Amber Starr - Gatwick - lacking the 'Starr'

[Gatehouse]

£80 for a 30 min quickie near Gatwick, as I was in the mood but short on time.

Firstly, you will not get the girl in the photos. She may have been her once, but she isn't a looker now I'm afraid. Straggly blonde hair and rather pale.

You could say the body isn't bad but she's a little 'worn'. If she hadn't had a sunny disposition and I hadn't needed to unload, I would have walked.

She then proceeded to give me a solid ball licking and sucking, some nice little noises while she did it and a half decent blow job. Some light rimming too.

Pleasant girl which is why I feel a bit shit saying it, but 5/10 for looks and I personally wouldnt want to fuck her.

Would not return. The 175 rating is in my view a false indicator, despite some good reviews elsewhere here.

External Link/Members Only

[JimmRed]

more of a neutral than negative maybe?

Especially as she has a positive attitude.

Just my 2 cents.

[dubhcarr]

more of a neutral than negative maybe?

Especially as she has a positive attitude.

Just my 2 cents.

its the OP call.........she isn't the girl in the profile IMO..........I saw her in Slough very dark room TV showing porn.....OK session but I did feel cheated......

[Gatehouse]

I feel I need to go with a negative as a) the photos are not representative of her - whether its her or not (probably is her, but its been a 'hard life' since the snaps) and b), she just isnt a looker as an aside from that.

'Cheated' is a fair summary.

[JimmRed]

Fair enough then, just having read a few negative reviews, which seemingly theme around the WG's attitude I thought it might be an indicator of the standard of a negative, but if you feel goods were not as advertised and your money was ill spent, then I agree it can only be a negative.

After all it is subjective.

[MrMatrix]

Yes the OP's opinion is always to be respected. I too have seen Amber and the pictures are a few years out of date. I had a great 30 mins with her 3 years ago. - very enthusiastic and she swallowed the lot with out me asking. Most impressed with that. However I too am not sure I'd go back either 50/50 I'd say. I did enjoy her company. Sorry you were so disappointed OP.

[budz]

I saw her this year and although disappointed she didn't look as good as the pictures I still enjoyed myself.  Swallowed mine too without asking, cheeky bitch

[CuriousGuy]

And I too have seen her ... indeed the pictures are not accurate but the enthusiasm made up for some of it.

At the end of the day; a quick punt with some enthusiasm is all one needs to unload ... but I haven't returned either; albeit that I have had many the chance.

[Jim153]

I've seen her as well she does give good head and she does have a fantastic arse.

[nigel4498]

I've seen her as well she does give good head and she does have a fantastic arse.

Welcome to the forum. 
As a first time poster a little advice.
Thread is over a year old.
When you bump a thread older than 60 days you get a warning in red advising you to start a new topic.
Members might think you are a pimp, the prossie herself or a troll otherwise.

[dubhcarr]

concurr with OP.......when I saw her in Slough a few years ago it was in a darkened room wasnt the girl in the photos porn playing on the TV and a late 30's early 40's OK bodied woman providing enthusiastic service.....if I made the same visit today it would also have been a neg..........BTW same £130PH fee.....

[Lema]

I saw Amber about a year ago. Ok! The pictures on her profile are professional so you can't expect perfection when you meet these girls! But she was a 7out of 10 when I saw her. One hour of total action and a wicked sense of humour.  Would most definitely go and see her again.