Sweet beccy - Holt

[Analist]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
100/h incall

Among my top punts of the year. Initial communication through aw was straightforward and beccy gave me her number after confirming.
Beccy lives in a cottage in North Norfolk. Pity her profile pics don't show much, in person beccy is an attractive slim dark haired lady in her 30s with some nice tattoos on her body. Very polite and friendly, interesting to talk to. Among other things, she has a hobby for shoes and lingerie and has an impressive collection she'll happily model for you.
French kissing was just right, clean tasting and romantic while I fondled her breasts. Began with oral both ways, my licking brought her to orgasm while I managed to hold myself back for some penetration. This was in all the usual positions and delightful. Then we moved to anal in doggy without any fuss and I eventually came while thrusting fairly deep. Cleaned up and had a short chat before leaving.
I believe she works full-time so it's easier to arrange a meet in the evenings. Overall, I felt the meet was the best of both worlds- GFE in personality and attention to detail and PSE in service.

[madeinwales56]

Glad you had a good time. This prossie has had at least one other incarnation but I can't remember what she was called before.

[itk]

Glad you had a good time. This prossie has had at least one other incarnation but I can't remember what she was called before.

I wonder if it’s Kissable Milf? She was bloody fantastic

[Thistle222]

To me she sounds like Little Cutie who also went by the name of RayRay. Had seen the profile and wondered if it was her. Reading the profile makes me sure, must re visit!

[happyharry]

To me she sounds like Little Cutie who also went by the name of RayRay. Had seen the profile and wondered if it was her. Reading the profile makes me sure, must re visit!

Yes, that's the old RayRay. Great girl who really delivers. Only problem is availability, which is limited due to her work commitments

[socks]

I wonder if it’s Kissable Milf? She was bloody fantastic

She sure was, sadly definitely not her and looks like that RayRay to me too. Xmilf was truly insatiable, never had such a passionate, enthusiastic, energetic fuck with anyone else. No holes barred, dt, dfk all like her life depended on it. Only regret was she didn't do filming but otherwise best pse I ever had.

[backentry]

Must agree a truly great girl. Fun to be with and likes a good cock up her ass, must re-visit soon.

[James999]

She's a member here and not happy about this review,

she seems to have registered under a different nic to her working name 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=28177

[socks]

She's a member here and not happy about this review,

she seems to have registered under a different nic to her working name 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=28177

And did so nearly three years ago. I think of lurkers as leeching punters but guess I need to broaden that to monitoring providers. Checked her profile and she goes the extra mile in distancing herself from her location, literally, by putting NR21 as where she's based. The map shows Holt as being well outside that. Can't see how it matters to put the town of location as it's not likely to identify her. 

[madeinwales56]

And did so nearly three years ago. I think of lurkers as leeching punters but guess I need to broaden that to monitoring providers. Checked her profile and she goes the extra mile in distancing herself from her location, literally, by putting NR21 as where she's based. The map shows Holt as being well outside that. Can't see how it matters to put the town of location as it's not likely to identify her. 

You are right Socks. When she was Ray Ray she was very determined to hide her location and tried to keep it to North Norfolk. I guess now the gaff has been blown ...

[masseyferguson]

You are right Socks. When she was Ray Ray she was very determined to hide her location and tried to keep it to North Norfolk. I guess now the gaff has been blown ...

I'm very concerned about the way this board is going at the moment. This is the second time recently that one of our best East Anglian  SP's has been badly let down by the inconsiderate attitude of some of our posters.
Both CharlotteScott and Sweet Beccy are jewels in the sexual services scene of Suffolk / Norfolk.
It was blatantly obvious to anybody with an ounce of sense that SweetBeccy was being very discreet about her exact location and it's absolutely her prerogative to be so.
Us punters are the very first to cry foul if a prossie is indiscreet about us !!
To reveal her location and risk forcing her into retirement or going "underground" is selfish and shortsighted and will only impoverish the punting scene in this region.
Who are we to second quess her reasons for being so cautious ?
I think we should respect the SP's as we'd expect them to respect us, I'm not joking when I say that we should all be feminists on this board.
To me that atittude is the only morally sustainable one in the paid sex arena - ie prossies and punters have exactly equal rights.

[Dick Emeroids]

Totally agree.

[finn5555]

Both CharlotteScott and Sweet Beccy are jewels in the sexual services scene of Suffolk / Norfolk.

If CharlotteScott is a jewel in that area then pickings must be slim 

[LurkNoMore]

I'm very concerned about the way this board is going at the moment. This is the second time recently that one of our best East Anglian  SP's has been badly let down by the inconsiderate attitude of some of our posters.
Both CharlotteScott and Sweet Beccy are jewels in the sexual services scene of Suffolk / Norfolk.
It was blatantly obvious to anybody with an ounce of sense that SweetBeccy was being very discreet about her exact location and it's absolutely her prerogative to be so.
Us punters are the very first to cry foul if a prossie is indiscreet about us !!
To reveal her location and risk forcing her into retirement or going "underground" is selfish and shortsighted and will only impoverish the punting scene in this region.
Who are we to second quess her reasons for being so cautious ?
I think we should respect the SP's as we'd expect them to respect us, I'm not joking when I say that we should all be feminists on this board.
To me that atittude is the only morally sustainable one in the paid sex arena - ie prossies and punters have exactly equal rights.

While i would completely agree that digression is the name of the game, and that this works both ways, i also want to know a rough area.

Her current location is "Norwich, Fakenham, Kings Lynn" and considering the roads in east anglia this is a big difference and not suitable. If i was trying to "out" her, i could call, message or attempt to make a booking and find out roughly where she lives.

There are no identifying images on her profile and by the looks of google maps, Holt is a big enough area that i wouldn't be able to go into a pub and ask about her.

[Analist]

Firstly, I am relatively new to the area and to UKP. I was completely unaware that sweet beccy has a previous profile or been reviewed before.
Secondly, I was only following UKP guidelines that ask for location in the review. As pointed out by lurknomore, her profile location of 'Norwich, Fakenham, King's Lynn' is a radius that covers most of Norfolk. I was only trying to be helpful to future punters by being more accurate. I have done the same in other reviews where wg's list multiple incall locations and I put down where I saw them.
Thirdly, we do not know what she is objecting to as she has not posted herself or contacted me directly. All we have are indirect posts from third parties and some of the comments are rather fluffy.

Anyway, i sincerely apologize to sweet beccy as my review (positive!) was not intended to cause any inconvenience. If there are any issues, she or one of her fans should contact admin and ask the review and the list I posted under regional information to be edited accordingly.

[Students Notebook]

While i would completely agree that digression is the name of the game, and that this works both ways, i also want to know a rough area.

Her current location is "Norwich, Fakenham, Kings Lynn" and considering the roads in east anglia this is a big difference and not suitable. If i was trying to "out" her, i could call, message or attempt to make a booking and find out roughly where she lives.

There are no identifying images on her profile and by the looks of google maps, Holt is a big enough area that i wouldn't be able to go into a pub and ask about her.

Yes LNM, East Anglia is a very rough area.

S.N.

[James999]

Secondly, I was only following UKP guidelines that ask for location in the review.

You are correct, and that's why Admin has not had to make any changes 

[masseyferguson]

I totally agree that this is a site for punters and the sharing of punter information, however I don't think that means that discretion and sensitivity towards SP's isn't also necessary.
Having booked Sweetbeccy and on learning her actual location it should be clear to anybody that she's being very cautious about her location on her AW profile. In this situation I feel a description of her location as "North East Norfolk, near the coast" would have sufficed ?
A prossie from Norwich ( pop 150,000 ish ) is totally anonymous whereas one who might be born and bred locally ( for all we know ) to Holt ( pop 4000 ish ) is in a very different situation surely ?
If you've not spent your life in a Norfolk village or small town you probably don't understand how everybody tends to know everybody else's business !!!
I'm just wanting to encourage sensitivity and consideration of everybodies, punters AND SP's,  private lives.
Besides which, as I said before, it will be to nobodies advantage if we drive genuine English providers out of business, many of us lamented the disappearance of RayRay / Little Cutie some months ago so the possibillty that Sweetbeccy might go too is real.
 

[norwichfunseeker]

Whilst I agree that the review process does require a location, surely this should match the 'declared' location on AW.
Whilst im new to this whole arena, discretion is an absolute must, for both sides, and I think the op has made a genuine error when trying to be helpful, and following their interpretation of the rules. We all learn.

If a profile on AW stated Norwich for example, you wouldn't feel the need to be more specific and name the hotel / road where the meeting took place in a review.

[The_Don]

Holt ( pop 4000 ish )

3,810
The town has a population of 3,550, rising and including the ward to 3,810 at the 2011 census. Holt is within the area covered by North Norfolk District Council.
Holt, Norfolk - Wikipedia
External Link/Members Only

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

- Privacy of service providers
It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. Hotels used by service providers may not be named. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers or street names or postcodes. Linking porn work is allowed. Modelling work is also allowed depending on circumstance, e.g. face pics showing on both prostitution profile and modelling profile. News items may be posted depending on circumstances (e.g. criminality). Previous working names are never censored, regardless of reasons (see below for more). Objections from service providers to any privacy-related info will need to be raised with Admin for consideration.

External Link/Members Only

Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Girl's name plus LOCATION in the SUBJECT. For London put first part of post code, or tube stop. Not just agency/parlour (though ok to add as option)

* AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review.

* Logistics: booking and communication.

* Location (for In-call): Safety, discretion, facilities, comfort, ease of finding.

* Looks: WG body and face, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos, nationality and language.

* Services used and the price paid (detailing time and extras charged). Mention enthusiasm, attitude, time keeping.

* Bonus points: Current photos from the profile.

[muddy funxter]

am I the only one bored of hearing about charlotte scott?

[Students Notebook]

am I the only one bored of hearing about charlotte scott?

Charlotte who ? 

This thread is about Sweet Beccy in #### 

S.N.

[The_Don]

Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm very concerned about the way this board is going at the moment. This is the second time recently that one of our best East Anglian  SP's has been badly let down by the inconsiderate attitude of some of our posters.

Once a thread has been started, members may reply and question, if they wish.

As long as its with in the rules set by Admin .

Both CharlotteScott and Sweet Beccy are jewels in the sexual services scene of Suffolk / Norfolk.

External Link/Members Only, with any W/G, and one punters

jewel

to another punter, may be substandard and warrant a negative.

It was blatantly obvious to anybody with an ounce of sense that SweetBeccy was being very discreet about her exact location and it's absolutely her prerogative to be so.

External Link/Members Only

I met Beccy at her home in small village near Norwich, she had told me via e-mail the best place to park, this was free and very easy to find. I then called to get final directions and was a minutes walk if that, I felt safe at all times and door was answered promptly. Her home is very clean and tidy and has no curtain twitching neighbours.

Town:    Norwich, Fakenham, Kings Lynn
County:    Norfolk
Region:    East of England (Anglia)
Country:    United Kingdom
Nationality:    British
Member Since:    10/04/2017

Us punters are the very first to cry foul if a prossie is indiscreet about us !!

There are levels of External Link/Members Only the punting WIKI is useful, for new and seasoned punters, IMO.

And the site rules are in-place around "Privacy". If a post or thread breaks these, they can be reported to Admin. 

To reveal her location and risk forcing her into retirement or going "underground" is selfish and shortsighted and will only impoverish the punting scene in this region.

W/G come and go. Just like punters.

This has been case, long before we started punting and may continue, long after we have gone.

Even if they do return, some times they may be, not be as good as remembered.

As with time and more experience, of some things. An outlook, expectation or aspirations. May change, just like W/G and punters, do.

Who are we to second quess her reasons for being so cautious ?

Unless a person is with a W/G 24/7, we don't truly know what she gets up to or what her issue are.

Its up W/G how they wish to conduct bookings and who they wish to see. A punter may, or may not book for a number of reasons.

I don't jump though hoops and my current view, on A/W and the way I book W/G.

I'm not joking when I say that we should all be feminists on this board.

 

[oohermrs]

Yet another thread that ceases to become useful after the first 3 or 4 posts.

Thank you Analist for the review and TOFTT - very helpful.  I'm up that way 3/4 times a year and this would avoid me having to schlep into Norwich to scratch the itch.

 

[muddy funxter]

Charlotte who ? 

This thread is about Sweet Beccy in #### 

S.N.

so I imagined it then? I am imagining that nearly everything I read she is there?

[James999]

Whilst I agree that the review process does require a location, surely this should match the 'declared' location on AW.

What a load of bollocks, if you follow that logic should the stats age etc all match the profile, a review is a summary of the events and where they took place, a town nothing more specific, from a pro$$ies perspective that's part of the "risk" that goes with earning £100 / £150 an hour, if they want total anonymity with zero risk then stack shelves for £7 an hour, and anyway, surely her work address is declared to HMRC for tax purposes 

[norwichfunseeker]

I was thinking more so future punters can be sure it's the same wg they're visiting, if the locations match etc.

[James999]

But she doesn't work from where she says on her profile 

[norwichfunseeker]

Exactly. Perhaps her location is more general for a reason.

I've never booked or seen Beccy, but living near norwich the travel to see her at either quoted locations is the same, and I'd never travel to any punt without a confirmed address and booking.

[James999]

Exactly. Perhaps her location is more general for a reason.

And naming a town is pretty general 

[masseyferguson]

And naming a town is pretty general 

Oh dear, sorry it's not that general in a town of <4000 poulation, that's the whole point of the nedd for some common sense and discretion.

Ok 4000 people, half are male.
2000 females, of those only about 10% ( generous as the pop of North Norfolk is quite old and affluent ) are between 30 and 35 yrs old.
200 females, of those say an absolute maximum of half are brunette, 5'7" tall and size 10 ish.
100 females, half of those have blue eyes maybe,
50 females, half have visible tattoos
..... here we go there are only 25 or so women in Holt who match up.

Okay it's back of a fag packet maths, but not very far the truth I'm sure ?
I reiterate in these rural communities everybody tends to know everybody else and their business.

Would you punt with a one in 25 chance of you being recognised ?

We just need to understand and respect other peoples desire to protect their civvy lives.

[itk]

Oh dear, sorry it's not that general in a town of <4000 poulation, that's the whole point of the nedd for some common sense and discretion.

Ok 4000 people, half are male.
2000 females, of those only about 10% ( generous as the pop of North Norfolk is quite old and affluent ) are between 30 and 35 yrs old.
200 females, of those say an absolute maximum of half are brunette, 5'7" tall and size 10 ish.
100 females, half of those have blue eyes maybe,
50 females, half have visible tattoos
..... here we go there are only 25 or so women in Holt who match up.

Okay it's back of a fag packet maths, but not very far the truth I'm sure ?
I reiterate in these rural communities everybody tends to know everybody else and their business.

Would you punt with a one in 25 chance of you being recognised ?

We just need to understand and respect other peoples desire to protect their civvy lives.

Your maths and point of her being recognised are based on the fact that someone who has zero interest of punting is going to be  searching AW, stumbling across the profile and then going to the village in search of someone who fits the description. It’s bloody madness, it’s more likely a WG would have problems with someone she’s met for a punt, so therefore who knows where she’s situated. . Plus, I’m sure she’s aware of the dangers being a WG brings, but at £100 per hour it’s worth the risk I’m guessing.

[masseyferguson]

Your maths and point of her being recognised are based on the fact that someone who has zero interest of punting is going to be  searching AW, stumbling across the profile and then going to the village in search of someone who fits the description. It’s bloody madness, it’s more likely a WG would have problems with someone she’s met for a punt, so therefore who knows where she’s situated. . Plus, I’m sure she’s aware of the dangers being a WG brings, but at £100 per hour it’s worth the risk I’m guessing.

So okay, you notice your neighbour, or the girl down the street, or your friend, or your sister, or your daughter has quite a few visitors who stay for either about half an hour or an hour, you wonder whether she might be a prossie. Now you google prossie websites and come first to aw and Ukp, now searching those sites by Holt ( or it's postcode ) you could easily come across Sweet Beccy's profile and the description exactly matches your neighbour. Fake booking entered and ... Hey presto she's busted !!
Would you punt if the dots could so easily be joined back to you, I wouldn't I know ?
I'm not saying it's likely, I'm just saying it's possible and Sweet Beccy quite reasonably obviously doesn't want to take that chance.

[masseyferguson]

Okay, I'm sorry, that was a pretty mad post. Just ignore it please.

[James999]

Oh dear, sorry

That's the only part of your waffle worth quoting, it's up to her where she works, if you want her to work in a larger town then perhaps contact her and tell her 

[Norfolkfuntimes]

am I the only one bored of hearing about charlotte scott?

No you are not. It all started with a thread about one of her gangbangs. She joined in and a few people seemed to get a bit obsessed about it. I got told off for telling them to let it go.

[socks]

am I the only one bored of hearing about charlotte scott?

No you are not. It all started with a thread about one of her gangbangs. She joined in and a few people seemed to get a bit obsessed about it. I got told off for telling them to let it go.

Let it go

[Norfolkfuntimes]

As for Beccy, I would have put the town in the review, but would have asked admin to take it off when she objected. If she asks nicely then we should oblige.

[Norfolkfuntimes]

Let it go

OK socks, it's gone. And hooefully I have learned how to quote properly now.

[Norfolkfuntimes]

Yes I have. Hopefully. It is actually a bit of a pain not being able to edit our own posts to correct them, but I can see why. Some punters do change their minds alot.