Author Topic: Alluringasiananna, Chichester  (Read 3267 times)


14 review(s) for Anna_Chichester (13 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by The_Don]

Offline ParkingArea

I figured I should get around to writing a review for this WG: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I've seen her twice, once about 18 months ago (under a different profile) , and once in February.

Comms: Good, by phone or text.
Location: Private house in quiet residential area, south of the City.  If travelling by car, she usually requests you to park a little away and walk.  This has provoked some controversy, but I was fine with it.
Time: 1 hr both times
Price: £150 both times

The girl:

Diminutive Asian lady.  Not skinny, but still broadly size 8, with small breasts.  Quite pretty.

On both occasions, we had a quiet, relaxing, sensual time.  I rarely want to fuck, because I don't like condoms, and on both occasions she displayed a wide range of skills to make me and keep me hard, before a good strong orgasm.

The second was much better than the first, because we both knew what to expect, and what each other liked.

Overall, a very positive experience, and it's likely I will return at some point.

Offline Zimbaman

I've seen her twice, once about 18 months ago (under a different profile) , and once in February.

The second was much better than the first, because we both knew what to expect, and what each other liked.


She remembered you after 18 months?  :sarcastic: more likely she had just learnt new skills. I’ve seen this girl too, and I get the impression she’s quite high throughput.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2018, 08:39:08 pm by Zimbaman »

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
on both occasions she displayed a wide range of skills to make me and keep me hard, before a good strong orgasm.

Such as ? You make her sound like Liam Neeson in the movie "Taken"  :dash:

because we both knew what to expect, and what each other liked.

Sorry Mr Area - your nonsenical & ambiguous review is not of much use IMO - I'm not asking for a detailed description of her labia but I think a few more details would help other members make up their minds to see her or not based upon a more detailed description of the services she provides perhaps ?  :unknown:

Or just change your handle name to "Soft Focus"  :hi:

Offline ParkingArea

Such as ? I think a few more details would help other members make up their minds to see her or not based upon a more detailed description of the services she provides perhaps ?

Maybe.  Personally my eyes glaze over when I see blow-by-blow accounts.  I'm not looking for a narration, just basic details - what the girl looked like, whether good service was given, what the location was like, whether it was safe and discreet etc etc.

In my case, given I don't tend to fuck the WG, if they don't use some imagination in working on my cock, I might lose interest.  In this case, she used mouth, hands, breasts, other parts of her body.  Varied pace and firmness.  Used oil sometimes, used saliva sometimes.  As I said: a variety.  I rather doubt people are actually interested in the exact techniques used.  What I enjoy is unlikely to be the same as what other people enjoy, so I prefer to keep the review to the point, and factual.  It's not as if I tried 47 different positions... I just relaxed while she attended to and maintained a good hard erection for the best part of an hour.  That's what I like, and she did it well.

Offline ParkingArea

She remembered you after 18 months?  :sarcastic: more likely she had just learnt new skills. I’ve seen this girl too, and I get the impression she’s quite high throughput.

Yes, she remembered me.  We chatted a bit the first time we met about the kinds of things I do for a living, and she remembered and asked me about them.

I don't think she'd learned new skills.  The first time with a WG you've not met is likely to be a learning experience - different people respond better to different things.  In my case I learned that she responds better to a subtle and teasing tongue action than a more vigorous one.  I remembered that from the last time, and used it this time, with good effect.  In her case she remembered that I also prefer a slow and gentle approach rather than a harder one, and so she did this from the start.

Not really rocket science - if I like a WG I'll make an effort to be friendly, maybe share a little non-sensitive, non-revealing thing about my day, or what I do, usually at the end, if I've had a good time.  See if there's anything she says that I remember.  Clearly worked, as she remembered me. If the punt isn't that good, I wouldn't bother, but if I think there's a chance I'll return, I'll usually make a bit of effort.

I've probably seen Hayley 5 or 6 times - she sees a lot of people, but remembered me when she saw me the second time.  She puts notes in her phone to remind herself what the person was like.  If she does, I expect others do.  Not much effort, but helps with rapport.

So yeah, I think the more times you see someone, if things are generally good in the first place, the better things get, up to a point.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Maybe.  Personally my eyes glaze over when I see blow-by-blow accounts.  I'm not looking for a narration, just basic details - what the girl looked like, whether good service was given, what the location was like, whether it was safe and discreet etc etc.

In my case, given I don't tend to fuck the WG, if they don't use some imagination in working on my cock, I might lose interest.  In this case, she used mouth, hands, breasts, other parts of her body.  Varied pace and firmness.  Used oil sometimes, used saliva sometimes.  As I said: a variety.  I rather doubt people are actually interested in the exact techniques used.  What I enjoy is unlikely to be the same as what other people enjoy, so I prefer to keep the review to the point, and factual.  It's not as if I tried 47 different positions... I just relaxed while she attended to and maintained a good hard erection for the best part of an hour.  That's what I like, and she did it well.

Cheers, Yep that's very informative & why you chose to leave it out of your review is a bit of a mystery - Thanks for taking the time to post regardless.

When you collate your response to my question with the review it makes more sense - Cheers  :hi:


Offline ParkingArea

Another trip to:

External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only

Found myself 5 mins from this WG's house, with a wadge of cash in my pocket, having just done a job, so sent a speculative text.  Got a reply right away saying she's out with friends but could come back if I didn't mind seeing her in civvies, not made up etc.  I was completely fine with this.

15 mins later she's answering the door, in regular clothes, which added to the enjoyment - really felt like a GFE.  She looked pretty hot in short tight shorts and a little top.  No make-up.  For those who've not met her or read my earlier review, she's an asian girl, maybe mid 20s, size 8 verging on 10, nice shape - not exactly skinny, but certainly not fat.  Small tits, fantastic arse.  £150 for the hour.

I grabbed a shower, and shortly later we were on the bed kissing and catching up.  I usually indulge in an hour of various sorts of foreplay, oral, reverse oral, and whatever techniques the WG can come up with to keep me hard and on edge until the very end.  I don't usually like to fuck, because I just don't like condoms that much, but this time I was properly in the mood.

After about 20 mins of foreplay, she covered me, and then lowered herself onto me for some serious cowgirl action.  She looked pretty fantastic as I felt her tits, and enjoyed her sliding up and down.  I tried to hold on but it was very intense and I came very hard after probably 5-10 mins.

A bit of chatting and relaxing, and gentle stroking and I was hard again, and suggested I'd like another go.  This time I lasted much longer, and fucked her in mish and then from behind for a good long time.  I was achingly hard and loving the view, and when I finally came we were both very hot and sweaty.

Jumped in the shower and finished probably 15 mins over.

Thoroughly enjoyable session, my third with this WG, and I'll probably see her again if I'm in the area.  Some have felt her service to be a bit perfuntory, or suspected she may be a bit conveyor belt, but my experience has been good so far, and I'd consider her a pretty reliable punt.  Definitely worth a try if you like small asian girls.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Hello again Mr Area - Another fluffy bollocks touty review of this WG I see  :thumbsdown:

You clearly haven't bothered to read the rules so I've taken the trouble to highlight the relevant section for you.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

Quote
- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Do not post the same review in multiple regions. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel. Past or current sex workers or anyone related to a sex worker (e.g. boyfriend) may not review any other sex worker. Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider). Massage-only reviews without any sexual services are permitted, but ideally should make it clear in the topic title. Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

I'm sure someone can report the review for you so the two of them can be merged - I think it's a 'wad' or 'wedge' of cash too, never heard of a :

Quote
wadge


Offline Zimbaman


Thoroughly enjoyable session, my third with this WG, and I'll probably see her again if I'm in the area.  Some have felt her service to be a bit perfuntory, or suspected she may be a bit conveyor belt, but my experience has been good so far, and I'd consider her a pretty reliable punt.  Definitely worth a try if you like small asian girls.

Thanks for the advert. By some, you mean me as the only other reviewer of this girl. I actually agree, she was reliable, and I enjoyed my time with her. Hence I reviewed her as positive. Not the best out there by any means, but adequate. I’m just wondering why you have taken issue with me mentioning she runs a conveyor belt type system? You were able to see her with 15 mins notice, and I was able to book very short notice too. In fact, she was directing the next punter while I was still putting my trousers on. So I would say she is cramming as many punters in as possible :unknown: any reason to disagree?

Offline ParkingArea

I've taken the trouble to highlight the relevant section for you.

Thanks - you're right, I wasn't aware of that rule/guideline.  Thanks for pointing it out - I'll make sure to follow it henceforth.

I think the spelling is actually "wodge" rather than "wadge":

Quote
Definition of wodge
chiefly British
: a bulky mass or chunk : lump, wad

Offline ParkingArea

You were able to see her with 15 mins notice, and I was able to book very short notice too. In fact, she was directing the next punter while I was still putting my trousers on. So I would say she is cramming as many punters in as possible :unknown: any reason to disagree?

No that's fair.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Thanks - you're right, I wasn't aware of that rule/guideline.  Thanks for pointing it out - I'll make sure to follow it henceforth.

I think the spelling is actually "wodge" rather than "wadge":

 :hi:

No that's fair.

Acknowledgement of a conveyor belt ho - Cheers but not for me  :thumbsdown:

Offline milf_lover

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 54
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
She also previously worked for an escorting agency and I have seen her once through the agency for an outcall, I guess she decided to do operate independently.
Banned reason: 8+ years and no reviews.
Banned by: 90125

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
She also previously worked for an escorting agency and I have seen her once through the agency for an outcall, I guess she decided to do operate independently.

You've been a member on UKP since Feb 2014 - And you finally get around to contributing something now - Thanks for fuck all  :thumbsdown:

Offline Zimbaman

She also previously worked for an escorting agency and I have seen her once through the agency for an outcall, I guess she decided to do operate independently.

Why would it matter what she used to do? Years ago....? That’s your effort to keep access to the site is it?