ALICEINXWONDERLAND, Stevenage.

[Foxtail17]

Go to be honest, I've been interested in her as she looks hot in her UKE media. But having read this and a few other reviews, I can't take the chance on her fucking me about, especially as I'd be driving a fair distance. So there's one punter she's lost with her couldn't give a shit attitude.

Me too. If I was within 20 mins drive I would take a chance but over 90 mins journey with her growing unreliability means she is a non-starter for ne.

[Belgarion]

Me too. If I was within 20 mins drive I would take a chance but over 90 mins journey with her growing unreliability means she is a non-starter for ne.

Exactly my problem. I have not hid the fact that I fancy her and I'm not "angry" I got messed about.

But it's an hour and a half drive from my place to hers or just under an hour if I use the train.

To turn up and get radio silence after that much travel is risky

[Belgarion]

"Well your excuse making ad normalising her poor behaviour"

That's the whole point - this sort of behaviour *is* "normal" or at the very least "not unexpected" for a number of WGs (I think my 1st review (or 2nd, etc.) concerned a WG who had clearly read my AW email, and had certainly replied to texts, but just wouldn't commit to confirming a meet) - and as I was pointing out, goes on in the non punting world.

I never said it was acceptable in either punting or real world, just that it happens - and, I'm sure a deal of people on here, despite protestations to the contrary, have probably fucked someone over in favour of a better offer, be it financial (house sales), social (dreary mate's party or exciting mate's party on a Saturday night) or sexual (plan a suddenly comes good so you cancel plan b).

I was merely expressing surprise as to why people continue to be surprised.

Good riddance



Hidden Image/Members Only

[vw]

Good riddance



Hidden Image/Members Only

Another one

Who you sending next Alice?   

If only you hadn't  rallied the wonderland cult.

[Hackneylad1]

Another one

Who you sending next Alice?   

If only you hadn't  rallied the wonderland cult.

The next ones out and about - goes under the id of Mick1972

[PleadInsanity]

It never ceases to amaze me how many punters that are prepared to 'fall on their sword' for a WG

[smiths]

Thanks to admin for getting rid of yet another white knight fanboy of this WG.

[PLeisure]

Go to be honest, I've been interested in her as she looks hot in her UKE media. But having read this and a few other reviews, I can't take the chance on her fucking me about, especially as I'd be driving a fair distance. So there's one punter she's lost with her couldn't give a shit attitude.

Very sensible.
It's also worth noting that her photos always employ a filter. Always.
Notice how the skin tone is always smoothed out to a dreamy haze. Real human beings simply don't look this way.
Please don't be drawn in by images alone - she's not worth the disappointment.

[Sparta Prada]

Very sensible.
It's also worth noting that her photos always employ a filter. Always.
Notice how the skin tone is always smoothed out to a dreamy haze. Real human beings simply don't look this way.
Please don't be drawn in by images alone - she's not worth the disappointment.

+1.

Those photos are from quite a few years ago too. Before admin gave UKE a makeover you could view info on any of the media posted including the date when the photo was taken. With the exception of AIW, whose photos never showed this info. I can only assume it was deliberately taken off.

The one exception was when I posted my negative review and she put up this face photo. Unfortunately for nervous colin he won't be able to see this now



[Removed by admin - 03/08/2018]

[Davido0007]

+1.

Those photos are from quite a few years ago too. Before admin gave UKE a makeover you could view info on any of the media posted including the date when the photo was taken. With the exception of AIW, whose photos never showed this info. I can only assume it was deliberately taken off.

The one exception was when I posted my negative review and she put up this face photo. Unfortunately for nervous colin he won't be able to see this now



[Removed by admin - 03/08/2018]

What happened to her eyebrows? Looks like someone drew on her face.

[Waterhouse]

What happened to her eyebrows? Looks like someone drew on her face.

Baffles me as to why some chicks shave their eyebrows off only to paint and draw them back on. 

[STAR-LORD]

+1.

Those photos are from quite a few years ago too. Before admin gave UKE a makeover you could view info on any of the media posted including the date when the photo was taken. With the exception of AIW, whose photos never showed this info. I can only assume it was deliberately taken off.

The one exception was when I posted my negative review and she put up this face photo. Unfortunately for nervous colin he won't be able to see this now



[Removed by admin - 03/08/2018]

JC! I thought it was Kylie Minogue! 

[Badvicar]

Well if anyone knows about a lack of credibility it would be you. Where is your credibility? Two reviews in the past 12 months and you think you’re something special on this forum? Nobody gives a fuck about you, and that’s the absolute truth.

My credibility is that I'm credible and not a proven lying slag. Such vitriol reminds me of several past members that have been called out. Which one are you?

Never claimed to be special,just honest. How many true reviews versus your false reviews would make you happy?

Do I have to review for validation from a lier .I think not. Honesty is a  trait you lack, along with a spine.

I don't post for fame, so I have no issue with no one "giving a fuck" about me, least of all a lier. So pick up your sticks and stones and go back to making up your punts.

[Sparta Prada]

My credibility is that I'm credible and not a proven lying slag. Such vitriol reminds me of several past members that have been called out. Which one are you?

Never claimed to be special,just honest. How many true reviews versus your false reviews would make you happy?

Do I have to review for validation from a lier .I think not. Honesty is a  trait you lack, along with a spine.

I don't post for fame, so I have no issue with no one "giving a fuck" about me, least of all a lier. So pick up your sticks and stones and go back to making up your punts.

It’s funny how all you have to go on is one negative review I posted. One which most people supported me on.

But then when I think about the people on that thread that took your holier than thou stance about changing a couple of details to provide anonymity the guys that supported it were:

Hertsgent - proven to be your mate, has hardly posted since
Nervous Colin - who you was still chummy with but now banned
Pale Rider - keeps his head down low
Ziltoid - got banned as he White Knighted AIW

These were the guys that objected to me at the time. Two of your cohorts are now banned, the other two don’t post much. Well, they say that if you lie with dogs you catch fleas.

It should be important to add that all four of the posters above are big fans of AIW. So I am also wondering if by attacking me over something that happened 18 months ago Badvicar is really just here to defend Alice? A kind of stealth knight? ‘My credibility is that I'm credible’. If you say so, but that’s down to others to decide not me or you.

Badvicar previously said he appreciated my posts and reviews, but after that review he turned against me. Not a problem, I’m not here to make friends. I’m here to read other punters experiences and contribute TRUTHFULLY to this great place. And most seasoned punters will see my posts and reviews for what they are.

As for Badvicar, your card is well and truly marked. You ask me to ‘lay low’, well that’s not happening sunshine.

[bearcat69]

I was categorically advised early in my professional career that if certain clients wanted something done, you did it at the expense of pushing other (less well paying) clients further down the chain....

The words of a scumbag.

It's like you're one of those rouge traders you see on those shows making excuses for screwing over decent paying customers.

All said with a complete lack of irony too, as it's exactly the sort of bullcrap prossies with poor attitudes say to try and excuse their arrogant attitudes and poor approach to serving customers.

Aptly sums up the mindset of a white knights though. Thinks it's fine to not respect a punter's custom, as we all treat each other badly in order to get ahead, apparently.

Meanwhile outside of your cosy little bubble in the real world, not everybody looks so fondly upon individuals with such shitty attitudes to life.

Good riddance.

[threechilliman]

This one sounds a bit like that bird up in the NE Brook Knights. Her MO was of the cherry picking kind.

[vw]

This one sounds a bit like that bird up in the NE Brook Knights. Her MO was of the cherry picking kind.

She is on a charm offensive on uke that's for sure.   

[Badvicar]

It’s funny how all you have to go on is one negative review I posted. One which most people supported me on.

But then when I think about the people on that thread that took your holier than thou stance about changing a couple of details to provide anonymity the guys that supported it were:

Hertsgent - proven to be your mate, has hardly posted since
Nervous Colin - who you was still chummy with but now banned
Pale Rider - keeps his head down low
Ziltoid - got banned as he White Knighted AIW

These were the guys that objected to me at the time. Two of your cohorts are now banned, the other two don’t post much. Well, they say that if you lie with dogs you catch fleas.

It should be important to add that all four of the posters above are big fans of AIW. So I am also wondering if by attacking me over something that happened 18 months ago Badvicar is really just here to defend Alice? A kind of stealth knight? ‘My credibility is that I'm credible’. If you say so, but that’s down to others to decide not me or you.

Badvicar previously said he appreciated my posts and reviews, but after that review he turned against me. Not a problem, I’m not here to make friends. I’m here to read other punters experiences and contribute TRUTHFULLY to this great place. And most seasoned punters will see my posts and reviews for what they are.

As for Badvicar, your card is well and truly marked. You ask me to ‘lay low’, well that’s not happening sunshine.

Mark my card all you want sunshine. For newer members I will link the pretend "review" that you made of the chunky bird, which you changed from positive to negative...maybe when you owned up to lying about the entire review. Palerider and nervous Colin were all sucking your dick when it was positive, then not so much when it turned out you fabricated the entire review.

I've never shagged the chunky monkey and have never lied about a punt. You have done both sunshine. Enjoy.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=130640.0

[Badvicar]

I have been scratching my head as to your motives. You give chunky monkey a positive in a fabricated review. You then change to a neg, as she has emailed you(how would she have your email). Bearing in mind the chunky tout has been banned 3 times or more, you still gave her an initial fabricated  positive and then change your mind when your bitch mum calls you out.

I mean what the utter fuck?

Were you and nervous Colin, palerider etc all getting preference over other punters? Did she cut off your privilege  and that's why you turned against the 3 times Nick devoius skank?

Luckily Smith's highlighted the shit bitch as a wrong'en, a while ago


Did your initial white knighting  not get you a place on the roster?

Or did you just lie in your review as you have some sad need to be revered and get numbers under your name?

Tell another story,  spouting propaganda.