Author Topic: Phoenix Club 10th July 2017  (Read 10215 times)


162 review(s) for Phoenix Parties (145 positive, 12 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Steely Dan]

Offline TDH82007

Girls: Jasmine, Ivana, Anna, Paloma

New venue, not too far from the old venue really. Decent layout, one chill-out room, a kitchen, bathroom and, of course, the boudoir...

A slightly different line-up from the one advertised but still a very good one. My first time with these ladies. After handing over cash, showering, etc. I made my way into the room and immediately lay down for Ivana to start proceedings by giving me a BJ. She seemed a little preoccupied as the buzzer was still going off from someone else wanting to join in. However, as she noted to Jasmine who was sucking someone else off next to me, there were already nine guys and only four ladies, exceeding the advertised 2:1 ratio. This led to a crowded atmosphere for the duration of the session, which was disappointing. Anyway, back to the details. Ivana proceeded to give me an excellent BJ for a while before I turned her over, popped the helmet on and proceeded to bang away in missionary. I was quite hungover that day (I wouldn't recommended TPC with a hangover) and struggled to get momentum going. I eventually did but it led to a surprisingly early pop. S has an amazing figure and was a good shag. I climbed off and went to the chill-out room for water and a sit-down. I went back in about ten mins later and immediately noticed the temperature in the room - it was f*cking boiling hot. This also remained for the duration of the session and made both myself and several of the others uncomfortable. I had three showers whilst I was there and wasn't alone in taking frequent showers! It's a bit off-putting when a) you're dripping in sweat, and b) other blokes who are on top of women you're waiting to bang are also dripping sweat onto them. The sweaty atmosphere meant I was put off from muff-diving, which again was disappointing as it's something I enjoy. Others there were braver than me and took the plunge but a salty, sweaty fanny wasn't on my menu that day.

One guy was going down on Jasmine so I went over and dipped my c*ck into her mouth. She was quite enthusiastic with her BJ and soon I had her bent over the bed and began to go at it. I had to stop soon after though as I was dripping in sweat and needed my second shower. I returned soon after and had to wait a while before Paloma became available. She was probably the least attractive there, for me, but ended up being the best shag for me, as she was getting right into it and managed to claim my second pop. She looks like another girl who I've seen at TPC before, but Paloma is definitely the better looking of the two.

Another water break and then more sitting around waiting for my final shag, which was Anna. She was a nice girl and an excellent BJ, so before long I told her I wanted to fuck her. I'd been watching her get nailed by someone else and seemed quite receptive to a thumb up her arse whilst being banged, which turned me on. However, I only managed missionary before pop no.3 and then 'time' was called and it was time to go.

Overall, me being hungover hampered my experience but so did the imbalance in the ratio and the heat in the room. The girls were all really pleasant and attractive; Jasmine had the worst figure (although it was still nice) but she was the biggest go-er there - she was even DFK one lad there, which I've never seen before. Just I didn't get time to enjoy much of her, which was disappointing! Still, I managed to shag them all. The guys in attendance were all friendly and talkative, which was a new experience for me, and meant there was a more relaxed feel to the session than anything I've experienced previously.

I'm a bit of a novice punter so this was still VFM in my opinion. Others may think differently. I've given a positive due to the polite manner and attractiveness of the girls, as well as the atmosphere. However, the heat and imbalance in the ratio nearly pulled it down to a neutral.
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Girls: Jasmine, Ivana, Anna, Paloma

New venue, not too far from the old venue really. Decent layout, one chill-out room, a kitchen, bathroom and, of course, the boudoir...

A slightly different line-up from the one advertised but still a very good one. My first time with these ladies. After handing over cash, showering, etc. I made my way into the room and immediately lay down for Ivana to start proceedings by giving me a BJ. She seemed a little preoccupied as the buzzer was still going off from someone else wanting to join in. However, as she noted to Jasmine who was sucking someone else off next to me, there were already nine guys and only four ladies, exceeding the advertised 2:1 ratio. This led to a crowded atmosphere for the duration of the session, which was disappointing. Anyway, back to the details. Ivana proceeded to give me an excellent BJ for a while before I turned her over, popped the helmet on and proceeded to bang away in missionary. I was quite hungover that day (I wouldn't recommended TPC with a hangover) and struggled to get momentum going. I eventually did but it led to a surprisingly early pop. S has an amazing figure and was a good shag. I climbed off and went to the chill-out room for water and a sit-down. I went back in about ten mins later and immediately noticed the temperature in the room - it was f*cking boiling hot. This also remained for the duration of the session and made both myself and several of the others uncomfortable. I had three showers whilst I was there and wasn't alone in taking frequent showers! It's a bit off-putting when a) you're dripping in sweat, and b) other blokes who are on top of women you're waiting to bang are also dripping sweat onto them. The sweaty atmosphere meant I was put off from muff-diving, which again was disappointing as it's something I enjoy. Others there were braver than me and took the plunge but a salty, sweaty fanny wasn't on my menu that day.

One guy was going down on Jasmine so I went over and dipped my c*ck into her mouth. She was quite enthusiastic with her BJ and soon I had her bent over the bed and began to go at it. I had to stop soon after though as I was dripping in sweat and needed my second shower. I returned soon after and had to wait a while before Paloma became available. She was probably the least attractive there, for me, but ended up being the best shag for me, as she was getting right into it and managed to claim my second pop. She looks like another girl who I've seen at TPC before, but Paloma is definitely the better looking of the two.

Another water break and then more sitting around waiting for my final shag, which was Anna. She was a nice girl and an excellent BJ, so before long I told her I wanted to fuck her. I'd been watching her get nailed by someone else and seemed quite receptive to a thumb up her arse whilst being banged, which turned me on. However, I only managed missionary before pop no.3 and then 'time' was called and it was time to go.

Overall, me being hungover hampered my experience but so did the imbalance in the ratio and the heat in the room. The girls were all really pleasant and attractive; Jasmine had the worst figure (although it was still nice) but she was the biggest go-er there - she was even DFK one lad there, which I've never seen before. Just I didn't get time to enjoy much of her, which was disappointing! Still, I managed to shag them all. The guys in attendance were all friendly and talkative, which was a new experience for me, and meant there was a more relaxed feel to the session than anything I've experienced previously.

I'm a bit of a novice punter so this was still VFM in my opinion. Others may think differently. I've given a positive due to the polite manner and attractiveness of the girls, as well as the atmosphere. However, the heat and imbalance in the ratio nearly pulled it down to a neutral.

TPC clearly state the maximum ratio is 2-1 so they broke this at this party you attended, that is totally out of order in my view, and you say it was one of the reasons it hampered your experience. Glad to hear it was still a good punt overall.

How many WGs did they change from who was advertised as being their? And you haven't put the TPC site link in this review, its always handy for others unaware to add a link, and what is asked when you do a review on here.

While I was looking at their site to check if it stated a max 2-1 ratio I saw some total rubbish about it not being a brothel. For punters bothered it IS most certainly a brothel, its a sex party that charges punters cash in exchange for punting with a number of WGs.

Offline Kingy28

Rebecca and Beatriz were on the rota published on TPC  website 24 hours earlier and this same rota was shown on the twitter page on the morning of this party. We know Beatriz was at Bella's Belles on this day, so Rebecca was bumped off for Ivana.
9 punters already there & the doorbell still ringing?  Not good. Sounds like Ivana wasn't happy about it either.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Rebecca and Beatriz were on the rota published on TPC  website 24 hours earlier and this same rota was shown on the twitter page on the morning of this party. We know Beatriz was at Bella's Belles on this day, so Rebecca was bumped off for Ivana.
9 punters already there & the doorbell still ringing?  Not good. Sounds like Ivana wasn't happy about it either.

So this party was on the same day discussed in the London Regional Board thread started on 10th July discussing Bea who I assume is Beatriz here where the OP of the thread said TPC and Bellas were both advertising this WG as with them that day. So this reviewer has confirmed this WG wasn't at TPC at the party he attended, and I note he has done a previous positive review on TPC as this one is so I cant see any reason not to believe him. So at this party they changed 2 WGs from the advertised line-up, and for some reason Bea was on both the TPC and Bellas site as partying with them but wasn't at TPC for this reviewers party. And on that regional thread I note a punter stated Bea was at Bellas, so we now have him confirmed that and this reviewer confirming she wasn't at his party that day.

As to exceeding the max ratio of 2-1 this has always been a big selling point of TPC, LMP never ever exceeded it in my hundreds of parties and I always did at least 2 parties per visit sometimes 3. We shall see if VT tries to spin this for TPC. :rolleyes: In reality its a VERY simple case of checking the number of punters to the number of WGs and making sure a max of 2.1 is adhered to as TPC state on their site where they use it as LMP did as a selling point to attract punters. Really piss poor that it was exceeded in my opinion. :thumbsdown:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
TPC claiming they are not a brothel .But a Lifestyle Club ??? :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Lying about ratios . Getting worse then before .



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 12:02:55 pm by TrevorN »

Offline chris44

Glad i went many times in Marylebone and Lancaster Gate. These parties now seem a shadow of there former self and much more expensive. Reckon Moss knew what he was doing when he was involved.

An tUasal Liathroid Mor

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Glad i went many times in Marylebone and Lancaster Gate. These parties now seem a shadow of there former self and much more expensive. Reckon Moss knew what he was doing when he was involved.

Indeed...been going myself since the Marylebone High Street days 2003/4.....essentially now it is basically a 'hit or miss' event....

Offline hawai5o

Lancaster Gate was the best place where the best girls at the time worked there . Emma Butt , Jade ,Carmella ,Parissa .Isabella ,Oriental Misha ,a lovely Ebony ,Cleo .very well and behaved Romanian girls , 2 or 3 Very hot blonde Brazilians.
  Even the Milfs parties on a Monday were very good ,5 Milfs for £120 .A star was Russian Roxana .
Never been to Phoenix .
« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 02:34:34 pm by hawai5o »

An tUasal Liathroid Mor

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Lancaster Gate was the best place where the best girls at the time worked there . Emma Butt , Jade ,Carmella ,Parissa .Isabella ,Oriental Misha ,a lovely Ebony ,Cleo .very well and behaved Romanian girls , 2 or 3 Very hot blonde Brazilians.
  Even the Milfs parties on a Monday were very good ,5 Milfs for £120 .A star was Russian Roxana .
Never been to Phoenix .

Yeah....Milf Monday....what a great way to start the week.....my absolute fave....always put me in good stead for the week...

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Lancaster Gate was the best place where the best girls at the time worked there . Emma Butt , Jade ,Carmella ,Parissa .Isabella ,Oriental Misha ,a lovely Ebony ,Cleo .very well and behaved Romanian girls , 2 or 3 Very hot blonde Brazilians.
  Even the Milfs parties on a Monday were very good ,5 Milfs for £120 .A star was Russian Roxana .
Never been to Phoenix .

When I first went to Lancaster Date they had only just moved their I was told, they had some great WGs then, Jewels, Jennifer, Jasmine, Antonia and later the best of the best for me Shamila. In fact there was only 1 maybe 2 WGs I didn't rate one being a tall Brazilian so she said who I had first punted with at LAPC when they were based in that tiny council flat off Hatton Garden for their weekday parties where she was a right misery, cant recall her name but she was certainly a lot more cheerful looking at LMP.

I also attended the first few MILF Mondays Em brought in which her twins later ran for a while. The Indie Linzi D was at one or two of them, then helped out more at LMP for a while.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Glad i went many times in Marylebone and Lancaster Gate. These parties now seem a shadow of there former self and much more expensive. Reckon Moss knew what he was doing when he was involved.

Moss was very organised but got ill and was hardly at the parties I went to at LMP, but he was the one I rang on Monday mornings to book my weeks partying. I always then rang on the day before I left my place and was always told of any changes to the rota, I was never lied to. Em used to say she knew for sure by 11am if a WG was going to be a no show and had time to get a stand in. I am puzzled why this has now changed and WGs are changed more often, they were hardly ever changed when I went and as I say I was always told if I asked as I always did. Moss and Em knew I liked certain WGs more than others and out of the 7 there needed to be at least 4 I really liked or I would go another day.

As to the cost it was £120 for 2 hours, £200 for 4 hours and £300 for 6 hours when I first went with 7 WGs. This later went up to £140 for 2, £240 for 4 and I think £340 for 6 but I never did 3 parties after the price rise, I never did less than 2 parties on any visit to LMP as it was such great VFM to me.

Plus parking often in the Queensbury car park near the station and that shortish walk.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 03:12:39 pm by smiths »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We shall see if VT tries to spin this for TPC. :rolleyes:

I was wondering if I might get a name-check from my old buddy smiths!  ;)

If a provider deliberately exceeds stated ratios and has no intention of providing girls advertised on its line-up it is a black mark against them and punters should be rightly annoyed if that is proven to be the case.

Saying that, I have been to 80 or 90 parties at LMP & TPC and only once was the ratio exceeded, the week before Xmas 2016. Most of the parties I have attended this year the line-ups have been as advertised and Em has always told me if there's a change and given me the option not to attend. Though it has proved somewhat harder to get that information out of Barbara if she answers the phone.

« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 05:16:48 pm by vt »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
These are the girl numbers and approximate guy numbers from my TPC parties this year:

18th Jan: 4 girls & 6 guys

17th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

24th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

7th Apr: 5 girls & 9/10guys

25th Apr: 5 girls & 7 guys

12th May: 5 girls & 6/7 guys

23rd Jun: 6 girls - 11/12 guys

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
These are the girl numbers and approximate guy numbers from my TPC parties this year:

18th Jan: 4 girls & 6 guys

17th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

24th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

7th Apr: 5 girls & 9/10guys

25th Apr: 5 girls & 7 guys

12th May: 5 girls & 6/7 guys

23rd Jun: 6 girls - 11/12 guys

So all kept under 2.1 whilst you attended....  :wacko:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I was wondering if I might get a name-check from my old buddy smiths!  ;)

If a provider deliberately exceeds stated ratios and has no intention of providing girls advertised on its line-up it is a black mark against them and punters should be rightly annoyed if that is proven to be the case.

Saying that, I have been to 80 or 90 parties at LMP & TPC and only once was the ratio exceeded, the week before Xmas 2016. Most of the parties I have attended this year the line-ups have been as advertised and Em has always told me if there's a change and given me the option not to attend. Though it has proved somewhat harder to get that information out of Barbara if she answers the phone.

Yes well you virtually always pop up to spin for TPC, on the matter of the max ratio its TPC that matters now as that is who is still operating and charging £160 for 2 hours with 4 or 5 WGs per party. You and others have pointed to the max 2-1 ratio being a reason you prefer TPC, well if they have exceeded it as the OP states this is bad news for punters in my opinion. I loved the max 2.1 at LMP myself but I never saw that exceeded, and I also cant recall many if any punters posting they saw it exceeded. Em and Moss were always very careful not to in my experience.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So all kept under 2.1 whilst you attended....  :wacko:

Yeah, it's great when that happens, it means you often get multiple girls on you when the other guys are resting!  ;)

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
These are the girl numbers and approximate guy numbers from my TPC parties this year:

18th Jan: 4 girls & 6 guys

17th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

24th Mar: 5 girls & 7/8 guys

7th Apr: 5 girls & 9/10guys

25th Apr: 5 girls & 7 guys

12th May: 5 girls & 6/7 guys

23rd Jun: 6 girls - 11/12 guys

Which all relies on taking your word for it unless someone credible posts the same, bearing in mind I don't trust you so don't believe your word. For all I know this is just more VT spin, to make TPC look like this is a rare occurrence, hopefully it is a rare occurrence. They charge £160 for 2 hours which is more than some other parties with higher ratios, and the pay-off should be they never exceed the max ratio, which is 100% in their hands to do or not. And they should always provide the number of WGs advertised, and to me they should tell punters of changes to the line-up online the day of the party or if they know earlier when they find out. And to any punters who ring or contact them on the day. Moss and Em never had a problem giving me honest info on the phone and never lied to me, so Em is still involved so why should that be different now. I see you mention above Barbara can be another matter if she answers the phone. Why, she should be answering punters questions if asked when its about what WGs will be their, that's one of the jobs of whoever is answering the phone in my view. Piss poor. :thumbsdown:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yes well you virtually always pop up to spin for TPC, on the matter of the max ratio its TPC that matters now as that is who is still operating and charging £160 for 2 hours with 4 or 5 WGs per party. You and others have pointed to the max 2-1 ratio being a reason you prefer TPC, well if they have exceeded it as the OP states this is bad news for punters in my opinion. I loved the max 2.1 at LMP myself but I never saw that exceeded, and I also cant recall many if any punters posting they saw it exceeded. Em and Moss were always very careful not to in my experience.

As I said, if it's a deliberate policy to exceed the stated ratio, punters should be rightly annoyed. No spin there, I'm afraid.  :)

At the Hot Box party I attended last Friday there were more guys than there should have been. They have a stated ratio of 2:1, but there were 15 (maybe 16) guys to 7 girls.

It's good that punters are keeping an eye on providers and their various failures to deliver on their promises, whether these occur by accident or by design.

Offline Kingy28

As I said, if it's a deliberate policy to exceed the stated ratio, punters should be rightly annoyed. No spin there, I'm afraid.  :)

At the Hot Box party I attended last Friday there were more guys than there should have been. They have a stated ratio of 2:1, but there were 15 (maybe 16) guys to 7 girls.

It's good that punters are keeping an eye on providers and their various failures to deliver on their promises, whether these occur by accident or by design.

One of the good things that hotbox do is continually use Twitter to inform punters of any rota changes. If only TPC could take a leaf out of that book & communicate their rota changes instead of just repeating what is published on their website each week on a Sunday.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
As I said, if it's a deliberate policy to exceed the stated ratio, punters should be rightly annoyed. No spin there, I'm afraid.  :)

At the Hot Box party I attended last Friday there were more guys than there should have been. They have a stated ratio of 2:1, but there were 15 (maybe 16) guys to 7 girls.

It's good that punters are keeping an eye on providers and their various failures to deliver on their promises, whether these occur by accident or by design.

Yes well they were lying as well then if that's what happened. Another party lying doesn't make TPC any better that they lied, ALL parties should be honest.

I don't accept the accident excuse, its for the pimp to ensure there isn't one, that's their job as a pimp, and as Em never lied to me with accidents when running LMP why should that be different with TPC. Em told me she knew by 11am if a WG was a no show, why any different now, plenty of time to change the rota to reflect the new line-up, and for whoever answers the phone or emails if they have emails to be honest with them about any changes.

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
It would be a miracle if anyone manages to get Ivana to do anything other than lay on her side and give a BJ, another lazy WG I have met who complains about everything and barely delivers moneys worth.

When I attended all the guys at least once asked her to get on top and ride in CG, including myself everyone got the same response "I can't be doing everything you do me from the back or get on top of me" lazy bum !

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yes well they were lying as well then if that's what happened. Another party lying doesn't make TPC any better that they lied, ALL parties should be honest.

I don't accept the accident excuse, its for the pimp to ensure there isn't one, that's their job as a pimp, and as Em never lied to me with accidents when running LMP why should that be different with TPC. Em told me she knew by 11am if a WG was a no show, why any different now, plenty of time to change the rota to reflect the new line-up, and for whoever answers the phone or emails if they have emails to be honest with them about any changes.

Autumn at HotBox was trying to explain that some guys hadn't confirmed their booking, but they then showed up. Of course, they should have been asked to leave, but she took their cash and they stayed.

Last Xmas at TPC, the excuse was that 2 guys had booked in advance by email, but that hadn't been communicated to whoever was taking the phone bookings, so they took 12 of those, but 14 showed up to play with the 6 girls. I'm not sure who should have gone home on that one. When I complained, Barbara suggested I could leave and have my money back if I didn't like it, but it should have been the guys who booked last I suppose. So that was claimed to be an accident, but probably an avoidable one.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Autumn at HotBox was trying to explain that some guys hadn't confirmed their booking, but they then showed up. Of course, they should have been asked to leave, but she took their cash and they stayed.

Last Xmas at TPC, the excuse was that 2 guys had booked in advance by email, but that hadn't been communicated to whoever was taking the phone bookings, so they took 12 of those, but 14 showed up to play with the 6 girls. I'm not sure who should have gone home on that one. When I complained, Barbara suggested I could leave and have my money back if I didn't like it, but it should have been the guys who booked last I suppose. So that was claimed to be an accident, but probably an avoidable one.

Yes well being told it was an accident isn't the same as it actually being one in reality.

Offline SirCharles

Yes well they were lying as well then if that's what happened. Another party lying doesn't make TPC any better that they lied, ALL parties should be honest.

I don't accept the accident excuse, its for the pimp to ensure there isn't one, that's their job as a pimp, and as Em never lied to me with accidents when running LMP why should that be different with TPC. Em told me she knew by 11am if a WG was a no show, why any different now, plenty of time to change the rota to reflect the new line-up, and for whoever answers the phone or emails if they have emails to be honest with them about any changes.
Em is old and lazy now: no man wants to shag her and she is only interested in fucking the girls more than anything else...maybe i am a serial pervert but that's my view...
The bottom line is very simple, i.e. price must go back to £120, 130max...rest of the thread is useless

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Em is old and lazy now: no man wants to shag her and she is only interested in fucking the girls more than anything else...maybe i am a serial pervert but that's my view...
The bottom line is very simple, i.e. price must go back to £120, 130max...rest of the thread is useless



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline SirCharles



Hidden Image/Members Only
Altough wish to gang bang her and the bitches: filling all their holes with my cream  :wackogirl:

Offline SirCharles

Altough wish to gang bang her and the bitches: filling all their holes with my cream  :wackogirl:
And watersport...that is my main fantasy on her and i am sure they all would like that: mother and daughters  :angelgirl:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
And watersport...that is my main fantasy on her and i am sure they all would like that: mother and daughters  :angelgirl:

Give it a few years I'm sure her daughters will be getting  involved once their  TV work dries up . :sarcastic:

Em looks quite fit in this pic .


 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline SirCharles

Give it a few years I'm sure her daughters will be getting  involved once their  TV work dries up . :sarcastic:

Em looks quite fit in this pic .


 

Hidden Image/Members Only
She is full of botox but if someone is aware of her still taking cocks, then to provide her with my meat

Offline TDH82007



Hidden Image/Members Only

Is that Em? As she was the host when I went.

Yes sorry, I should've been clearer - there were technically two changes to the rota as there were only 4 girls and not the 5 advertised. Ivana was definitely not happy though! Not the first time a rota swap at the last minute has happened in my TPC experience. I just haven't gotten around to reviewing those visits that's all. This time the rota was still good but one previous visit in particular, the rota was not a favourable swap and the girls weren't great at all. Should've reviewed that visit actually, sorry.
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jeezyuk


Offline SirCharles

I must be crazy - but I'd still put some cock on Em... :crazy: lol . Don't judge!
I am sure she is lesbian only now, but it would be nice to see her gangbanged anyway: VT can you pls ask her to arrange an event of banging th girls andv10 of us gangbanging her?

An tUasal Liathroid Mor

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I must be crazy - but I'd still put some cock on Em... :crazy: lol . Don't judge!

Done her several times....many years back.....excellent service.....good looking woman in her day....as regards the Parties I really do hope she becomes more actively involved in the running of them.....as then the 'variability' of quality should diminish....

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
VT can you pls ask her to arrange an event of banging th girls andv10 of us gangbanging her?

I would suggest you ask her yourself Sir Charles...if undergoing penis reattachment surgery doesn't faze you!   :sarcastic:

Offline SirCharles

I would suggest you ask her yourself Sir Charles...if undergoing penis reattachment surgery doesn't faze you!   :sarcastic:
8inches attached since ever: i can figure out Em fisting you and the girls behind the door and if invited, you could also have a flavor of my snake...must try it  :lol:

Offline SirCharles

8inches attached since ever: i can figure out Em fisting you and the girls behind the door and if invited, you could also have a flavor of my snake...must try it  :lol:
Intersting to hear the pricing for that: Em..toc toc..how much? I am just curious for such a show

YidArmy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
8inches attached since ever: i can figure out Em fisting you and the girls behind the door and if invited, you could also have a flavor of my snake...must try it  :lol:

Can someone tell her to get her 2 daughters on the game and then i'll turn up to this place. :D

Surely someone on here has done the daughters, I can't believe they don't do some escorting. It's not like their mother can say actually I don't think you should do that!

Offline hawai5o


Offline hawai5o

EM should really start again the Milfs parties on a MONDAY so we can do our part in care in the community . :dancegirl:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Can someone tell her to get her 2 daughters on the game and then i'll turn up to this place. :D

Surely someone on here has done the daughters, I can't believe they don't do some escorting. It's not like their mother can say actually I don't think you should do that!

Now that would be great . To shag Preeti/Priya along with there mum Em . Will be a big crowd puller!!!

Offline SirCharles

Now that would be great . To shag Preeti/Priya along with there mum Em . Will be a big crowd puller!!!
Em, if you read this, you should seriously consider this option!

Offline hawai5o

I would love to shag Preeti Patel and being cheered on by Amber Rudd and Justine Greening .

YidArmy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Em, if you read this, you should seriously consider this option!

Haha, imagine the queue outside if the daughters were willing to party. There would be a fucking roadblock.  :D


TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Haha, imagine the queue outside if the daughters were willing to party. There would be a fucking roadblock.  :D

They are on their way TAXI !!!!

Hidden Image/Members Only

Here's a small video of the Em and her hot daughters on c5 early this year ..
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 01:26:26 am by TrevorN »

Offline jeezyuk

I'd pay good money to watch Em, Preeti and Priya fuck each other ...

Wish we could get all 3 in a room and gangbang them .. fuck the TPC 2:1 ratio at that point .. I'd just want to see cum all over them and participate in pure hedonistic carnage ! :wackogirl:

Offline Rocket Scientist

Beginning to feel uncomfortable with this thread

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Beginning to feel uncomfortable with this thread

Hmm yes, have the schools broken up for Summer Holidays this week or something??  :unknown:


Offline Chorley

I was considering trying one of these parties, but on reading this review and the other one by Markpartylover, I think I'll give it a miss until they get their shit together.

Overbooking punters so that the ratios are skewed is not great as a one off is bad enough, but when it becomes a regular occurrence, then it's taking the piss and is disrespectful towards punters. :thumbsdown:

Surely it can't be that hard for an experienced organiser like Em to sort it out  :unknown:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I was considering trying one of these parties, but on reading this review and the other one by Markpartylover, I think I'll give it a miss until they get their shit together.

Overbooking punters so that the ratios are skewed is not great as a one off is bad enough, but when it becomes a regular occurrence, then it's taking the piss and is disrespectful towards punters. :thumbsdown:

Surely it can't be that hard for an experienced organiser like Em to sort it out  :unknown:

No its not hard if she wants to sort it out she can easily, its whether she does actually want to sort it out, and time will tell on that.

There is NO excuse to exceed the max 2.1 ratio ever, and there is NO excuse not to inform punters of any line-up changes on Twitter and inform any that ring in from about 11am onwards when she will know who is being replaced with who. None of this is difficult stuff, its also her job if she is running it to sort out obviously. Whats needed in my view is transparency from now on and I have no idea why this hasn't been the case at TPC all along.

The 1 thing TPC wont know until all punters for any party turn up is how many that booked have actually turned up. If 10 booked but only 8 turned up for example there would be 5 WGs their or should be, but they may cut 1 so only 4 are partying at that party and still keep to the max ratio. I found this a very rare occurrence at LMP when I went as they would keep the number of WGs advertised usually if a party was punters short, and on occasion a punter might arrive late anyway. This not knowing until they turn up is the same at all party providers.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 08:56:44 am by smiths »

Offline Kingy28

Is that Em? As she was the host when I went.

Yes sorry, I should've been clearer - there were technically two changes to the rota as there were only 4 girls and not the 5 advertised. Ivana was definitely not happy though! Not the first time a rota swap at the last minute has happened in my TPC experience. I just haven't gotten around to reviewing those visits that's all. This time the rota was still good but one previous visit in particular, the rota was not a favourable swap and the girls weren't great at all. Should've reviewed that visit actually, sorry.

So Em was hosting this party. 4 girls and 9 punters counted by Ivana.  Could possibly have been 10, 11 or even 12 there as the doorbell was still going. So much for the optimism of how the setup will improve now she's back in charge