looking
Clean, her skin was ok
Size 6, fairly firm physique but with no real muscle definition
One tattoo from memory
Sporting a full bush which wasn't unkempt
I found Woofie intelligent and articulate 

Wearing black knickers emblazoned with "Please gang bang me" on the front, a collar with some wording on which now escapes me, combined with what I'd best describe as a crop top/bra type of affair.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

MissKDD ("Kristen"):
Late 20's, 5'4"
Long blonde slightly 'wavy' hair
Facially (*)
Clean, her skin looked pretty good 
Anywhere between a size 12 - 14 for my money
No tattoos that I can recall
Brazilian
Kristen came across as confident and outgoing

Wearing a matching black underwear set.

(* - Looks are subjective, but personally, if I saw Kristen on the street I'd walk past without batting an eyelid.  Carrying a fair bit of timber for her frame, which given her stature left little place for it to hide, put bluntly, I thought that she was fairly chubby.  Each to their own, but in terms of my attraction towards Kristen, regrettably she did nothing for me at all, either facially or physically and this was the root cause of my problem with this booking.)
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
At the outset, Woofie clearly set out the boundaries.  Face slapping was understandably off the menu given the number of Punters involved, the obligatory condom change if vaginal penetration was to be performed after a-levels.  Condom changes were also compulsory when changing between each WG.

SERVICES (EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO BOTH WGs)
OWO - DT, FF, gagging, spitting etc, I didn't witness any puking;
Rimming (Receiving);
Fingering;
Protected sex in multiple positions, including a-levels;
DP - The Girls did seem disappointed that they weren't made air tight simultaneously, resultant on there not being enough Punters in attendance;
Squirting - Kristen's a bit of a geyser, christened by one Punter there as London's answer to Old Faithful.  Another Punter sat almost on the other side of the room caught some 'collateral damage' from one of her various eruptions.  In this booking Woofie was the more prolific squirter, I'd hazard a guess she must have got close to, if not exceeded double figures, at one point standing from CG and showering one guy's torso;
CIM/snowballing/swallow/facials.

THE BOOKING
Woofie answered the door, however it was upon being introduced to Kristen that my immediate instinct was to walk.  Kristen seemed pleasant, and I'll be the first to admit that I'm shallow, but I need something to work with optically, which I just didn't get from Kristen. 

No one was forcing me to stay, weighing it up in my mind, the only reason I did was because I was hoping that Kristin's reputed attitude and deliver would counter how I felt about her. 

This isn't a criticism, more an observation, and I fully accept that there's only so much groundwork the Girls can do in laying the foundations, as it's up to the Punters to step up and play their part, myself included.  With no disrespect intended to anyone in attendance, it felt to me as if the atmosphere was a little flat and stilted, I was hoping things would improve as the booking progressed, but for me they didn't. 

Initially splitting into two groups, Kristen took on two Guys, Woofie the other three, including myself.  Woofie's OWO was good, some DT, gagging, saliva, spitting etc, all interspersed with some dirty talk thrown into the mix.

Straight after this, I was keen to see where I stood with Kristen given my initial concerns, so still hard from being blown by Woofie, I started with Kristen in standing doggy (a-levels) whilst she was being FF.  This however was brief, as I couldn't maintain my erection. 

At this point I still held out hope of resolving my issues with Kristen, so later in the booking I tried to engage with her again.  Sadly much to my dismay, this ended in the same result which was annoying as I wasn't having the same trouble where Woofie was concerned.

To summarise my involvement where Kristen was concerned, was brief and quite limited.  Consisting of fucking her in a-levels, later receiving some OWO, she also rimmed me whilst I was fucking Woofie at one point.

I found Kristen's OWO, like Woofies', pretty good, basically consisting of DT, little speed variation, it's fairly fast paced, she just smashes herself away at you.  Lots of gagging, saliva, spitting etc, but the whole package just didn't work for me, the best I got from this was a fairly flaccid semi, not hard enough to put a condom on.

The knock on affect of my shortcomings with Kristin meant that I was conscious of spending too much time with Woofie, I, therefore, tried to make a concerted effort not to monopolise her time.  This all meant that my participation in the booking was sporadic, which it has to be said was of my own choosing.

At various points over the course of the booking I fucked Woofie in mish, her head off the end of the bed whilst she took a decent FF.  At another point in CG, first vaginally then anally before a condom switch to allow another Punter to DP her.

The rimming I received from both Girls was surprisingly shallow, this I found surprising given each's reputation but there you have it.

Throughout there was a lot of squirting by both girls, at the conclusion the bed was a bit of a sodden mess and there were various wet patches all over the floor.

The booking broke down into two rounds.  Some Punters were multiple popping in each, others just the once.  A nice touch was Kristen snowballing Woofie who from what I saw, swallowed everything that came her way.

Two Punters left quite early during round 2, which they're perfectly entitled to, the booking after that point slowly loosing its energy/momentum.

WOULD I RETURN
No, I didn't really enjoy myself and left disappointed.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
There was no requirement to provide evidence of a recent, clear sexual health screening before participating in this booking.

Offline claretandblue

fair play for reviewing,has kdd been in touch yet to moan about your review and to leave you negative/neutral feedback on awank?

Offline Belgarion

Thanks for the review, recently had an experience where I was completely turned off by the SP.

Better luck next time

Offline JohnnyScars

Thanks for the review, recently had an experience where I was completely turned off by the SP.

Better luck next time

What did she do to turn you off?

Nvm, it's obvious you meant physically.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2018, 06:24:41 pm by JohnnyScars »

Offline last_days_of_logan

Overall all I thought that this was well organised and professionally run.

My rating, however, is based on how I felt on leaving and after spending what has been an inordinate amount of time mulling this over, I stand by my original opinion.  It is perhaps harsh, as in their defence, this is due to circumstance outside of the WG's influence, nonetheless, I found this encounter disappointing.

COST: £300
DURATION: 2 hours

COMMS
All handled by Woofie35.  Minimal fuss, initial contact by AW email with the final run in by text.

LOCATION
Mid-range and 'popular' hotel around 5 minutes walk from Shepherd's Bush underground.  As I've found is usual here, no issues with reception.  The room itself was clean and tidy but a little on the small side.  I suspect that if all 6 punters had turned up it might have felt a little cramped, fyi the actual ratio was 5:2.

The Girls had done a good job of laying on plenty of refreshments, soft drinks, water, prosecco etc.  Clean towels (x 2) were issued and I don't recall seeing so many different toiletries available on a hotel booking.

THE WGs
Woofie35 ("Woofie"):
Mid 30s, 5'3"
Long straight brunette hair
Facially fairly average looking
Clean, her skin was ok
Size 6, fairly firm physique but with no real muscle definition
One tattoo from memory
Sporting a full bush which wasn't unkempt
I found Woofie intelligent and articulate 

Wearing black knickers emblazoned with "Please gang bang me" on the front, a collar with some wording on which now escapes me, combined with what I'd best describe as a crop top/bra type of affair.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

MissKDD ("Kristen"):
Late 20's, 5'4"
Long blonde slightly 'wavy' hair
Facially (*)
Clean, her skin looked pretty good 
Anywhere between a size 12 - 14 for my money
No tattoos that I can recall
Brazilian
Kristen came across as confident and outgoing

Wearing a matching black underwear set.

(* - Looks are subjective, but personally, if I saw Kristen on the street I'd walk past without batting an eyelid.  Carrying a fair bit of timber for her frame, which given her stature left little place for it to hide, put bluntly, I thought that she was fairly chubby.  Each to their own, but in terms of my attraction towards Kristen, regrettably she did nothing for me at all, either facially or physically and this was the root cause of my problem with this booking.)
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
At the outset, Woofie clearly set out the boundaries.  Face slapping was understandably off the menu given the number of Punters involved, the obligatory condom change if vaginal penetration was to be performed after a-levels.  Condom changes were also compulsory when changing between each WG.

SERVICES (EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO BOTH WGs)
OWO - DT, FF, gagging, spitting etc, I didn't witness any puking;
Rimming (Receiving);
Fingering;
Protected sex in multiple positions, including a-levels;
DP - The Girls did seem disappointed that they weren't made air tight simultaneously, resultant on there not being enough Punters in attendance;
Squirting - Kristen's a bit of a geyser, christened by one Punter there as London's answer to Old Faithful.  Another Punter sat almost on the other side of the room caught some 'collateral damage' from one of her various eruptions.  In this booking Woofie was the more prolific squirter, I'd hazard a guess she must have got close to, if not exceeded double figures, at one point standing from CG and showering one guy's torso;
CIM/snowballing/swallow/facials.

THE BOOKING
Woofie answered the door, however it was upon being introduced to Kristen that my immediate instinct was to walk.  Kristen seemed pleasant, and I'll be the first to admit that I'm shallow, but I need something to work with optically, which I just didn't get from Kristen. 

No one was forcing me to stay, weighing it up in my mind, the only reason I did was because I was hoping that Kristin's reputed attitude and deliver would counter how I felt about her. 

This isn't a criticism, more an observation, and I fully accept that there's only so much groundwork the Girls can do in laying the foundations, as it's up to the Punters to step up and play their part, myself included.  With no disrespect intended to anyone in attendance, it felt to me as if the atmosphere was a little flat and stilted, I was hoping things would improve as the booking progressed, but for me they didn't. 

Initially splitting into two groups, Kristen took on two Guys, Woofie the other three, including myself.  Woofie's OWO was good, some DT, gagging, saliva, spitting etc, all interspersed with some dirty talk thrown into the mix.

Straight after this, I was keen to see where I stood with Kristen given my initial concerns, so still hard from being blown by Woofie, I started with Kristen in standing doggy (a-levels) whilst she was being FF.  This however was brief, as I couldn't maintain my erection. 

At this point I still held out hope of resolving my issues with Kristen, so later in the booking I tried to engage with her again.  Sadly much to my dismay, this ended in the same result which was annoying as I wasn't having the same trouble where Woofie was concerned.

To summarise my involvement where Kristen was concerned, was brief and quite limited.  Consisting of fucking her in a-levels, later receiving some OWO, she also rimmed me whilst I was fucking Woofie at one point.

I found Kristen's OWO, like Woofies', pretty good, basically consisting of DT, little speed variation, it's fairly fast paced, she just smashes herself away at you.  Lots of gagging, saliva, spitting etc, but the whole package just didn't work for me, the best I got from this was a fairly flaccid semi, not hard enough to put a condom on.

The knock on affect of my shortcomings with Kristin meant that I was conscious of spending too much time with Woofie, I, therefore, tried to make a concerted effort not to monopolise her time.  This all meant that my participation in the booking was sporadic, which it has to be said was of my own choosing.

At various points over the course of the booking I fucked Woofie in mish, her head off the end of the bed whilst she took a decent FF.  At another point in CG, first vaginally then anally before a condom switch to allow another Punter to DP her.

The rimming I received from both Girls was surprisingly shallow, this I found surprising given each's reputation but there you have it.

Throughout there was a lot of squirting by both girls, at the conclusion the bed was a bit of a sodden mess and there were various wet patches all over the floor.

The booking broke down into two rounds.  Some Punters were multiple popping in each, others just the once.  A nice touch was Kristen snowballing Woofie who from what I saw, swallowed everything that came her way.

Two Punters left quite early during round 2, which they're perfectly entitled to, the booking after that point slowly loosing its energy/momentum.

WOULD I RETURN
No, I didn't really enjoy myself and left disappointed.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
There was no requirement to provide evidence of a recent, clear sexual health screening before participating in this booking.

fantastic review

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Overall all I thought that this was well organised and professionally run.

My rating, however, is based on how I felt on leaving and after spending what has been an inordinate amount of time mulling this over, I stand by my original opinion.  It is perhaps harsh, as in their defence, this is due to circumstance outside of the WG's influence, nonetheless, I found this encounter disappointing.

COST: £300
DURATION: 2 hours

COMMS
All handled by Woofie35.  Minimal fuss, initial contact by AW email with the final run in by text.

LOCATION
Mid-range and 'popular' hotel around 5 minutes walk from Shepherd's Bush underground.  As I've found is usual here, no issues with reception.  The room itself was clean and tidy but a little on the small side.  I suspect that if all 6 punters had turned up it might have felt a little cramped, fyi the actual ratio was 5:2.

The Girls had done a good job of laying on plenty of refreshments, soft drinks, water, prosecco etc.  Clean towels (x 2) were issued and I don't recall seeing so many different toiletries available on a hotel booking.

THE WGs
Woofie35 ("Woofie"):
Mid 30s, 5'3"
Long straight brunette hair
Facially fairly average looking
Clean, her skin was ok
Size 6, fairly firm physique but with no real muscle definition
One tattoo from memory
Sporting a full bush which wasn't unkempt
I found Woofie intelligent and articulate 

Wearing black knickers emblazoned with "Please gang bang me" on the front, a collar with some wording on which now escapes me, combined with what I'd best describe as a crop top/bra type of affair.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

MissKDD ("Kristen"):
Late 20's, 5'4"
Long blonde slightly 'wavy' hair
Facially (*)
Clean, her skin looked pretty good 
Anywhere between a size 12 - 14 for my money
No tattoos that I can recall
Brazilian
Kristen came across as confident and outgoing

Wearing a matching black underwear set.

(* - Looks are subjective, but personally, if I saw Kristen on the street I'd walk past without batting an eyelid.  Carrying a fair bit of timber for her frame, which given her stature left little place for it to hide, put bluntly, I thought that she was fairly chubby.  Each to their own, but in terms of my attraction towards Kristen, regrettably she did nothing for me at all, either facially or physically and this was the root cause of my problem with this booking.)
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
At the outset, Woofie clearly set out the boundaries.  Face slapping was understandably off the menu given the number of Punters involved, the obligatory condom change if vaginal penetration was to be performed after a-levels.  Condom changes were also compulsory when changing between each WG.

SERVICES (EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO BOTH WGs)
OWO - DT, FF, gagging, spitting etc, I didn't witness any puking;
Rimming (Receiving);
Fingering;
Protected sex in multiple positions, including a-levels;
DP - The Girls did seem disappointed that they weren't made air tight simultaneously, resultant on there not being enough Punters in attendance;
Squirting - Kristen's a bit of a geyser, christened by one Punter there as London's answer to Old Faithful.  Another Punter sat almost on the other side of the room caught some 'collateral damage' from one of her various eruptions.  In this booking Woofie was the more prolific squirter, I'd hazard a guess she must have got close to, if not exceeded double figures, at one point standing from CG and showering one guy's torso;
CIM/snowballing/swallow/facials.

THE BOOKING
Woofie answered the door, however it was upon being introduced to Kristen that my immediate instinct was to walk.  Kristen seemed pleasant, and I'll be the first to admit that I'm shallow, but I need something to work with optically, which I just didn't get from Kristen. 

No one was forcing me to stay, weighing it up in my mind, the only reason I did was because I was hoping that Kristin's reputed attitude and deliver would counter how I felt about her. 

This isn't a criticism, more an observation, and I fully accept that there's only so much groundwork the Girls can do in laying the foundations, as it's up to the Punters to step up and play their part, myself included.  With no disrespect intended to anyone in attendance, it felt to me as if the atmosphere was a little flat and stilted, I was hoping things would improve as the booking progressed, but for me they didn't. 

Initially splitting into two groups, Kristen took on two Guys, Woofie the other three, including myself.  Woofie's OWO was good, some DT, gagging, saliva, spitting etc, all interspersed with some dirty talk thrown into the mix.

Straight after this, I was keen to see where I stood with Kristen given my initial concerns, so still hard from being blown by Woofie, I started with Kristen in standing doggy (a-levels) whilst she was being FF.  This however was brief, as I couldn't maintain my erection. 

At this point I still held out hope of resolving my issues with Kristen, so later in the booking I tried to engage with her again.  Sadly much to my dismay, this ended in the same result which was annoying as I wasn't having the same trouble where Woofie was concerned.

To summarise my involvement where Kristen was concerned, was brief and quite limited.  Consisting of fucking her in a-levels, later receiving some OWO, she also rimmed me whilst I was fucking Woofie at one point.

I found Kristen's OWO, like Woofies', pretty good, basically consisting of DT, little speed variation, it's fairly fast paced, she just smashes herself away at you.  Lots of gagging, saliva, spitting etc, but the whole package just didn't work for me, the best I got from this was a fairly flaccid semi, not hard enough to put a condom on.

The knock on affect of my shortcomings with Kristin meant that I was conscious of spending too much time with Woofie, I, therefore, tried to make a concerted effort not to monopolise her time.  This all meant that my participation in the booking was sporadic, which it has to be said was of my own choosing.

At various points over the course of the booking I fucked Woofie in mish, her head off the end of the bed whilst she took a decent FF.  At another point in CG, first vaginally then anally before a condom switch to allow another Punter to DP her.

The rimming I received from both Girls was surprisingly shallow, this I found surprising given each's reputation but there you have it.

Throughout there was a lot of squirting by both girls, at the conclusion the bed was a bit of a sodden mess and there were various wet patches all over the floor.

The booking broke down into two rounds.  Some Punters were multiple popping in each, others just the once.  A nice touch was Kristen snowballing Woofie who from what I saw, swallowed everything that came her way.

Two Punters left quite early during round 2, which they're perfectly entitled to, the booking after that point slowly loosing its energy/momentum.

WOULD I RETURN
No, I didn't really enjoy myself and left disappointed.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
There was no requirement to provide evidence of a recent, clear sexual health screening before participating in this booking.

Well done for being honest, it was your experience and you can rate it as you please. Be ready for KDD to try to debunk it or get her white knight fan boys on here to jump in to defend her. These arseholes can go fuck themselves as this is YOUR account of what happened as you experienced it.

A problem from my observations is KDDs description seems to be different from different punters on here, as I understand she doesn't show any pictures, I don't know if that's still the case though. If she isn't someone you fancy then a negative is quite right in my book.

We shall see if any white knight fan boys come a charging to defend KDD. :rolleyes:

Offline finn5555

Rumour has it KDD has being overdoing it in cake and has piled on the pounds  :unknown:

Offline unus669

Great detailed review OP, shame it wasn’t what you expected  :hi:

Online Billy no mates

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,840
  • Likes: 52
  •  
  • Reviews: 67
Good review, thanks for the honesty.

Offline bonapati

Cracking review. Must be the best review I’ve read here. Thanks for the honesty, bravery, and demystify (some of) the hype.

A lot of punters will sleep well tonight know they have either missed out on seeing 2 legends or saving their dosh.

Offline Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,045
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Well done for being honest, it was your experience and you can rate it as you please. Be ready for KDD to try to debunk it or get her white knight fan boys on here to jump in to defend her. These arseholes can go fuck themselves as this is YOUR account of what happened as you experienced it.

A problem from my observations is KDDs description seems to be different from different punters on here, as I understand she doesn't show any pictures, I don't know if that's still the case though. If she isn't someone you fancy then a negative is quite right in my book.

We shall see if any white knight fan boys come a charging to defend KDD. :rolleyes:

I don’t think it is possible to defend, it’s the OPs opinion and if he wasn’t happy then it needs to be a red.

Offline Grenadier36

Excellent review OP, thanks for this. Was intrigued by KDD but will probably pass. Hope you don't get your ear bent for being honest!

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,657
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Excellent review OP :thumbsup: and certainly shows that YMMV is the golden rule in punting.

Offline SamLP

Good review OP. Sorry to hear it wasn't up to your expectations.
A flat atmosphere isn't good either.

Offline Moby Dick

Good to see a down to earth review to balance the hype.
For me there needs to be an attraction and gangbangs are so much better if you have met the girls solo before. Nothing worse than trying to keep it hard with a lass that's not doing it for you, especially when she has 4 other dicks to play with.

Offline jsparky


With KDD PSE services, I would only try one to one, I enjoy dfk and would not be keen to kiss any SP after she gave OWO or rimming on other punter.

Offline Dicky

Well done on being honest...quite a few punters here try to curry favor with the wg and end up fluffing them up for others. my learning after all these years is that there is always a reason behind WGs hiding their faces or bodies....and its not privacy.

Offline Hobbit

Good review and thank you for being honest. It's good to see people writing good reviews which help us punters from the pitfalls of punting life!

Offline Laney08

Exactly the sort of balanced review needed on here  :thumbsup:

I definitely need to sample Woofie's service. Quite gutted didn't make the recent GB.

Have met KDD and whilst a lot of fun can understand the turn-off with optics. I think every punter's got to be cautious around spend and chemistry.


vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
good review, I hope Sherwood don't turn up.   :sarcastic:

Offline Hobbit




Offline unus669

sherwood have delivered.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=223987.0


Right on cue, as usual in situations like this. Reading it made me feel :vomit:

Punters of this ilk, will never learn, dropping rebuttals in a review, doesn’t help the WG :dash:

Offline Cuntminion

Fair play op , I'd get the jousting armour on though

Build or loos aren't a mega issue for but i still wouldn't touch either with a barge pole

Offline Cuntminion


Right on cue, as usual in situations like this. Reading it made me feel :vomit:

Punters of this ilk, will never learn, dropping rebuttals in a review, doesn’t help the WG :dash:

I always find the cuntiest form of chivalry is when someone chimes in

Thanks for the review

Now thats a fair post but its the but

Thanks for the review

But

-i saw her and had a great time
-strange so many positive reviews
-sorry you had a bad experience it wasn't like mine
-it doesn't sound like other's experiences


It's stealth knighting to slip a point across to contradict a nuetral or negative and highlight posters aim of hyping the positive reviews




vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I always find the cuntiest form of chivalry is when someone chimes in

Thanks for the review

Now thats a fair post but its the but

Thanks for the review

But

-i saw her and had a great time
-strange so many positive reviews
-sorry you had a bad experience it wasn't like mine
-it doesn't sound like other's experiences


It's stealth knighting to slip a point across to contradict a nuetral or negative and highlight posters aim of hyping the positive reviews

Agree it is WKing, also some like to quote aggregates, as if posters cannot see them anyway.   

Offline Placebo88

Looking over the review the negative rating is because of only one of the escorts. The other one seemed to look and perform up to scratch. So does she deserve the negative against her name because she choose to duo with a woman who looks as sexy as your average fridge? Especially when that other woman has one of the best UKP review records ever? Posting the same review twice with a copy of it linked to each of the escorts allows for different ratings.

MissKDDs lack of looks and shape is not news, her selling point is extreme services. Problem is that this caution is hidden in positive review threads. A red one like this will go far further in making that information accessible to joe average punter when doing his research.

Offline Belgarion

Looking over the review the negative rating is because of only one of the escorts. The other one seemed to look and perform up to scratch. So does she deserve the negative against her name because she choose to duo with a woman who looks as sexy as your average fridge? Especially when that other woman has one of the best UKP review records ever? Posting the same review twice with a copy of it linked to each of the escorts allows for different ratings.

MissKDDs lack of looks and shape is not news, her selling point is extreme services. Problem is that this caution is hidden in positive review threads. A red one like this will go far further in making that information accessible to joe average punter when doing his research.

Nice stealth White Knighting.

Offline cueball

Looking over the review the negative rating is because of only one of the escorts. The other one seemed to look and perform up to scratch. So does she deserve the negative against her name because she choose to duo with a woman who looks as sexy as your average fridge? Especially when that other woman has one of the best UKP review records ever? Posting the same review twice with a copy of it linked to each of the escorts allows for different ratings.

MissKDDs lack of looks and shape is not news, her selling point is extreme services. Problem is that this caution is hidden in positive review threads. A red one like this will go far further in making that information accessible to joe average punter when doing his research.
It doesn't matter, it's the reviewers decision. He had a duo, didn't enjoy it, gave it a negative and that's that.

If two lasses work together, they get rated together, good or bad.

But, having said that, the devil is in the detail. Reviews must be read to be understood.

Anyway, an hero in horseback has already righted all the wrongs done to this fair maiden  :dash:

Offline unus669

Looking over the review the negative rating is because of only one of the escorts. The other one seemed to look and perform up to scratch. So does she deserve the negative against her name because she choose to duo with a woman who looks as sexy as your average fridge? Especially when that other woman has one of the best UKP review records ever? Posting the same review twice with a copy of it linked to each of the escorts allows for different ratings.

MissKDDs lack of looks and shape is not news, her selling point is extreme services. Problem is that this caution is hidden in positive review threads. A red one like this will go far further in making that information accessible to joe average punter when doing his research.

Duos are like debt, joint signatories are jointly and severally liable :lol:

Offline Placebo88


reviewreader

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Despite all the AW reviews I cant understand why people would book a girl with barely even a body pic to entice.....  :lol:

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,657
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
It doesn't matter, it's the reviewers decision. He had a duo, didn't enjoy it, gave it a negative and that's that.

I don't understand why this is so hard to grasp for some.


Offline Placebo88


But, having said that, the devil is in the detail. Reviews must be read to be understood.


True and in exact line with what I said about MissKDDs looks and physique. The problem is that a less diligent punter will see 100+ positive reviews without a negative and wrongly assume that she must be utterly gorgeous to have such a record. Luck or a ton of reading is needed to hit on the right pieces of information among such a mountain of reviews if all are marked with a green.

Offline SamLP

Looking over the review the negative rating is because of only one of the escorts. The other one seemed to look and perform up to scratch. So does she deserve the negative against her name because she choose to duo with a woman who looks as sexy as your average fridge? Especially when that other woman has one of the best UKP review records ever? Posting the same review twice with a copy of it linked to each of the escorts allows for different ratings.

MissKDDs lack of looks and shape is not news, her selling point is extreme services. Problem is that this caution is hidden in positive review threads. A red one like this will go far further in making that information accessible to joe average punter when doing his research.
A negative can't be helped even if one party was good. It was the overall experience.
Guarantors can be taken to court despite not being the offending party.
You can go and watch your team lose 5-4. Lots of goals and excitement, just not the right result.

Offline Belgarion