Lisa Independent - Central Manchester

[NigelF]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Having recently noticed this girl's profile and due to her seemingly decent photos as well as her very recent positive review, I thought I'd go see some fresh meat. Unfortunately, upon arrival I noticed that in fact, for me, she was "old meat". I've already reviewed her and given her a neutral here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166527.0

That review was for an old profile which also used different pictures. Note that the indexed pictures in that review are not the ones that appeared on her profile when I saw her and as such they're not the ones I talk about in that review. The indexed pictures for that review are now actually pretty accurate and give a fairly good representation of what she actually looks like.

So, upon recognising her I was actually very tempted to walk however I was confident she'd still provide a good service (like last time), I was horny and I couldn't be bothered going elsewhere.

We had brief chat about her pics, particularly the one showing her face and I did say she looks different. She said it is genuinely her and it's a recent pic which hasn't been edited/photoshopped and she was just making an expression/pulling a face to hide from people who might recognise her - hence why she looked different. This is of course total rubbish and I'm surprised she had the cheek to say it. Of course, debating it would serve no purpose and wouldn't be conducive to a good punt so I just accepted her explanation.

Price: £100 for an hour (including DFK, OWO and sex).

Location: Decent flat, fairly near the Deansgate Interchange (roundabout). The bathroom was perfectly fine, as was the bedroom. The only real negative (aside from perhaps a lack of ventilation in the heat although it wasn't too bad) was the poor mattress. It was rather thin and very springy (noticeable/it would dig into you a bit). She lamented this herself but it's not a big deal. During the punt, I heard a few noises from presumably a flatmate. Apparently her flatmate is this TS escort: External Link/Members Only

Looks: On her main page, the picture of her in the robe is accurate but it also shows pretty much nothing of her. The face pic is not accurate. I'm sure it is her, however it's probably quite old and almost certainly photoshopped. It makes her face look quite significantly thinner, younger and prettier than she actually is. In reality she has a fairly round (fat) face and while she did look very similar to when I saw her last year, I think her face is fairly poor IMO (I said OK, not great in my previous review), perhaps that's influenced by the fact that I've seen her before but regardless she doesn't look like her photo and I was definitely disappointed.

The first pic in her public gallery (black dress, red shoes) shows her pretty accurately but of course her boobs are mashed together by her bra, you can't see her face clearly and I'm convinced her legs look thinner than they do in reality/now. I think this pic (indexed in my previous review) gives you a pretty good impression of what she actually looks like: External Link/Members Only

Body wise, she's definitely not the size 10 she claims to be. I'm pretty confident she's a size 14 (or at least on the large end of 12). She doesn't have a particularly protruding belly though, everything is in decent proportion because the fat is fairly evenly distributed across her stomach, limbs, face/chin, arse and to a lesser extent her tits. So her tits are a bit disappointing given her size but they're not bad and her claim of 34C seems accurate. Her arse is big but has a good shape, is quite firm and is definitely nice IMO. She claims to be 28 (still) and while I said she looked late 20s/early 30s last time, this time I'm more confident that she looks early-mid 30s. Overall, I don't think she's bad looking but she's not too far off for my tastes. As I said last time, she reminds me a bit of Lauren James (but Lauren's service is better), see my review here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=163228.0

Service: Good DFK and a good amount of it but I kept having to go in for it (unlike last time). OWO was pretty good technique wise but wasn't particularly deep. Sex was enjoyed in a variety of positions and was enthusiastic. I don't think her service was quite as good as when I last saw her but I think perhaps we both weren't at our best given the heat. Her service was definitely still good.

She was also friendly throughout and aside from deception of some of her pics, she definitely comes across as a nice girl.

Overall: Not good looking in my book but does provide a good service. Last time, I said "I doubt I'll want to see more of her" (which would have been true if she kept that profile/I'd known this profile was hers) but now I definitely don't want to see any more of her and I'm happy with the punts I've had.

[milkman10]

good review mate I said in my review that her pics had been photoshopped

[NigelF]

good review mate I said in my review that her pics had been photoshopped

Indeed, that was handy to know, it's a shame I still wasn't able to recognise her! Your review was definitely good too, it's just a case of different tastes on this occasion (and me having already seen her of course).

[milkman10]

tbh still getting my feet doing reviews but im hopefully getting better at what is helpful to other punters one thing you said in your review what was the same for me was the dfk I also had to keep going in for it but when I did she responded pretty well

[NigelF]

tbh still getting my feet doing reviews but im hopefully getting better at what is helpful to other punters one thing you said in your review what was the same for me was the dfk I also had to keep going in for it but when I did she responded pretty well

Yes, they're definitely helpful and you're quick to answer any questions fully so even if you forget to mention something people can always ask.

[milkman10]

thanks mate