jucy lucy 32

[Werewolfofliverpool]

so i booked with this slut   External Link/Members Only

and i text her last night, and she replies with the usual one word answers "yeah, no, ok, yeah " blah blah, just very cold replies which i dont like, its a bad sign when they dont even try to build any kind of rapport, so i was a little unsure now, but decided to book anyway.   i ask her where she lives, and she replies "prom"
right, ok, where about, i ask her.  i asked if she lives in the new apartment along the water front, and she replies with yes.  well thats a lie, i knew she was lying, cos i know from her reviews she lives above shops.. so i ask her for the address, and her ONLY reply was the post code... yeah like that helps, idiot.  i go to google earth and type it in, and its on Victoria street new Brighton, so not the water front in the new apartment block then.. thought not.  so i decided to give it a go anyway and walked down.  i got there 15 mins early and text her to say im outside, and what the number of her flat was... i got no answer... so i waited and waited and waited, no answer.  so i decided to go get some food... no answer still... so fuck that, i leave... only when i get home she texts with some bullshit about being in the park with her kids and shes only just got back... oh fuck off..... i havent replied to her and she will get a nice little negative feedback to her shitty little AW page...

[lewisjones23]

well arent you the soft twat

you were warned about her from multiple posters and still went for it

[Werewolfofliverpool]

yeah but also multiple people said shes good too, so i had to try.

[lewisjones23]

not one person posted anything positive on the thread you put up about her

[vw]

not one person posted anything positive on the thread you put up about her

To be fair the review is useful, all those people saying bad things had not posted a negative between them (Shame on them)

At least a negative review is now on record, may help future punters !

Thanks for the review wearwoof !   

[Werewolfofliverpool]

not one person posted anything positive on the thread you put up about her

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44830.0



no?

[lewisjones23]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44830.0



no?

no - read what I put

[vw]

no - read what I put

Nothing !

[OakTree]

Werewolf started a thread Here

I think this is what Lewis is referring to.

[lewisjones23]

He posted up a thread asking about her - no one had anything positive to say about her.

Maybe I've came over wrong as I do appreciate the review, they all help, but it does make me think some people are beyond help a bit when they ignore all advice given

[vw]

Werewolf started a thread Here

I think this is what Lewis is referring to.

Oh well at least there is a proper negative now and he didn't touch her so wont catch any bugs !

Maybe I've came over wrong as I do appreciate the review, they all help, but it does make me think some people are beyond help a bit when they ignore all advice given

True, I do like an I told you so as much as the other !

Does make you think about bothering again !

[lewisjones23]

Werewolf started a thread Here

I think this is what Lewis is referring to.

This

[mexicola]

I had the pleasure / misfortune of punting with Lucy about 18 months ago (way before I signed up her hence no review).

I'd have rated her a neutral, it was mostly an hour me jamming stuff up her arse, her with her dildo up her pussy and arse doing a show (and letting me take some pics), shagging her pussy and arse. Basically just filth (no attempt at GFE) which was what I wanted at the time.

 She was very chatty but didn't come across as the brightest. 

I've never been back as she has added bb to her likes and a lot of her feedback is from guys who see multiple BB girls. Plus a lot of her recent feedback is from a fluffy fan boy of hers.

[cueball]

I've never been back as she has added bb to her likes and a lot of her feedback is from guys who see multiple BB girls.

I might be wrong but I suspect it's the bb that attracted the wolf man to her.

As I said, I might be wrong and its wolfy's choice at the end if the day.

We know a little more about her now anyway (shit comms), not that it mattered to a lot of us but the info is there to see.

Cheers for the review op

[Werewolfofliverpool]

hi cueball.
no, not interested in the bb, i chose her cos shes the closest escort to me and allowed filming... 

[mexicola]

Might be worth giving her a second chance if filming is what you are after. I was amazed she wasn't bothered with how explicit the pics where I took of her.

[cueball]

hi cueball.
no, not interested in the bb, i chose her cos shes the closest escort to me and allowed filming... 

 

I did say I might be wrong

I'd cast your net a bit wider if I were you then, there must be somebody better that's within range 

[Integral]

Not wanting to hijack an old thread, but I thought this was the most relevant place to post this (didn't seem like worth a new thread on its own).

To make a long story short, the Wirral is outside of my usual hunting grounds but I looked this WG up as a potential plan B to a BDSM-flavored Plan A I'm considering in the area.

I was a bit put off by her location and the lack of clarity around bareback (neither BB or unprotected sex are listed on her AW profile) from this and another thread, so I made contact with her and she confirmed to me that she ABSOLUTELY DOES offer bareback. For that reason I won't be seeing her.

A real shame as there was something about her profile pics I really liked and she seemed very friendly and bubbly over text and email.

[Werewolfofliverpool]

just shag her with a condom, whats the difference?
its not like shes a busy WG, she just does it every now and then, its not like she just goes around fucking everyone bareback, maybe all her punters use condoms?

[Integral]

just shag her with a condom, whats the difference?
its not like shes a busy WG, she just does it every now and then, its not like she just goes around fucking everyone bareback, maybe all her punters use condoms?

Yeah, fine if all you want to do is shag her but what about if you want DFK and OWO, or you like to go down on WG's?

I know the risk of catching anything from OWO (for example) is lower than unprotected penetration, but personally I want to keep my risk as low as possible. To me a girl who dosn't bareback is less risky.

I've also been in the situation where I've seen a girl only to find out later from UKP that she had previously done BB with clients. I posted this to remove any doubt for other punters who might be thinking about seeing her but, like me, wern't 100% sure if she did BB or not.

It's up to everyone to balance risk vs. reward of seeing a BB girl for themselves.

[rovingman]

 
Strewth....... that has to be the worst arse I've seen in any prossie advert ever....
Each to their own.