Author Topic: BUBBLE BUTT, BIG ASS, BIG BOOTY, PAWG, CULO GRANDE (Read 2020688 times)

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5300 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:49:08 am »

i am sure there was another post i put where the women there i thought were 100000% bubble butt worthy .. i just cannae find it man

peter purves · « **Reply #5301 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:52:00 am »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 11:41:36 am

this one is like perla if not smaller...she was rejected i think

I rejected this one because she looks 'fat' (or stumpy) to me and this thread is not about that

Now if she stood 6 ft plus - or even just taller - with exactly the same physique then there is a possibility she could pass, which carries us back to my earlier point on the 'relativity' (ie subjectivity) aspect of the Punther's Charter.

peter purves · « **Reply #5302 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:58:11 am »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 11:49:08 am

i am sure there was another post i put where the women there i thought were 100000% bubble butt worthy .. i just cannae find it man

There may well be.

However, there are bound to be grey areas, with all the differing tastes, even when using the Punther's Charter.

I have had my learned friend GLM

reject one of my entries because he could not see any shape to the WG. She was a small to a medium sized candidate.

peter purves · « **Reply #5303 on:** July 22, 2018, 12:04:10 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 11:28:47 am

its ironic but i that is what i thought did happen...i.e the PP interpretation of punthers law

I had a feeling you had thought so.

However, if I was to use my own definition then the likes of Lia Queen/Mexican Barbie, Arab Kardishan (can't remember her current working name which is at the top of the sub-sections of Punther's post) would NOT be entrants.

You know the phrase 'Don't shoot the messenger'

peter purves · « **Reply #5304 on:** July 22, 2018, 12:33:44 pm »

JoDeelishuss

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

peter purves · « **Reply #5305 on:** July 22, 2018, 12:43:54 pm »

❤️Millan Blu❤️ Outcall Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5306 on:** July 22, 2018, 01:23:43 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 11:52:00 am

I rejected this one because she looks 'fat' (or stumpy) to me and this thread is not about that

Now if she stood 6 ft plus - or even just taller - with exactly the same physique then there is a possibility she could pass, which carries us back to my earlier point on the 'relativity' (ie subjectivity) aspect of the Punther's Charter.

thanks for the response

can you also let me know about the one initially gave as an example? why was she rejected....and why compared to perla is perla in

lets break it down to body parts and size etc

peter purves · « **Reply #5307 on:** July 22, 2018, 01:31:43 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 01:23:43 pm

thanks for the response

can you also let me know about the one initially gave as an example? why was she rejected....and why compared to perla is perla in

lets break it down to body parts and size etc

Sorry, I am not sure I understand who is 'the one intially gave' and 'why compared to Perla is Perla'

What I would say is Perla is 'fat' this is why she could not be accepted previously.

What I said to you last night was:

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 01:32:25 am

Cheers, and for pointing out that it is Perla

If so then she can't be an entrant. No need for any further discussion.

However, if it is not Perla then we can have a dialogue what constitutes the terms upper limits and BBW not according to yours or my definitions but rather the empirical evidence of the words and pictures in the Punther's Charter Code to guide us ??

peter purves · « **Reply #5308 on:** July 22, 2018, 01:39:02 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 20, 2018, 09:47:09 pm

Kata

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Cross-referencing with AW profile

HOT_LATINA_ [Katalaya]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

peter purves · « **Reply #5309 on:** July 22, 2018, 01:49:17 pm »

May be??

Naugthy Liza23

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5310 on:** July 22, 2018, 04:38:21 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on January 12, 2018, 12:13:07 am

Cross-referencing with BP profile

SDUCTIVE ANGEL 💓

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

...Thanks Mate!

It always of interest to me how subjective these things can be even when we try to bring in measurement scales to clear up the differing opinions.

Personally, I think she falls outside the FS scale and yet you do not . Don't mind me!!

Hidden Image/Members Only

PP ... this one was a rejection. i would be interested to know why?

and can we get a like for like comparison with perla as to how come her pics get her in and this one not.

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5311 on:** July 22, 2018, 04:45:53 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 01:31:43 pm

Sorry, I am not sure I understand who is 'the one intially gave' and 'why compared to Perla is Perla'

What I would say is Perla is 'fat' this is why she could not be accepted previously.

What I said to you last night was:

yes perla is fat and no one actually argued her case to be in here in this manner.....ironically enough you allowed her in last night based on those new pictures...who she actually is really isnt the point of contention.... its more that her pictures show her as bigger than what you have, IMO, hinted is acceptable here

if it was me interpreting punthers law....those new perla pics would be fine...but so would the one i just posted above and so would the one you called stumpy...these are phat booty women that arent themselves FAT. and if you think those two women are phat then i dont get how the perla pics are not also

i think whats going to happen is that we will indeed get quite a bit of crossover...the sheer fact that perla can take any sort of picture that isnt photoshopped and sneak in here just proves my point that the criteria was always broader than i feel some were led to believe

the thicker edition i havent been monitoring as much but i will get back to that one to keep it up to date as best i can

Vinceys · « **Reply #5312 on:** July 22, 2018, 07:38:49 pm »

Quote from: Gentlelovemaking on January 06, 2017, 11:36:52 am

She is back and is now taking bookings herself. She's working in Harrow and Wembley. PM me for the link the girl is sensational

Evening,
Apologies if I am disturbing. But I'd like to know if coco/Stacey is still around? It seems all her accoj t's are no longer online. Do you have her new detsils for booking? I understand it's been more than a year. But this lady just stunned me.
Many th and for your help in advance.

Vinceys · « **Reply #5313 on:** July 22, 2018, 07:44:35 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 20, 2018, 11:08:33 am

do that please...looking forward to it

Right, as promised.
We haven't managed to meet up. She happened to reply a bit late and vice versa.
We have pinned down a date for next Saturday.
Just so you know, she charges £150 if you want to take pics or record a video. Will keep you posted next weekend.

peter purves · « **Reply #5314 on:** July 22, 2018, 10:35:06 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 04:38:21 pm

PP ... this one was a rejection. i would be interested to know why?

and can we get a like for like comparison with perla as to how come her pics get her in and this one not.

Briefly,

I think you ask an unfair question because this picture would fail because although not mentioned in the Punther's Charter. I put out a question viz. can a WG be entered without seeing see the empirical evidence ie a bum picture.

Puntingpumping1920 response was no which I fully agree with.

You would have to present me with her butt picture and also I have refused entry to so many here, I am taking your word only that I did in fact do so.

Also I think this WG came up on the Censors board as probably being false.

Moving on to your next question

peter purves · « **Reply #5315 on:** July 22, 2018, 10:46:49 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 04:45:53 pm

yes perla is fat and no one actually argued her case to be in here in this manner.....ironically enough you allowed her in last night based on those new pictures...who she actually is really isnt the point of contention.... its more that her pictures show her as bigger than what you have, IMO, hinted is acceptable here

if it was me interpreting punthers law....those new perla pics would be fine...but so would the one i just posted above and so would the one you called stumpy...these are phat booty women that arent themselves FAT. and if you think those two women are phat then i dont get how the perla pics are not also

i think whats going to happen is that we will indeed get quite a bit of crossover...the sheer fact that perla can take any sort of picture that isnt photoshopped and sneak in here just proves my point that the criteria was always broader than i feel some were led to believe

the thicker edition i havent been monitoring as much but i will get back to that one to keep it up to date as best i can

Tbh I thought due to the very bad photo-bod-ging of her rear I decided to ask Dark_Gable if she was a contender to this thread? He replied yes and probably the Thicker thread.

I compared and contrasted the two pictures the same very one I asked you to evaluate and thought she could just squeeze in based on what Dark_Gable said. One of my rules here is that if the punter has seen the WG and says she has a Bubble Butt then I am in no position to challenge it until I see her in the flesh.
Therefore I take their assessment at face value as being 'true'.

There are a number of Perla's going around, now I am slightly confused which WG we are in fact referring to?

This is who I thought was Perla and the two pictures do not compare with each other IMHO

Hidden Image/Members Only and Hidden Image/Members Only

peter purves · « **Reply #5316 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:00:34 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 04:45:53 pm

yes perla is fat and no one actually argued her case to be in here in this manner.....ironically enough you allowed her in last night based on those new pictures...who she actually is really isnt the point of contention.... its more that her pictures show her as bigger than what you have, IMO, hinted is acceptable here

if it was me interpreting punthers law....those new perla pics would be fine...but so would the one i just posted above and so would the one you called stumpy...these are phat booty women that arent themselves FAT. and if you think those two women are phat then i dont get how the perla pics are not also

I think whats going to happen is that we will indeed get quite a bit of crossover...the sheer fact that perla can take any sort of picture that isnt photoshopped and sneak in here just proves my point that the criteria was always broader than i feel some were led to believe

the thicker edition i havent been monitoring as much but i will get back to that one to keep it up to date as best i can

Sorry, here, if I had to name the individuals who have confused and conflated this thread the most, I would say that Papa Smurf firstly, very closely followed by yourself by inputting fat and/or obese women that falls outside the remit of this thread

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5317 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:50:40 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 10:35:06 pm

Briefly,

I think you ask an unfair question because this picture would fail because although not mentioned in the Punther's Charter. I put out a question viz. can a WG be entered without seeing see the empirical evidence ie a bum picture.

Puntingpumping1920 response was no which I fully agree with.

You would have to present me with her butt picture and also I have refused entry to so many here, I am taking your word only that I did in fact do so.

Also I think this WG came up on the Censors board as probably being false.

Moving on to your next question

aha!!/....but there was a bum picture of sorts...i'll find that one too later

peter purves · « **Reply #5318 on:** July 22, 2018, 11:59:48 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 22, 2018, 11:50:40 pm

aha!!/....but there was a bum picture of sorts...i'll find that one too later

And I wasn't going to ask but think I must, for you to provide my refusal and/or comments regarding this WG?

Cheers

Stealthmode · « **Reply #5319 on:** July 23, 2018, 08:18:20 am »

External Link/Members Only

99% likely a fake.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

puntingpumping1920 · « **Reply #5320 on:** July 23, 2018, 08:29:26 am »

Quote from: Stealthmode on July 23, 2018, 08:18:20 am

External Link/Members Only

99% likely a fake.

100%

sunnyj · « **Reply #5321 on:** July 23, 2018, 09:15:51 am »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #5322 on:** July 23, 2018, 02:21:46 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 11:00:34 pm

Sorry, here, if I had to name the individuals who have confused and conflated this thread the most, I would say that Papa Smurf firstly, very closely followed by yourself by inputting fat and/or obese women that falls outside the remit of this thread

Funny thing is I pretty much abandoned this thread for that exact reason, and posted in the BBW/Pawg thread just to be on the safe side. But now I get shit for posting the Pawg WG's in the BBW/Pawg thread. Seems like I can't win.

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5323 on:** July 23, 2018, 02:30:16 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 22, 2018, 11:00:34 pm

Sorry, here, if I had to name the individuals who have confused and conflated this thread the most, I would say that Papa Smurf firstly, very closely followed by yourself by inputting fat and/or obese women that falls outside the remit of this thread

i would very much like to challenge that as i dont agree.... are you able to show me the fat obese ones i have put up? dont get me wrong..i am sure there are i just want to see if you make a sweeping statement based on feeling as opposed to fact

aside from the short stumpy one of course (i actually dont think she is fat. just has a massive big booty with a lot of junk it seems.)

case in point that one that you said was short and fat and stumpy has just got a big phat junky booty. the rest of her body is not fat unless you feel perhaps that the upper part of her is indeed fat which STILL means that perlas pics shouldnt be in here

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #5324 on:** July 23, 2018, 02:31:53 pm »

Quote from: Stealthmode on July 23, 2018, 08:18:20 am

External Link/Members Only

99% likely a fake.

Hidden Image/Members Only

jazmynekyng
External Link/Members Only
She even has a Youtube channel
External Link/Members Only
Fake indeed. Very nearly passed the the google image search test, but funnily enough, it's the pic with the hidden face that gave her away. ^^^
I almost feel like booking her just so I can walk and teach her a lesson in not cat fishing guys.

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5325 on:** July 23, 2018, 02:52:57 pm »

so this was the question

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on January 11, 2018, 06:48:54 pm

PP whether or not these are legit pics this person probably fits into the scale? maybe D or E?

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

and thy response was

Quote from: peter purves on January 12, 2018, 12:13:07 am

Cross-referencing with BP profile

SDUCTIVE ANGEL 💓

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

...Thanks Mate!

It always of interest to me how subjective these things can be even when we try to bring in measurement scales to clear up the differing opinions.

Personally, I think she falls outside the FS scale and yet you do not . Don't mind me!!

Hidden Image/Members Only

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5326 on:** July 23, 2018, 03:08:30 pm »

(i have to confess...i did to you what i just accused you of doing to me. sweeping conclusion based on a feeling rather than fact. this posts here prove it. a few of the below pictures were rejected but then you later held changed your mind about them)

Then there were these ones...i thought they all qualified personally

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on February 04, 2018, 06:43:56 pm

PP?? Thoughts...qualify or naaaw?? pretty sure i have seen some of these pics somewhere else. which would be ironic as she is claiming they are 100% real

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Actually you know what...in your defense you did get swayed and reversed your decision on some of these pics I have to admit

Quote from: peter purves on February 04, 2018, 07:49:57 pm

Cheers mate for posting

When I see a BBW entrant, my initial thought is no, because of the Punther rule. Then I take the time to re-consider if I can be swayed.

As for this WG, I think there are different pictures put together. The first picture with the natural hear reminds me of Davina (who now has blonde hair), 19-year-old.
So you may well be right on seeing the pic(s) previously.

I have to admit that some of the pics aren't too bad actually

Edit: Just had a word with censors' board, they found one of the pic to be used elsewhere

External Link/Members Only

and also

a WG profile

External Link/Members Only

and

External Link/Members Only

so yeah i apologise for assuming that you just flat out rejected some of these

peter purves · « **Reply #5327 on:** July 23, 2018, 07:57:27 pm »

Cool Mate!! No problem

It's a sign of humility for you to apologise but in this instance no apology needed or required

For me I take the convenient way out with the larger WGs here. If she is a BBW (by Punther's criteria) then she will not get due consideration because he has stated categorically this is not a BBW thread. If she is very exceptional as a BBW then I would be prepared to make an exception based upon 'she maintains her overall shape'

As for the lady above, I think she will probably be even bigger in real life than in the pic and secondly if she was to stand up, I would expect her to be carrying just lots of fat around her rear without much shape. For this reason, I did not place her in here - irrespective if the profile is false.

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5328 on:** July 23, 2018, 07:59:48 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 23, 2018, 07:57:27 pm

Cool Mate!! No problem

before we hold each others beers. i still want to know what i can and cant post here and thus would greatly appreciate which "fatties" i have brought in here...i dont think there have been that many as i do try to follow the rules

also how is that woman , not short stumpy, outside the FS scale...E's are pretty big and she doesnt come near that i dont think

peter purves · « **Reply #5329 on:** July 23, 2018, 08:12:41 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 23, 2018, 07:59:48 pm

before we hold each others beers. i still want to know what i can and cant post here and thus would greatly appreciate which "fatties" i have brought in here...i dont think there have been that many as i do try to follow the rules

also how is that woman , not short stumpy, outside the FS scale...E's are pretty big and she doesnt come near that i dont think

I think the best guide is if she is a BBW she cannot enter - unless very exceptional

If it is too much hassle, keep posting and I will tell you my opinion, it would be better if Punther actually did so because I suspect when he created this thread he was actually seeking a very high standard with regard to they type of WGs and butts IMHO

Punther - How say you my friend??

peter purves · « **Reply #5330 on:** July 23, 2018, 08:17:01 pm »

Quote from: last_days_of_logan on July 23, 2018, 07:59:48 pm

before we hold each others beers. i still want to know what i can and cant post here and thus would greatly appreciate which "fatties" i have brought in here...i dont think there have been that many as i do try to follow the rules

also how is that woman , not short stumpy, outside the FS scale...E's are pretty big and she doesnt come near that i dont think

We had agreed - well some of us at least

that the ideal was C-D, where B could be a part of that ideal. I do not have the FS scale chart in front of me so I am imagining it

Even from the chart one can see that E is carrying 'fat'. Again, unless 'exceptional', E will not make it in this thread because it is BBW status

oversexed · « **Reply #5331 on:** July 24, 2018, 12:30:25 am »

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Esmeralda from mexico?

oversexed · « **Reply #5332 on:** July 24, 2018, 12:39:19 am »

Hidden Image/Members Only

PERLA in Camberwell.
That ass appears fake. does it matter here
External Link/Members Only

BRAZILIAN Paloma
Hidden Image/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Hennesy
Hidden Image/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

punther · « **Reply #5333 on:** July 24, 2018, 12:52:23 am »

Quote from: peter purves on July 23, 2018, 08:12:41 pm

I think the best guide is if she is a BBW she cannot enter - unless very exceptional

If it is too much hassle, keep posting and I will tell you my opinion, it would be better if Punther actually did so because I suspect when he created this thread he was actually seeking a very high standard with regard to they type of WGs and butts IMHO

Punther - How say you my friend??

tbh the last bit about bigger women(upper scale) on the original post was to try and be accommodating

Hidden Image/Members Only

but as there is now a dedicated bbw thread its probably best to not post any bbw at all here to allow a clear distinction between the 2 threads

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #5334 on:** July 24, 2018, 01:26:52 am »

Quote from: oversexed on July 24, 2018, 12:39:19 am

BRAZILIAN Paloma
Hidden Image/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Was considering adding her to this thread, but I weren't to sure if her booty qualified. I'll be down to TOFTT though. Nice rates.

last_days_of_logan · « **Reply #5335 on:** July 24, 2018, 05:23:44 am »

Quote from: PapaSmurf on July 24, 2018, 01:26:52 am

Was considering adding her to this thread, but I weren't to sure if her booty qualified. I'll be down to TOFTT though. Nice rates.

any booty yor are not sure of is welcome in the thicker edition

peter purves · « **Reply #5336 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:04:06 am »

Quote from: oversexed on July 24, 2018, 12:39:19 am

Hidden Image/Members Only

PERLA in Camberwell.
That ass appears fake. does it matter here
External Link/Members Only

Cheers mate! Most of the Latina' ass have been augmented natural is a rarity - so it is not an issue here

peter purves · « **Reply #5337 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:06:27 am »

Quote from: PapaSmurf on July 24, 2018, 01:26:52 am

Was considering adding her to this thread, but I weren't to sure if her booty qualified. I'll be down to TOFTT though. Nice rates.

She has potential to use the Punther's term but I was not fully sure either. She does look alright though

Good luck mate on TOFFT

peter purves · « **Reply #5338 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:20:03 am »

Quote from: punther on July 24, 2018, 12:52:23 am

tbh the last bit about bigger women(upper scale) on the original post was to try and be accommodating

Hidden Image/Members Only

but as there is now a dedicated bbw thread its probably best to not post any bbw at all here to allow a clear distinction between the 2 threads

Cheers!! In your absence, there was one other contributor to this thread - not so much now - who felt that I and some of the other contributors had been posting 'fat' ladies. He wanted more toned and/or gym type body/butt physique. Personally, I think we are unfortunately in the wrong country for this

There was another person who was focused on that perhaps medium-sized could not be entered and what constitutes a Bubble Butt per se
It is interesting to observe all the nuances in this thread and the differing tastes we all have with regard to these issues.

After spending many nights studying, like the Founding Fathers of America your charter/constitution is not perfect but I think is very good, well thought out and constructed and more importantly functional

Have to say the aforesaid in bold brought a smile to my

punther · « **Reply #5339 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:20:51 am »

some potential here

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

punther · « **Reply #5340 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:28:20 am »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

peter purves · « **Reply #5341 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:33:23 am »

Quote from: punther on July 24, 2018, 11:28:20 am

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

I saw this picture and a series of other pics on VS operating out of the City of London somewhere, mainly outcall and then changed to incall.

My initial thoughts could not be real, including this one. I did not check with the censor's board at the time since I was that convinced it could not be real.

Now the same pic is on AW I wonder

punther · « **Reply #5342 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:34:33 am »

Quote from: peter purves on July 24, 2018, 11:33:23 am

I saw this picture and a series of other pics on VS operating out of the City of London somewhere, mainly outcall and then changed to incall.

My initial thoughts could not be real, including this one. I did not check with the censor's board at the time since I was that convinced it could not be real.

Now the same pic is on AW I wonder

you might have to dip into the research budget

peter purves · « **Reply #5343 on:** July 24, 2018, 11:43:59 am »

Quote from: punther on July 24, 2018, 11:34:33 am

you might have to dip into the research budget

You forget I have been unfunded all these years

The best I can do is that I made a quick call to the censor's board, and to my surprise, neither of the pictures were reported as false. So that is a good sign at least.

Burrell0377 · « **Reply #5344 on:** July 24, 2018, 01:16:38 pm »

External Link/Members Only

Wowww...i actually know this girl overhead on instagram

puntingpumping1920 · « **Reply #5345 on:** July 24, 2018, 01:21:50 pm »

Quote from: Burrell0377 on July 24, 2018, 01:16:38 pm

External Link/Members Only

Wowww...i actually know this girl overhead on instagram

Is she based in London or just a fake profile

Burrell0377 · « **Reply #5346 on:** July 24, 2018, 02:07:12 pm »

That i dont know if its her or some fake profile of her. She is real and as a matter of fact she was on xfactor last year. She was the girl simon cowell called back. Her name is Ash. On instagram goes by asholme.

puntingpumping1920 · « **Reply #5347 on:** July 24, 2018, 02:16:56 pm »

Quote from: Burrell0377 on July 24, 2018, 02:07:12 pm

That i dont know if its her or some fake profile of her. She is real and as a matter of fact she was on xfactor last year. She was the girl simon cowell called back. Her name is Ash. On instagram goes by asholme.

Clearly a fake profile then

peter purves · « **Reply #5348 on:** July 24, 2018, 03:57:49 pm »

Quote from: peter purves on July 24, 2018, 11:33:23 am

I saw this picture and a series of other pics on VS operating out of the City of London somewhere, mainly outcall and then changed to incall.

My initial thoughts could not be real, including this one. I did not check with the censor's board at the time since I was that convinced it could not be real.

Now the same pic is on AW I wonder

Here is one of those profiles - probably the main one actually

Rosa - always wondered whether this is the Cuban-Lebanese one I met??

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

peter purves · « **Reply #5349 on:** July 24, 2018, 04:26:15 pm »

Quote from: oversexed on July 24, 2018, 12:39:19 am

BRAZILIAN Paloma
Hidden Image/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Cross-referencing with VS profile

BRAZILIAN PALOMA 20 YEARS OLD FIRST TIME IN CATFORD SE6

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Author Topic: BUBBLE BUTT, BIG ASS, BIG BOOTY, PAWG, CULO GRANDE (Read 2020688 times)

punther

punther

punther

punther

Member Benefits