Nathalie-love - Knightsbridge (London)

[bluegene]

Nathalie-love – was looking for a bit of oral fun

External Link/Members Only

I had a 1 hour incall for £170 (no extras) last week.

Venue.
Her place was near Knightsbridge tube station in a secluded street. Almost no parking nearby. Plenty of (free withdrawal) cash machines.

About the escorts physical appearance and personality.
On her profile it says 32, sounds about right. Slim body. Small breasts. No pubic hair. Accurate public gallery pictures.

Arranging the meeting.
Called on the day and got a booking

During the meeting.
When we meet Natalie was in lingerie. Sorted the finances and went for a shower.

I get onto the room and get onto bed. Natalie goes to pay full attention to my cock and balls, nice oral but not deepthroat. Plenty of saliva. First pop just oral with CIM/swallow. No stopping even after cumming, only when I tell her.

After a quick chat, with Natalie always caressing my sock I’m ready again. Starts with oral and soon enough I ask for the condoms. Natalie gets into doggie and start pounding her like if her life depended on it – no complaints from her. When I felt I was about to cum, I get the condom off, stick my cock deep in her mouth and she swallows the load while I play with her pussy.

Work done, I have a quick shower, dry myself and leave with a smile on my face.

Positives.
1. Nice body.
2. Great attitude.
3. Swallows.

Negatives.
1. None.

[Heph]

Nathalie-love
External Link/Members Only

About the escorts physical appearance and personality.
On her profile it says 32, sounds about right. Slim body. Small breasts. No pubic hair. Accurate public gallery pictures.

Nice review: thank you.

One comment: I saw her in Notting Hill Gate, at a guess more than 8 years ago. I'd have placed her in her mid-to-late twenties back then, on the basis that she'd had some work done to her lips, cheeks and forehead; the deep tone of her voice, her neckline; her skin; her ease & diffidence; the relative novelty of being a Balt in London, and that she had already been in the business for sometime. It may be me who's mistaken; and I'm happy to be corrected. However, if I am right then she is presently at least in her later 30s. She started AW in late 2005.

I also recall having a pleasant time. The novelty (for that time) of a sloppy bj, and, if I recall, some upturned face-fucking on her bed.

[Illya Kurakin]

Thanks for the review and update. She has been on the bucket list for a long time and both have had to cancel for genuine reasons. I have been away for some time but hope I can now tick that one of the list.

Nathalie-love – was looking for a bit of oral fun

External Link/Members Only

I had a 1 hour incall for £170 (no extras) last week.

Venue.
Her place was near Knightsbridge tube station in a secluded street. Almost no parking nearby. Plenty of (free withdrawal) cash machines.

About the escorts physical appearance and personality.
On her profile it says 32, sounds about right. Slim body. Small breasts. No pubic hair. Accurate public gallery pictures.

Arranging the meeting.
Called on the day and got a booking

During the meeting.
When we meet Natalie was in lingerie. Sorted the finances and went for a shower.

I get onto the room and get onto bed. Natalie goes to pay full attention to my cock and balls, nice oral but not deepthroat. Plenty of saliva. First pop just oral with CIM/swallow. No stopping even after cumming, only when I tell her.

After a quick chat, with Natalie always caressing my sock I’m ready again. Starts with oral and soon enough I ask for the condoms. Natalie gets into doggie and start pounding her like if her life depended on it – no complaints from her. When I felt I was about to cum, I get the condom off, stick my cock deep in her mouth and she swallows the load while I play with her pussy.

Work done, I have a quick shower, dry myself and leave with a smile on my face.

Positives.
1. Nice body.
2. Great attitude.
3. Swallows.

Negatives.
1. None.

[mrhappypants]

A paid up member of the overpriced, over-the-hill mob.

£170 ph 

[king tarzan]

Looks hot..

[boardyhell]

saw her 15 years ago for the same money,swallowed for me
she has been around for at least 15 years as an independent and was with an agency before
good service ,looks fit as fuck now,friendly

[king tarzan]

saw her 15 years ago for the same money,swallowed for me
she has been around for at least 15 years as an independent and was with an agency before
good service ,looks fit as fuck now,friendly

Very long time for a whore to be around.

[Heph]

saw her 15 years ago for the same money,swallowed for me
she has been around for at least 15 years as an independent and was with an agency before
good service ,looks fit as fuck now,friendly

So if her profile age is correct, and your 15 year recollection is correct... she was 17 at the time!

[mrhappypants]

At the risk of labouring this, my cynicism about this SP is that she has been heavily “promoted” over the years, by Password/Panel amoung others, and I was distinctly unimpressed when I saw her about 4 years ago.  In my view looks put an upper ceiling on price.  I understand paying a bit over the odds for enthusiasm but looks ( ) and service did not justify her charging at this level in my view.

Read the back catalogue of her reviews with a knowing eye.  You will see one too many references to how nice the flat is (like “really” - who gives a fuck?!).  This is one aggregate I would not take at face value.

[Heph]

You will see one too many references to how nice the flat is (like “really” - who gives a fuck?!).

Your other points nothwithstanding, on this question ☝... i'll put my hand up. Turn it on its head: if the place is an utterly sordid dump, with peeling paint and used condoms and a mound of jizz rags bursting out of the bedside pedal bin, are you truly unaffected?

There are sensible limits: - I don't need a corner suite at The Ritz, but somebody taking some trouble over themselves and their environment is healthy and an all-round encouraging sign. And for the sake of an extra £20+/- on the price, more often than not, I've appreciated avoiding any depressing shabbiness.

Here's one which got it wrong: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=194081.0

[mrhappypants]

for the sake of an extra £20+/- on the price

I don't disagree, but I think the premium here is quite a lot more than that and the SP's looks just do not match it. 

[boardyhell]

looked at her reviews over the years and they are consistently good
probably mid 30s +
looks in good condition,whats not to like
for those who want a 20 year old avoid

[king tarzan]

looked at her reviews over the years and they are consistently good
probably mid 30s +
looks in good condition,whats not to like
for those who want a 20 year old avoid

Would prefer a 20 year old anytime anywhere. .
Smooth tight gorgeous

[mrhappypants]

Would prefer a 20 year old anytime anywhere. .
Smooth tight gorgeous

+1

[Heph]

Would prefer a 20 year old anytime anywhere. .
Smooth tight gorgeous

Not for me, but I'd prefer not to be bs'ed or BS'ed either.