Should guys inform WG of this site?

[scutty brown]

The more prossies who know about this site the better: it forces them to up their game.
However any punter with a brain should do his best to avoid any linkage: too much risk of fallout over bad reviews. Remember  that bitch in Bolton threatening to send her husband and his mates after me?

[Punter115]

The way I see it is all us guys on UK Punting should be using it for the sake of us all therefore it ain’t any prossies business what we get up too ( sure they can read the reports & it is up to them in the main to work for good/ honest reports)...if we strive to keep it like that ..honest we all win .
I know we all fight with each other in the non punting section ...me more than most ...but funnily enough I like that section and like having a banter with other guys on mostly political matters and I am aware none of us are ever going to change our views.
In a way you get to know some of the other punters  and it seems to bring us closer together ,that is also why I wouldn’t be coerced into making a false report.

[Marmalade]

The minute she knows you even know about UKP she will be trying to twist it to her advantage and then —- poof —- goes any UKP anonymity. Maybe you were gonna give her a good review anyway. But what about her mate? ...

yep... in my own experience “her mate” usually turns out to be right fucking bitch. 

There are ex-pats in Thailand who think they are on equal terms with Thai people. Until the day cones when there’s a dispute. Then they discover to their horror, even among their so-called ‘friends’ that Thais always stick together.

The same with prossies only more so. And they will feel right fucking righteous about it. The key is to make the most of the formal relationship. Both parties protect themselves by remaining completely anonymous, playing a part. If you do that, you can “be nice”, “relax” and even tell her what a pretty bum she has (as it wobbles under the low lighting).

Some punters have a ‘back story’ if she gets probing. A very common name, a shit ordinary job, respectable but not posh clothes, and no details or stories that are used anywhere else, even on here.

Personally I just steer the conversation away from me. If she wants to talk, let her talk about herself or what I like when I’m paying for her services. That’s enough to fill the odd moments of polite chat.

[shagmore]

Good point made by Marmalade,
I think a majority of the long term Wgs know about the site, probably Sergie and a few of his friends, but most of the Roms and other EEs probably don't.
Its up to them to find out, where you told about the site, or did you stumble across it?

[Rain_man]

Any half-smart WG should know about this site and others like it within her first few weeks/months of working, a simple google search will suffice.

Should a punter tell WGs about review does like UKP, ISG and SMB? Absolutely not, it does nothing for the punter other than making him look like a mug trying to curry some favour.

[sparkus]

I'm interested in the motivations of punters who do though?

Currying favour or perhaps thinking you're "not like the rest" ?

[FlyingBreadMan]

Hi all

Quick question. Is it worth pointing out to WG about this site?
I've often wondered if they are aware such a site for punters exist and that a neg review on here could easily tarnish there reputation.

Thoughts?

Fuck that!

That's how touts and knights get made.

Very few girls mention ukp to me. 

The last one that did, she asked me if i am a user and I told her I am Admin...never asked again.

[Rain_man]

I'm interested in the motivations of punters who do though?

Currying favour or perhaps thinking you're "not like the rest" ?

Both are fluffy Logic.

I’d say the latter is worse, especially in a situation where said punter shows the WG reviews about her from UKP and similar sites.

[Rain_man]

The last one that did, she asked me if i am a user and I told her I am Admin...never asked again.

We should all do this Negan style.

“I’m UKP Admin” 

[Health and Fitness]

Only a fluffy or white knight would do something like that. It's funny how in their deluded minds that they think they might get a free booking from an escort when in reality they just make themselves look like fools and still get charged the same rate as everyone else.

You can't trust people that behave like this, I know I wouldn't.

[cueball]

Only a fluffy or white knight would do something like that. It's funny how in their deluded minds that they think they might get a free booking from an escort when in reality they just make themselves look like fools and still get charged the same rate as everyone else.

You can't trust people that behave like this, I know I wouldn't.

It's the "do you realise who I am" syndrome 

Laughingly embaressing  that eventually bites them in the arse.... their look at me reviews give it away easily

[sparkus]

As I've said before, it depends on who you're referring to.

A WG has her own online identity with feedback, in the same way that WGs also share gen on abusive/weird clients via the likes of UglyMugs.  They also move around premises and rarely work from 'home', so the authorities/neighbours are less of a concern.  So they're less likely to care or want to try to attach reviews to punters, be they regular.

Women who wank in TCMs or at home and the like don't take such a relaxed view of being discussed on here.  Telling them of their existence on here or trying to 'negotiate' using gen on here is not only futile but is proven to see their extras provided curbed to new customers.  It's utterly pointless and self-defeating, but if you think it gives you some kind of 'edge' or function to tell them then it can't be stopped but you're just a tool.

[sparkus]

One motivation could be that, as punting is a solitary hobby (few of us discuss it with friends/family), UKP provides not only the 'Tit Advisor' function with reviews but an additional outlet/psychological crutch in the forums.  Once that's secured, the 'next step' could be to discuss UKP with WGs themselves.  Other than deluded white knights, that could be the only reason I'd think of that anyone could see 'benefit' in discussing the site.

[vw]

It's the "do you realise who I am" syndrome 

Laughingly embaressing  that eventually bites them in the arse.... their look at me reviews give it away easily

You mean those punters that don't book escorts they apply to review.   

[Stud01]

A catch 22 i reckon.

I feel the more positive results they get and they see, then the WGs tend to increase their prices and become more difficult to get a hold off. Too much praise is not good.

On the other hand, WG should be giving both good and bad feedback where appropriate. The only issue with negative feedback is that the they would know who the punter is.

I think it is best not to introduce the forum to a WG.

[Health and Fitness]

We should all do this Negan style.

“I’m UKP Admin” 

I like the walking dead reference there, pretty much like a cult that Negan runs.

"We are all Admin"