Author Topic: Sweet-Miley 20 MK?  (Read 1367 times)

Alexm7

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Anyone had the pleasure? looks bit like Sexy chicky who also worked out of MK and is polish, Would TOFTT but not in this weather.

External Link/Members Only

Offline l31nad

Hi, not as good as sexy chicky, pretty vanilla but did do cim which was ok but extra £20. i probably wouldn't see again there are better in mk.

Googlyguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Any recommendations for mk at the moment?

Offline l31nad

Hi, I am pretty vanilla, but I am always on look out for wg who offers a levels, not many do tbh, or change mind when you get there lol. But apple at annabellas is good, maybe a bit passive but definitely vfm. However she isn't as great as the Web photos, she is pretty though. Hope this helps.



Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,625
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
Hi, not as good as sexy chicky, pretty vanilla but did do cim which was ok but extra £20. i probably wouldn't see again there are better in mk.

Any chance of actually doing a review, please, bearing in mind there's nothing on here? Thanks.

Offline l31nad

Hi, I would do a review but this forum gets a bit savage too easily. Sorry. Miley is a really vanilla experience and the extra cim was expected and agreed with. The punt was so so but you get that service for 60£ all in at the parlours in mk, 90£ was  a bit steep.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Hi, I would do a review but this forum gets a bit savage too easily. Sorry. Miley is a really vanilla experience and the extra cim was expected and agreed with. The punt was so so but you get that service for 60£ all in at the parlours in mk, 90£ was  a bit steep.

Plonker - Comments like this are going to generate more flak as you've just admitted you prefer to leech than contribute  :unknown:

I appreciate the limited amount of information you've contributed on this WG but if you've been & seen a few Annabellas WG's put up a review & see how you get on - UKP can be a hostile environment I know but so is punting - Contributions from new members are welcomed if they are honest & informative  :hi:


Offline l31nad


Offline finn5555

I rest my case!

This site may be to much for your fragile ego (just saying)

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
I rest my case!

Didn't mean to offend your delicate sensibilities  ;) - I was actually trying to be encouraging  :hi:

Carry on leeching  :unknown:

Offline l31nad

 I find most of the reviews on here of working girls overly harsh. I think the reason is because generally the other members jump on a positive as white Knighting or fluffy.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
I can only speak for myself, I always try to include as much information as possible that I think would help other punters in the public domain whilst trying to be accurate & honest.

Read this & the site rules & you'll be fine  :hi:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

External Link/Members Only



Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,625
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
Hi, I would do a review but this forum gets a bit savage too easily.

I find most of the reviews on here of working girls overly harsh. I think the reason is because generally the other members jump on a positive as white Knighting or fluffy.

That's rubbish.

If a review is harsh, it's because the punter received a shit service. Extremely few positive reviews are accused of being fluffy.

You're just looking for excuses not to write a review, contribute properly and give something back after benefiting from the vast wealth of info.  :thumbsdown:

Every year, thousands of punters manage to write a review on here, so not really sure why you can't.  :unknown:

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
That's rubbish.

If a review is harsh, it's because the punter received a shit service. Extremely few positive reviews are accused of being fluffy.

You're just looking for excuses not to write a review, contribute properly and give something back after benefiting from the vast wealth of info.  :thumbsdown:

Every year, thousands of punters manage to write a review on here, so not really sure why you can't.  :unknown:

The highlighted bit - Just a troll CP - I won't be wasting any more posts trying to give advice.

Doubt he/she/it will be back - school home work will be requiring mummys approval  :sarcastic: