Author Topic: Positive/Neutral borderline Pheonix club Paddington  (Read 3609 times)


162 review(s) for Phoenix Parties (145 positive, 12 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline notcalledchris

External Link/Members Only

£160 for 2 hrs

I'm not going to get into the discussions about how this orgy club is run which to be honest I find a bit tedious, but I hope that this report gives those interested some more datapoints on the girls present.

My third, and least good, visit to this club.  The last week at the old venue.

had always previously done the 7 to 9 slot.  This visit was 1 to 3.  I thought that this might mean that the girls were less tired, but several appeared to be saving themselves for later and there was a general over emphasis on wanking by hand rather than fucking and sucking.  This meant they were reluctant to take the deep prolonged hard poundings I had wanted to give them and which I generally need if I am to cum from cunt sex.

Nine blokes for Barbara, Alana, Talida, Sandra, Nicole.  hosted by a friendly E E woman who I swear I have seen before as a HoD maid.

Barbara,  RO on her, then pretty good fuck.  Good at maintaining eye contact and talking dirty, but absolutely no touching of tits.  IMHO that is not right because after mouth and cunt, tits is what we are hiring.

Sandra.  The best of the night.  Ordinary young girl appearance and figure but a really fun fuck. Would have spaffed in the bag in her but saved myself for the others.

Alana. terrible blow job (it helps if you use your mouth love), and a very brief crap fuck.  Body is amazing but a big disappointment

Nicole.  Had enjoyed her before and enjoyed reacquainting myself with her fantastic tits and BJ skills.  Last time I had spunked whilst doing her in doggy and there is something about that position and the anatomy of her cunt that brought me off nicely.  Tried doggy this time and I was in heaven again, but not for long as she complained I was too big (I am big but not abnormally so)and switched to much less satisfying position which failed to make me cum.

Talida,  A truly gorgeous woman.  But similar experience to with Nicole.  Had previously pounded her hard with her legs round my neck until filling the bag with a satisfying load.  This time it was too much for her and she quickly changed to a competent hand job which was fine but not what I wanted.  was joined on bed by Alana who by now seemed to have warmed up and started talking dirty to me and showing off her slutty facial expressions, her bum and her cunt. My only spunk of the night ensued.

Conclusion.  Not bad but not as good as it could have been. 



TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

£160 for 2 hrs

I'm not going to get into the discussions about how this orgy club is run which to be honest I find a bit tedious, but I hope that this report gives those interested some more datapoints on the girls present.

My third, and least good, visit to this club.  The last week at the old venue.

had always previously done the 7 to 9 slot.  This visit was 1 to 3.  I thought that this might mean that the girls were less tired, but several appeared to be saving themselves for later and there was a general over emphasis on wanking by hand rather than fucking and sucking.  This meant they were reluctant to take the deep prolonged hard poundings I had wanted to give them and which I generally need if I am to cum from cunt sex.

Nine blokes for Barbara, Alana, Talida, Sandra, Nicole.  hosted by a friendly E E woman who I swear I have seen before as a HoD maid.

Barbara,  RO on her, then pretty good fuck.  Good at maintaining eye contact and talking dirty, but absolutely no touching of tits.  IMHO that is not right because after mouth and cunt, tits is what we are hiring.



Sandra.  The best of the night.  Ordinary young girl appearance and figure but a really fun fuck. Would have spaffed in the bag in her but saved myself for the others.

Alana. terrible blow job (it helps if you use your mouth love), and a very brief crap fuck.  Body is amazing but a big disappointment

Nicole.  Had enjoyed her before and enjoyed reacquainting myself with her fantastic tits and BJ skills.  Last time I had spunked whilst doing her in doggy and there is something about that position and the anatomy of her cunt that brought me off nicely.  Tried doggy this time and I was in heaven again, but not for long as she complained I was too big (I am big but not abnormally so)and switched to much less satisfying position which failed to make me cum.

Talida,  A truly gorgeous woman.  But similar experience to with Nicole.  Had previously pounded her hard with her legs round my neck until filling the bag with a satisfying load.  This time it was too much for her and she quickly changed to a competent hand job which was fine but not what I wanted.  was joined on bed by Alana who by now seemed to have warmed up and started talking dirty to me and showing off her slutty facial expressions, her bum and her cunt. My only spunk of the night ensued.

Conclusion.  Not bad but not as good as it could have been.


So technically 4 girls to 9 guys as Barbara wants to not get fully involved. ...Tits are to be played with not off limits? ??

VT I thought you or MarkPartyLover said was Em was back in charge to run the show to take full control. ..

Seems the girls can brush off the party goers with a simple exuse for not performing at a high standard for what TPC charges .

Daytime they could say we have 2 more parties to save our energies for . Or say in the evening party . We have been fucked all day ..

 :hi:
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 11:12:44 am by TrevorN »

Offline notcalledchris

The ratio was 9 to 5 so let's not try and argue that 2 to 1 had been breeched.  Tits off limits are not acceptable but Barbara was far from the worst  performer there.  One comment on ratios I will add though is that a ratio of 2 to 1 (or even slightly over as at proper gangbangs) works well only if the girls adopt positions to facilitate it.  Previously at TPC i have seen plenty of split roasting in the past and it is a great way to share a whore.  This time i think there was a reluctance to wear their cunts out so early in the day which meant that missionary was encouraged and doggy discouraged. Now i like the sight of a girl sucking someone elses cock from a respectable distance but when yoh are on top of a girl and she is blowing another punter his cock ends up being sucked and potentially spunking about a foot from your face which i found a bit close for comfort.

Lady M was present but stayed in Kitchen with her dog. 

Phaedrus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for the review OP. The fact of a poor service as an early customer or the thought of 29 other men on the same day between 5 women with a later service is too off putting for me. Will avoid thanks.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

So technically 4 girls to 9 guys as Barbara wants to not get fully involved. ...Tits are to be played with not off limits? ??

VT I thought you or MarkPartyLover said was Em was back in charge to run the show to take full control. ..

Seems the girls can brush off the party goers with a simple exuse for not performing at a high standard for what TPC charges .

Daytime they could say we have 2 more parties to save our energies for . Or say in the evening party . We have been fucked all day ..

 :hi:

No, it was Mark that said Em was back and ready to take full control and make the necessary decisions to improve the punter experience.  I hope that is the case, but this latest report doesn't bode well. I haven't attended in over a month and not since the move to Edgware Rd.

These parties are in need of direction or else lazy girls will do the minimum they can get away with. In the past Em would pick up on laziness and direct 'wallflower' guys to join in. If a girl proved consistently lazy or obstructive, she would soon be gone. It was funny to sometimes see girls quickly sharpen their act if they heard Em approaching. If laziness is allowed to continue, it will start affecting the morale of the girls who are good performers, so something needs to be done if a downward spiral is to be avoided.

I agree a girl whose tits are out of bounds is not really suited to being a party girl, some difficult staffing decisions still appear to be needed.

I have had fun there so far this year, but I do always pick a line-up where I know there are some top performers and I always get a mid-morning confirmation of the line-up when I book. I really don't want to meet any lazy, obstructive or unappealing girls who are there just to count time.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 01:06:55 pm by vt »

Offline notcalledchris


I have had fun there so far this year, but I do always pick a line-up where I know there are some top performers and I always get a mid-morning confirmation of the line-up when I book. I really don't want to meet any lazy, obstructive or unappealing girls who are there just to count time.

Agree with that but on this occasion I did choose the line up carefully. It included Talida and Nicole who i had previously found to be great fucks and Alana who was generally well reviewed and yet still I was disappointed.

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So this party took place at the end of June before the move and before the date partymark said Em was supposedly back in charge, anyway I can't personally comment on Alana, Sandra or Nicole haven't partied with them before but every girl is different so behaves differently, have different perferences and different limits. I can confirm that their Twitter is now updating rota changes and though there is no installed air con in the new venue there are a couple of portable fans ventilating the room which makes it better then what it was like before

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
No, it was Mark that said Em was back and ready to take full control and make the necessary decisions to improve the punter experience.  I hope that is the case, but this latest report doesn't bode well. I haven't attended in over a month and not since the move to Edgware Rd.

These parties are in need of direction or else lazy girls will do the minimum they can get away with. In the past Em would pick up on laziness and direct 'wallflower' guys to join in. If a girl proved consistently lazy or obstructive, she would soon be gone. It was funny to sometimes see girls quickly sharpen their act if they heard Em approaching. If laziness is allowed to continue, it will start affecting the morale of the girls who are good performers, so something needs to be done if a downward spiral is to be avoided.

I agree a girl whose tits are out of bounds is not really suited to being a party girl, some difficult staffing decisions still appear to be needed.

I have had fun there so far this year, but I do always pick a line-up where I know there are some top performers and I always get a mid-morning confirmation of the line-up when I book. I really don't want to meet any lazy, obstructive or unappealing girls who are there just to count time.

Mark was a piece of low life scum banned for being a TPC white knight tout and slagging off UKP, whatever they posted I don't believe. :thumbsdown: Its been reported now that Em has been present and is in charge. She is 100% responsible for the party service she offers. If its true she is now updating her Twitter to reflect changes to the advertised line-up that is good to hear, it needs to be the case from now on. Time will tell as it will if the max 2.1 ratio is adhered to at every party.

It was always the case at LMP when I went that Em being their to supervise ensured the WGs did their job, she walked from room to room all the time. And the max 2.1 ratio was never exceeded in my hundreds of parties and I was told about line-up changes when I rang in on the morning about 11.30am or so, which by then they knew if there was going to be a rota change. I have no idea why all this doesn't happen or hasn't been happening at some parties at TPC as it did at LMP.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 04:50:17 pm by smiths »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So this party took place at the end of June before the move and before the date partymark said Em was supposedly back in charge, anyway I can't personally comment on Alana, Sandra or Nicole haven't partied with them before but every girl is different so behaves differently, have different perferences and different limits. I can confirm that their Twitter is now updating rota changes and though there is no installed air con in the new venue there are a couple of portable fans ventilating the room which makes it better then what it was like before

Oh right, I missed that important point about the date of the party in this review. So, lets hope things have changed since. Good news about the Twitter notifications of line-up changes. Maybe things are looking up.

I've partied with all the girls mentioned here. I would definitely put Nicole & Sandra in the top half of the draw, curvy girls, but both have sweetsexy personalities and are solid performers. Talida would also make it on account of her stunning looks, she is one of the best lookers there, but her variable mood lets her down on occasion. There are definitely others that I wouldn't mind losing from the gallery before her though.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 06:22:15 pm by vt »

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Oh right, I missed that important point about the date of the party in this review. So, lets hope things have changed since. Good news about the Twitter notifications of line-up changes. Maybe things are looking up.

I've partied with all the girls mentioned here. I would definitely put Nicole & Sandra in the top half of the draw, curvy girls, but both have sweetsexy personalities and are solid performers. Talida would also make it on account of her stunning looks, she is one of the best lookers there, but her variable mood lets her down on occasion. There are definitely others that I wouldn't mind losing from the gallery before her though.

is Sandra really that great? I dont know, I have looked at her photos before and she just doesnt seem to be my cup of tea, Talida is quite cute though and has a quiet personality my only negative against her is she uses too much hairspray

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Had a peep at TPC Twitter . Emma has thrown her toys out of her pram calling those who have criticised TPC in recent days as nasty and rude sad people behind keyboards .


vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
is Sandra really that great? I dont know, I have looked at her photos before and she just doesnt seem to be my cup of tea, Talida is quite cute though and has a quiet personality my only negative against her is she uses too much hairspray

Well, I only said top half of the draw, but maybe you need to meet her in the flesh to appreciate her.  :hi:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Had a peep at TPC Twitter . Emma has thrown her toys out of her pram calling those who have criticised TPC in recent days as nasty and rude sad people behind keyboards .

Well, with your one lousy review and pointless recycled trolling posts, maybe she's right in your case.  :lol:

Maybe you do need to get out a bit more and do some punting!  :hi:
« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 06:56:30 pm by vt »

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Had a peep at TPC Twitter . Emma has thrown her toys out of her pram calling those who have criticised TPC in recent days as nasty and rude sad people behind keyboards .

is this criticism or just nasty and rude comments that are said behind keyboards and without a doubt will not be said in person to someones face

"You should have ask for a refund or for a CIM to Em"

"Em pls take note and bring your daughters that we want gangbang them (and you, together with them)"

"andv10 of us gangbanging her"

"Altough wish to gang bang her and the bitches: filling all their holes with my cream"

"Em is old and lazy now: no man wants to shag her and she is only interested in fucking the girls more than anything else"

"Em probably too old and not bright to run the business, she should delegate to Emily, or some other smart and clever girl"

« Last Edit: July 31, 2017, 08:07:20 pm by TT115 »

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well, with your one lousy review and pointless recycled trolling posts, maybe she's right in your case.  :lol:

Maybe you do need to get out a bit more and do some punting!  :hi:

So me calling out the tout , now banned White Knight arse licker in chief MarkPartyLover who bragged to TPC he will be writing reviews on UKP makes me a troll .

You are dodgy . You took secret discounts from Divines now you are backing Pimps at TPC

 :hi:

Offline Brazilian Martian

Well, with your one lousy review and pointless recycled trolling posts, maybe she's right in your case.  :lol:

Maybe you do need to get out a bit more and do some punting!  :hi:

Ouch that's a strong jab

Offline Brazilian Martian

So me calling out the tout , now banned White Knight arse licker in chief MarkPartyLover who bragged to TPC he will be writing reviews on UKP makes me a troll .

You are dodgy . You took secret discounts from Divines now you are backing Pimps at TPC

 :hi:

Good come back :thumbsup:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So me calling out the tout , now banned White Knight arse licker in chief MarkPartyLover who bragged to TPC he will be writing reviews on UKP makes me a troll .

You are dodgy . You took secret discounts from Divines now you are backing Pimps at TPC

 :hi:

Just look at the posts TT115 quoted above, that's what I was referring to. I can't see how that helps punters' cause in any way, it just makes you look childish & immature, but you carry on if that's what you want to be known as on here.  :hi:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just look at the posts TT115 quoted above, that's what I was referring to. I can't see how that helps punters' cause in any way, it just makes you look childish & immature, but you carry on if that's what you want to be known as on here.  :hi:

VT like your spin . You are implying those are my quotes when there are not .

Again you are spinning in favour of TPC . OK you took discounts from Divines.  What are you really  getting from TPC as their chief spinner of turning a negative review into a positive on many occasions.

 :hi:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
VT like your spin . You are implying those are my quotes when there are not .

Again you are spinning in favour of TPC . OK you took discounts from Divines.  What are you really  getting from TPC as their chief spinner of turning a negative review into a positive on many occasions.

 :hi:

You also joined in with the childish, unnecessary & counterproductive comments...how does this help punters??   :rolleyes:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152266.msg1662828#msg1662828


Come back to me when you've put some reviews up and we can start discussing the merits or not of my contributions here.  :rolleyes:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You also joined in with the childish, unnecessary & counterproductive comments...how does this help punters??   :rolleyes:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152266.msg1662828#msg1662828


Come back to me when you've put some reviews up and we can start discussing the merits or not of my contributions here.  :rolleyes:

Keep up the sterling work for TPC, Em must be proud of you . I note you have not responded too my earlier question to help punters of your claim a few of the girls you have met go more then providing a vanilla service . Looking forward to your girls names that do that . Sure that will be in the punters interests .

Which girls push the boundries ???


Some of the girls at LMP/TPC have been known to push the boundaries beyond vanilla, I've experienced filthy talk, slapping, spitting, deep-throat, gagging, squirting, anal play, girl-on-girl, FFM moresomes, lots of variety of action, just depends on the girl and your finding out what she's comfortable with.


 :hi:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Just look at the posts TT115 quoted above, that's what I was referring to. I can't see how that helps punters' cause in any way, it just makes you look childish & immature, but you carry on if that's what you want to be known as on here.  :hi:

What I don't get is why you are bothered what he posts, what odds does it make to you what he posts about Em and her daughters. This IS a free speech forum that isn't censored unless admin says so.

I wouldn't post what he does but he is allowed to post it unless admin says he cant. Once again this is you stepping in to defend TPC as you seem to have a problem what he has posted, but its fuck all to do with you what he has posted, that's his business. All very odd, its like you wish to defend Em and her daughters from having the piss taken out of them, but why. Not being rude to Em and her daughters but they have been on TV portraying themselves as the British version of the Kardasians, the twins have a softish core website, have been on Babestation and were even on the first page of xvideos porn site the other day. They have put themselves in the public arena. With that comes others  being able to comment about them. If admin doesn't think it appropriate for the twins to be mentioned on here he will say so, and of course the twins are adults.

I will be sticking to the TPC service myself.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2017, 01:57:45 am by smiths »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Keep up the sterling work for TPC, Em must be proud of you . I note you have not responded too my earlier question to help punters of your claim a few of the girls you have met go more then providing a vanilla service . Looking forward to your girls names that do that . Sure that will be in the punters interests .

Which girls push the boundries ???


 :hi:

Have you heard of the phrase 'YMMV'? That applies here.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
What I don't get is why you are bothered what he posts, what odds does it make to you what he posts about Em and her daughters. This IS a free speech forum that isn't censored unless admin says so.

I wouldn't post what he does but he is allowed to post it unless admin says he cant. Once again this is you stepping in to defend TPC as you seem to have a problem what he has posted, but its fuck all to do with you what he has posted, that's his business. All very odd, its like you wish to defend Em and her daughters from having the piss taken out of them, but why. Not being rude to Em and her daughters but they have been on TV portraying themselves as the British version of the Kardasians, the twins have a softish core website, have been on Babestation and were even on the first page of xvideos porn site the other day. They have put themselves in the public arena. With that comes others  being able to comment about them. If admin doesn't think it appropriate for the twins to be mentioned on here he will say so, and of course the twins are adults.

I will be sticking to the TPC service myself.

I suppose it's those sort of comments play into the hands of the detractors of UKP who paint us all as misogynistic morons.

Also, despite a general loathing for pimps, to organise a sex party it requires an organiser, someone willing to do the legwork of getting a bunch of prossies in the same room willing to service a bunch of guys for a few hours. Now I don't fancy that job myself. I don't see why it would be in punter's best interests to antagonise unduly someone who is willing to do that. By all means call them to account if they aren't doing what they promise, but being disrespectful to their family doesn't achieve anything except get their back up and less likely to listen to the constructive criticism.

Of course it's a free speech forum and we can't legislate against idiots joining and posting unhelpful crap, but I'd rather not be associated with it.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I suppose it's those sort of comments play into the hands of the detractors of UKP who paint us all as misogynistic morons.

Also, despite a general loathing for pimps, to organise a sex party it requires an organiser, someone willing to do the legwork of getting a bunch of prossies in the same room willing to service a bunch of guys for a few hours. Now I don't fancy that job myself. I don't see why it would be in punter's best interests to antagonise unduly someone who is willing to do that. By all means call them to account if they aren't doing what they promise, but being disrespectful to their family doesn't achieve anything except get their back up and less likely to listen to the constructive criticism.

Of course it's a free speech forum and we can't legislate against idiots joining and posting unhelpful crap, but I'd rather not be associated with it.

If admin gave a shit about what these distractors thought he would delete such comments, you clearly give him no credit. :rolleyes: Some WGs, pimps, trolls and other assorted low lifes will hate UKP whatever is posted as they have no control over it, and good job to as it proves UKP works which is down to admins work.

A sex party doesn't need a pimp at all in reality, a bunch of WGs could run one without a pimp if they chose to. I don't have a problem punting through a pimp at a party as long as the service is good. I don't see it relevant though if a pimp gets stick on here, so what, this IS a punters forum, it ISNT a pimps support group. If they get pissed off again so what, it might keep them on their toes in future. In TPCs case Em has been taking some punters for mugs by lying, well there is a consequence to that shit and if smart she will wake up and smell the roses by offering ALL her punters a good honest service from now on as she and Moss did me at LMP. Her touts like yourself on here wont have an easy time otherwise, 4 low lifes have been banned so far thanks to admin, good news for honesty. :thumbsup:

On a positive note I read that changes to the rota have been put on their Twitter so I assume that's the case, that should now by the normal procedure, time will tell if it is. And I hope the max 2.1 ratio isn't again reported as being exceeded, and again time will tell.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If admin gave a shit about what these distractors thought he would delete such comments, you clearly give him no credit. :rolleyes: Some WGs, pimps, trolls and other assorted low lifes will hate UKP whatever is posted as they have no control over it, and good job to as it proves UKP works which is down to admins work.

A sex party doesn't need a pimp at all in reality, a bunch of WGs could run one without a pimp if they chose to. I don't have a problem punting through a pimp at a party as long as the service is good. I don't see it relevant though if a pimp gets stick on here, so what, this IS a punters forum, it ISNT a pimps support group. If they get pissed off again so what, it might keep them on their toes in future. In TPCs case Em has been taking some punters for mugs by lying, well there is a consequence to that shit and if smart she will wake up and smell the roses by offering ALL her punters a good honest service from now on as she and Moss did me at LMP. Her touts like yourself on here wont have an easy time otherwise, 4 low lifes have been banned so far thanks to admin, good news for honesty. :thumbsup:

On a positive note I read that changes to the rota have been put on their Twitter so I assume that's the case, that should now by the normal procedure, time will tell if it is. And I hope the max 2.1 ratio isn't again reported as being exceeded, and again time will tell.

All credit to Admin for his moderation decisions, a world away from the draconian censorship of other punting forums. I guess we tend to self-censor on here, with members calling each other out and arriving either at a consensus or just agreeing to disagree. I know each poster on here stands on their own merit to some extent, but there is such a thing as collective responsibility, I'd just rather any would-be detractors didn't have the ammunition of some of the idiotic posts we occasionally see, so I'd prefer to call them out as you do on other occasions. I even wonder sometimes whether detractors join, so that they can post the dumb stuff and then point to it and say UKP members are all socially-inept morons or suchlike.

Yes, in theory a sex party could be organised collectively by the girls themselves, but name me one that hasn't folded without someone taking charge. I'm definitely not here to support pimps who lie to punters, so all power to any who call out the lies, but I think more can be achieved for punters by sticking to the issues at hand rather than diverting into stuff that's irrelevant.



« Last Edit: August 03, 2017, 01:17:11 am by vt »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
« Last Edit: August 03, 2017, 01:16:39 am by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
All credit to Admin for his moderation decisions, a world away from the draconian censorship of other punting forums. I guess we tend to self-censor on here, with members calling each other out and arriving either at a consensus or just agreeing to disagree. I know each poster on here stands on their own merit to some extent, but there is such a thing as collective responsibility, I'd just rather any would-be detractors didn't have the ammunition of some of the idiotic posts we occasionally see, so I'd prefer to call them out as you do on other occasions. I even wonder sometimes whether detractors join, so that they can post the dumb stuff and then point to it and say UKP members are all socially-inept morons or suchlike.

Yes, in theory a sex party could be organised collectively by the girls themselves, but name me one that hasn't folded without someone taking charge. I'm definitely not here to support pimps who lie to punters, so all power to any who call out the lies, but I think more can be achieved for punters by sticking to the issues at hand rather than diverting into stuff that's irrelevant.

Whereas I couldn't care less what so called distractors think, fuck em. Seeing as you stepped in as it was Em and her adult daughters and you just happen to punt through Em at TPC I find it all very cosy, Em will be happy with you. :rolleyes: Unlike some I am not as thick as pig shit, I know exactly whats going on. You touts wont prevail on UKP. :rolleyes:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Whereas I couldn't care less what so called distractors think, fuck em. Seeing as you stepped in as it was Em and her adult daughters and you just happen to punt through Em at TPC I find it all very cosy, Em will be happy with you. :rolleyes: Unlike some I am not as thick as pig shit, I know exactly whats going on. You touts wont prevail on UKP. :rolleyes:

Well, Sinz was the first to say that the stuff about gangbanging Em & her daughters was irrelevant to the discussion at hand, so perhaps you should take it up with him...or is he a 'tout' too??  :wacko:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152266.msg1667277#msg1667277

Mate what are you on about, this thread was about a punters review on TPC WGs and you went on a tangent about how you want to f*ck Em and her daughters at the same time, how the hell is that constructive or beneficial for anyone ? So before you point fingers at someone to keep at topic, do it yourself and if you don't like the disagreements, move along instead of whining and being a hypocrite.

« Last Edit: August 03, 2017, 04:59:33 pm by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Well, Sinz was the first to say that the stuff about gangbanging Em & her daughters was irrelevant to the discussion at hand, so perhaps you should take it up with him...or is he a 'tout' too??  :wacko:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152266.msg1667277#msg1667277

I didn't say posting about gangbanging Em and her daughters was relevant to the discussion at hand, I said why were YOU bothered about it, you came up with this bollocks about UKPs distractors as a reason, which also isn't relevant, and in addition is total crap. Fuck any distractors and good if they don't like it. :rolleyes: I have no control over what others post, I asked YOU why you jumped in, trying to undermine me by bringing another poster into it is your usual standard, dodgy arse licking tout. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I didn't say posting about gangbanging Em and her daughters was relevant to the discussion at hand, I said why were YOU bothered about it, you came up with this bollocks about UKPs distractors as a reason, which also isn't relevant, and in addition is total crap. Fuck any distractors and good if they don't like it. :rolleyes: I have no control over what others post, I asked YOU why you jumped in, trying to undermine me by bringing another poster into it is your usual standard, dodgy arse licking tout. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Well if Sinz thought it was 'not constructive or beneficial', I thought it was irrelevant & unhelpful and you thought it 'wasn't relevant' too, we're all pretty much on the same page on the subject, so why are you getting your knickers in such a twist about it?  :unknown:
« Last Edit: August 03, 2017, 05:31:21 pm by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Well if Sinz thought it was 'not constructive or beneficial', I thought it was irrelevant & unhelpful and you thought it 'wasn't relevant' too, we're all pretty much on the same page on the subject, so why are you getting your knickers in such a twist about it?  :unknown:

I am not getting my knickers in a twist as you call it, :rolleyes: I asked you why YOU were bothered, not someone else. I have already stated its not what I would post, but its a free speech forum so what others post that admin doesn't delete is up to them. With YOU not others its just another example of you stepping in to defend TPC. :rolleyes:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am not getting my knickers in a twist as you call it, :rolleyes: I asked you why YOU were bothered, not someone else. I have already stated its not what I would post, but its a free speech forum so what others post that admin doesn't delete is up to them. With YOU not others its just another example of you stepping in to defend TPC. :rolleyes:

Jog on smiths, your accusations are getting more & more absurd, I say the same thing as Sinz and you take issue with it, you're like a grumpy old dog with a bone.  :wacko:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Jog on smiths, your accusations are getting more & more absurd, I say the same thing as Sinz and you take issue with it, you're like a grumpy old dog with a bone.  :wacko:

Yes, when touts like yourself are on here I am like a dog with a bone. :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
A warning for TPC punters. Either Em at TPC herself or she gave the info to a poster called Mark Party Lover banned off here for being a WK tout slagging off UKP recently, if she is not posing as Mark herself tried too out me on Twitter. They used 2 names that I only used when dealing with LMP as it was then. I didn't use both names anywhere else. So it could of only come from TPC.

Do not give TPC your real name, I dared to criticise and challenge them and they try to out me, I used a false name but they didn't know that. Real low life behaviour in my book. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: