Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Good Kama or Bad Kama  (Read 4077 times)

Offline iPad3

This lady has caught my eye gents

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Any opinions would be helpful, I'm considering booking her for a pre Xmas party punt next week.

Cheers

password02

  • Guest
When you see her please put up a review as her fb on AW seems very good from double digit punters

Offline Jimmyredcab

Dress size 4     :unknown: :unknown:

If you meet her tell her to put up a free gallery, that one photo is shite.      :hi:

kam100k

  • Guest
Mate she looks pretty fine to me and the FR all seem positive

Offline Meursault

When you see her please put up a review as her fb on AW seems very good from double digit punters
I seem to remember her having a good rep on here a few months ago.


Offline Jimmyredcab

Mate she looks pretty fine to me and the FR all seem positive

Maybe you have paid for the private gallery ----------------- the one photo on the profile is totally useless.    :hi:

andrei

  • Guest
i wouldnt say its "totally" useless

you can see shes slim, nice rack

but of course it could be better to have more pics

Offline Jimmyredcab

i wouldnt say its "totally" useless

Well I would, let our brothers decide for themselves ---------------

Hidden Image/Members Only

andrei

  • Guest
ofcourse everyone decides for themselves, you think its totally useless, i think that it could be better

James999

  • Guest
Mate she looks pretty fine to me

If she looks good then why hide the fact in a private gallery ?

If a girl has a good body and is interested in escorting then she;d likely have a few pics to show her body, the hiding in private gallery gives the impression the £1.50 for the PG is more important than a booking  :hi:

andrei

  • Guest
lazy profiling though

no owo but offers cim according to the services part on the right  :dash:


Offline Jimmyredcab

If she looks good then why hide the fact in a private gallery ?

If a girl has a good body and is interested in escorting then she;d likely have a few pics to show her body, the hiding in private gallery gives the impression the £1.50 for the PG is more important than a booking  :hi:

Also hides her verification photo.      :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

James999

  • Guest
Also hides her verification photo.      :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Probably of a different girl  :lol: The AW verification process is a joke  :sarcastic:

Offline rubric

Actually, in this case the photographs are reasonably accurate. She does occasionally have other photographs up on her profile as well. The description is accurate, her English is relatively good even if she isn't a girl who answers the phone and services offered work as described (including the offer of prostrate massage)

She's pretty enough but does have a particularly distinctive face. I personally didn't have a great time off it, but that was mainly down to chemistry and tiredness on my part.

Offline Meursault

Maybe you have paid for the private gallery ----------------- the one photo on the profile is totally useless.    :hi:
I looked at her private gallery a while back and she was attractive and had an excellent figure.

password02

  • Guest

Offline Meursault

Any idea who she looks like?
I'm never good at this, but Maggie Gyllenhaal works for me.


Offline Meursault

If this is her looks then I'm in -
You never know until you see a person in the flesh. MG is a goddess  :rose:

Offline tomato sauce and waffles

Seen her twice. She's okay. Nothing amazing. She does her services. She has a decent face; looks slightly better when she pulls a big gummy smile. Cat eyes. Nice slim body, but her skin is not smooth. Her breast were nice and really firm.

If you do make a booking, you can't go wrong with her. However, don't expect a mind blowing experience. She's a decent punt.

Offline lewishamguy

well perhaps  finally she revealed  her face I do remember her verification pic was similar to this one which she has hidden later Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Jimmyredcab

I looked at her private gallery a while back and she was attractive and had an excellent figure.

I believe you, but a couple of decent photos on the profile would bring her in a lot more business.    :hi:

Offline rubric

I believe you, but a couple of decent photos on the profile would bring her in a lot more business.    :hi:

Sure, but there are quite a number of Poles in the UK, so I can understand why Polish WGs chose to hide their face.

disgracedpolitician

  • Guest
Seen her twice. She's okay. Nothing amazing. She does her services. She has a decent face; looks slightly better when she pulls a big gummy smile. Cat eyes. Nice slim body, but her skin is not smooth. Her breast were nice and really firm.

If you do make a booking, you can't go wrong with her. However, don't expect a mind blowing experience. She's a decent punt.

Mate, thanks for your comment.

As Andrei pointed out earlier, it is somewhat strange that she lists CIM but not OWO on her "Enjoys" list. Did you receive OWO from her? Thanks.


bigone

  • Guest
she looks pretty but is she really a size 4 ? :rolleyes:

disgracedpolitician

  • Guest
Yes, and without asking.

Thanks mate. Given her petite body type, she looks like a very good punt. And with OWO, she can't be more perfect for me.

bigone

  • Guest
she only works till 6 at night,  :( not good if you work as well

disgracedpolitician

  • Guest
she only works till 6 at night,  :( not good if you work as well

Damn. Is she worth me skipping lunch?  :rolleyes:

Offline tomato sauce and waffles

She had a new profile, which disgracedpolitician pointed out here, but that's now gone.

However, she is advertising outside AW:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only