SamiTVLondon in Lewisham: £20 for 30 mins

[Hydrant]

Warning: this is a review of a meeting with a transvestite escort. If that's not for you, kindly leave quietly...

External Link/Members Only

I get email alerts when new Adultwork providers pop up near me and this one from a couple of weeks ago looked too good to be true. As we all learn to our cost, things that look that way usually turn out to be emphatically UN-true. Not in this case though. Sami is, to me, a reasonably convincing and attractiive TV who provides a friendly and willng OWO and 69 service and charges just £20 for a 30-minute incall in Lewisham (anal is not on offer, either way).

Her apartment is in a large sub-divided house in a good quality neighbourhood. It was untidy (for a specific reason I won't specify) but clean nevertheless. I arrived on public transport and didn't check out the parking but I don't think it would have been a problem and there's no reason for neighbours to be suspicious of discreet callers. The action took place standing up in the living room then lying down on a large sofa.

Sami has a slim and well-proportioned figure with fake breast implants, of course. She was dressed the same way as in the full length pic in her AW public gallery that I've posted below. She is a native English speaker but I won't specify which former colony she's from in the interests of her privacy. (Her domestic arrangements seem to me to be courting disaster — for her, not the punter — but that's her choice.)

She is bright and friendly and seemed fully at ease with the slightly odd situation of sex on a grey and wet lunchtime between two strangers in such a domestic setting. She did everything I asked her to with skill and enthusiasm. Her hot wet mouth and darting tongue had me super-hard during OWO and the experience was about as delicious as uncovered oral sex gets.

When we switched to 69 while lying down on the sofa her mouth was perfectly positioned for me to indulge in some vigorous face-fucking, which she took without a murmur. Meanwhile, at my end, I contented myself with gentle sucking and licking of her clean, bare, uncut and very erect cock, which I'd estimate as just under 7ins long and of moderate girth.

For the stand-up finish she was very enthusiastic about taking my cum into her mouth and swallowed every drop after it landed on her outstretched tongue. Then she clamped her mouth over me and milked me of every last drop, which was a really nice finishing touch.

This really was a quality experience and at £20 amazingly good value for money. If you're a guy who likes erotic moments with a pretty TV then Sami comes with my unqualified recommendation. I will definitely be going back soon for more.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[HighlyMotivated]

I've seen some convincing TS girls reviewed on here but that legit looks like a bloke in a wig

[pumps]

I've seen some convincing TS girls reviewed on here but that legit looks like a bloke in a wig

I think that's the definition of a transvestite aka a gay bloke that likes to dress in a wig/dress.


isn't there was a rule on man>man reviews?




Hidden Image/Members Only

[Soapyjoe21971]

Sorry to say this, its like putting a wig on one of you mates and sucking one another off

pass

[The_Don]

isn't there was a rule on man>man reviews?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

- Male prostitution
General discussion allowed, but not reviews or requests for info or recommendations.

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Do not post the same review in multiple regions. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel. Past or current sex workers or anyone related to a sex worker (e.g. boyfriend) may not review any other sex worker. Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

- Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.

- Transsexuals / Shemales
Allowed.

[Brazilian Martian]

The fact that he finds a skinny man in a wig convincing is alarming. It's a tv not ts how can you find him convincing 

[pumps]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

but it's not a transsexual.....


So this review is against the rules

[Rochelle]

But what's the difference if the TS is pre-op?

[pumps]

But what's the difference if the TS is pre-op?

google "transexual definition"  & "transvestite definition"  and work it out for yourself.

[Rochelle]

It was a genuine question and I already know the definition of both. A transvestite will still be transsexual if they feel they belong to the opposite sex. Unless you know the psychological state of the escort, you can't really say that they're not a TS as there can be pre-op transsexuals.

[pumps]

It was a genuine question and I already know the definition of both. A transvestite will still be transsexual if they feel they belong to the opposite sex. Unless you know the psychological state of the escort, you can't really say that they're not a TS as there can be pre-op transsexuals.

don't be a smart arse.

by OP's own admission he classes her as a TV, Also look at the clue in the SP's user name SamiTVlondon  need I continue?

Also gender selected by SP is Male too.

[Rochelle]

I wasn't being a smart arse. I was genuinely curious and wanted to know so thanks for clearing that up.

I also didn't look at the escort's profile, I read the review and noticed that the OP kept saying 'she' and 'her'.

I would still ask, if it was just a man that enjoyed wearing women's clothes, and didn't want to be a woman at all, why then get the breast implants?

[pumps]

I wasn't being a smart arse. I was genuinely curious and wanted to know so thanks for clearing that up.

Okay I do understand where you're coming, Any escort/person at any point could decide they want a sex change and become a TS>>to>>correct gender... in theory.

But as of right now purely from a ukpunting rules standpoint... it's technically just a bloke in a frock. 

[pumps]

I also didn't look at the escort's profile, I read the review and noticed that the OP kept saying 'she' and 'her'.

she her = politeness

I would still ask, if it was just a man that enjoyed wearing women's clothes, and didn't want to be a woman at all, why then get the breast implants?

are you on a wind up tonight? what makes you think SamiTVlondon has implants?

[Rochelle]

The review makes me think so.

[pumps]

The review makes me think so.

Sami has a slim and well-proportioned figure with fake breast implants, of course.

True, possibly clarification required there.

as op says "fake" and "implants" in the same sentence they sort of cancel each other out. So I assumed bra external stuffing was what he was getting at.... lol

[The_Don]

it's technically just a bloke in a frock. 

External Link/Members Only 

[Rochelle]

True, possibly clarification required there.

as op says "fake" and "implants" in the same sentence they sort of cancel each other out. So I assumed bra external stuffing was what he was getting at.... lol

Fair enough, could be right. I just assumed he meant implants.

[Brazilian Martian]

Googled his name and found a few video links
Not for the faint hearted but looks to me like a bloke with fake tits and a wig hardly convincing.
External Link/Members Only

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Googled his name and found a few video links
Not for the faint hearted but looks to me like a bloke with fake tits and a wig hardly convincing.
External Link/Members Only

You fucker BM, had to click the link, the fella looks like a young Laurence Olivier in a syrup and I'm struggling to keep my dinner down 

[Brazilian Martian]

You fucker BM, had to click the link, the fella looks like a young Laurence Olivier in a syrup and I'm struggling to keep my dinner down 

Loool I warned you not for a person with a weak stomach  .
I've seen convincing ts when I was a kid growing up in Sao paulo some that could trick straight guys but this is blatantly a man in a frock as pumps put it. 

Each to their own but it's not a TS it's a transvestite

[pumps]

Googled his name and found a few video links
Not for the faint hearted but looks to me like a bloke with fake tits and a wig hardly convincing.
External Link/Members Only

GRIM

 

[The_Don]

Googled his name and found a few video links
Not for the faint hearted but looks to me like a bloke with fake tits and a wig hardly convincing.
External Link/Members Only

Thanks for the warning, I feel

                    

after seeing that!

[Brazilian Martian]

Thanks for the warning, I feel

                    

after seeing that!

I did say not for the faint hearted 

[The_Don]

I did say not for the faint hearted 

External Link/Members Only

[pumps]

Thanks for the warning, I feel

                    

after seeing that!

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Type_O_Negative]

This review is indexed now with Transsexual category. So it was written by the book. This case is clear then.

[mothra]

Googled his name and found a few video links
Not for the faint hearted but looks to me like a bloke with fake tits and a wig hardly convincing.
External Link/Members Only

Watching purposely through quick skips  . It makes the prospect of shagging ladyboys feels straight and appealing.

[Brazilian Martian]

Watching purposely through quick skips  . It makes the prospect of shagging ladyboys feels straight and appealing.

 

[Hydrant]

Thanks for the video research. I'd never have found that clip of Sami (which I find very arousing) under my own steam.

Anyway, while it's good to have stirred up a controversy, why do guys who profess to have no interest in TV escorts have so much to say on the subject when someone posts a review of one? 

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Thanks for the video research. I'd never have found that clip of Sami (which I find very arousing) under my own steam.

Anyway, while it's good to have stirred up a controversy, why do guys who profess to have no interest in TV escorts have so much to say on the subject when someone posts a review of one?

I reckon it's just curiosity Hydrant, nobody is criticising your choice here but it's sure as hell not everyone's cup of tea, it's good that you enjoyed the punt, you certainly have eclectic taste.

[mash]

It was a genuine question and I already know the definition of both. A transvestite will still be transsexual if they feel they belong to the opposite sex. Unless you know the psychological state of the escort, you can't really say that they're not a TS as there can be pre-op transsexuals.

By punting definition, TS = someone that has has work done, be it implants, hormones, surgery etc. TV = bloke in womens clothing.

"Feelings" dont come into it. I "feel" like I am an aeroplane today but I'm not and the whole world can see that I'm not. We need less of this gender neutral crap which is rife across the pond and slowly creeping over here.

[Cuntminion]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Fffuuuucccc


How did you get film from the end of the booking ? No swallow I see

[Cuntminion]

Thanks for the video research. I'd never have found that clip of Sami (which I find very arousing) under my own steam.

Anyway, while it's good to have stirred up a controversy, why do guys who profess to have no interest in TV escorts have so much to say on the subject when someone posts a review of one?

Not my cup of tea , I don't think I'd want a £20 blow job from anyone, but you like what you like and that's it

[Sufaking]

I've got to agree with pumps, a TV is just a bloke in a wig. I know many here still classify transgendered women as men still which is something I don't (I consider them women and a person's desire to have sex with them a straight fetish, actual gay men aren't interested in a chick with a dick, same with how straight men would not fuck a guy with a pussy), however for me a TV is a man who is simply dressing as a woman. End of story.

I wouldn't refer to such a person as "she" even if they refer to themselves as such because "they're in character." There are even transgendered women who don't like TV's because  they're a stereotype of a TS, the idea that a TS is just a man in a wig. Also TV's are calling themselves women while dressed up yet live life as a man and only consider themselves women while dressed up because they're basically role-playing. TS aren't role-playing.

Reminds me of self professed "straight" people calling themselves such even after fucking a TV, justifying it by saying they see them as female and since they call themselves female, it's straight. IMO that would only be somewhat arguable with a convincing young Asian TV, some of whom can pass as female without any hormones. Otherwise you're going with someone who clearly looks like a man so that's what attracted you to them, therefore you're either a gay in the closet or bisexual.

I'm not referring to you OP, I'm referring to discussions I've seen elsewhere on the web. Funniest ones are where they've been bummed up the ass by a TV but come out claiming they're as straight as a fiddle still. LOL

Personally OP, since you're paying for it, I'd suggest you to find a better looking more convincing TV in future but each to their own.

[pumps]

Thanks for the video research. I'd never have found that clip of Sami (which I find very arousing) under my own steam.

Anyway, while it's good to have stirred up a controversy, why do guys who profess to have no interest in TV escorts have so much to say on the subject when someone posts a review of one?

Can't really stress enough that it was nothing personal, in my eyes it was more of a classification issue, as I personally don't believe a TV has any place on the forums, according to admins rules. But I accept it now as the threads still here and alive and kicking
It was only mentioned as it may have been an over sight as admin has alot of reviews to classify and twats to ban usually hourly.


As for the negative comments about the TV its just the way the cookie crumbles, if you review a horror that people do not like....they'll tell you about it, I've had countless reviews where people express there opinion and if I'm honest I can't disagree with them usually 
Look at my review of this massssiiiiiivvvvvveeeee unit....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=113863.0