Author Topic: ~AMAZING~LIDIA~ - Clerkenwell (Barbican/Farringdon) - Good punt but not enough  (Read 4193 times)


5 review(s) for ~AMAZING~LIDIA~ (1 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Online collector

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Not sure how I wanted to rate this because it was a borderline between Positive and Neutral. Not an important fact for punters who will read the whole review and will understand the reasons, but done purely for a sort of statistic in the review counting, giving some balance with her previous reviews. Also doing a comparison with External Link/Members Only.
Decided to put neutral because, even if I quite enjoyed the punt there are a list of small things that bothered me a bit.

Comms: it was my plan B subsequent of my last no show negative review. Texts for a short time notice punt, agreed time and dress request. Probably with the maid.

Location: already been in this flat last year when I saw Vicky but in the next room. I will write the current flatmates links in a second post after this review.
It's a working flat in a good condition court, close to offices. The ensuite shower in Lidia's room was unavailable and I used the main bathroom which apparently was not properly working either as the water was cold  :thumbsdown:

Price: £100 for one hour. CIM is inclusive in the price but swallow is extra, so let her spit in a tissue was a better choice for my wallet.

Look:
Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only
Met me with casual clothes unlike my dress request was the black dress above
Said she forgot. Nevertheless she remedied going to quickly change. Looked hot with the black dress.
Didn't wear heels but was already very tall, 5"9 in bare feet IMO. Gorgeous legs, small tits (A cup). Nice model type body but not hourglass figure, I'd say chest was a size 8 and hips a size 10. Not fat BTW, looked slim cause her height but with a bigger bum. I think a boob job would improve her body proportion.
Face is cute/beautiful but too natural for my liking. No wearing make up and would have loved it as seeing from old pics in previous profile and now stolen  :unknown: See second pic above.

Attitude: friendly and chatty but I think we didn't click. Didn't feel she provided a GFE illusion .
Offered a drink and shower before and after. Second shower was in a little overtime so she didn't clockwatch but she watched the wristwatch few times during the chat, she could have been more discrete.

Service: FK, HJ, OWO, bit of gagging, RO, 69, sex in cowgirl, mish and doggy, CIM x2.

- Kissing was nice and wet but not deep.
- OWO felt nice in the beginning cause I was horny. She easily gagged a couple of times so I didn't ask to go deeper. Before the second pop, the technique became almost awful, just an HJ with her tongue touching my dick. Tired to suck after few minutes maybe. Anyway she changed rhythm again with mouth and hand action and I could pop for the second time.
- No balls licking
- No fingers
- Sex was quite good wearing the dress all the time and was a turn on especially in doggy. I didn't even see her naked tits but there was not so much to see.

In conclusion, I'd say it was an OK punt. Even VFM for the current price (was £120 not long time ago), enjoy list, look and central location. Unfortunately easy to forget because the lack of skills in a particular thing. I'll probably remember this experience as "shagging an attractive tall girl". That's it.

Online collector

Previous reviews of her old profiles:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=7924
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=8143 except the last one which belong to another WG after a swapping.

Second profile with stolen pics External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
There was even a third profile with other stolen pics but not anymore. I'll link it anyway External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only IMO could be dodgy, no reviews yet, caution needed.

And links for the flatmates:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only which I saw in Bethnal Green,
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only Big avoid  :bomb:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only unreviewed.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,400
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250

Not sure how I wanted to rate this because it was a borderline between Positive and Neutral.



Some times its a fine line, after some reflection and how you feel about a punt. You weight up the good and bad points, then chose your rating IMO.

 

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Collector

Thank you for your review which I think brings out that she will not be for everyone, and particularly for identifying the other flat mates.

On reflection, I think her height and bust will keep her rate down.  One specific; when I saw her I said to her; "you are very tall, aren't you? You must be 6' tall!" She agreed with me.

I found she repayed the effort I made to engage, and was able to adapt.  I had a similar issue with her hand work but, by gently showing her what I wanted, she was immediately able to reproduce it very satisfactorily  :D.  Engaged, she was also also able tease well, although she clearly has a boundary around role play.

Dave

Online collector


Some times its a fine line, after some reflection and how you feel about a punt. You weight up the good and bad points, then chose your rating IMO.
Agree. I was thinking how to rate this since few days. Choosing neutral in the end, I think is fair and summarises how the punt went.

Online collector

Collector

Thank you for your review which I think brings out that she will not be for everyone, and particularly for identifying the other flat mates.

On reflection, I think her height and bust will keep her rate down.  One specific; when I saw her I said to her; "you are very tall, aren't you? You must be 6' tall!" She agreed with me.

I found she repayed the effort I made to engage, and was able to adapt.  I had a similar issue with her hand work but, by gently showing her what I wanted, she was immediately able to reproduce it very satisfactorily  :D.  Engaged, she was also also able tease well, although she clearly has a boundary around role play.

Dave
I think 6 feet is too much but I can be wrong. I found her something like one inch taller than KSG, another tall WG, good for comparison.

I would like to specify that her flatmate BLONDE~MARTHA~KAMA should be a new one after a profile swapping. Been discussing this in another thread. Therefore the neg reviews don't belong to her, this one too should be a TOFTT unless someone can find her old profiles and linked reviews.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2016, 09:21:18 am by collector »

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I think 6 feet is too much but I can be wrong. I found her something like one inch taller than KSG, another tall WG, good for comparison.

i won't about a point - she is tall, nuff said.

Dave


mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for the update.  She's blurring her photos and there is plenty of profile swopping at this address so just so we know who we're talking about....

Dave

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 21, 2016, 09:27:56 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline Mr_Shins

Lidia is pretty, and I think that's the same address that Martha works from.

Online collector

Thanks for the update.  She's blurring her photos and there is plenty of profile swopping at this address so just so we know who we're talking about....

Dave

Hidden Image/Members Only
Yep, lots of swappings, a picture update is welcome.

Online collector

Lidia is pretty, and I think that's the same address that Martha works from.
I'll take this opportunity to update the flatmates cause they are changed since the post above.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Edit: Just saw a neg review posted saying she is working in Old Street, therefore she should be working with:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Not easy to keep track of all this changes. Time to External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 21, 2016, 11:02:48 pm by collector »

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'll take this opportunity to update the flatmates cause they are changed since the post above.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Edit: Just saw a neg review posted saying she is working in Old Street, therefore she should be working with:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Not easy to keep track of all this changes. Time to External Link/Members Only

Thanks for the heads up collector.  I have gone back to the Diamond Dog, the OP of the review and asked him to clarify location.

Dave

Offline rubric

I'll take this opportunity to update the flatmates cause they are changed since the post above.


Thanks for that, have seen "stunning lucy" from the above and can confirm that its the girl in the photos, pretty terrible service though as she had a bad attitude.  I would have reviewed when I saw her a few months back, but her profile disappeared a few days later.