Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Good Kama or Bad Kama  (Read 3375 times)

Offline iPad3

This lady has caught my eye gents

https://www.adultwork.com/1313400 or https://www.adultwork.com/xxxKAMA

Any opinions would be helpful, I'm considering booking her for a pre Xmas party punt next week.

Cheers


1 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

password02

When you see her please put up a review as her fb on AW seems very good from double digit punters

Offline Jimmyredcab

Dress size 4     :unknown: :unknown:

If you meet her tell her to put up a free gallery, that one photo is shite.      :hi:

Offline kam100k

Mate she looks pretty fine to me and the FR all seem positive

When you see her please put up a review as her fb on AW seems very good from double digit punters
I seem to remember her having a good rep on here a few months ago.


Offline Jimmyredcab

Mate she looks pretty fine to me and the FR all seem positive

Maybe you have paid for the private gallery ----------------- the one photo on the profile is totally useless.    :hi:

Offline andrei

i wouldnt say its "totally" useless

you can see shes slim, nice rack

but of course it could be better to have more pics
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jimmyredcab

i wouldnt say its "totally" useless

Well I would, let our brothers decide for themselves ---------------


Offline andrei

ofcourse everyone decides for themselves, you think its totally useless, i think that it could be better
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline James999

Mate she looks pretty fine to me

If she looks good then why hide the fact in a private gallery ?

If a girl has a good body and is interested in escorting then she;d likely have a few pics to show her body, the hiding in private gallery gives the impression the £1.50 for the PG is more important than a booking  :hi:

Offline andrei

lazy profiling though

no owo but offers cim according to the services part on the right  :dash:

Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jimmyredcab

If she looks good then why hide the fact in a private gallery ?

If a girl has a good body and is interested in escorting then she;d likely have a few pics to show her body, the hiding in private gallery gives the impression the £1.50 for the PG is more important than a booking  :hi:

Also hides her verification photo.      :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline James999

Also hides her verification photo.      :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Probably of a different girl  :lol: The AW verification process is a joke  :sarcastic:

Offline rubric

Actually, in this case the photographs are reasonably accurate. She does occasionally have other photographs up on her profile as well. The description is accurate, her English is relatively good even if she isn't a girl who answers the phone and services offered work as described (including the offer of prostrate massage)

She's pretty enough but does have a particularly distinctive face. I personally didn't have a great time off it, but that was mainly down to chemistry and tiredness on my part.

Maybe you have paid for the private gallery ----------------- the one photo on the profile is totally useless.    :hi:
I looked at her private gallery a while back and she was attractive and had an excellent figure.

password02


Any idea who she looks like?
I'm never good at this, but Maggie Gyllenhaal works for me.


If this is her looks then I'm in -
You never know until you see a person in the flesh. MG is a goddess  :rose:

Seen her twice. She's okay. Nothing amazing. She does her services. She has a decent face; looks slightly better when she pulls a big gummy smile. Cat eyes. Nice slim body, but her skin is not smooth. Her breast were nice and really firm.

If you do make a booking, you can't go wrong with her. However, don't expect a mind blowing experience. She's a decent punt.

well perhaps  finally she revealed  her face I do remember her verification pic was similar to this one which she has hidden later

Offline Jimmyredcab

I looked at her private gallery a while back and she was attractive and had an excellent figure.

I believe you, but a couple of decent photos on the profile would bring her in a lot more business.    :hi:

Offline rubric

I believe you, but a couple of decent photos on the profile would bring her in a lot more business.    :hi:

Sure, but there are quite a number of Poles in the UK, so I can understand why Polish WGs chose to hide their face.

Seen her twice. She's okay. Nothing amazing. She does her services. She has a decent face; looks slightly better when she pulls a big gummy smile. Cat eyes. Nice slim body, but her skin is not smooth. Her breast were nice and really firm.

If you do make a booking, you can't go wrong with her. However, don't expect a mind blowing experience. She's a decent punt.

Mate, thanks for your comment.

As Andrei pointed out earlier, it is somewhat strange that she lists CIM but not OWO on her "Enjoys" list. Did you receive OWO from her? Thanks.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)