Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: WG asked not to be reviewed on UKP...  (Read 4354 times)

Offline MrFox

This wasn't one of my punts, I have a mate that punts and is not a UKP member.

He visited a popular Glasgow WG for the first time, and after having a positive session during the small talk she asked him if he was on the forum UKPunting, he said he knew what the forum was but was not a member. She then said if you are and do not want to say, or plan to sign up, please do not write a review regardless if it was positive review, she has asked most of her punters the same. Unfortunately he didn't ask why not.

I'm not sure if I would or not, I suppose it rules out any future bookings if you went against her wishes.

Has a WG asked you not to review them? What did you do and why?

 :hi:



Offline Ramminit

Obviously has a boyfriend or ex that she doesn't want them to read about her antics. Would be interesting to know who she was

Offline DickDiver

It would only rule out future bookings if he outed himself. Change small details, use a punting name different from UKP and still be a useful member of UKP and maintain a happy harem.

Online myothernameis

he said he knew what the forum was but was not a member. She then said if you are and do not want to say, or plan to sign up, please do not write a review regardless if it was positive review, she has asked most of her punters the same. Unfortunately he didn't ask why not.

Any chance you can tell us who she is

Offline Sonny Crockett

This wasn't one of my punts, I have a mate that punts and is not a UKP member.

He visited a popular Glasgow WG for the first time, and after having a positive session during the small talk she asked him if he was on the forum UKPunting, he said he knew what the forum was but was not a member. She then said if you are and do not want to say, or plan to sign up, please do not write a review regardless if it was positive review, she has asked most of her punters the same. Unfortunately he didn't ask why not.

I'm not sure if I would or not, I suppose it rules out any future bookings if you went against her wishes.

Has a WG asked you not to review them? What did you do and why?

 :hi:

I would still review if I wanted to. That is my choice, not hers!!

Offline MrFox

Any chance you can tell us who she is

I don't doubt my mate but as it wasn't my punt it wouldn't be fair on the WG to post her name when I wasn't there.

Being a popular WG I'm sure she will have said to others and they are free to say.

 


Offline auldie63

Any chance you can tell us who she is
If he was prepared to name her he might as well review.
I have met more than one WG who has asked me not to mention her on here, and despite having a good time with them, I always respect their wishes. If the time is crap I do review or add to someone else's post.
How happy would us guys be if the little darlings had a site where they came on all the time and rated our performances, and how many of us would never be off it?
We pay the girls for a service and that is all! If they want it we should respect their privacy.


moosehead69

  • Guest
Has she been reviewed on here before??

Offline Courtney

Any chance you can tell us who she is
AW or agency?
Has she been reviewed on here before??

Tall or short? Fat or thin?

Basil Brush,
I take it you have a Post-it on your head with her name..........guess the WG! :lol:

JV547845

  • Guest
A WG asked me not to read all about our session on UKP.  Even though she's got really good reviews and is highly regarded and my review would've been totally positive.  Maybe it's indiscrete or it breaks their trust.  If they're getting fully booked too, then maybe they don't need any more praise or to deal with becoming a forum darling.

Offline MrFox


Offline MrFox

Tall or short? Fat or thin?

Basil Brush,
I take it you have a Post-it on your head with her name..........guess the WG! :lol:

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

moosehead69

  • Guest
Yes, rather a lot
Well respect her request and don't ( or sorry tell ur friend not to) unless she's mad and French !!!

chico1000

  • Guest
I agree with Auldie's position.  I don't bring the subject up normally but if I get a specific request not to review and it has been a good experience I respect their wishes.  However no problems mentioning if I have had a rubbish time regardless of what they want.

Offline bigmc

If she asked me not to I wouldnt unless it was aweful and I thought it was something everyone needed to know ( If id been ripped off, scammed ect ).
If it was shit I wouldnt be going back so wouldnt make a difference anyway.

Offline johnjo72

have a feeling about this one name begins with "S" ???

Burnside

  • Guest
have a feeling about this one name begins with "S" ???
I'm thinking that the profile used to begin with a M. mmm

Online myothernameis

I'm thinking that the profile used to begin with a M. mmm

If it is her, then it shows you, she is a control freak, she is preventing a field report being place here on ukp, and she probably reading this right now, the mad cow that she is  :D :D :D

Offline Sonny Crockett

I would still review if I wanted to. That is my choice, not hers!!

Plus if I had a bad experience, I would review. Couldn't give a damn about her opinion or whatever. That wouldn't count as she couldn't give a damn about giving me a good time, so why would I care what she thinks.

Burnside

  • Guest
+1 if it is her, come on Mr (Bean) Fox let the cat out of the bag, as no doubt by the end of the weekend there will be about 100 replies to this.

Offline DickDiver

AW

Does the mysterious courtesan choose to hide her feedback on AW? I suspect not or she would have a dusty phone which doesn't sound like the case.

chico1000

  • Guest
If it is her, then it shows you, she is a control freak, she is preventing a field report being place here on ukp, and she probably reading this right now, the mad cow that she is  :D :D :D

Are we talking about the one who keeps retiring and then re-inventing herself.  Now a prima domme.

Online myothernameis

have a feeling about this one name begins with "S" ???

I'm thinking that the profile used to begin with a M. mmm

Are we talking about the one who keeps retiring and then re-inventing herself.  Now a prima domme.

Think the guys are talking about a certain French  girl, oh la la

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
Think the guys are talking about a certain French  girl, oh la la


Nah, if it was magalie then no one would care

Yikes, the fluffies will come out for miss alexxxxxxxxx

I can probably guess who it is. Less than a handful.

What i dont get is... Why make a new thread and not name


Your friend will be fine she has probably said it to a few folk.

Average prossie sees 6-8 clients a day x number of days. She will have forgotten whos who by now

Offline johnjo72

aye, c`mon foxxie who the f..k is it? She will have seen 50 to 100 since then and would probably not recognise your mate at the bus stop and will have said the same shit to all of them. She will be a poster on this site monitoring her own status so  the mere fact that she said this means she should be outed, she can then reply as "whoever" and we can all have  a  laugh at the white knight/her
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 11:29:10 pm by johnjo72 »


chico1000

  • Guest

Nah, if it was magalie then no one would care

Yikes, the fluffies will come out for miss alexxxxxxxxx

I can probably guess who it is. Less than a handful.

What i dont get is... Why make a new thread and not name


Your friend will be fine she has probably said it to a few folk.

Average prossie sees 6-8 clients a day x number of days. She will have forgotten whos who by now

Well one thing for sure it won't be you.  Your too busy back on here to be the average prossie.  Useful insight though.

RandyF

  • Guest
How happy would us guys be if the little darlings had a site where they came on all the time and rated our performances, and how many of us would never be off it?
We pay the girls for a service and that is all! If they want it we should respect their privacy.

As if it was already apparent from your mindless rants Aldi - You  clearly don't understand prostitution

Punters are the customers, the temporary employer, the 'boss'.  Prostitutes are the employee, the service providers.  Punters don't get reviewed.

Hoor's are selling their looks, body, sexual skills - there's no reason why they shouldn't be reviewed and compared and critiqued on websites or wherever.

RandyF

  • Guest
Think the guys are talking about a certain French  girl, oh la la

Shut the front door.  French Magalie doesn't like getting mentioned on UKP?  :D :lol:  I think that might come as big news to the moderators, as they've probably had to delete about 200 posts, ban 30 touts/her herself 20x - all chomping at the bit to mention, discuss, review her.  She's the most notorious tout in Scotland.  I notice slightly odd 'newbie' Burnside, knows of her....there's always at least of them active on here...  :scare:

RandyF

  • Guest
Tall or short? Fat or thin?


Well yeah, this is a bit of a drama lama thread.  There's probably about 10 hoors in Scotland that openly loathe UKP and don't want featured on it  :lol:

Take the most obvious one - Glasgow Kendra. It's ok to mention her, she rants and posts on her aw blog every time she has a meltdown, and she fairly typical of the 'don't mention me on ukp' gang.

She's never been comfortable being a prostitute, has no self confidence in herself, her looks (and she probably looks better than most..), or the services she provides , and she can't cope with people reviewing her or comparing her.  So like 98% of all females she's totally un-suited to being a prostitute.  These sorts can't cope with the realities of being a hoor - they need never have there looks, or cock sucking skills compared and judged publicly, behind the checkout at Tesco's, they must know this.

It's solely the punters prerogative whether he reviews or not.

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
Its definately Miss K or one of her crew.

What i dont get is, negative or positive feedback still gets one bookings. Its stupid to even mention ukp then be on the backfoot about it
« Last Edit: April 30, 2016, 02:16:59 pm by bensonhedges20 »

chico1000

  • Guest
As if it was already apparent from your mindless rants Aldi - You  clearly don't understand prostitution

Punters are the customers, the temporary employer, the 'boss'.  Prostitutes are the employee, the service providers.  Punters don't get reviewed.

Hoor's are selling their looks, body, sexual skills - there's no reason why they shouldn't be reviewed and compared and critiqued on websites or wherever.
+1

chico1000

  • Guest
Well yeah, this is a bit of a drama lama thread.  There's probably about 10 hoors in Scotland that openly loathe UKP and don't want featured on it  :lol:

Take the most obvious one - Glasgow Kendra. It's ok to mention her, she rants and posts on her aw blog every time she has a meltdown, and she fairly typical of the 'don't mention me on ukp' gang.

She's never been comfortable being a prostitute, has no self confidence in herself, her looks (and she probably looks better than most..), or the services she provides , and she can't cope with people reviewing her or comparing her.  So like 98% of all females she's totally un-suited to being a prostitute.  These sorts can't cope with the realities of being a hoor - they need never have there looks, or cock sucking skills compared and judged publicly, behind the checkout at Tesco's, they must know this.

It's solely the punters prerogative whether he reviews or not.
Totally agree hope Kendra gets a job in Tesco soon along with all the other good looking prostitues that feature on this site.

chico1000

  • Guest
Shut the front door.  French Magalie doesn't like getting mentioned on UKP?  :D :lol:  I think that might come as big news to the moderators, as they've probably had to delete about 200 posts, ban 30 touts/her herself 20x - all chomping at the bit to mention, discuss, review her.  She's the most notorious tout in Scotland.  I notice slightly odd 'newbie' Burnside, knows of her....there's always at least of them active on here...  :scare:
Not met the French one but she must love any kind of reference to her good or bad.  No not her was meaning someone else.

Offline johnjo72


Offline Dime

It may be Emma from G-E escorts. When I saw her, she told me she would prefer a review on AW rather than on here.

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
It may be Emma from G-E escorts. When I saw her, she told me she would prefer a review on AW rather than on here.

She wouldnt mention ukp out the blue. Plus she isnt banned here so no reason not to hate.

Most likely MissK the new owo queen or one of her associates

Online myothernameis

She said; please do not write a review regardless if it was positive review, she has asked most of her punters the same. Unfortunately he didn't ask why not

Right, even though we wont get told who she was, I would say it's kind of back firing on her, as she is getting talked about, and eventually her name is going to get out, by someone seeing her, and they go against her word

Inspector Gadget

  • Guest
She wouldnt mention ukp out the blue. Plus she isnt banned here so no reason not to hate.

Most likely MissK the new owo queen or one of her associates

Why would you say that? Very random!  I find that very curious.  Could be any hoor. 

Inspector Gadget

  • Guest
I don't doubt my mate but as it wasn't my punt it wouldn't be fair on the WG to post her name when I wasn't there.

Being a popular WG I'm sure she will have said to others and they are free to say.

If it's unfair on the lassie, why bring it up at all?  It's as though you want folk to ask who it is. If yer dying to spill the beans, just say who she is. If she's very well reviewed as you say, she probably has a very good reason fur asking not to be brought under a spotlight. Which makes me curious as to your motive fur mentioning it at all. You're very Niave if ye think she's the first hoor to ask no to be reviewed. Probably happens every day.

Offline MrFox

If it's unfair on the lassie, why bring it up at all?  It's as though you want folk to ask who it is. If yer dying to spill the beans, just say who she is. If she's very well reviewed as you say, she probably has a very good reason fur asking not to be brought under a spotlight. Which makes me curious as to your motive fur mentioning it at all. You're very Niave if ye think she's the first hoor to ask no to be reviewed. Probably happens every day.

I brought it up as I found it strange a WG asked not to be reviewed on a forum I used, and wondered what her (or any WG's) reason could be.

I'm not 'dying' to tell you who she is, my post was not about who she is, but more why and would you review if asked not to.

Motive...I have no agenda with the WG i have never met or named. There is no possible gain for me.

I didn't think this was the first case of a WG asking not to be reviewed but clearly from the lack of replies stating a WG asked not to be reviewed it probably is not every day as you suspect.




Offline auldie63

Seriously, who is so desperate to know the girl's name but nosey bastards with nothing better to do in their lives. I don't give a fuck who she is and fail to see why anyone should not have their wishes respected as regards privacy, simply because they are in a certain job.
I asume the girl advertises somewhere as otherwise the poster would not have met her. If she is happy with this as her only means of advertising her wares, who on here has the right to alter that?
She is entitled to do her business as she wishes and all the auld sweetie wives on here who are gagging for her secret identity should fuck off and get a life!

RandyF

  • Guest
I brought it up as I found it strange a WG asked not to be reviewed on a forum I used, and wondered what her (or any WG's) reason could be.

99/100 it's for purely selfish reasons MrFoxx.  Bookings & money.  This isn't AW, so blatant lies about pic accuracy, size, age etc., etc. get discussed routinely on here...and nowhere else really?

There's loads of them.  Another Glasgow example springs to mind - Lucy Sanfranciso.  Ok to mention her again, as she has ranted about UKP before on her AW profile.

Has a perfect AW feedback of 500+ probably the highest in the area, but hates UKP and its members with a passion does not want featured on here ever, why? Because punters consistently report on her appalling time wasting tactics, because we all remember and talk about her threesomes she used to offer with her mum...and so on, and so on.

Offline DickDiver

Seriously, who is so desperate to know the girl's name but nosey bastards with nothing better to do in their lives. I don't give a fuck who she is and fail to see why anyone should not have their wishes respected as regards privacy, simply because they are in a certain job.
I asume the girl advertises somewhere as otherwise the poster would not have met her. If she is happy with this as her only means of advertising her wares, who on here has the right to alter that?
She is entitled to do her business as she wishes and all the auld sweetie wives on here who are gagging for her secret identity should fuck off and get a life!

I hear what you are saying Auldie and like you I give not one fuck to know who it is.

She definitely has the right to conduct her business how she wishes. And equally punters definitely have the right to review how they wish. She can ask them not to review, they can take that into consideration and make their own decision on whether to or not.

Inspector Gadget

  • Guest
I brought it up as I found it strange a WG asked not to be reviewed on a forum I used, and wondered what her (or any WG's) reason could be.

I'm not 'dying' to tell you who she is, my post was not about who she is, but more why and would you review if asked not to.

Motive...I have no agenda with the WG i have never met or named. There is no possible gain for me.

I didn't think this was the first case of a WG asking not to be reviewed but clearly from the lack of replies stating a WG asked not to be reviewed it probably is not every day as you suspect.

Regardless if your intentions are pure my friend, I stand by my a comment that it is indeed normal for a prozzie not to want to be reviewed, and for a variety of reasons. My proof?  Well, of the 40 plus I've encountered in 5 years, a significant number of those have asked for no feedback. Often not giving a reason. Given the amount of punts that happen a day, I'd say it's a daily occurrence. You will come across it again. That you can be sure of.

Offline DickDiver

Do they ALL ask you not to review them Gadgie??

C'mon man, time for you to get off the review bench.

Offline Fasting

Regardless if your intentions are pure my friend, I stand by my a comment that it is indeed normal for a prozzie not to want to be reviewed, and for a variety of reasons. My proof?  Well, of the 40 plus I've encountered in 5 years, a significant number of those have asked for no feedback. Often not giving a reason. Given the amount of punts that happen a day, I'd say it's a daily occurrence. You will come across it again. That you can be sure of.

I always wonder how some guys find the time to talk about this stuff with WGs. I shag and I leave. Reviews haven't come up in conversation once.

Prossies who wouldn't want honest reviews are either bad-prossies, insecure, or both. It's also to do with power/control. Good prossies should count their lucky stars (or their piles of cash) that UKP exists.

Also, nothing would convince me to review a WG like being told not to.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Some prossies prefer AdultWork system knowing if you leave them bad feedback they will respond with malicious lies against you to damage your own feedback history which could put other prossies off seeing you (e.g. false violent allegations). They don't have the same retaliation for negative reviews on UKP.

Another reason is that reviews on this site are not deleted if they claim to have "retired", which they are allowed to do so with other review sites or AdultWork where they simply delete their own profile to get rid of bad feedback, create a new one and claim being victim of "hacking", just to rally up the fluffies to feel sympathy for her :rolleyes:

Another reason is that reviews on UKP are open to discussion, for positive reviews others may chip in about downsides about her not mentioned in the review to help those reading become more informed before spending their hard earned money. Again not possible on AdultWork.

That's three reasons, many more.