Su Nin Ya Rugby (Farin)

[goodolnick]

External Link/Members Only

Nice Salon with special offer on before 2 pm: £30 per hour for massage.

On street parking £2 per hour. Very industrious looking traffic wardens patrol the streets.

Introduced to Farin who is average Thai height and build probably about 50, quite pretty and very friendly.

Very good massage which got rid of all of my knots and bumps & has left me feeling exhausted!

Quite sexy with the odd swipe and in the end she gave a nice and vigorous HE.

She finished off with a good head massage and overall I enjoyed the experience. My mind wasn't blown but it was overall a good time.

Paid £60 for 2 hours and gave Farin a £40 tip. She didn't ask for anything from me which was nice touch.

Would return if in the area and feeling the urge!

[redliner69]

I've looked at this place. I have to go to Rugby every couple of months or so. I think I'll pop in next time.

Looking at their website I see a gallery.

Would be nice to put names and services to these four.

Knowing my luck, I'd get number 3.   

External Link/Members Only

PS. Can you remember which one was Farin?
PPS Do they wear them uniforms?
PPPS Can you touch?

[robx66]

Anyone knows if they offer owo and maybe cim??

Thanks

[Stapler]

Anyone knows if they offer owo and maybe cim??

Thanks

Whenever a member puts in a review about FBSM why does someone always ask the above question!? 

Plenty of other WG's do. Why not see one of them? 

[redliner69]

Whenever a member puts in a review about FBSM why does someone always ask the above question!? 

Plenty of other WG's do. Why not see one of them?

I'm only guessing, but I think they ask the question in the hope to find an answer. 

Truth is,I'd also like to know the answer, although I didn't actually ask myself.

I'm sure I've read of some "massage" salons where some girls do more than FBSM.
Nothing wrong with asking if this is one that does, is there?

[mr.bluesky]

These Thai or Chinese massage parlours usually only offer Happy ending body to body or topless at most in my experience.

[Benson50]

These Thai or Chinese massage parlours usually only offer Happy ending body to body or topless at most in my experience.

At Chinese massage parlours with a frequent turnover of girls, nearly all of the girls I have seen have been happy to receive reverse oral and/or rimming for extra money - £60, £50, sometimes even  £40 (this is including HR but excluding the cost of the massage ). OW is often available.

A wide range of "girls" pass through these places, some seem like fs girls but I haven't asked for fs so I can't verify.
Many of them are past their best and realise they will have to offer more services if they want to earn the extra money.  However they will not divulge this until you turn down b2b for  £40  (the easy and preferred option).

You have to ask for what you want, they seem reluctant to offer services - probably because they will be breaking house rules.

[Dellboy]

These Thai or Chinese massage parlours usually only offer Happy ending body to body or topless at most in my experience.

Not in my experience!

Money always talks.

Some of the best sex I have had are at so-called FBSM shops   

[Stapler]

At Chinese massage parlours with a frequent turnover of girls, nearly all of the girls I have seen have been happy to receive reverse oral and/or rimming for extra money - £60, £50, sometimes even  £40 (this is including HR but excluding the cost of the massage ). OW is often available.

Really? So where are your reviews on these places?

[Flunt]

Whenever a member puts in a review about FBSM why does someone always ask the above question!? 

Plenty of other WG's do. Why not see one of them?

Some of us like the best of both worlds.

I have been known to visit Thais purely for the massage (among others) and I'm loathe to pay for a wank, if there is something else available then it opens up the possibilities.

If you don't ask then you don't know 

[Benson50]

Really? So where are your reviews on these places?

Wow, here talks Mr Reviews.

2806 / 5 = 561

That's 1 review for every 561 posts.

So, to match the "master" I'm not due a review for around 440 posts.

As my preference is for Chinese parlours with frequent turnover of girls, there would be very little value in doing a review of a girl who will be gone by the end of the week.

The places themselves are the regular places well known on the forum - it's common knowledge how they operate.


 

[Dekka]

I can't be the only member on here who considers "Stapler" the archetypal troll.

[Benson50]

I can't be the only member on here who considers "Stapler" the archetypal troll.

+1

I imagine if this wasn't a backwater thread about Rugby there would be a hundred +1s on here by the end of the day.

[Benson50]

Really? So where are your reviews on these places?

Just to further clarify "Mr Reviews" incredible hypocrisy:

After being a member since June 2013 he did zero reviews until 26/07/16 - 3 full years.
He then did 5 reviews in a 10 week period and has done none since.

So, he did a few reviews to make himself safe from the "where are your reviews?" attack, and then he has the gall to berate other members for their lack of reviews.

[redliner69]

I can't be the only member on here who considers "Stapler" the archetypal troll.

+2

[Flunt]

To those who wish to dismiss and insult senior members, I offer some advice. They have years of valuable knowledge and experience which you may want them to share, don't bite the hand that feeds you! Secondly, they have your best punting interests at heart which is the underlying principle of this site.

If any of you can start a thread which has over 500k views and thousands of comments on a regional board then you will have achieved something greater than a handful of reviews.

That's my white knighting done for the year

As for the review: £30 seems a worthwhile investment but I'll look for a happier ending elsewhere.

[Benson50]

To those who wish to dismiss and insult senior members, I offer some advice. They have years of valuable knowledge and experience which you may want them to share, don't bite the hand that feeds you! Secondly, they have your best punting interests at heart which is the underlying principle of this site.

If any of you can start a thread which has over 500k views and thousands of comments on a regional board then you will have achieved something greater than a handful of reviews.

That's my white knighting done for the year

As for the review: £30 seems a worthwhile investment but I'll look for a happier ending elsewhere.

Have you actually looked at Stapler's posts over the last few months?

The vast majority are berating and rebuking other members, invariably new members. This stifles the free flow of information.

Do you really think he has the best interests of the site at heart? Is that what got him banned twice?

He is obviously a pest and a troll but his bullying tactics have generally prevented people from calling him out.
Not this time though. He has been hoist with his own petard.

[Stapler]

Since Dodo was banned Benson has upped his post count and continued in the same vein as Dodo. They couldn't be the same person could they? Surely not?

Just saying!

[Flunt]

Have you actually looked at Stapler's posts over the last few months?

The vast majority are berating and rebuking other members, invariably new members. This stifles the free flow of information.

Do you really think he has the best interests of the site at heart? Is that what got him banned twice?

He is obviously a pest and a troll but his bullying tactics have generally prevented people from calling him out.
Not this time though. He has been hoist with his own petard.

Stapler and I have different pursuits so I tend not to read much of what he posts. He has made two valid points on this thread, although I asked a similar question on another FBSM review which prompted my reply.

You're not shy in questioning newbies or promoting Stapler for a New Year's honour. I've done my bit as a WK, if you don't like what he posts block him but I suspect more of what he posts is beneficial to you than not?

[Benson50]

Since Dodo was banned Benson has upped his post count and continued in the same vein as Dodo. They couldn't be the same person could they? Surely not?

Just saying!

That's a feeble attempt to deflect the thread.

It's not even true that I have upped my post count.

No one took on Dodo more than me.

Surely you haven't forgotten that there are 2 posts during your mutual bans where  I mock Stapler and Dodo as a bickering married couple. Here's one of them:

I just heard that Dodo and Stapler had a nice morning at the beach on Friday. Dodo was fuming cos he had to carry both the folding chairs and the mini picnic cos Stapler likes to use his Scandinavian walking poles - even if he's just going to the shops. Then Dodo wanted to go right down by the dunes where it's private so he could get some sun on his todger, but Stapler insisted that they stay right by the car park cos it's convenient for the toilets, what with his weak bladder, and for the penny arcades. Dodo went off to investigate the rock pools and by the time he came back Stapler was bursting for a piss, so he was furious and wouldn't speak to Dodo for the next few hours. But Dodo had made such a nice picnic that Stapler relented and by the time it clouded over they were on good terms and went back to the caravan to complete the 500 piece jigsaw of Christmas at the Cotswolds.

[Benson50]

Stapler and I have different pursuits so I tend not to read much of what he posts. He has made two valid points on this thread, although I asked a similar question on another FBSM review which prompted my reply.

You're not shy in questioning newbies or promoting Stapler for a New Year's honour. I've done my bit as a WK, if you don't like what he posts block him but I suspect more of what he posts is beneficial to you than not?

I only question newbies when they make serious allegations or seem to be faking their experiences, whereas Stapler does it for sport.

I was being kind to Stapler to help him back into the fold after his layoff but I was obviously being naive in thinking he would change his ways.

I don't think Stapler's posts have much merit because he only appears to enjoy being wanked while on all fours - a niche interest.

[Flunt]

I don't think Stapler's posts have much merit because he only appears to enjoy being wanked while on all fours - a niche interest.

I bow to your superior knowledge...

[redliner69]

Regardless of how many "valid" posts he has made on this thread (Apparently two  ),  his first comment is the one that drew the general feeling that sometimes
some of his comments are more sarcastic or derogatory than helpful.

The question asked by Robx66 was a totally valid and legitimate question regarding this parlour. 

To be "shot down" by Stapler was unhelpful, unnecessary and uncalled for IMHO.

And, as has been mentioned before, it's not the first time it has happened.


PS Nothing wrong with the all fours position. 

[Dekka]

To those who wish to dismiss and insult senior members, I offer some advice. They have years of valuable knowledge and experience which you may want them to share, don't bite the hand that feeds you! Secondly, they have your best punting interests at heart which is the underlying principle of this site.

If any of you can start a thread which has over 500k views and thousands of comments on a regional board then you will have achieved something greater than a handful of reviews.

That's my white knighting done for the year

As for the review: £30 seems a worthwhile investment but I'll look for a happier ending elsewhere.

This is exactly the problem with this "senior member" the legend fair outweighs the reality. I can count on one hand the amount of times I've read one of his post's and thought; yes that's genuinely helpful. Most of his posts are recycled bit's and pieces (the casino tale, regaled three times to my knowledge) and information you'd glean from spending too long looking at adverts.
I can understand how a newbie could be taken in by him,but not somebody who Know's the score.

[Dekka]

Regardless of how many "valid" posts he has made on this thread (Apparently two  ),  his first comment is the one that drew the general feeling that sometimes
some of his comments are more sarcastic or derogatory than helpful.

The question asked by Robx66 was a totally valid and legitimate question regarding this parlour. 

To be "shot down" by Stapler was unhelpful, unnecessary and uncalled for IMHO.

And, as has been mentioned before, it's not the first time it has happened.


PS Nothing wrong with the all fours position. 

This is way I felt the need to stick my head above the parapet, for the amount of threads that are disrupted by his trollage, where he has no interest or expertise.