SexyNicole22

[gumption]

External Link/Members Only

Duration: £100 for 1hr

Location: Walthamstowe

Looks: Amazingly pretty girl, as close as you would ever expect from the photoshoot - petite breasts but very shapely thigh/ass more so than you can expect from the pics, also a little bit shorter than the 5'7 stated which suited me perfectly. Blown away.

As soon as I opened the door and took my shoes off she came in with some DFK which pretty much set the mood for the place - very accomodating and quite "touchy" and pro-active, complete opposite off those punts where they passively lie back and expect you to initiate. Won't go into too much details but went through usual, OWO, reverse rimming, 69 (a nice touch of ball sucking in there), doggie (oh my god, amazing ass), cowgirl etc.. then tried to end with CIM which she valiantly attempted but I ended up asking her to finish with hand, I'm usually very insensitive so it does take a lot, not a slight on her oral skills in any way, maybe just need girls with naturally rough tougues as it rarely happens for me. However what REALLY impressed me the most was when we'd finished and had about 10-15 minutes left, rather than just lie down and chat (which is perfectly fine), she insisted on a massage that was actually really good, she definitely goes the extra mile to please.

Suffice to say, I will be returning - this is a top tier girl, you're getting £150/hour value for £100, it's a bargain.

P.S CAN A MODERATOR PLEASE MOVE TO REVIEW SECTION - SORRY POSTED HERE BY ACCIDENT.

[GBush]

Her photos look like agency photos, does she work for on of the EE agencies?

[gumption]

As far as I know she isn't currently, she might've been before she went independent? I'll ask her next time!

[ramrodronnie]

External Link/Members Only

Duration: £100 for 1hr

Location: Walthamstowe

Looks: Amazingly pretty girl, as close as you would ever expect from the photoshoot - petite breasts but very shapely thigh/ass more so than you can expect from the pics, also a little bit shorter than the 5'7 stated which suited me perfectly. Blown away.

As soon as I opened the door and took my shoes off she came in with some DFK which pretty much set the mood for the place - very accomodating and quite "touchy" and pro-active, complete opposite off those punts where they passively lie back and expect you to initiate. Won't go into too much details but went through usual, OWO, reverse rimming, 69 (a nice touch of ball sucking in there), doggie (oh my god, amazing ass), cowgirl etc.. then tried to end with CIM which she valiantly attempted but I ended up asking her to finish with hand, I'm usually very insensitive so it does take a lot, not a slight on her oral skills in any way, maybe just need girls with naturally rough tougues as it rarely happens for me. However what REALLY impressed me the most was when we'd finished and had about 10-15 minutes left, rather than just lie down and chat (which is perfectly fine), she insisted on a massage that was actually really good, she definitely goes the extra mile to please.

Suffice to say, I will be returning - this is a top tier girl, you're getting £150/hour value for £100, it's a bargain.

P.S CAN A MODERATOR PLEASE MOVE TO REVIEW SECTION - SORRY POSTED HERE BY ACCIDENT.

You have posted you're Review in the correct section gumption. Thanks for you're Review mate, glad it went well for you. I've got her on my HL. So I'm pleased to see a Positive Review for her on here. She's now gone up in my pecking order for girls that I want to see.
So you reckon that she will do CIM then gumption? But you didn't quite manage it  So you feel that she was and energetic, passionate (even if acting) punt then mate? I have to admit if you say she looks the same as her AW pics? Then yeah, a great punt for the money. Thanks again gumption 

[ramrodronnie]

She would go down better on this site if her pics weren't photoshopped. Nobody, as far as I am aware are fans of photoshopped pics. 

[GBush]

OP  She has anal on her profile.  Is this included in her price?  There is no mention of extra.

If it's £100 p/h with anal and CIM then she will be busy.

[Aussiecrocsss]

I'm going to save you all some of your hard earned credits on AW--avoid the private gallery on her profile.  Three repeats from free gallery and then a few similar clothed snaps with no added information, and at £6. Insulting, and my usual policy is, if they are scamming you on the private gallery (here quality and price) it ain't going to be a great meet either. 

[GBush]

I'm going to save you all some of your hard earned credits on AW--avoid the private gallery on her profile.  Three repeats from free gallery and then a few similar clothed snaps with no added information, and at £6. Insulting, and my usual policy is, if they are scamming you on the private gallery (here quality and price) it ain't going to be a great meet either.

It all has a feeling of "too good to be true"

 

[gumption]

In reply to GBush, yes she is definitely worth the money - it's a real shame that a lot off pictures are photoshopped nowadays especially by agencies, her skin tone is a little darker than the pics and she wasn't quite so tall looking (a bonus to me) but she was hot, shapely (no hiding any fat) and had good skin which is usually the biggest thing that it covers when it's indeed the "same person".

As for the skepticism, completely welcome it and think it's best to have that - all I can say is never see a girl unless she is cross referenced by more than a single person, so I would absolutely not recommend taking mine (or anyone's) word as the be all and end all especially since I'm a new member - personally I've had a few great recommendations from this site and thought I'd a favour by reporting back which is the reason I've started posting. I do understand how Nicole is a bit "too good to be true" as she's definitely top tier at low prices... if you're not convinced just wait until she establishes herself.

Seriously check out the other reviews though, the only negative was a time wasting one in which the person never met up, could be a case of mis-commuication.. it happens.

[robbie54321]

I agree with the OP
She's a very good punt although a previous review says she a time waster. Not what I found but if she double books it's worth bearing that in mind before making arrangements.
She does look like photoshopped pictures.  Why she photoshopped them to look exactly like her is very strange!

[Atticus Finch]

Nice review, and definitely hot listed, but I think that suggesting that she is a 'bargain', and a £150 girl for £100 will go down on here about as well as a sneeze in an astronaut helmet.

It is tantamount to suggesting to the girl that she should be charging more, which is never a good idea.

 

[GBush]

How about anal guys??? Anyone tried this with her?

[yumyum3]

Nice review, and definitely hot listed, but I think that suggesting that she is a 'bargain', and a £150 girl for £100 will go down on here about as well as a sneeze in an astronaut helmet.

It is tantamount to suggesting to the girl that she should be charging more, which is never a good idea.

 

Spot on

[gumption]

Nice review, and definitely hot listed, but I think that suggesting that she is a 'bargain', and a £150 girl for £100 will go down on here about as well as a sneeze in an astronaut helmet.

It is tantamount to suggesting to the girl that she should be charging more, which is never a good idea.

 

Sorry, that was never the intention - just from the point of view of my own experience that you tend to get hotter model-like girls at the £150/hr agency range, rather than say, parlour girls or walk ins.

[James999]

for £100, it's a bargain.

Even if £90 of that goes to Sergai?

[smiths]

Sorry, that was never the intention - just from the point of view of my own experience that you tend to get hotter model-like girls at the £150/hr agency range, rather than say, parlour girls or walk ins.

Most certainly not my experience in over 30 years of punting.

[ramrodronnie]

It is "NEVER!" a good idea to say that a WG is worth more than she is charging, on this site. As soon as these WGs get wind of it. Up go their rates. 

[punk]

Not another punter suggesting that she worth far more than he paid 

[yumyum3]

Most certainly not my experience in over 30 years of punting.

Nor mine