cheers for that
this thread was needed 100% , some of the ones that were being rejected was pretty surprising and the original almost categorically was not allowing BBW. i'll be honest and say that the last time i questioned your decision on a few i thought to myself "i can go on with this but i am clearly getting under his nerve a tiny bit so just say what he wants to hear mixed in with your thoughts and apologise and be done with it" i really dont mind going back and showing you why there was a need for this thread... some of the ones that were not being allowed? those are the ones that should be here
the snippet you took satisfied your narrative, the example i gave you about taking my snippet that shows the size isnt an issue was an example of showing how taking snippets can change the picture of what the narrative is.... yes as i was writing it if you actually read the tone of the post, again something i see more and more isnt your thing, those numbers about the VW are just an illustration...there is an idea and the numbers are used try to get people to come as close to that idea as possible...if we look for that idea exactly....MOST women wouldnt come through... just too stringent
the idea that BBWs were allowed on th original... i actually smirked at that a bit. you even said that if the WG called herself a BBW that she probably wouldnt be an entrant
Sorry, I still do not think it is needed because it has created more confusion than it has solved. Since I was present at the beginning, even before this thread was created, I have a slight advantage, and like I said earlier most of my posts have been WGs who have fallen just outside the criteria of the Bubble Butt thread.
If the thread went this way WGs just missing the Punther's Charter [PC] then I would fully agree with you on the need for the thread. Obviously there are other yardsticks apart from Punther's on Bubble Butts, Big Butts, nice shape etc etc
Even in this thread, there are many WGs who are already present in the Bubble Butt thread. Off the top of my head Arab Kardishan, Kimmi Dash, Nicky Dany, British Ailyah etc.
I will reiterate that
I was just looking after the thread in the Punther's absence. I tried to remain
true to what he wrote not merely just substituting and/or replacing
his values with
my own. This is why it becomes very important that threads be well written and clear so there can be very little room for doubt. So for instance in the Simply Red: London thread, The Illustrious FCB
said he is not worried about looks and attractiveness. So in this instance. anything can go.
There will always be room for interpretation. For instance, I did not realise until in a dialogue with Punther that the size of a 'big bum' can be accepted even if does not have 'impeccable shape'. The
impeccable shape factor seems only applicable as a yardstick for the smaller -medium sized bums and for BBWs only
So in this respect, I have got his view for the thread wrong.
BBWs were allowed but the problem is that not many BBWs have an impeccable shape according to the [PC]. This cannot be refuted since it is said unequivocally in the Punther's Charter.
As for the snippets, I could not quote you in full because of 1. it take up too much space and 2. The issue of no size restriction is a contradiction in terms to the shape you are trying to achieve on this thread. If I quoted it then I would be saying I agree with your line of thinking - which obviously I do not.
Finally, and to bring things back around again, the more well-written a thread the less likely it's end result will be a contradiction in terms.
Like I said you have to re-word the Logan's Charter 