BritishBabe1 In Baker Street
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Face pics on profile not hitting on Yandex / Tineeye / Lens and extensive range of services…
ANy One sampled her yet
No, but I'm going to say her AW feedback looks, to me, deeply suspect, therefore probably fake, as follows:-
She currently has 6 feedback notes
1. Laca (16) - (who gives her a poor rating of mechanical attitude - the remainder being all positive)
2. Latenightlion (13)
3. CityGent (18)
4. MisterDiscrete (10)
5. Bscutt (54)
6. Latenightlion (13)
Latenightlion, Citygent45 and Bscutt have also seen Sloppy-Anna, who has 4 feedback notes, thus-
1. Latenightliom (13)
2. Citygent45 (18)
3. Bscutt (54)
4. JStone (3)
Then compare the feedbacks for Latenightlion and Citygent45, separated thus / below
Sloppy-Anna 05/04/26 "respectful and kind man" / Lovely time with you"
Squat Queen 26/02/26 "lovely guy, had a fun time" / 27/02/26* "lovely lad"
BritishBabe1 10/01/26 "nice time with this fella" / "nice time with this fella"
Ruby Redhead 21/01/26 "good client" / "good client"
British-Indian 10/01/26 "10/10" / "10/10"
Bscutt has hidden his feedback but there's recent crossover with J Stone, who also has significant crossover with Latenightlion and Citygent45. As does MisterDiscrete, whose feedback is:
BritishBabe1 15/02/26 "great guy"
Ruby-Redhead 21/01/26 "good client"
BritishBabe1 10/01/26 "nice time with this fella"
British-Indian 10/01/26 "10/10"
Member Not Active 20/05/25 "Slim. Petit. 5ft of Pure temptation. I?m Lolly Pop?..."
(the latter of which also appears, verbatim, in Citygent45's feedback).
It's arguable that this wee sample could be said to show us that-
1. some sex-workers write the same or nearly the same feedback for their punters
2. some punters like visiting the same sex-workers
-but the overall number and similarity of coincidences revealed in these feedbacks seems, to me at least, to be too much to be a random distribution, and that it is rather what it looks like - 3. sex-workers outsourcing reputational enhancement to rather lazy fake-feedback farmers. And anyone who'll pay for or engage in that is almost certainly going to take short-cuts elsewhere, and especially where their input requires the most effort- providing their customers with good service. On this basis you'd be well advised to be sceptical about her credibility at the very least, or else swerve her entirely.
