ALICEINXWONDERLAND, Stevenage.

[vw]

Far from it - the messaging that led to the review change was daft-I completely agree with that

It's been a long felt belief of mine that comments shouldn't be allowed in the reviews section and the constant fighting we see on this, and many other review threads just reinforces this

Anyway-no point arguing as we all have our opinions about how we like to punt.

Another East Midlands cry baby trying to put the site back in the hands of touts and prossies that you and your type worship.

Just yesterday another example of comments proving a review fake. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=131106.0;topicseen

This would have slipped through  as with many others, this review punters would not have been abel to ask Prada to compare 2 girls, useful stuff.#

Your opinion stinks of someone that is a former banned white.  Sure admin will check you out anyway.

[nervous colin]

So how did you base booking and punting with Alice on Spartas review where you say "yours included" seeing as it was after yours on her?

I will hold my hands up and admit I made a mistake, I thought I had seen that review before. End of.

if I can ask sparta, you say you changed details so you could remain some anonymity. But surely when you punt you use a punting phone and a fake name and aw profile? So therefore you are already anonymous?
And then when you post on here, assuming at worse you use the same details, you are still anonymous, so why does changing details of the punt help?
oh and one valuable lesson I have learnt. If in doubt, just call everyone a white knight

[smiths]

I will hold my hands up and admit I made a mistake, I thought I had seen that review before. End of.

if I can ask sparta, you say you changed details so you could remain some anonymity. But surely when you punt you use a punting phone and a fake name and aw profile? So therefore you are already anonymous?
And then when you post on here, assuming at worse you use the same details, you are still anonymous, so why does changing details of the punt help?
oh and one valuable lesson I have learnt. If in doubt, just call everyone a white knight

You either have a bad memory Colin or are one dodge merchant, time will tell which one it is.

[Sparta Prada]

I see Ziltoid has fallen on his sword.

3000+ posts on UKE.

50 posts on UKP.

He won't be missed at all.

[James999]

Approaching 2000 views on this thread, and turning it from a positive to a negative, she must have got to the Ratner school of marketing 

[Sparta Prada]

Hertsgent let's look at your first reply:

Notwithstanding the snowballing of the response in this thread, I agree with this comment - I mean for fucks sake....if you didn't get your cock wet, why say you did???

I'll just modify a few of my reviews to say how I managed it 9 times in an hour with my 12 inch cock 

Now let's look at your last reply:

Sparta - It is precisely because it is a punters forum that I regard it as of primary importance that what actually happened is reasonably accurate. In this case there is a significant difference , that is at best misleading. To repeat - for me (and others will be different) - my priority take from reviews as a punter is what sexual activity happened and is it a safe/decent location. Then does the WG fit the AW profile sufficiently (looks, age, size etc).

I didn't comment on your entire review or exchange , because I had nothing much to say on it. Neither did people who picked up on other things (other things you like/agree on), so unless it is a forum rule that we have to do a complete critique on your posts? For what it's worth , my original"snowballing" comment (not the sexual version!) was a reference to a "how did we get here" on both sides.

Finally you state in my review that I said she is 5 years older - I didn't....I said she can't be younger, she could easily be the stated age, and I'd be surprised if she were any more that 5 years older. I can't copy my quote on this phone, but feel free too. My opinion of course, I could easily be wrong on age, like everyone can.

I think it is strange that the WG in this case would pick a fight with a positive review......strange, that is all really (hence the lack of previous comment). I find it bizarre that a reviewer makes up sexual activities that never happened, and then just waves it away as a triviality when challenged.

Happy punting

Because of the tone of your first post focused solely on what I did wrong but not a dicky bird about what Alice did wrong that's why you got labelled a WK (and once again not by me, but by other contributors too). If you had posted the latter post initially then I would have read it with the respect it deserves, because it is much more measured post. If you look at my replies to BV & socks to name a couple, I am not immune from accepting criticism when they have shown they have also taken into consideration what Alice has done. As you finally state yourself, if Alice didn't rage against my original review then we would not have had 5 pages of her first negative staying at the top of the region's page!

Hertsgent I think we have previously had a mutual respect for each other's reviews and posts in the East England forum. We are possibly the 2 biggest contributors to this region's reviews (apologies if I have missed anyone off). And because of my previous respect for your posts plus your one sided initial reply, that led to me to reply the way I did. Neither of us will apologise for what has happened but I am explaining why I was surprised by your first post on here.

[Punchdrunk]

I see Ziltoid has fallen on his sword.

3000+ posts on UKE.

50 posts on UKP.

He won't be missed at all.

Have you seen his stuff on UKEscorting to Alice?  proper white knight stuff and vomit inducing.

[Spruce]

Just seen this thread, and can't say I'm surprised, and have to agree with Sparta's comments. She has a track record of overreacting to any negative comments aimed towards her, regardless of how minor they are.
On another thread a few weeks ago I questioned her age, as its listed on her AW profile as 36 which is clearly bollox, she then replied with a total load of lies making herself look foolish, and then sent me a really snotty PM, all of which caused her to be banned from this site for the second time!!! This just about sums her up! She clearly offers and provides a top notch service, and is only shooting herself in the foot if she persists with her OTT reactions towards her clients when anything is queried.

I'm sure she will read this, so stick to what your good at girl, because when it comes to diplomacy you are clearly lacking in that department.

[Brazilian Martian]

Had better scuttle off on my horse then and leave you all to spit your bile at one another then

This forum has really gone to shit - totally attributed to members like you that just love to be the nasty keyboard warrior

I'd rather be called a white knight than come across as an angry little nobody

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Sparta Prada]

Just seen this thread, and can't say I'm surprised, and have to agree with Sparta's comments. She has a track record of overreacting to any negative comments aimed towards her, regardless of how minor they are.
On another thread a few weeks ago I questioned her age, as its listed on her AW profile as 36 which is clearly bollox, she then replied with a total load of lies making herself look foolish, and then sent me a really snotty PM, all of which caused her to be banned from this site for the second time!!! This just about sums her up! She clearly offers and provides a top notch service, and is only shooting herself in the foot if she persists with her OTT reactions towards her clients when anything is queried.

I'm sure she will read this, so stick to what your good at girl, because when it comes to diplomacy you are clearly lacking in that department.

Well said.

I turned on my punting phone and there's a SMS from the lovely Alice. As Spruce says she is following this thread from her HQ so i will send my reply here:

Hi Alice. About this AW message you say you didn't receive, it's because you didn't open it. If you check, there's a timestamp next to it showing when it was sent to you. I believe Ziltoid or Pale Rider have a spare pair of super strength glasses which they can lend you next time they see you, TTFN!

External Link/Members Only

[Sparta Prada]

Have you seen his stuff on UKEscorting to Alice?  proper white knight stuff and vomit inducing.

I log onto UKE just to look at photos. When I have been unfortunate enough to catch a thread it make me wonder who is the service provider and who is the buyer? Most of the guys seem to forget who is paying for the services the way they post utter shite on there. Vomit inducing is absolutely right.

[smiths]

Just seen this thread, and can't say I'm surprised, and have to agree with Sparta's comments. She has a track record of overreacting to any negative comments aimed towards her, regardless of how minor they are.
On another thread a few weeks ago I questioned her age, as its listed on her AW profile as 36 which is clearly bollox, she then replied with a total load of lies making herself look foolish, and then sent me a really snotty PM, all of which caused her to be banned from this site for the second time!!! This just about sums her up! She clearly offers and provides a top notch service, and is only shooting herself in the foot if she persists with her OTT reactions towards her clients when anything is queried.

I'm sure she will read this, so stick to what your good at girl, because when it comes to diplomacy you are clearly lacking in that department.

Yes its important to note in my view from an honesty point of view that Alice was banned on here as Alice for having been previously banned and had a third account, so was a lying triple nicker. So its proven she isn't averse to lying if it suits her.

[James999]

I questioned her age, as its listed on her AW profile as 36 which is clearly bollox, she then replied with a total load of lies making herself look foolish, and then sent me a really snotty PM, all of which caused her to be banned from this site for the second time!!!

Of course she's sensitive about her age, she's clearly knocking on 50 and lies putting a lower age and doesn't like it discussed 

[smiths]

Well said.

I turned on my punting phone and there's a SMS from the lovely Alice. As Spruce says she is following this thread from her HQ so i will send my reply here:

Hi Alice. About this AW message you say you didn't receive, it's because you didn't open it. If you check, there's a timestamp next to it showing when it was sent to you. I believe Ziltoid or Pale Rider have a spare pair of super strength glasses which they can lend you next time they see you, TTFN!

External Link/Members Only

The writing is small and my eyes are bad but it appears to me that Alice thanks you for posting a UKP review, so assuming that's the case how can she say on UKE that it was "totally made up" as she did. She acknowledges in that email that there WAS a punt that occurred between you, or am I missing something?

[glowworm]

Dare I put a review in for AIW. 

A lot of what takes place in a punt is subjective, ones persons greatest punt can be another's complete turnoff. You can never really tell what kind of punt your going to get until you walk in through the door and if it clicks brilliant. Maybe we should start doing video reviews so everybody gets the facts!!!

As a lot of the Wg,s advertise age is just a number.

[Sparta Prada]

The writing is small and my eyes are bad but it appears to me that Alice thanks you for posting a UKP review, so assuming that's the case how can she say on UKE that it was "totally made up" as she did. She acknowledges in that email that there WAS a punt that occurred between you, or am I missing something?

Her SMS refers to the top message from me timed at 21:26:29 starting 'Well I didn't expect that reaction from you'. In her SMS to me Alice says I 'made up' this AW message, but clearly it has been sent but she has not opened it, and it remains unopened still.

I see that Alice is still using peroxide blonde photos on AW and UKE, so I'm not quite sure she's in a position to shout about 'totally making things up' is she?

[SamLP]

Another East Midlands cry baby trying to put the site back in the hands of touts and prossies that you and your type worship.

Just yesterday another example of comments proving a review fake. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=131106.0;topicseen

This would have slipped through  as with many others, this review punters would not have been abel to ask Prada to compare 2 girls, useful stuff.#

Your opinion stinks of someone that is a former banned white.  Sure admin will check you out anyway.

I've said it before. There seems to be more of these white knights who are growing a pair, criticising punters and UKP, intentionally getting themselves banned, safe in the knowledge they're still on UKE, and then they'll wear their banning as some some of honour. IMO, they should be banned off both sites for their actions to teach them a lesson that there are consequences for their stupid actions. Admins call though, but it's a growing habit. The really dumb part is some of these wg's love the digs banded towards UKP, forgetting that this site is the review site, and it's this site that ultimately gets them exposure and potential customers. If they want to alienate the majority in favour of a few white knights who they think have their back because they blow hot air up their arses then they'll soon have dusty phones. Let their white knights bankroll their business then.

[vw]

I've said it before. There seems to be more of these white knights who are growing a pair, criticising punters and UKP, intentionally getting themselves banned, safe in the knowledge they're still on UKE, and then they'll wear their banning as some some of honour. IMO, they should be banned off both sites for their actions to teach them a lesson that there are consequences for their stupid actions. Admins call though, but it's a growing habit. The really dumb part is some of these wg's love the digs banded towards UKP, forgetting that this site is the review site, and it's this site that ultimately gets them exposure and potential customers. If they want to alienate the majority in favour of a few white knights who they think have their back because they blow hot air up their arses then they'll soon have dusty phones. Let their white knights bankroll their business then.

100% agree with you but as always admins call.

A while back they used to get a few weeks pre-mod on UKE when banned form UKP but seems admin has stopped this.

Anyway as long as they are kept out of here that's fine by me. 

[dubhcarr]

Interesting read reminds me a bit about the Michelle independent review and spats.....

For me and concerning my hard earned an accurate review is helpful but I am happy with the minimalist approach by TD etc..with caveats

Sorry for the follow ons girls must learn that this is a punters forum but sounds like the actual punt was OK?

Lots of sweets in this sweetshop

[Sparta Prada]

Sorry for the follow ons girls must learn that this is a punters forum but sounds like the actual punt was OK?

Punt itself was fine, as you can see from what I initially wrote. For whatever reason Alice took umbrage at what I wrote and nobody - including those wishing to defend her - still can't see why she threw her toys out of the pram with the original review.