Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Miss KDD under interrogation, London  (Read 6641 times)


162 review(s) for MissKDD (158 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline The Beano

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


After dabbling with Seeking Arrangement I thought I should recalibrate my filth scale with a booking with Kristen. Thinking about it, it has been over a year since I have seen her one to one, without a third person, or in the dungeon or other such distraction.
Comms were excellent as usual on aw, with responses within a couple of hours usually. Agreed 1.5 hours at the published rate at the central London Hotel I was staying at. Sent her the outline of the theme and got back the usual reply of "perfect"
In the past she has always come straight from work and is usually in a hurry to get out of her civvies and into the shower. This time she was finishing early and I asked her to wear sexy secretary type gear on arrival and explained she didn't need a shower straight off. Sure enough on arrival she was dressed in short skirt, hold ups, white blouse. She only had to change into her heels. So it all started off nice enough, proper dfk, plenty of groping, hand up skirt, and pleased to discover a butt plug already in place. Then a change of mood as the theme of the booking began to unfold. The last time we met was with TS Becky and I remember K saying, as I was gagging away on Becky's cock, "now you know what I go through". At the time I thought it was just an insolent comment, but later I started to wonder if there had been a conspiracy. Maybe while I was in the shower K had told Becky to stick it down my throat. Maybe she had whispered in her ear "fuck him hard" then smirked as Becky's stuck her cock in me. So I decided to interrogate K to find her motives.
So after kissing her so nicely and removing her top, I pinned her, face to the wall, leg between hers, and made my accusations. She admitted the insolent comment but said she just wanted to push my boundarie s. I told her she was taking the piss and, after stripping her naked pulled her by the hair to the shower cubicle and gave her my piss directly into her mouth. Eventually my cock was in her mouth with the liquid spraying from the corners of her mouth. Once I was finished I told her to clean up and get her wrist restraints and collar on.
After I had chained her to the towel rail, bent her over,I gave her a good spanking, then spread her arse cheeks to admire the jewelled plug. Eventually, I took it out and put it in her mouth while I undid the chain and got her on her knees ready for some serious DT. Firstly she was facefucked with her hands cuffed behind her, then her hands were cuffed behind my back. Then facedown on the bed with her holding onto her heels, then on her back with her head over edge of the bed with me standing over her, looking down at her face between my legs, while I fucked her further before putting my arse over her lips for some deep rimming. The oral ordeal was not over yet and I ordered her onto her front and inserted the anal hook and facefucked her while pulling on the lead.
As I took the hook out I was pleased to see the gape, and after putting the condom on fucked her in the arse. I was ready for a bit of a rest after these exertions so told K to entertain me with her orgasm. Soon I was lying on the floor, looking up as she worked her clit with the doxy, and before long I was rained on by her squirt. I reached up and inserted fingers into her pussy and arse, causing more squirt. When I took the fingers out she bent over and sucked them. Back on the bed for anal cowgirl before cim ( she gave some ow before taking it off). I took the cum from her mouth and spread it on her cheeks and chin, then she asked me to do her forehead as well. She seemed to be looking over my head, then I realised there was a mirror above the bed and she was admiring her facial decoration!
Round 2 was slightly mundane. Watched porn and dfk to get hard then wanked to climax while K rimmed me all the way only stopping to take another cim. This time dribbling cum out of her mouth in an arc onto her tits, a bit like a frown, but timed it so the tips of the arc gradually ran into her nipples before she rubbed it in.
Had a nice chat, shower and said goodbye.
Exceptional as always.
TB

Offline claretandblue

Still want to see this girl one day!is she still a curvy size ten op?

Ben4454

  • Guest
I haven't seen KDD although I did have a E-mail discussion with her in arranging a booking although our schedules didn't fit - her comms were very good though.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2016, 08:20:16 am by Ben4454 »

Offline The Beano

Still want to see this girl one day!is she still a curvy size ten op?

She certainly is. Nice round ass, tapered waist and E cup boob job (although you wouldn't know unless you asked, it's one of the best I've come across)
TB

hanschad

  • Guest
Meeting her in may...

you made my day...!!

Offline hendrix

Great review TB :hi:

MissKDD is still the benchmark for that type of punt in London imo. Difficult to top really.

Offline Weathersmo

Would love to see her , she is the benchmark for all escorts

Offline claretandblue

She certainly is. Nice round ass, tapered waist and E cup boob job (although you wouldn't know unless you asked, it's one of the best I've come across)
TB
Cheers, good to know  :hi:

mrhappypants

  • Guest
At my count this is your SIXTH positive review of the same girl.  I notice also you have given several other girls multiple positive reviews.  Some of these girls, to my certain knowledge, screen punters in order they only book those who will write them positive reviews.

just saying....

Dave

Offline Ozy84

Hendrix how would you compare her service and looks to cutestlucy?

Offline hendrix

Some of these girls, to my certain knowledge, screen punters in order they only book those who will write them positive reviews.


Dave

Think you should name and shame if it's certain knowledge. That would benefit the board and help punters decide if they want to book prossies that do that. I wouldn't book a prossie that I knew was expecting a positive review :thumbsdown:

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Think you should name and shame if it's certain knowledge. That would benefit the board and help punters decide if they want to book prossies that do that. I wouldn't book a prossie that I knew was expecting a positive review :thumbsdown:

I already have, in post 47 of this thread; https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86997.75 - reproduced below.



"A very similar thing happened to me. I had a lengthy conversation trying to find an agreeable time then Adele read my reviews and said she did not want to meet me.

Which is fine.  As you say - move on.  But I move on now aware that there are a group of girls, who may or may not be known to each other, who screen punters if they think they may write a critical review. Adele is one of these, but there are others. If you can bear to go back and read the review I wrote on Dee you might see that what was actually a measured description of my experience got a reaction, not just from her but from a number of punters on here, completely out of proportion with the commentary in the review. 

There is also a group of punters, who may or may not be known to each other, who appear aware of this and post reviews on here that focus on at least some of the same girls, that tend to play up the positive and down the negative.  They often review the same group of girls and they often review these girls multiple times.

I am less comfortable with this as I think it is against the interests of the board.  So when I read another positive review, of one of the same group of girls, by one of the same group of punters, I hope that punters outside of the circle are aware of the broader context."



By the way, what I am certain of is that there are a group of girls who screen punters that they think might write a negative review.  It is not the same as "a prossie that I knew was expecting a positive review."

Dave

Offline hendrix

I already have, in post 47 of this thread; https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86997.75 - reproduced below.



"A very similar thing happened to me. I had a lengthy conversation trying to find an agreeable time then Adele read my reviews and said she did not want to meet me.

Which is fine.  As you say - move on.  But I move on now aware that there are a group of girls, who may or may not be known to each other, who screen punters if they think they may write a critical review. Adele is one of these, but there are others. If you can bear to go back and read the review I wrote on Dee you might see that what was actually a measured description of my experience got a reaction, not just from her but from a number of punters on here, completely out of proportion with the commentary in the review. 

There is also a group of punters, who may or may not be known to each other, who appear aware of this and post reviews on here that focus on at least some of the same girls, that tend to play up the positive and down the negative.  They often review the same group of girls and they often review these girls multiple times.

I am less comfortable with this as I think it is against the interests of the board.  So when I read another positive review, of one of the same group of girls, by one of the same group of punters, I hope that punters outside of the circle are aware of the broader context."



By the way, what I am certain of is that there are a group of girls who screen punters that they think might write a negative review.  It is not the same as "a prossie that I knew was expecting a positive review."

Dave

So, the group is Adele and Dee?

This should probably be a separate thread though, apologies to the OP.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 10:29:14 am by hendrix »

Offline The Beano

So, the group is Adele and Dee?

This should probably be a separate thread though, apologies to the OP.

No problem Hendrix. I suppose I should comment now as I feel as though I've been implicated as one of these alleged  punters who review with an ulterior motive. All I can say is that I can only review those I have seen (or didn't see in the case of Little Miss Orla). Also I like writing reviews. I'm risk adverse to not having a good time or wasting money, so I do tend to stick with the girls I'm likely to have a good time with and who offer the services I require. If the service is not up to scratch I will neutral or negative them. As far as KDD is concerned I have reviewed her mainly in different scenarios eg one to one, with another girl, with a TS, in the dungeon etc. She also has over 70 reviews, and I can't remember seeing a negative one, so I wouldn't say I was being over generous in giving her positives. It's never crossed my mind that the reviews I've written on here would make booking a girl easier or give me some advantage over others, indeed I think most of the reviews I have done have lead to questions from other members, therefore have been beneficial to them.
TB
TB

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Hendrix, I think it belongs here.

I think that a track record of writing SIX positive reviews for the same WG is something punters should consider when they read the opinion in this review.

Dave

Offline hendrix

Hendrix, I think it belongs here.

I think that a track record of writing SIX positive reviews for the same WG is something punters should consider when they read the opinion in this review.

Dave

Ah ok. I was referring to the "group of girls" idea as being possibly another thread as that's pretty interesting.

The OP can answer for himself (I see that he just did) - I'm happy to say that I think I've written a lot more than 6 positive reviews on KDD :D but I think they've nearly all involved different combo's/scenarios, which I think was useful information for other punters :hi: - people can take what they want out of it really, but I'm told that they've been useful :unknown:

Offline rockharders

There is also a group of punters, who may or may not be known to each other, who appear aware of this and post reviews on here that focus on at least some of the same girls, that tend to play up the positive and down the negative.  They often review the same group of girls and they often review these girls multiple times.

I am less comfortable with this as I think it is against the interests of the board.  So when I read another positive review, of one of the same group of girls, by one of the same group of punters, I hope that punters outside of the circle are aware of the broader context."


+1

Just my general thoughts on this:

When you have forum darlings with 50 odd reviews but over half of them written by the same handful of people it doesn't really add anything new or informative, therefore not that useful to me. Fluffies are particularly prone to doing this. Not just that, but it makes the girl appear more popular than she is when in reality she's getting more than the usual visits and reviews from her personal fan club. The "talk of the town" builds up hype and expectations.

I have my favorite girls too but I don't write up a new review every time I see them. Unless there was a drastic change in the quality of service I just don't see the point.

Offline hendrix

+1

Just my general thoughts on this:

When you have forum darlings with 50 odd reviews but over half of them written by the same handful of people it doesn't really add anything new or informative, therefore not that useful to me. Fluffies are particularly prone to doing this. Not just that, but it makes the girl appear more popular than she is when in reality she's getting more than the usual visits and reviews from her personal fan club. The "talk of the town" builds up hype and expectations.

I have my favorite girls too but I don't write up a new review every time I see them. Unless there was a drastic change in the quality of service I just don't see the point.

But do you think that writing another review of a "favourite" that is a different type of punt is valuable? Like a duo with a different girl, or a dungeon or a TS or a golf club?

Offline OutForJustice80

Some of these girls, to my certain knowledge, screen punters in order they only book those who will write them positive reviews.
Can I just ask how you know this? Also I don't really understand the premise, are people sending disclaimers with every booking request letting the WG know that a negative review will be written if the meeting doesn't live up to standards? How can you be certain that is the reason for the screening?

Just to be clear, I'm not trying to call you out, I'm genuinely curious.

OP, sorry this is all over your review. Sounds like you had a great time, I wish I could afford KDD.

Justanotheruser

  • Guest
I find duo reviews very useful as it's always good to hear about two girls that work well together. Repeats of one to one bookings, not so much. But that's just me  :unknown:

Offline rockharders

But do you think that writing another review of a "favourite" that is a different type of punt is valuable? Like a duo with a different girl, or a dungeon or a TS or a golf club?

I'm not judging your reviews or pointing the finger at you Hendrix. Personally not for me because I'm a fairly vanilla punter but I'm sure they are useful for guys who do want that kind of thing.

If a girl has a good run of positive reviews from a variety of punters that's plenty good enough for me to try her out or at least put her on the HL

It's just no help when we had fluffy cunts like unclesnideheart incessantly spamming this forum with loveletters with the same girls again and again.

Offline hendrix

I'm not judging your reviews or pointing the finger at you Hendrix. Personally not for me because I'm a fairly vanilla punter but I'm sure they are useful for guys who do want that kind of thing.

If a girl has a good run of positive reviews from a variety of punters that's plenty good enough for me to try her out or at least put her on the HL

It's just no help when we had fluffy cunts like unclesnideheart incessantly spamming this forum with loveletters with the same girls again and again.

Understood  :thumbsup:

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Can I just ask how you know this?

As I said above, Adele gave it as the reason for not giving me a booking.

Also I don't really understand the premise, are people sending disclaimers with every booking request letting the WG know that a negative review will be written if the meeting doesn't live up to standards?

I am going to treat this as a genuine question but I should tell you that your premise makes me doubt the sincerity of your intention.  I think the girls involved keep an eye on this board, chat with each, and with pet punters, as a way of checking punters before booking them.

How can you be certain that is the reason for the screening? 
.

Because Adele told me it was, and the pattern is the same with a number of other WG's.

I should also say that, to me, what I am saying looks obvious. Read the back catalogue of reviews - starting with Beano. Look at the girls he has reviewed (multiple times) and then the other punters who have written multiple reviews on these same girls, and then the other girls they review multiple times.  Look also at the girls who work together.

You will find the same names keep coming up.

Can I "prove" it - obviously not. But we are not in a court of law here.

When I read yet another blandly positive review, of one of the same girls, from one of the same group of punters, I smell bullshit.  I am not an investigative journalist, I do not have time, resource or inclination to try and "prove" I am right and nor do I think I need to.  All I am saying is that I think it is a good thing if punters on here are aware that these patterns may exist and able to draw their own conclusions. And if this is all just a figment of my imagination I am sure they will see through it and punt accordingly.

Dave

« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 01:31:13 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline ciscoxxx69

Fucking Awesome Filth......loved it!  :drinks: :drinks: :drinks: :hi:

Offline hendrix

Hendrix how would you compare her service and looks to cutestlucy?

Sorry Ozy, I forgot to respond :D

Service wise, they both have a great attitude. KDD is up for pretty much anything. I've obviously met her many more times than Lucy,  but Lucy certainly delivers everything on her "likes" list with no messing around. Looks wise, they're both great for my tastes, but quite different as Lucy is Latin/Med looking. Lucy has had comms issues highlighted, which is something KDD excels at as many have said.


Offline smiths

As I said above, Adele gave it as the reason for not giving me a booking.

I am going to treat this as a genuine question but I should tell you that your premise makes me doubt the sincerity of your intention.  I think the girls involved keep an eye on this board, chat with each, and with pet punters, as a way of checking punters before booking them.
.

Because Adele told me it was, and the pattern is the same with a number of other WG's.

I should also say that, to me, what I am saying looks obvious. Read the back catalogue of reviews - starting with Beano. Look at the girls he has reviewed (multiple times) and then the other punters who have written multiple reviews on these same girls, and then the other girls they review multiple times.  Look also at the girls who work together.

You will find the same names keep coming up.

Can I "prove" it - obviously not. But we are not in a court of law here.

When I read yet another blandly positive review, of one of the same girls, from one of the same group of punters, I smell bullshit.  I am not an investigative journalist, I do not have time, resource or inclination to try and "prove" I am right and nor do I think I need to.  All I am saying is that I think it is a good thing if punters on here are aware that these patterns may exist and able to draw their own conclusions. And if this is all just a figment of my imagination I am sure they will see through it and punt accordingly.

Dave

And as I posted in your link I agree with you. What is known is unclesnideheart who I KNEW was dodgy got banned for sharing a computer with Sylvester/Atticus Finch who i also KNEW was dodgy under both nicks. So punters conspiring HAS occurred, now to me its not a big jump to believe as I do that there are others doing the same, and conspiring with some WGs trying to undermine UKP. I smelt the bullshit from snide when he tried to undermine a negative review on Little Katie by Mr Brightside and then wrote her a love letter he called a review, admin didn't agree it was a review and moved it to the relevant regional board. Non white knight fanboys don't behave like that, they just have to put the WG first.

A punter giving a WG a good review may well result in her getting more punters as that's the power of UKP so that could be a WGs motive. For a punter it could be because he is besotted with the WG or WGs and/or he gets something in return, for example a free punt, again some WGs could see this as a small price to pay to get more punters. Now UKP is a forum not a court of law so we are free on here to post our views and opinions and this is mine. I have a number of punters who I disregard as being well dodgy and their posts not to be trusted.


vw

  • Guest
And as I posted in your link I agree with you. What is known is unclesnideheart who I KNEW was dodgy got banned for sharing a computer with Sylvester/Atticus Finch who i also KNEW was dodgy under both nicks. So punters conspiring HAS occurred, now to me its not a big jump to believe as I do that there are others doing the same, and conspiring with some WGs trying to undermine UKP. I smelt the bullshit from snide when he tried to undermine a negative review on Little Katie by Mr Brightside and then wrote her a love letter he called a review, admin didn't agree it was a review and moved it to the relevant regional board. Non white knight fanboys don't behave like that, they just have to put the WG first.

A punter giving a WG a good review may well result in her getting more punters as that's the power of UKP so that could be a WGs motive. For a punter it could be because he is besotted with the WG or WGs and/or he gets something in return, for example a free punt, again some WGs could see this as a small price to pay to get more punters. Now UKP is a forum not a court of law so we are free on here to post our views and opinions and this is mine. I have a number of punters who I disregard as being well dodgy and their posts not to be trusted.

You mentioned this circle on your Christmas message to the white knights

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=79828.msg993664#msg993664

mrhappypants

  • Guest
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 03:24:16 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline smiths

You mentioned this circle on your Christmas message to the white knights

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=79828.msg993664#msg993664

Indeed I did and my view remains the same but on the London boards things have improved since then with the bannings overall in my observations. Doesn't mean the fanboys have all gone but admins chopping some of their ilk down made some step back and consider what too do next, and some have seemingly fucked off elsewhere.

Offline herbie007

Great review Beano.

I still haven't seen KDD yet but hoping to put that right next month if she's available, I want to team here up as a duo with Dee for a birthday treat.  :P

Offline Jeffpike

Seen KDD three times now and she is fantastic. Probably the best deep throat ever.

Offline The Beano

Great review Beano.

I still haven't seen KDD yet but hoping to put that right next month if she's available, I want to team here up as a duo with Dee for a birthday treat.  :P

Cheers Herbie, I could see that pairing working very well together. I've seen KDD with another girl and she doesn't hold back. Can't imagine Dee being too shy either. Look forward to the review of that one!
TB

Offline herbie007

Cheers Herbie, I could see that pairing working very well together. I've seen KDD with another girl and she doesn't hold back. Can't imagine Dee being too shy either. Look forward to the review of that one!
TB

So can I  :P

Just got to put it all together now. 

Offline ciscoxxx69

Cheers Herbie, I could see that pairing working very well together. I've seen KDD with another girl and she doesn't hold back. Can't imagine Dee being too shy either. Look forward to the review of that one!
TB

+1 - love both Girls in that Combo..... :wacko:

Offline cantwait

Does she charge extra for watersport? Been with her twice, both memorable experiences!

theGOAT

  • Guest
Cracking review TB.  I've got a booking with her soon and intend a very similar routine.

Cheers!  :drinks: