Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Sensual Carmen  (Read 3365 times)


6 review(s) for FinDom Roxy (4 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline whiggedwhip


Comms were all good up until a few hours before the meet. Arranged to see her Sunday as she was busy the Friday when I initially got in touch with her, spoke with her on the phone to discuss services etc. and all seemed well.

She has quite a thick Essex accent, not necessarily strong, but more thick, if that makes sense which was wholly unexpected (I pictured a kind of sharper english accent), but I love soft accents of all kind, but someone as stunning as her she could have spoken jawa and i'd still get a bone.

I didn't have any aw feedback at the time a few weeks ago when this was so she asked to see pics on whatsapp, chatted to her she saw my pic all was good and set.

Catch up with her sunday morning on the whatsapp to and towards the end of convo she casually asks if she's seen me before, and becomes convinced she has, send her more pics to confirm, but its too late, for some reason she's convinced we have and cancels. I suggested meeting in public (as we're supposed to do according to her protocol as stated on aw profile re: meeting at the station) and then she would be able to see that I clearly am not the same person she was thinking off, but she was having none of it alas.

Responded to my last message re: all this a week or so later, and I suggested just some vanilla but she said she wouldn't be able to. Pretty gutted as she is the prettiest girl on aw, and I am all about faces and she is unbelievable. Another reviewer likened her to Jessica Alba which while I can see a bit, nevertheless shows you the level she is on in some people's opinions.


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline PLeisure

This WG's jump-through-hoops security measures are becoming quite legendary. As is her paranoia. I wonder what's sponsoring such caution.

Hope you didn't send her clear pics of your face, OP.
You saved yourself £250 for a very vanilla met, at least :)

Offline paul_2407

Vanilla would be a fair reflection of her services, but she is very pretty and petite

Offline whiggedwhip

This WG's jump-through-hoops security measures are becoming quite legendary. As is her paranoia. I wonder what's sponsoring such caution.

Hope you didn't send her clear pics of your face, OP.
You saved yourself £250 for a very vanilla met, at least :)

I did show her clear pics unfortunately willingly I was looking forward to seeing her so much.

But appreciate the comments guys. I would be wholly down for vanilla because considering how pretty she is all I'd want to do is have a gfe experience in the end ending coming in mish, but at the time I spoke to her I was really horny from how filthy her profile sounded. Strange that service would be so vanilla considering her profile. Was going for £120 at half an hr btw but yes, principle's the same seem to have dodged a bullet potentially
« Last Edit: June 09, 2016, 10:42:04 pm by whiggedwhip »

Offline jimmycallum

I did show her clear pics unfortunately willingly I was looking forward to seeing her so much.

Dude you are brave for writing a negative review AFTER giving a full face pic to a WG, she could easily exploit you.

I still dont understand the £120 per half hour and £250 per one hour thing, she has had it like that for weeks.
I would like to hear a logical explanation from anyone regarding how that makes sense.

Offline Cunning Punt

Making 2 classic schoolboy errors, I'm afraid, OP.

1) Letting your little head rule your big head

2) Not doing any research on here. You would have found out: a) her MO, b) the fact she is a timewaster and c) some useful advice:

As a general principle, for the safety and privacy of punters, I would strongly advise them NEVER to send an escort their picture - unless they are ready to seriously risk them and their 'hobby' to be exposed.

Offline whiggedwhip

I did search in here for info but thought I'd take my chances considering she only had a couple of positives and couple of negatives. Not sure what you mean by MO but yes probs been very dumb to send her my pics. I don't see how she could exploit me though, unless there's a website for people specifically to upload photos of punters to expose them. Even then, someone i know would need to go on that site to look for me. More so, I don't see any reason why she would want to, I've  been honest on here and our comms didn't leave her with any thing to be upset about (I haven't been rude or anything). Ah well live and learn I suppose.

Lucia_

  • Guest
Comms were all good up until a few hours before the meet. Arranged to see her Sunday as she was busy the Friday when I initially got in touch with her, spoke with her on the phone to discuss services etc. and all seemed well.

She has quite a thick Essex accent, not necessarily strong, but more thick, if that makes sense which was wholly unexpected (I pictured a kind of sharper english accent), but I love soft accents of all kind, but someone as stunning as her she could have spoken jawa and i'd still get a bone.

I didn't have any aw feedback at the time a few weeks ago when this was so she asked to see pics on whatsapp, chatted to her she saw my pic all was good and set.

Catch up with her sunday morning on the whatsapp to and towards the end of convo she casually asks if she's seen me before, and becomes convinced she has, send her more pics to confirm, but its too late, for some reason she's convinced we have and cancels. I suggested meeting in public (as we're supposed to do according to her protocol as stated on aw profile re: meeting at the station) and then she would be able to see that I clearly am not the same person she was thinking off, but she was having none of it alas.

Responded to my last message re: all this a week or so later, and I suggested just some vanilla but she said she wouldn't be able to. Pretty gutted as she is the prettiest girl on aw, and I am all about faces and she is unbelievable. Another reviewer likened her to Jessica Alba which while I can see a bit, nevertheless shows you the level she is on in some people's opinions.


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Seriously what is your problem? :angry: You know we've met before, I have the right to refuse clients that I don't feel safe around! 

Offline Mr_Shins

This one makes you out worse than the one before. You really are not doing yourself any favours, Lucia.



Offline jimmycallum

Seriously what is your problem? :angry: You know we've met before, I have the right to refuse clients that I don't feel safe around!

The O.P said your one of the prettiest girls on AW, he is clearly annoyed at not being able to see you. Doesnt take a genius to figure that out!

Lucia_

  • Guest
The O.P said your one of the prettiest girls on AW, he is clearly annoyed at not being able to see you. Doesnt take a genius to figure that out!

I feel like he's trying to damage my reputation because I won't see him.

Offline nikmeister

Hey just a quick tip as mentioned by cunning post in the other negative review of yours.

Please stop replying to your own negative comments, it just bumps them up to the front of the page and then you complain about your reputation being affected.

Come on girl think!




Lucia_

  • Guest
Hey just a quick tip as mentioned by cunning post in the other negative review of yours.

Please stop replying to your own negative comments, it just bumps them up to the front of the page and then you complain about your reputation being affected.

Come on girl think!

Okay

Offline smiths

Hey just a quick tip as mentioned by cunning post in the other negative review of yours.

Please stop replying to your own negative comments, it just bumps them up to the front of the page and then you complain about your reputation being affected.

Come on girl think!

You are right but its good in my view that punters who may be interested in her can now see her bad attitude in her posts, it would certainly put me off her if I were interested which I am not.

Offline Cunning Punt

Hey just a quick tip as mentioned by cunning post in the other negative review of yours.

Please stop replying to your own negative comments, it just bumps them up to the front of the page and then you complain about your reputation being affected.

Come on girl think!

Maybe we shouldn't have mentioned it. Some of us were enjoying seeing this girl continue to dig a hole for herself.


Lucia_

  • Guest
You are right but its good in my view that punters who may be interested in her can now see her bad attitude in her posts, it would certainly put me off her if I were interested which I am not.

This punter did something that made me feel extremely uncomfortable last time I saw him, and now that I've refused to meet him again, he's left me a negative review. I don't think that's fair.

Now he's saying he might have potentially "dodged a bullet" when he's met me before!

Offline HighlyMotivated

From my outsider PoV, it sounds like you want to have a look at the punter before you grant him the privilige of paying to have sex with you. That's why you were asking for more photos, not because you wanted to be sure it was an ex punter. Just a theory

Offline jimmycallum

This punter did something that made me feel extremely uncomfortable last time I saw him, and now that I've refused to meet him again, he's left me a negative review. I don't think that's fair.

You might as well tell us what he did to make you uncomfortable?..you know you want to!

Offline smiths

This punter did something that made me feel extremely uncomfortable last time I saw him, and now that I've refused to meet him again, he's left me a negative review. I don't think that's fair.

Now he's saying he might have potentially "dodged a bullet" when he's met me before!

As long as a review is genuine to admins satisfaction it makes no odds whether you think its fair or not, this IS a punters forum.

If he did something completely out of order I suggest you show proof of it to admin to substantiate it.

Offline mf_1101

Interesting, so we got a known WG who has had form for TW'ing before with a bizarre MO claiming she is being rattled by a guy who she is refusing to see for safety reasons.

I would always side with the punter, but I am not convinced he is telling the truth here, though it is difficult as she does have previous for lying, can we get a bit more information about claims she has seen you before OP?

Still Carmen comes across as thick as two short ones, and with her rates and the previous she has, I don't fancy a trip around South Kensington Tube anytime soon  :hi:
« Last Edit: June 24, 2016, 01:39:27 am by mf_1101 »

Offline whiggedwhip

Interesting, so we got a known WG who has had form for TW'ing before with a bizarre MO claiming she is being rattled by a guy who she is refusing to see for safety reasons.

I would always side with the punter, but I am not convinced he is telling the truth here, though it is difficult as she does have previous for lying, can we get a bit more information about claims she has seen you before OP?

Still Carmen comes across as thick as two short ones, and with her rates and the previous she has, I don't fancy a trip around South Kensington Tube anytime soon  :hi:

I have no info on the claims about her seeing me before, except what has been posted here was essentially the same as what she said on whatsapp (that I look like someone that made her uncomfortable before). Of course she absolutely has a right to refuse to see clients that have made her feel uncomfortable in the past, but just a shame (and strange) she's so convinced we have and I did, but meh its up to her if she wants to get annoyed by a negative review. Anyway I don't care if people can't tell if I'm telling the truth, I don't know how it would ever be proven, Carmen posting the pics of me I sent her and the other chap's pics for comparison!? lol I hope not and even then if shes *so* convinced I doubt it would solve anything. Make of it what you will I'm not bothered and have moved on.