Sienna is getting some flack at the moment with a recent review saying she has a 'disproportionately large belly' something which she hasn't yet challenged although her photos show a very good flat belly so she is clearly getting in defensive mode
Certainly nobody mentioned her age so what is that all about?
her profile says some odd things;
If you're the kind of person to leave nasty feedback when the profile is genuine ....get a blow up doll
I find it disgracefully unfair to discuss my faults on a forum if you don't sort out the problem with me
subtle reviews are welcome but unless you think it fair for me to publicly disclose your width, length, shape and fantasies with all contacts that I have made and blacklist you with all the gorgeous colleagues I have met then I am not for you
All seems a little odd to me very worried about anything less than a perfect review and threatening to blacklist punters and expose all their details. Is that reasonable behaviour. Clearly the first negative feedback and she is straight on it denying the meeting even took place - could be some mileage in this issue.
Yet she looks great on her photos so why so protective ?
+1
No reply.... Very odd, as neither Paige or I can recall your booking, and having tried to be polite giving you chance to correct us it seems our suspicions were right.
He didn't log in at all yesterday so he's not really had a chance to see this, never mind reply. He has now logged in this morning but he still might not have seen this thread and if he's anything like me, he may well have just been having a quick browse or doing a search.
My profile has old pics, but also very recent pics - obviously unairbruhed, selfies from the past several weeks.
My profile says I'm 32, so again what are you talking about?
What are you talking about? As others have said, he didn't mention your age at all. However earlier this year you were claiming to be 28 so it's still shameful that you misled punters for so long (and they did notice, as per some of your older reviews). Your other recent reviewer puts you at "mid 30s".
Your may have some recent and unairbrushed pics (which is good) but according to your other recent reviewer (who gave you a positive -
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204200.0) they're still "not very accurate bodywise. She is quite a bit bigger around the midriff which was disappointing as I was expecting her to be much leaner"
I'm a reasonable lady so hope to receive a pm reply to prove me wrong here, however if I don't, I will report you and hope to show this example proves that this site encourages false negativity given that there is no official proof of your booking, or procedure for me to respond with feedback on yourself.
I hope you'll prove me wrong and kindly respond to my request for information on the booking details so I can carefully look at the problems and find a solution.
This site doesn't encourage false negativity at all. Nor are people who make false reviews protected - there are a good number of deleted reviews and banned members demonstrating that. In my experience on here it is far far more common for WGs to come on here with lies, bullshit and crap excuses. It has been seen many times and I personally have proven this on multiple occasions with evidence, screenshots etc. Hopefully the OP will do the same, although he doesn't need to do it publicly, it could be done via admin for example. If he doesn't PM you (which wouldn't be that unreasonable of him if part of his real/non-punting identity was at risk although even if it's just his punting identity, he's still open to backlash should you be unscrupulous like some WGs are) then I would actually agree with you reporting him (provided you genuinely can't remember his booking) so admin can act as the impartial judge/intermediary.
Negativity isn't reflected in the reviews sections on here, of which the vast majority of reviews are still positive and it's certainly not reflected in any of the OP's other reviews.
It is much more easily argued that AW encourages false positivity, as punters will be afraid to give honest feedback for fear of getting a negative in return. Such a negative is much more likely to affect a punters ability to book rather than a WG's ability to get bookings (especially since many will dispute the feedback with lies/bullshit claims and so many punters won't believe it/give them the benefit of the doubt). I love helping other punters (hence why I'm on here) but not at the detriment to myself (or the risk of that) so I, like many others, never give out negative feedback on AW (unless I'm able to do it at it exactly the right/safest time - which 99% of punters don't know about anyway - including on here). Also, since I review on here, any negative feedback I leave on AW would make my AW profile stand out like a sore thumb (and indeed it has in the past). On the very few occasions I have left negative feedback (which has always been honest and accurate), it's either been disputed (with lies) and/or I've received an unfair or lying retaliatory negative.
those who feel justified treating girls as idealistic robots but then publicly crucifying them for not being so.
Bollocks. You claim to look a certain way and claim to deliver a certain service on your profile and then you agree to it during comms. Don't be surprised when people call you out for not delivering. You also charge plenty of money for it (higher than most).
The OP clearly doesn't have "idealistic" expectations of escorts. Of his 6 other reviews, only 1 is negative. Also bear in mind that pretty much no one reviews all their positives but many/most will review all their negatives (so if anything the number of negatives in the review section is low). His review record suggests he's not hard to please (the same can be said for me and most others) and you should really ask yourself why you didn't get a positive like 5 of the other girls he reviewed.
He also didn't "publicly crucify" you, indeed he said he'd be prepared to see you again. Most of his negative points were about Paige and he clearly explained/justified them.
I haven't called anyone a liar, nor would I ever publicise their identity. I've simply asked for more details so I can rectify this situation. Given that the details given so far don't seem to link to any bookings I've given recently, I think it's only fair for me to question if this is genuine. I've not been aggressive, only responded as any business would to being unfairly summarised, particularly when the booking is in fact questionable.
I do mostly agree with what you've said, particularly your right to question the review's authenticity but assuming it is genuine (and I definitely believe it is), how the hell do you know you were "unfairly summarised"?
Topic: Paige Elite & SiennaTantric1, Manchester (Read 6351 times)