I don't know why you are complaining so much, I thought it was only fair to review back the reviewer.
It's only fair when you don't make stuff up. Besides, this is still the wrong site for it. If you really want, set up your own site where WGs review punters. Or you could just post it on sites likes SAAFE etc.
I honestly don't smoke weed.. I don't know where you are getting this from.. are you sure you're not mixing me up with someone else?
I was about to say I am sure but then you said this:
I could write at length about how I used to smoke weed when I was a teenager and I can't any-more, but that's beside the point, you're just going to have to trust my word. I am my own human, I know what I do.. I don't smoke weed.
As far as I recall, your flat definitely smelt of weed on one occasion and it actually may well have been the first time I saw you, as opposed to what this review suggests (the 2nd meet). However, while this review is a review of the 2nd meet, that meet took place a good few months before this review was posted and actually I'd seen you a 3rd time before I posted this review - I haven't seen you since. I'm fairly sure it was on the first meet where I thought it was on your breath but I'm not totally sure, I could possibly be getting mixed up with someone else on that. I'm pretty you said you used to smoke a lot more, rather than you used to smoke and now don't. To be fair though, I'm not confident of the specifics but obviously I am confident that you admitted to smoking weed (I asked you about it).
The above is all a little complicated but is due to me delaying/taking ages to post this review (my first ever TS review) and me deliberately wanting to ensure you couldn't easily identify me. And on that note, I'm not convinced you do know who I am although there are now plenty of clues. Perhaps you weren't outright lying in your "review" of me and were mixing me up with someone else! Anyway, I'm happy to post a screenshot proving our comms and last two bookings (I don't have anything for the first meet because that was a couple of years ago and was on an old phone).
I don't particularly care about the weed stuff myself anyway, people can come to their own conclusions (I only mentioned it to help others inform their decision making). While you do have some reason to lie, since you seem to be fairly offended at the suggestion, perhaps it's pretty safe for people to take you at your word. As I've suggested, I hadn't noticed anything in my last 2 visits.
My overall gripe isn't the review.. I have no issues with the review.. I'm only defending the parts that I disagree with, it's an open discussion after all.
Yes, that's fine. WGs are allowed to post on here for this very reason.
point two being my room is a mess, well I do live here full time, it may be messy as I share the room with someone else.. but I assure you I clean it and tidy it and make it.. yes.. 'super tidy' whenever someone comes over.
As far as I recall, your room and particularly the bed didn't look visibly dirty (hence I said "mostly clean") but the it didn't look fresh either and the mess in the room sends a bad signal about the likely cleanliness. The room definitely was messy (on every occasion, perhaps it got a bit better but each time was definitely still messy to some degree) and I'm confident no punter (even those very relaxed about messiness) would ever honestly describe it as "super tidy" (as I've said though, I'm sure plenty would say that when you asked them though because it's simply not in their interests to tell the truth/there's no point). As I said in the review though, I don't really care about the mess, it's just there to help those who might do.
point three being, critiquing someone's looks, in this specifies thread.. my own looks.. now I don't want to disrespect everyone right to know what they are purchasing due to the internet being a open source of information. however it's not like reviewing a hairdressers or a restaurant.. you're reviewing a human being's personality and looks.. forgive me for being upset at the fact that you're reviewing me as a person.. somewhere on the internet.. it's not like I can have a business meeting and tell my staff to work harder.. my point is.. if you're going to review a human being.. try and be most sensitive.. it's really hurtful.
You absolutely can review the personality of a hairdresser or waiters at a restaurant. Of course those people don't sell anything on the basis of their looks and they also charge a lot less than you do (or at least they make much less profit per hour of work). You can also critique their service and I'm sure some of them may take it too personally and think I'm reviewing them as a person. Same with you, I am not reviewing you as a person - I am reviewing you as a sexual service provider. That doesn't mean I think you're some sort of sex robot and not a person, but it does mean this review represents only a small fraction of what you are actually like as a person (but a large fraction of what you are like as a service provider - based on my experiences and in my opinion only). Perhaps, I should have talked more about your friendliness or personality but I think most of it is a given based on the review/the fact that I saw you multiple times. To make it clear now though, you were definitely friendly and came across as a nice girl each time. Your first post in this thread however suggested that might have changed or would change if I were to see you again - hence I won't be seeing you again.
I am sorry for hurting your feelings and of course that wasn't my intention but this site isn't about your feelings, it's about helping other punters make informed decisions. This is even more important considering the fairly the large sums of money that WGs charge. You've said you're fine with reviews so you just have to accept the rough with the smooth, not take things so personally and just try to improve in any areas you can.
I am surprised I hurt your feelings actually because I didn't think I said all that much. I do however think my most recent review will hurt the WGs feelings if she sees it:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=209066.0 Which is shame because she is mostly a nice girl and provided a good service but there's simply no excuse for the blatantly misleading photos and descriptions on her profile. And it would not be fair to other punters for me to not give my honest opinion about her appearance. If you sugarcoat it then the meaning is diluted.
Perhaps though, saying your pictures were accurate would have sufficed but as BP suggests, I think it's important to put in my opinion as well (which is handy for punters reading it so they know where I'm coming from and can see if we seem to have similar tastes or not etc).
I apologise for any disrespect I may have caused. overall positive is good!
Just like this site isn't about your feelings, it's not about mine either so I don't mind any disrespect. However, your false review of me could easily be considered offensive (if only due to the lack of truth). However, at least it is pretty funny.
but it's unfair to write hurtful things about a person, just because she offers a personal experience. it is personal, and it will hurt.
It's not unfair to write things that are true (to the best of my knowledge). It doesn't matter if they're "hurtful" (which is subjective anyway). It is far more unfair to hold back or sugarcoat information that could have helped other punters - especially since there's a decent amount of cash on the line (and some punters don't have all that much to spend so need to be very careful about their picks).
I appreciate this post is far too long and boring.
Don't get yourself so worked up over silly things.
Great summary (plus the rest of your post).
