OK, seems like I've fallen for the first-post curse of being mistaken for the person I reviewed. Not sure there's much I can do to disprove this - happy to provide a screenshot of my adultwork email list that dates back to 2010, with requests for meetings back to 2011 with such girls as pinkcupcakesxx (which I presume is before nina was working) - let me know if this is acceptable. Not sure how my suggestion that a 30 min appointment might be a better way of seeing her, than JR's hint of advice of a 2hr appointment, is seen as good marketing?
The one criticism that I feel was justified was the lack of detail - so I'll address that now if I may. So the theme of the meet was humiliation (see below if you want my response to 'tantric talents' query as to why this is a positive for me). Started with some mild cock-slapping where she was (at request) quite dismissive of me, and what i'd describe as teasing kissing (no tongues were exchanged). Then came the one moment I considered a negative: She lay back on the bed demanding I lick her - not something I do on any punts for fear of taking anything back. Once again, this'll make me seem odd to many in this forum, but I awkwardly avoided doing this. She then pulled me on the bed on my back, and straddled me facing away, a bit like 69 but with no oral in either direction. A bit more slapping. Then she turned around and lowered herself down on to me. About ten minutes of that, quite enthusiastically given, but the main feature was she put her hand at my throat - not something I'd experienced, but was done quite well and I felt added to the kinkiness. The she climbed off, and we went into missionary. Another ten minutes of good eye contact and keeping up the vocal performance and it was all over very satisfactorily.
I felt that I enjoyed my punt way more than was implied by JR's neutral review, so was realistically only left with a positive. If he'd left a negative, I might well have left a neutral because, even though I enjoyed it, I could easily see the appeal wouldn't be universal.
Regarding the SPH, who really knows how our quirks arise. I think I'm fairly average, but have been 'unfortunate' in that my wife and a previous gf both came out of relationships with substantially hung guys before me. The SPH punts offer a way of exploring this, and the farewell kiss is usually accompanied by a cheeky 'don't worry, you're not that small' ego-boost (damn, actually I didnt get that from nina - another overlooked negative!)
In context, my next review (though the punt happened earlier), would have been lollygoldshow. For me that would initially have been a neutral (same scenario requested as it was quite prominently highlighted on her profile) as she didn't act out the scenario as she (correctly) pointed out that her profile stated that 'all requests were included in the hour service', which apparently meant they weren't in shorter. Disappointing as she fitted my visual requirements perfectly,and I was on the verge of paying for the full hour to get what I wanted (which would have put it up to £100 per pop), but knew I didn't have time. An attempted second meet (arranged, got to the area, and she then didn't answer the phone) means I'd retrospectively give her a negative.
Again, apologies if this comes over 'fluffy' - another ad hominem cliche often applied to first reviews. If this forum is purely for hard-core gonzo style meets, this should be made clearer. Yes, my going on a punt is predicated on finding the girl stunning - sorry, LL, if not prefixing every instance of an obviously subjective judgement with IMO is against forum form.
