Alice in Wonderland (Stevenage)

[bassman135]

I saw Chorley's negative review on monday morning. I clicked the link to Alice's profile , largely to enjoy reminiscences of a couple of excellent  meets with her, and found she had availability today, at a time I could make. Rare occurrence, as she is usually booked up days in advance. Texted and got a reply a few minutes later and set up a lunchtime meet.

Arrived, parked in Tesco's carpark, texted, got flat number and in I went.

Greeted with a kiss by Alice looking great in lingerie and tasteful makeup. I find her Very attractive. Great cheekbones and everything else.

I've reviewed Alice before and have little more to add.  Exceptional, total immersion GFE. I did my best to devour her and she did her best to devour me. A delicious intense experience with every impression that she was enjoying the sex as much as I was. Lovely cuddling and conversation in the afterglow.

I noticed on UKE today that she is considering breast implants. I sincerely hope she doesn't. Just great the way she is.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Hertsgent]

This should really just be appended to your original review Bassman, else it looks a tad suspect....

[bassman135]

You may well be right.

But i did have a spectacular time and wanted to say so somewhere!

[Airforceone]

Hertsgent
I think your right and if you look at a post recently she was left a bad review. So she's prob asked Bassman to help her out

[nervous colin]

He has done a repeat review for another working girl, I dont think there is anything suspicious

[Jas1975]

He has done a repeat review for another working girl, I dont think there is anything suspicious

I might be wrong but I thought the overall view was that second and third reviews were welcome as the current "service" is helpful and it is also helpful to see consistently good service from SPs? 

[The_Don]

Please note the following requests (when posting a review).

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Do not post the same review in multiple regions. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel. Past or current sex workers or anyone related to a sex worker (e.g. boyfriend) may not review any other sex worker. Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

- Include a profile or website link. If no link is available, please include contact details (e.g. phone number).
- Include town / city in the subject.
- Reviews cannot be deleted once posted.

External Link/Members Only, the below linked A/W and UKE, ID's are for the W/G in question 

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+


Old profile for linking reviews:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Badvicar]

Probably not best to start review with "saw negative ". Agree with Hertsgent, just add to last review to confirm consistency of services. Cheers though.

[The_Don]

I might be wrong but I thought the overall view was that second and third reviews were welcome as the current "service" is helpful and it is also helpful to see consistently good service from SPs?

Even though this has been discussed many times and there are different view points.



IMO and currently the below is my thoughts:

As for the review, side. I sometimes, just update my existing review. The exception to this, is if a rating were to change.

If, I've had positive punts with a W/G and reviewed. But for what-ever reason, it wasn't positive, punt. I normally just do a new review, stating why (I've done this a number of times).

I've reviewed some W/G that, I've punted in the double figures. Never felt the need to update the review and I don't review all the W/G, I punt.

[bassman135]

Oops, I'm confused. I just wanted to leave a positive rview

[smiths]

What admin once posted about doing reviews was its up to the punter how many he does on the same WG and others will judge, but don't take the piss. I took that to mean don't continually review the same WG. In the OPs case it was 6 months since his last review on the WG, I don't see any problem with that as long as its a genuine review obviously. I have done the same myself a couple of times, and some have done loads of positive reviews on the same WG.

What it could look like is he is balancing her recent negative with his positive, but I am not saying that is his motivation. The same thing happened when this WG got a previous negative review, another punter tried to do a positive review, admin didn't agree it was a review and moved it to the regional punting board.

To me this WG is a low life because she is a triple nicker which is against the rules as she would of known, admin caught her out and banned her.

[Brompton]

Bit confused! Could someone confirm please as few reviews state enhanced breasts but her profile states natural?

[Big Bad R]

Bit confused! Could someone confirm please as few reviews state enhanced breasts but her profile states natural?

Seen several times and confirm they are natural (and very nice too!) think she is considering having them enhanced hence the comment to which you refer. 

[Brompton]

Seen several times and confirm they are natural (and very nice too!) think she is considering having them enhanced hence the comment to which you refer. 

Thanks for the inf