Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Doug Richard of Dragons Den had sex with 13 and 15yo from sugar daddy site  (Read 5960 times)

I think having sex with any 13 year old is a crime.  It's no excuse in my book that she looked older.

I think he got off because of all the Muslims having sex and marrying underage girls!  The Muslims all say my religion allows it, and under Sharia it's not a crime.


Is a 13 year old girl able to give consent, or does she even know what she is agreeing to; now I have always thought if you cant give proper consent, its basically rape

Now we have seen instances where the governing department, hasn't been happy with the sentence handed out to the prisoner, so they increased the sentence; surely the same thing should apply here, Doug Richard has openly admitted having sex with a 13 year old, in my eyes he has broken the law

This verdict will come back to haunt the courts, as you will now get other persons claiming, oh excuse me, she told me she was 17 year old

Offline Donnie69

The problem is the jury has found him not guilty.  He can only be retried in new evidence comes to light.

This verdict will come back to haunt the courts, as you will now get other persons claiming, oh excuse me, she told me she was 17 year old

Seriously? That's not exactly a new defence!

Should we also ask where the parents of these girls thought they were for such a long time?

Offline Apu

Hold on a minute;

The bloke shagged a 13 year old 5ft girl who weighed less than 6 stones, spanked her, had submissive-dom sex with her for hours and got away with it .

What?

Didnt one of the queens sons take part in a pedo-orgy party aswell? on a remote island etc

The rich sure do have their way in any part of the world, even in so called civilised countries like England where the rich can shag children.

The average pedo would be jailed, the rich pedo gets away easily after only 4 hours of discussion. The parents must be livid.

Bad parents, dodgy girls who will probably grow up f-cked up prossies.
This man probably has a string of underage girls he's gotten to in the past, look at his age, probably decades worth of underage girls.

That pedo should never live a normal life again, I honestly wish terrible repurcussions on him.

Bad parents but if I were the parents that man would be in grave by now.

That he was cleared seems very odd, given the evidence as I understand it from the Telegraph write-up. He knew beforehand that at least one of them still went to school, and didn't ask for any photographic ID. So I'm struggling to see how reasonable his belief that they were over 16 can have been. No doubt his lawyers were the best money can buy, but equally it doesn't sound as though the jury had too much sympathy for the two girls either. Obviously I wasn't sitting in the courtroom and didn't hear all the evidence, but my hunch is that I'd have found it difficult to acquit based on what (little?) I know.

jcdmj12

Now he has been cleared, but is it the end of the story, surely the police could apply for a Sex Risk Order, and apply the full term of 2 years, and he will have no say in this, tough if the police apply for this order

Very unlikely with the lawyers he'll be able to afford.

jcdmj12

Dirty nonce. Yes a 16 year old can look older, but no amount of make up is going to make a 13 year old look 18.

Yep, was at the swimming baths with one of my kids recently, and saw a bunch of 13-year-olds in swimming cossies. From their figures, they were blatantly children.

Offline two20

As there were 8 women on the jury the victim obviously never came across very well. He might be free, but he'll never be free from what we all think of him. Felt for the wife having to hold hands on the way to court.

Offline Fagin Again


Didnt one of the queens sons take part in a pedo-orgy party aswell? on a remote island etc

I've just done some internet research on this story, which I vaguely remembered being in the papers last year.

In 2008 a rich American friend of Prince Andrew’s called Jeffrey Epstein was jailed for 18 months after pleading guilty to a charge of soliciting prostitution from girls as young as 14.

Then, last year, Virginia Roberts, one of the girls with whom Epstein had been involved, alleged that she had had sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17. This claim was never tested in court, however, because it was irrelevant to the case that was being tried, which involved two other women suing the US government on the grounds that it had failed to protect their rights when it had entered into a plea bargain with Epstein in 2008.

Banning reason: Idiot

Offline Sonny Crockett

18-19 year olds make rubbish escorts.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline Odd Job

18-19 year olds make rubbish escorts.
Zara in Milton Keynes a few years ago was only 19 and wad fantastic.

jcdmj12

One interesting thing about this case from a punter's point of view is that the jury accepted a defence of 'it wasn't payment for sex, it was a gift'. 

That could be very important if the nordic model comes to pass in the UK.

Should we also ask where the parents of these girls thought they were for such a long time?

I wouldn't be surprised right now if these kids and the parents have sold there story to the news papers; so we going to find out more sordid detail about Doug Richard

The trouble is kids don't have a child hood any more, all the porn they see on there phones, my mates daughter was asked to send pics at 13 to boys in there class, it's going on with younger ones cos they all have phones at 8 these days, it's the parents that need to let them grow up slowly, everything seems so rushed these days.
I even saw a girl on face book buy a 3 year old a Iphone, stupid idiot she is.
That's the frighting thing as well. I was about 13 when i saw my first porn mag - before that I had to 'rely' on saucy pics in the papers for any visual stimulation. Now days you're just a click away from anything you might be curious about.

Very feel sorry for the kids today - seems they have to lead double lives; a real one, and an online one taking up just as much time. If i had any they certainly wouldn't be getting any sort of computer until they were at least 8/9 - let them use a bit of imagination and just play. Also only a basic mobile phone - calls, texts, no need for any social profile.

That's the frighting thing as well. I was about 13 when i saw my first porn mag -

Those were the days, top shelf magazines, we bit hard to reach, but once reached, like a naughty boy you browsed the photos, while the person next to you did the same......but just be careful mum doesn't walk in to the shop

Kids now a days don't need to do this, they just go online, to someplace like redtube, and its 10x as graphic as what you have seen in magazines

Offline webpunter

Felt for the wife having to hold hands on the way to court.
Didn't see this.  This term of reference is a badge only in the circumstances.  We don't know what price / leverage she will have extracted from her 'husband' in this display of support to improve his image.  Think of her as if playing cards with him - holding all the aces & picture cards.  There's one thing her husband shagging hookers [this happens all the time], something completely different underage ones & then being plastered all over the media & being up in court

Offline Jimmyredcab

18-19 year olds make rubbish escorts.

 You have to find one first.    :rolleyes:


Offline webpunter

You have to find one first.    :rolleyes:
And if you do, then if you really feel the need to take a present then maybe a bag of Haribos  :sarcastic:

Offline James999

18-19 year olds make rubbish escorts.

Bullshit.

First, there is no "escorting involved" pro$$ies are providing sex, they don't escort you anywhere, and an 18 / 19 year old can provide this along with an often fit body and of course without the years of emotional baggage and a body that's been banged senseless by every tom dick and abdul for years  :music:

Offline Jimmyredcab

Bullshit.

First, there is no "escorting involved" pro$$ies are providing sex, they don't escort you anywhere, and an 18 / 19 year old can provide this along with an often fit body and of course without the years of emotional baggage and a body that's been banged senseless by every tom dick and abdul for years  :music:

1000% correct ------ but how many genuine 18 year olds are on Adultwork.  :unknown:

Offline James999

1000% correct ------ but how many genuine 18 year olds are on Adultwork. 

Very very few (if any)

Pre AW was in many respects better for them, as "parlours" would advertise in local papers offering girls high earnings and as such more girls would try it, since AW arrived this route to market has vanished.

Offline normal_guy

Some of the comments in this thread are far too 'holier than thou'.

Are we not all perverts?

I suggest that a girl of 13/14 who's tall, with big boobs, make up, tats, and enough life experience to talk about adult things (sex cars uni shopping) could convincingly do a booking and pass off as 18/19.

From working in the nightclub industry you would be surprised how prelavant it is. Oddly enough, door policies have always been to ask lads for id and just let the girls in.

Obviously we must be very careful of what we all say in a topic like this.

From working in the nightclub industry you would be surprised how prelavant it is. Oddly enough, door policies have always been to ask lads for id and just let the girls in.

Obviously we must be very careful of what we all say in a topic like this.
Money before all else in these places !

I don't think Doug Richards will encounter any have a go hero's or be encumbered by this event in any way simply because he has the money and lawyers to back up this verdict.  If any news/media outlet or individual suggests otherwise, I'm sure he'll have good reason to sue. 

As for the comment on Sharia courts or whatever it was, I think you'll find there are far more serious and hideously dark goings on in Christendom Europe;

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/30/fears-for-missing-child-refugees

Anyway, back on topic;  I grew up on an estate and I remember a girl of about 14 living in my building who could easily pass for 17+.  She had a tramp stamp and other tats, smoked, drank alcohol, had boobs and curves etc.  In fact I'd only realized she was 14 after overhearing her uncle say 'You're only 14' to her and her sulking and sounding like someone who's 14! I also remember her hanging around with much older men, in their 40s who made no secret about enjoying her 'company'.  This sort of thing has been going on in sink estates up and down the country for decades if not centuries.  Blaming black men, gay men, and recently muslim men, etc has always been a false argument for something that is homegrown and a huge problem.  That loony tunes nut job David Icke was right all along!


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)