Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.

Author Topic: Amber Starr - Gatwick - lacking the 'Starr'  (Read 724 times)

6 review(s) for ~ amber starr ~ (4 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]

£80 for a 30 min quickie near Gatwick, as I was in the mood but short on time.

Firstly, you will not get the girl in the photos. She may have been her once, but she isn't a looker now I'm afraid. Straggly blonde hair and rather pale.

You could say the body isn't bad but she's a little 'worn'. If she hadn't had a sunny disposition and I hadn't needed to unload, I would have walked.

She then proceeded to give me a solid ball licking and sucking, some nice little noises while she did it and a half decent blow job. Some light rimming too.

Pleasant girl which is why I feel a bit shit saying it, but 5/10 for looks and I personally wouldnt want to fuck her.

Would not return. The 175 rating is in my view a false indicator, despite some good reviews elsewhere here.


6 review(s) found for ~ amber starr ~ linked to in above post (4 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline JimmRed

more of a neutral than negative maybe?

Especially as she has a positive attitude.

Just my 2 cents.

Offline dubhcarr

more of a neutral than negative maybe?

Especially as she has a positive attitude.

Just my 2 cents.

its the OP call.........she isn't the girl in the profile IMO..........I saw her in Slough very dark room TV showing porn.....OK session but I did feel cheated......

I feel I need to go with a negative as a) the photos are not representative of her - whether its her or not (probably is her, but its been a 'hard life' since the snaps) and b), she just isnt a looker as an aside from that.

'Cheated' is a fair summary.

Offline JimmRed

Fair enough then, just having read a few negative reviews, which seemingly theme around the WG's attitude I thought it might be an indicator of the standard of a negative, but if you feel goods were not as advertised and your money was ill spent, then I agree it can only be a negative.

After all it is subjective.

Offline MrMatrix

Yes the OP's opinion is always to be respected. I too have seen Amber and the pictures are a few years out of date. I had a great 30 mins with her 3 years ago. - very enthusiastic and she swallowed the lot with out me asking. Most impressed with that. However I too am not sure I'd go back either 50/50 I'd say. I did enjoy her company. Sorry you were so disappointed OP. :hi:

Offline budz

I saw her this year and although disappointed she didn't look as good as the pictures I still enjoyed myself.  Swallowed mine too without asking, cheeky bitch ;)

Offline rsd007

And I too have seen her ... indeed the pictures are not accurate but the enthusiasm made up for some of it.

At the end of the day; a quick punt with some enthusiasm is all one needs to unload ... but I haven't returned either; albeit that I have had many the chance.

Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)