sexy louise 1990

[rodjaneandfreddy]

SexyLouise1990 - Neutral

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Link added by admin]


I saw louise last year on one of her leicester tours, not a massive fan of visiting hotels but she had been on my to do list for a while so booked her for a hotel in call as thats all she did. Got past reception easy enough up to the room knocked the door and louise answered. pretty enough girl but easily a whole dress size bigger than her advertised size, probably 2 stone heavier than her pictures make her look but she has a pair of fantastic huge tits so as i was there  i decided to stay and see it through.


no french kissing at all which makes it difficult to fully enjoy the experience as kissing for me is a huge turn on, didn't help either that when she took her clothes off it proved i was correct in my theory of her being much bigger than her photos, so i just concentrated on looking at the tits.... well i tried to anyway but she had that much fake tan on it had formed a dark brown line down the middle of her tits, not sure how fake tan works but I assume thats from sweat as the tan absolutely stunk, resembled a coat of ronseal if I'm honest, I'm now hoping it 'does what it says on the tin' as not impressed so far.


her service was decent, a lot of dirty talk which i like and she bounces well on cock, i managed to enjoy myself by closing my eyes and pretending it was someone else, she does do owo as well which is a good point ,it wasnt the best owo I've had but again decent and reasonably deep. i ended up shooting my load and leaving with 15/20 minutes left on the clock, i left thinking i should of just booked half an hour like i usually do with a new girl but i assumed she would be good given all of her reviews.


it wasnt a complete disaster, good tits, good fuck, decent oral and pretty face. just much much bigger than advertised, not the best personal hygiene, way too much fake tan and no kissing. Id say a neutral is fair.


Would I recommend? If you want a quick ok ish fuck then go for it, but not if you'd like a clean nice smelling slim girl

Would I return? If I was desperate, couldnt get anyone better and she lowered her prices.
Apologies if it's a little blunt but no point reviewing with the fluffies and wk as they ain't got any place here in my opinion!

If somebody could add her aw link it would be appreciated.

[GolfNut]

Links:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[CoolTiger]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I have alerted the mods to add the above to the review.

[leicesterdude]

Thanks for the review.

I've been tempted loads by her.

But I was spit off by the fact her pictures have been the same for at least 18 months.  Some of the better ones were at least 4 years ago.

But now I know. Thanks

[jasonleics41]

I had a similar experience with louise, I did wonder if my previous positive on her was too generous and if mine also should of been a neutral.

Can't comment on the fake tan, but I agree on the hygiene issues in other areas. I'm not into dirty talk but I'm glad it worked for you in this situation.

[CharlieChan]

Thanks for the review. Gutted tbh, that's another one off my HL. They seem to be dropping off like flies at the mo.

Still; on with the quest 

[Taggart]

I sat on the fence about seeing her some time back, and in the end saw Gemma from her stable, and it was probably a 5.5/10 experience, and her photos were dated. With this report that Louise's photos are also not representative, it begs the question about how accurate pictures of other girls in her stable are.  I've a hankering for Ria, but dont take disappointment well.

[GolfNut]

I've a hankering for Ria, but dont take disappointment well.

I doubt you'll be disappointed with Ria. I'll be seeing her again when she's back in the area.

[malenko]

Someone i wanted to see ages ago but I had a feeling she'd be a bit of a heffa

Sorry to hear about this mate, reading your review a neutral is pretty kind!

[Jackjones]

I'll echo Goldnuts comment Taggart, she is worth a visit and like most girls in the group best to see them sooner rather then later

[leicesterdude]

Goldnuts  is tons better than golf nut

[GolfNut]

Goldnuts  is tons better than golf nut

  . Yeah I like it!

[Picti]

Yes you can have them polished!

Also fully recommend Ria.  Saw Louise several years ago and had a good punt then but never returned and wouldn't have a clue how she is now.

[gunsun23]

I have seen sexy Louise 1990 for many years now and never had a problem with her hygiene.  Her pictures are in my opinion 100% accurate  she has never bean over weight in fact in the last 4 years I have got to know her she has lost weight not that she needed to. not every lady that advertise sex is going to be what you are looking for but that does not mean you have to insult and degrade someone for no reason just to make yourself feel better. half the lady's I have seen that I have paid for sex I am grateful that they give me the time off day because I would not stand a chance with most of them if we met in a pub or club. Louise is the most passionate and professional lady I have met though adult work. turns up on time always smelling of candy floss perfume dressed so as not to draw attention  to the reason why she is here but always brings a different sexy outfit in her bag  with her that has never disappointed. she makes you feel like she actually wants to be there unlikely some who spend there time looking around or at the watch or phone not interested in what you have to say. never once have I been let down even when she has had the odd  car problems she will always find a way to make the appointment. so in my opinion sexy louise 1990 is one of the best escorts/people  out there and you would be a fool not to see her.

[Steely Dan]

I have seen sexy Louise 1990 for many years now

So the OP thought she was neutral.  Seems fair from HIS experience.  It seems you may have had a different experience. If you posted a review, we could them learn from it.

Sound like a plan?

[Picti]

I'll be gentle with you gunsun as I fear that others won't be. Simply seeking to defend a WG by trying to discredit another punter's review isn't tolerated. You can't possibly know what happened in another punter's experience. Your response is a classic example of White Knighting. If you want your views to be considered then post your own review. That way a range of reviews are available for others to inform their punting choices / decisions. That's how the forum works.

[leicesterdude]

My godness. 

I am grateful they give me the time of day??

Hello Louise!  Atleast try love.

[TheNewSeeker]

. . . you would be a fool not to see her.

I must be a fool then 'cos I'll never see her; she's just not my type.

The OPs post is a reflection of his experience, not yours. Instead of writing such drivel, do your own review.

[Diehard]

I must be a fool then 'cos I'll never see her; she's just not my type.

The OPs post is a reflection of his experience, not yours. Instead of writing such drivel, do your own review.

Plus one! 

[CoolTiger]

I have seen sexy Louise 1990 for many years now and never had a problem with her hygiene.   

The OPs post is a reflection of his experience, not yours. Instead of writing such drivel, do your own review.

Gunsun, you have been a member on here for nearly 2 years and were very quick to warn members on here about sultry savannah.
I suspect you have used this board to take on fair bit of info on WGs yet you made no effort to provide us with details of any of your other punts, including your numerous punts with Louise1990, and you only end up posting about your positive experience with her in a neutral review on her, rather than starting your own review on her.

[Mark76]

I've seen her twice. The first time was good, second much less so. I can confirm also that she has hygiene issues. I was her first punter of the day and she wasn't clean and fresh. I actually stopped going down on her as a result.

She is a lot bigger now than her pics suggest. Though a couple in her private gallery are more realistic.

I wouldn't see her again as there are much better out there who smell sweaty!

[Diehard]

I've seen her twice. The first time was good, second much less so. I can confirm also that she has hygiene issues. I was her first punter of the day and she wasn't clean and fresh. I actually stopped going down on her as a result.

She is a lot bigger now than her pics suggest. Though a couple in her private gallery are more realistic.

I wouldn't see her again as there are much better out there who smell sweaty!

She and many of her stable are false advertisers, bigger than their pictures and older than claimed, most by at least a decade.

They have a number of fluffy white knighters though who wax lyrical but seasoned punters know to steer clear of these timewasters.

Plenty of other girls in the areas they appear in so I assume they have dusty phones these days

[Corsaire]

She and many of her stable are false advertisers, bigger than their pictures and older than claimed, most by at least a decade.

They have a number of fluffy white knighters though who wax lyrical but seasoned punters know to steer clear of these timewasters.

Plenty of other girls in the areas they appear in so I assume they have dusty phones these days

Wow, Diehard you make some very informative comments there. Most of that stable look good, I like slim girls. I think what you say is turn up but be prepared to walk if the photos are not accurate. Would that be a fair conclusion?

[rodjaneandfreddy]

She and many of her stable are false advertisers, bigger than their pictures and older than claimed, most by at least a decade.

They have a number of fluffy white knighters though who wax lyrical but seasoned punters know to steer clear of these timewasters.

Plenty of other girls in the areas they appear in so I assume they have dusty phones these days

Very valid points raised there even if it was Diehard making them.

[CoolTiger]

Very valid points raised there even if it was Diehard making them.

Agreed. Credit to DH for the valid points.

Someone has previously posted that a pimp manages their profiles, so it would seem no different to an agency advertising their girls. Having spoken to a few girls, I believe that this is the case.

Another point for which I will stick my neck out for....
I could be wrong on this, but here are my thoughts on the girls "managed" by this pimp.

Whenever they appear to stop working, full facial pictures are shown in their profiles, before being removed altogether. IMHO, I think the girls have fallen out with him and he has then decided to show their full pictures.

Anyone else notice that quite a few girs in this stable have their full facial pics being shown, yet are not working at the moment??