Emilyjane95 - Central Manchester

[NigelF]

Link: External Link/Members Only

As per her profile this girl has been an escort for at least 7 months. On her profile she used to mention her UKP reviews for an old profile and invited people to ask her for the details however she now seems to have removed any mention of that. Before booking I asked her about it and she told me her old name/profile. She said she made a new profile and moved location in order to avoid a stalker. Given that she only volunteers this information when asked, I will keep the exact details confidential and recommend you ask her directly yourself (although good contributing members can feel free to PM me). This site is all about the interests of punters though and in order to help you make an informed decision I will point out that she had numerous positive reviews on here but also 1 negative which was essentially for rushing/not going for a round 2 despite having half the booking left (and having gone for a 2nd round on his first visit - which he rated positive).

Price: £70 for 30 mins (including FK, OWO and sex - both vaginal and anal)

Location: Decent hotel near Piccadilly station. It was perfectly fine. Unfortunately, she's now working from a downmarket hotel in Salford but it is at least fairly close to the city centre.

Looks: Mostly as per her pics but I think she's sucking in her stomach a bit (but definitely not all the way in). I'd still guess she's around a size 8  though. Her tits are small and look like B cups. Facially, she's fairly good looking but not too far off average (I was still happy though). I'd say she looked around mid-late 20s although she did sound younger and possibly her make-up made her look a bit older. Her arse is fairly small but it was nice to hold/feel and of course to fuck. One minor point - when I caressed her legs I found that they were noticeably prickly due to short hairs. This wasn't just a bit of stubble, it was slightly more substantial growth and it didn't feel good/was slightly annoying. I mention this more for the sake of others and because there's no excuse for it.

Service: It was FK not DFK but it was good (and she initiated quite a lot). OWO was good. Sex was enthusiastic - both vaginal and anal where she had no problems taking my average-sized member at full pelt. She was also fine with a variety of positions.

I didn't feel rushed and I got my full 30 mins.

One small warning though (but I'm possibly overreacting), she asked a couple of very personal questions, one of which could quite easily have identified me. I found this rather invasive but perhaps she didn't realise/just wanted to create conversation. Nonetheless, it's something to bear in mind.

Overall: It was a solid punt and I would see her again.

[frankc]

Thanks for the review Pal.....one for the " must shag " hotlist I think

[yorkieyorkie]

Cheers Nigel for the review. I subscribed to her PG and she’s on my maybe to do list. The details mentioned on here certainly help.

[malu999]

Thanks for the review, now on the hotlist 

[NigelF]

Given that every man and his dog seems to be reviewing this girl, I might as well update this review and get some more added to her tally so it's a full accurate reflection of her performance across her current and previous profile.

As per her profile this girl has been an escort for at least 7 months. On her profile she used to mention her UKP reviews for an old profile and invited people to ask her for the details however she now seems to have removed any mention of that. Before booking I asked her about it and she told me her old name/profile. She said she made a new profile and moved location in order to avoid a stalker. Given that she only volunteers this information when asked, I will keep the exact details confidential and recommend you ask her directly yourself (although good contributing members can feel free to PM me). This site is all about the interests of punters though and in order to help you make an informed decision I will point out that she had numerous positive reviews on here but also 1 negative which was essentially for rushing/not going for a round 2 despite having half the booking left (and having gone for a 2nd round on his first visit - which he rated positive).

She claimed she changed profile due to a stalker but this isn't true based on info from other punters (or at the very least they were told differently by her) so it's pretty obvious she was just lying, probably so she wouldn't be linked to her negative review. Also, if that was the case she wouldn't have gone back to the North East (Sunderland and Newcastle) recently nor would she have gone back to work briefly at the agency she used to work at (she also worked indie).

Also, suppression of info is actually against the site rules (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0):
"- Suppressing info
It is not acceptable to try suppress info being posted by other members that may be of use to punters, e.g. negative reviews or name changes of service providers, regardless of reasons."

So her previous name was Rihanne at Premium Escorts (agency) and her name on AW was lucyjane95, her profile was: External Link/Members Only

I've gone ahead and indexed all the reviews I could find of her with her new/current profile. I found 6 reviews in total, 5 positive and 1 negative. One of the positives was written by the same punter who wrote the negative (the negative was for his most recent punt with her).

Here's a direct link to her negative: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=159414.0
Here's a list of all the reviews for her previous profile: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=14680

My experiences with Emily (or Lucy) Jane have been as per my review (this one).

[Emilyjane9595]

Thanks Nigel. Another 5 positives to add. Cheers for that

[NigelF]

Thanks Nigel. Another 5 positives to add. Cheers for that

Yes, I think you now have the most reviews out of any escort in the North West. Still not the most positives though and you have a lot more neutrals and negatives than almost everyone else too.

Have a look here: External Link/Members Only
You can sort the table by rating in various orders if you click on that heading. Note that review count in the table should update soon/tomorrow. Also note that table isn't a complete list and I'm sure there are few escorts who have more than 3 positives who're missing but most of the "top girls" seem to be there.

[Emilyjane9595]

Yes, I think you now have the most reviews out of any escort in the North West. Still not the most positives though and you have a lot more neutrals and negatives than almost everyone else too.

Have a look here: External Link/Members Only
You can sort the table by rating in various orders if you click on that heading. Note that review count in the table should update soon/tomorrow. Also note that table isn't a complete list and I'm sure there are few escorts who have more than 3 positives who're missing but most of the "top girls" seem to be there.

I’m a human Nigel, I am who I am. Some people won’t like me. But I have a lot of people who do and praise me highly. You really need to all stop this now though, why do you and others feel he need to just pick on me and jump on the reviews to slag me off. You’ve met me and liked me. Why do you go out of your way to just hurt my feelings. Wouldn’t wish how I’ve been made to feel on my worst enemy.

[yorkieyorkie]

I’m a human Nigel, I am who I am. Some people won’t like me. But I have a lot of people who do and praise me highly. You really need to all stop this now though, why do you and others feel he need to just pick on me and jump on the reviews to slag me off. You’ve met me and liked me. Why do you go out of your way to just hurt my feelings. Wouldn’t wish how I’ve been made to feel on my worst enemy.

That’s a fair comment Emily. Unfortunately my booking with you wasn’t the best but wish you well and one simply moves on.

[Emilyjane9595]

That’s a fair comment Emily. Unfortunately my booking with you wasn’t the best but wish you well and one simply moves on.

Yeah I do understand. Sorry about that.

[NigelF]

I’m a human Nigel, I am who I am. Some people won’t like me. But I have a lot of people who do and praise me highly. You really need to all stop this now though, why do you and others feel he need to just pick on me and jump on the reviews to slag me off. You’ve met me and liked me. Why do you go out of your way to just hurt my feelings. Wouldn’t wish how I’ve been made to feel on my worst enemy.

I've not picked on you, I've just pointed out the flaws and seemingly the lies in your posts. Only my last post in direct response you (not in this thread) was close to "slagging you off" and even then my intention was never to hurt your feelings, only to get a response out of you in order to help other punters better gauge your personality (which I admit is a bit trollish but it does have a genuinely altruistic motive towards other punters). And the post in your recent negative where I said your I hope you post because they're amusing, well that's just true/me being honest.

I'm surprised that I've hurt your feelings. I've never lied about you either. Why would you feel so bad about what I've said? Except perhaps the post I mentioned above (I can't be arsed to find it - you have too many bloody reviews and it might have been in a discussion thread anyway) - which of my posts have hurt your feelings?

To be clear, I genuinely do like you as an escort (hell, I even recommended you to someone via PM just a few hours ago). It's just that your posts on here are often really rubbish. Honestly, I'm surprised at a lot of them (and I'm very used to WGs talking rubbish on here, even good ones).

[Emilyjane9595]

It’s just all the time I get told about it, read all the comments I’ve had on the posts mainly by men who haven’t even met me , swearing at me and calling me worse than shit.

Enough to make some girls quit or let’s be honest it can tip people over the edge. I love what I do and not once have I said anything bad about anyone. Everyone has a right to say what they want but honestly this just feels like a war I’m never going to win.

I take what people say and I do listen but I don’t need the comments. Linking me to my old account is bad also, I came to Manchester to start a fresh you have no idea how much hassle that will cause me.

Are you all just trying to make me quit

[NigelF]

It’s just all the time I get told about it, read all the comments I’ve had on the posts mainly by men who haven’t even met me , swearing at me and calling me worse than shit.

You should definitely ignore all the random abuse not based on evidence/without reason. A lot of people with even just a moderately high profile have to deal with "nasty" comments online or if a business, even campaigns of false reviews (I'm talking about in other fields/businesses - not punting/here because admin is very proactive against such stuff, as much as he reasonably can be and when in doubt siding with the punter as is right on a punters' forum).

Who's called you worse than shit (or similar)? I'm not saying it definitely hasn't happened but I can't recall that, certainly not just out of the blue/not based on anything.

Enough to make some girls quit or let’s be honest it can tip people over the edge.

It can definitely tip some girls over the edge, in the sense that get really angry and go on a ridiculous rant (unfortunately some of the best ones end up in the deleted posts section). However, it's very helpful for punters to identify girls with those temperaments. It's not what you want from a good SP (and likewise it's not what you'd want from a client but obviously this site isn't for you to judge clients).

As for it making some girls quit, a small number of girls have said similar on here but only as emotional manipulation/an attempt to stifle critical comments. Please post an example of where a girl has quit because of UKP (you can use any source you want).

You get into this for the money and perhaps the lifestyle, hours and very occasionally job satisfaction or at least job ease. Many girls don't like what's said on here (often because they can't handle the truth/don't like hearing anything bad no matter how true/honest it is) but they soon learn to ignore it and many deliberately don't even look on here. It's your choice to do that or not.  Given that you do go on here you've also demonstrated no or very little ability to learn from your mistakes (hence your numerous neutrals and negatives) and this is particularly disappointing.

I love what I do and not once have I said anything bad about anyone. Everyone has a right to say what they want but honestly this just feels like a war I’m never going to win.

When you love what you do it usually shows to all who meet you - hence why many girls have a much fewer negatives and neutrals than you. Anyway, it's not a "war" and the fact that you even think along those lines suggests you've misinterpreted what's been said on here. Even thinking in terms of "winning" and "losing" is the wrong way to think about it.

I take what people say and I do listen but I don’t need the comments.

Well either you want to listen to comments or you don't. Feel free to judge each comment individually and ignore the ones that you feel aren't valid/have no basis.

Linking me to my old account is bad also, I came to Manchester to start a fresh you have no idea how much hassle that will cause me.

Aside from just trying to follow the rules and help other punters by revealing more info, I did put thought into it before I did it. Given that you've told so many punters and even other WGs about yourself and haven't even asked them to keep quiet about it, I didn't see why it would cause hassle, especially since you were happy to go back to the North East very recently, work with the same agency and work independently on AW with obviously a very similar name and very similar pics. 

Are you all just trying to make me quit

No one's trying to make you do anything. I don't want you to quit. We need as many escorts in Manchester as we can get, there's not that many, certainly not many who are anywhere near decent.

Quite a few escorts are able to view this site positively and simply learn from it, see here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=225546.0

Personally, I don't even believe you're as "hurt" as you're making out to be. There are many emotionally manipulative women out there and I think you've proven yourself to be one in this thread, specifically see this post:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210852.msg2185525#msg2185525

You managed to convince the guy to change your review and lie to us. Don't get me wrong, the guy is a fucking idiot (for lots of reasons) and he's also a cunt for even contemplating lying to us about what happened but you managed to make him feel sorry for you and manipulate him. You said things to him like "you've ruined my life", which is clearly just melodramatic rubbish. You asked for him to change the review etc.

See that's the problem when you lie on here, it makes everything you say hard to believe. Some good bedtime reading for you might be the boy who cried wolf.

Anyway, I don't expect you'll be bothered to read all this post either. Even I think it's way too long.

[smiths]

It’s just all the time I get told about it, read all the comments I’ve had on the posts mainly by men who haven’t even met me , swearing at me and calling me worse than shit.

Enough to make some girls quit or let’s be honest it can tip people over the edge. I love what I do and not once have I said anything bad about anyone. Everyone has a right to say what they want but honestly this just feels like a war I’m never going to win.

I take what people say and I do listen but I don’t need the comments. Linking me to my old account is bad also, I came to Manchester to start a fresh you have no idea how much hassle that will cause me.

Are you all just trying to make me quit

What a load of shit, this is WG bollocks to try to get some soft punters to stop being honest on here about their experiences of punting or dealing with you. This manipulation may work with these soft cunts, it WONT work with punters who are honest.

As long as what a punter posts on here is true and within the rules they can post what they like about their experiences of you.

[vw]

I’m a human Nigel, I am who I am. Some people won’t like me. But I have a lot of people who do and praise me highly. You really need to all stop this now though, why do you and others feel he need to just pick on me and jump on the reviews to slag me off. You’ve met me and liked me. Why do you go out of your way to just hurt my feelings. Wouldn’t wish how I’ve been made to feel on my worst enemy.

Or you could stop reading, after all this is punter site not one to suit prossies.

And maybe ask your fanbois to stop sending you links every time you are mentioned.

[p3ngu1n]

It’s just all the time I get told about it, read all the comments I’ve had on the posts mainly by men who haven’t even met me , swearing at me and calling me worse than shit.

Enough to make some girls quit or let’s be honest it can tip people over the edge. I love what I do and not once have I said anything bad about anyone. Everyone has a right to say what they want but honestly this just feels like a war I’m never going to win.

I take what people say and I do listen but I don’t need the comments. Linking me to my old account is bad also, I came to Manchester to start a fresh you have no idea how much hassle that will cause me.

Are you all just trying to make me quit

If you can't even handle the most tepid of criticisms, then you're 100%, most definitely in the wrong job
In any case, you're in the wrong place for the sympathy vote - this is a forum for punters

[Access]

Is it just me that thinks she doesn’t have that many negatives compared to her positives?

Is there a way to view the highest and lowest rated SP’s? As in % of negative to positive? A league of the most reviewed? Would be a nice filter to have.

[vw]

Is it just me that thinks she doesn’t have that many negatives compared to her positives?

Is there a way to view the highest and lowest rated SP’s? As in % of negative to positive? A league of the most reviewed? Would be a nice filter to have.

You could make one if the wiki link at the top does help your cause.

External Link/Members Only

[Access]

You could make one if the wiki link at the top does help your cause.

External Link/Members Only

Never knew that! Cheers!

[bigthickdick]

Is it just me that thinks she doesn’t have that many negatives compared to her positives?

Is there a way to view the highest and lowest rated SP’s? As in % of negative to positive? A league of the most reviewed? Would be a nice filter to have.

Yes it's just you. 11 of her 48 are NOT positive, that is nearly 23%. In other words every 4th clients of her are not entirely happy. 5 negatives out of 48 is over 10%, that's way too much. And that's before we start digging deeper.

4 out of the positives are 1 post wonders, 3 of those only registered weeks before they posted their reviews. Most of them posted conveniently right after someone else posted a negative or neutral.

And most importantly. 7 of her last 22 were NOT positive. 3 negatives and 4 neutrals. That's 1 out of 3 customers left not totally satisfied. Piss poor.

Seems to be the case that she can only provide a decent service to those who she fancies. That's very unprofessional and at £130/hr or £70/hh it's over 2 quid a minute. She should put her head down and provide excellent service to everyone.

And you should stop white knighting her. This wasn't the first time.

[Access]

Yes it's just you. 11 of her 48 are NOT positive, that is nearly 23%. In other words every 4th clients of her are not entirely happy. 5 negatives out of 48 is over 10%, that's way too much. And that's before we start digging deeper.

4 out of the positives are 1 post wonders, 3 of those only registered weeks before they posted their reviews. Most of them posted conveniently right after someone else posted a negative or neutral.

And most importantly. 7 of her last 22 were NOT positive. 3 negatives and 4 neutrals. That's 1 out of 3 customers left not totally satisfied. Piss poor.

Seems to be the case that she can only provide a decent service to those who she fancies. That's very unprofessional and at £130/hr or £70/hh it's over 2 quid a minute. She should put her head down and provide excellent service to everyone.

And you should stop white knighting her. This wasn't the first time.

White knighting? Fuck off. I asked a question, someone else responded with a decent answer... tell me where I’m white knighting or is this just a phrase you like to band about? I wanted to look at the stats as to me 5 negatives is a lot, but it’s when they’re coming that interests me.. as in is her service declining or not? And it looks like it is. So fuck off with your white knighting shit

[Northerndave666]

Got me cuppa tea and a hob nob in hand waiting for this to erupt ! 

[bigthickdick]

White knighting? Fuck off. I asked a question, someone else responded with a decent answer... tell me where I’m white knighting or is this just a phrase you like to band about? I wanted to look at the stats as to me 5 negatives is a lot, but it’s when they’re coming that interests me.. as in is her service declining or not? And it looks like it is. So fuck off with your white knighting shit

Most times when this prossie gets a negative review or even a negative comment you jump on and say something in her favour. That's white knighting of the finest kind by definition.

On this thread after Nigel said his bits and linked her old profile to this new one you came up with that shit saying her negs aren't a lot compared to her positives (and now contradicting yourself by saying that 5 negs seems to be a lot to you)

Another example:

Why?

Because most of those perfectly timed positives are from one post wonders.


Or another on the same thread:

I agree. Remarks about consistency though, are perhaps correct, however, it takes two to tango. If you’re sexually confident I think you can get the best out of her. She doesn’t take control like some SP’s and isn’t dominant. This suits some more than others.

It takes two to tango and it goes for every single SPs however there are girls without a single negative or a significantly better positive to negative ratio out there.

Or on this one trying to find excuses for her:

She’s a popular girl so it’s no surprise she’s burnt out. Would put me off the session if I got the life story of how a girl became an escort. It does seem to be the one hour bookings that are getting the neutrals though? Maybe she’s just best to have as a 30 min booking?

A good SP provides good service to everyone and all lenght of bookings. If she can't handle longer ones she shouldn't offer them.

Or here's your very own review of her:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.phptopic=211126.0

Worth reading what other members told you too about whiteknighting her.


And finally page 4 on this thread, your argument with me:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210852.0

I wonder who else think that you're a WK.

[goldwing1]

47 reviews on here
130 on AW
To me, that`s a very high ratio and plenty of info for you to make your mind up.

[vw]

47 reviews on here
130 on AW
To me, that`s a very high ratio and plenty of info for you to make your mind up.

What has that got to do with ratio?

[Numberone]

Emily is obviously interested in her feedback which is great. When I met her my session was pretty disappointing, particularly for the money she charges. Hopefully she is listening and will up her game.

[James999]

What has that got to do with ratio?

It shows she's consistently shit 

[EnglishRebecca121]

Most times when this prossie gets a negative review or even a negative comment you jump on and say something in her favour. That's white knighting of the finest kind by definition.

On this thread after Nigel said his bits and linked her old profile to this new one you came up with that shit saying her negs aren't a lot compared to her positives (and now contradicting yourself by saying that 5 negs seems to be a lot to you)

Another example:


Because most of those perfectly timed positives are from one post wonders.


Or another on the same thread:

It takes two to tango and it goes for every single SPs however there are girls without a single negative or a significantly better positive to negative ratio out there.

Or on this one trying to find excuses for her:

A good SP provides good service to everyone and all lenght of bookings. If she can't handle longer ones she shouldn't offer them.

Or here's your very own review of her:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.phptopic=211126.0

Worth reading what other members told you too about whiteknighting her.


And finally page 4 on this thread, your argument with me:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210852.0

I wonder who else think that you're a WK.

wow you have a lot of time on your hands clearly lol

[Sonny Crockett]

It’s just all the time I get told about it, read all the comments I’ve had on the posts mainly by men who haven’t even met me , swearing at me and calling me worse than shit.

Enough to make some girls quit or let’s be honest it can tip people over the edge. I love what I do and not once have I said anything bad about anyone. Everyone has a right to say what they want but honestly this just feels like a war I’m never going to win.

I take what people say and I do listen but I don’t need the comments. Linking me to my old account is bad also, I came to Manchester to start a fresh you have no idea how much hassle that will cause me.

Are you all just trying to make me quit

Sorry but you did call a punter a cunt for writing a justified negative about you, when you no showed on him.

[yorkieyorkie]

47 reviews on here
130 on AW
To me, that`s a very high ratio and plenty of info for you to make your mind up.

That’s a pretty meaningless comment and we all know AW feedback is worth jack diddly squat.

[yorkieyorkie]

I said many months ago (before I had met EJ) that she does attract unwarranted criticism. However, after seeing her and everything I can see why she’s racked up so many red and grey.

One thing is for certain... it’s bizarre how positive reviews pop up that too from new members once she does come under fire.

[Bustydusty]

Weird that there’s always so much talk about her and that she’s got so many reviews in such a short time especially when compared to other (far better) wg’s who’ve been around for years 

[yorkieyorkie]

Weird that there’s always so much talk about her and that she’s got so many reviews in such a short time especially when compared to other (far better) wg’s who’ve been around for 

I’m predominantly from the Yorkshire board but yeah I’ve noticed that too. A Sienna Kink for example provides a far better service as does Saskia. They ain’t discussed any where near as much.

[Bustydusty]

Even got more than naughty Amy who must have seen 10-20 times more punters and is in a different league 

[vw]

wow you have a lot of time on your hands clearly lol

Do you have a north west tour in the pipeline?   

[Access]

Most times when this prossie gets a negative review or even a negative comment you jump on and say something in her favour. That's white knighting of the finest kind by definition.

On this thread after Nigel said his bits and linked her old profile to this new one you came up with that shit saying her negs aren't a lot compared to her positives (and now contradicting yourself by saying that 5 negs seems to be a lot to you)

Another example:


Because most of those perfectly timed positives are from one post wonders.


Or another on the same thread:

It takes two to tango and it goes for every single SPs however there are girls without a single negative or a significantly better positive to negative ratio out there.

Or on this one trying to find excuses for her:

A good SP provides good service to everyone and all lenght of bookings. If she can't handle longer ones she shouldn't offer them.

Or here's your very own review of her:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.phptopic=211126.0

Worth reading what other members told you too about whiteknighting her.


And finally page 4 on this thread, your argument with me:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210852.0

I wonder who else think that you're a WK.

First of all, a typo, it should say “isn’t”. I was typing on my phone.

I wasn’t making excuses for her on the length of the booking. It was an observation.

As for the one post wonders, I don’t disagree they’re suspicious, and have never said anything otherwise.

Also, try reading ALL my posts and you’ll see I’ve been critical of some of her actions.

You say I jump on every post and try and defend her? No I don’t.. I haven’t on this on, I was asking for stats, and got them. Also, you jump on every post about her? Hypocrite much?
I also agreed that her recent reviews are negative and her service certainly seems to be declining. Another reason why I’m not seeing her all the time.

You can spout white knight all you want. I’ve seen her once, and comment on my experience with her. You’re full of shit and nothing more. Just because my opinion differs from yours, doesn’t make me anything other than someone who speaks honestly about his experience. You come across as nothing other than a miserable narcissistic troll.

[bigthickdick]

wow you have a lot of time on your hands clearly lol

Said by someone with over 3k posts here...

I don't have a lot of time but I'm not calling this prick a whiteknight for no reason (or am I??? Correct me if I'm wrong guys please) and then he tells me to fuck off again so i managed to find time to support my statement.

[NigelF]

wow you have a lot of time on your hands clearly lol

This is literally one of the most hypocritical posts I've seen on here. You are aware that you're an escort who has over 3,000 posts on a punters' forum?

It's good and helpful that people go back to check details as it helps build up a full, accurate picture, especially if someone is dodgy.

Anyway, I don't think Access is dodgy but some/many (not all) of his posts about Emily do fall into the white knight category. He's kind of like the opposite to me, I shouldn't care so much about her posts on here because I've already seen her and had a good time and he shouldn't care about any flack she receives because he's experienced likewise.

That’s a pretty meaningless comment and we all know AW feedback is worth jack diddly squat.

+1

One thing is for certain... it’s bizarre how positive reviews pop up that too from new members once she does come under fire.

As "Numberone" has said, she clearly cares quite a lot about her feedback, hence her posts on here and the repeated references to her feedback and UKP reviews  on her profile. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if she's encouraging punters to leave her reviews. I obviously don't know if she's offering any incentives and I don't know if she's even encouraging people to join. She probably just inspires some dumb fluffy tendencies in the many lurkers who've seen her. As others say though, it's odd that other girls haven't inspired the same even though they're "better"/more "worthy" of it. In some ways it could be a good thing if it encourages people to leave reviews of other girls too but that doesn't seem to have happened yet and there would be an issue with how reliable the reviews are considering they seem to be more for the WG's benefit than punters'.

I’m predominantly from the Yorkshire board but yeah I’ve noticed that too. A Sienna Kink for example provides a far better service as does Saskia. They ain’t discussed any where near as much.

Even got more than naughty Amy who must have seen 10-20 times more punters and is in a different league 

Funnily enough, those are all girls I've seen but I don't think I've bothered to review. I have definitely made comments though. Also, it makes sense that I've prioritised reviewing Emily, because at the time I was her first review on here (for her current profile/as Emily Jane). Nonetheless, it is definitely odd that so many others feel the need to review her but not many other girls.

Do you have a north west tour in the pipeline?   

I think she was recently in Warrington. Fuck knows why she didn't go to Manchester. If she was lucky, she might have had the great honour of meeting me 

[bigthickdick]

First of all, a typo, it should say “isn’t”. I was typing on my phone.

loads of bollocks. Read back what you said it is clearly NOT a typo

I wasn’t making excuses for her on the length of the booking. It was an observation.

of course it is.


As for the one post wonders, I don’t disagree they’re suspicious, and have never said anything otherwise.

yet you straight away asked 'why' when someone else pointed it out.

Also, try reading ALL my posts and you’ll see I’ve been critical of some of her actions.

trust me i have. When you realise that you get too close to get banned you always back off a bit

You say I jump on every post and try and defend her? No I don’t.. I haven’t on this on, I was asking for stats, and got them. Also, you jump on every post about her? Hypocrite much?

other bollocks. You said that her neg to pos ratio is not bad and asked a stupid question trying to masquerade your pathetic attempt at whiteknighting her again.


I also agreed that her recent reviews are negative and her service certainly seems to be declining. Another reason why I’m not seeing her all the time.

You can spout white knight all you want. I’ve seen her once, and comment on my experience with her. You’re full of shit and nothing more. Just because my opinion differs from yours, doesn’t make me anything other than someone who speaks honestly about his experience. You come across as nothing other than a miserable narcissistic troll.


I've not once questioned the integrity of your review. But you're constantly saying things trying to defend her. Good example is when you 'tried' to summarise the Thomas Santos thread and somehow failed to include most of the shit that looked bad on her even if those were supported by screenshots.

Have you not earned enough brownie points yet to exchange them for a free shag with her?

[bigthickdick]

Anyway, I don't think Access is dodgy but some/many (not all) of his posts about Emily do fall into the white knight category. He's kind of like the opposite to me, I shouldn't care so much about her posts on here because I've already seen her and had a good time and he shouldn't care about any flack she receives because he's experienced likewise.

That's the funny part. I don't think and never did say that he's dodgy. I believe his experience with her was accurately described in his review and all of his reviews i think are accurate and useful.  That's why I've never reported any of his posts.

But he's trying to defend her way too much. It's obvious that she's a hit and miss SP, and I'm more and more inclined to believe that it's all down to her finding the punter attractive or not. In other words she's not professional and not a really good SP as a consistent good service is not guaranteed.

 

[NigelF]

That's the funny part. I don't think and never did say that he's dodgy. I believe his experience with her was accurately described in his review and all of his reviews i think are accurate and useful.  That's why I've never reported any of his posts.

But he's trying to defend her way too much. It's obvious that she's a hit and miss SP, and I'm more and more inclined to believe that it's all down to her finding the punter attractive or not. In other words she's not professional and not a really good SP as a consistent good service is not guaranteed.

Yeah, I only said dodgy because that's the "catch all" word I used to describe people who can be caught out when you go back and check out their post history (or just remember it). Basically, I said dodgy in response to myself, not you. I wasn't trying to say you thought he was dodgy, only a white knight, which I mostly agree with but I don't care all that much because I like his reviews/find them helpful/reliable and at least it only seems to be this girl. It is something worthy of keeping an eye on though.

As I've implied, I think he's trying to be helpful but he's going too far in defence of her. And to be honest, I've probably been doing the same (but against her crappy posts). At least there's some entertainment value to it though.

[vw]

I think she was recently in Warrington. Fuck knows why she didn't go to Manchester. If she was lucky, she might have had the great honour of meeting me 

Warrington was a fake tour to go with the fake dolly the pig rescue.    

Have fun.   

[bigthickdick]

Yeah, I only said dodgy because that's the "catch all" word I used to describe people who can be caught out when you go back and check out their post history (or just remember it). Basically, I said dodgy in response to myself, not you. I wasn't trying to say you thought he was dodgy, only a white knight, which I mostly agree with but I don't care all that much because I like his reviews/find them helpful/reliable and at least it only seems to be this girl. It is something worthy of keeping an eye on though.

As I've implied, I think he's trying to be helpful but he's going too far in defence of her. And to be honest, I've probably been doing the same (but against her crappy posts). At least there's some entertainment value to it though.

You and me both were pulling her on her lies. Yes we've not been gentle but ffs she was blatantly lying and when we pointed it out to her she went quiet until the next negative/neutral review and the whole thing has started again.

If she was a really good SP or at least genuinely interested in becoming one she should learn from the negatives and should stop bullshitting around here as most guys on here are not daft and spot bullshitters from miles away.

My memory is pretty good and I can remember everything. And when not I'm not lazy to check back. (Obviously you're the same.) And i won't let a WG or a punter get away with lies on a punters forum. Why should we??

[EnglishRebecca121]

Warrington was a fake tour to go with the fake dolly the pig rescue.    

Have fun.   

YOU really are a little bit of a knob arnt you.

[vw]

You and me both were pulling her on her lies. Yes we've not been gentle but ffs she was blatantly lying and when we pointed it out to her she went quiet until the next negative/neutral review and the whole thing has started again.

If she was a really good SP or at least genuinely interested in becoming one she should learn from the negatives and should stop bullshitting around here as most guys on here are not daft and spot bullshitters from miles away.

My memory is pretty good and I can remember everything. And when not I'm not lazy to check back. (Obviously you're the same.) And i won't let a WG or a punter get away with lies on a punters forum. Why should we??

It shocks me you are justifying yourself to englishtroll121   

[bigthickdick]

It shocks me you are justifying yourself to englishtroll121   

 

[NigelF]

You and me both were pulling her on her lies. Yes we've not been gentle but ffs she was blatantly lying and when we pointed it out to her she went quiet until the next negative/neutral review and the whole thing has started again.

If she was a really good SP or at least genuinely interested in becoming one she should learn from the negatives and should stop bullshitting around here as most guys on here are not daft and spot bullshitters from miles away.

My memory is pretty good and I can remember everything. And when not I'm not lazy to check back. (Obviously you're the same.) And i won't let a WG or a punter get away with lies on a punters forum. Why should we??

Yes, totally agree. She seems to love going silent when called out. A much better strategy for her would be either total silence/never posting (like most WGs) or posts actually refuting/disproving.

[goldwing1]

That’s a pretty meaningless comment and we all know AW feedback is worth jack diddly squat.

On the flipside there are women that have hundreds of AW feedbacks but either bugger all or just a couple  on here, holly rude is an example
adultwork.com/903001
735 positives, not even a neutral or a negative
At least it gives you an indication.

[bigthickdick]

On the flipside there are women that have hundreds of AW feedbacks but either bugger all or just a couple  on here, holly rude is an example
adultwork.com/903001
735 positives, not even a neutral or a negative
At least it gives you an indication.

She's got 4 positives 0 neutral and 0 negative here. Not a lot compared to her aw feedbacks but an immaculate record.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=13689

[montypython]

Yes it's just you. 11 of her 48 are NOT positive, that is nearly 23%. In other words every 4th clients of her are not entirely happy. 5 negatives out of 48 is over 10%, that's way too much. And that's before we start digging deeper.

4 out of the positives are 1 post wonders, 3 of those only registered weeks before they posted their reviews. Most of them posted conveniently right after someone else posted a negative or neutral.

And most importantly. 7 of her last 22 were NOT positive. 3 negatives and 4 neutrals. That's 1 out of 3 customers left not totally satisfied. Piss poor.

Seems to be the case that she can only provide a decent service to those who she fancies. That's very unprofessional and at £130/hr or £70/hh it's over 2 quid a minute. She should put her head down and provide excellent service to everyone.

And you should stop white knighting her. This wasn't the first time.

Excellent post! Can't argue with that one bit.