Author Topic: xXx Sweet Lola xXx Edinburgh  (Read 4545 times)


3 review(s) for xXx Sweet Lola xXx (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
I'm popping a couple of review up that just about scrape a positive on my chart, but trying to give some perspective too.

Fairly cute wee French woman, believably 22yrs and no bigger than size 8. Small build with lots of long hair. Found her short-notice comms and very polite (which I like), tasted good, decent bed and didn't rush. The venue is central, near the Uni Law School/Thins just before the Festival Theatre, easy walk from Waverley). Beware that the numbers in her street are all over the place, so allow an extra few minutes to find where the fuck she is.

OWO (enthusiastic), RO(clean shaven), bit of anal play, and reasonably fit. Small tits, fairly big nipples. (Checked the PG, no nudity and only a couple of variations on her profile pic when I looked.) I'm not even sure that it's the girl in the photo though it could be and no complaints regarding her looks.
– this photo gives the most accurate impression I think:
Hidden Image/Members Only

She comes across as inexperienced but when you read between the lines it's clear she's not such a beginner. Reasonably good English. But here's the thing: how close to a GFE do you get with someone whose first language is not English and who doesn't really know Scotland or Edinburgh, has no observable hobbies that sort of stuff (while I think she's French she didn't seem to know much about France either). However she is cute. Why am I not doing cartwheels? Well that's one reason. The other is when you get a long finger up a petite woman and find what is another finger it could be anatomical or it could be something she's stuck up there, even if she's not on her period. I don't actually know or even believe that was the case (though it might have been). The only objection I can offer is by comparison: when one shags a top woman, even with a thick condom, it's possible to feel the reaction of her cunt, grip and lubrication, at least if you are experienced and sensitive. Now Lola is way above the average foreign mix that prossies in Edinburgh just now, she's warm and natural in her manner but she's not in the top category like Sweet & Petite or (at LSS) Marie. A step above many current AW or LSS girls though. Her fanny is like a warm hot very tight tube but it doesn't react much (even though her body face and lips were reactive and even passionate). However, I would possibly see her again so she scrapes a positive.

Prices are crap for an hour but just within my top limit for a half hour (£80, and she's recently increased it from £70). Believably French rather than a Romanian-pretending-to-be-non-EE. Decent looking.
External Link/Members Only
Seems fairly new but probably isn't. One of the better attempts at 'GFE' I've shagged recently.

JazzMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We're are honored that you're "trying to give some perspective too".
Wanker.

Offline S.X. MacHine

Careful Jazzman; Marmalade may take your calling him a 'wanker' as a compliment, which I don't think is your intention.
If you did mean to insult him, I don't really see why. Marmalade, however enigmatic, is always informative. Surely this forum is intended for the mutually beneficial exchange of info?

zundabar

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We're are honored that you're "trying to give some perspective too".
Wanker.

Not sure if i've missed something but Marmalade just seems to be helping us out as most reviewers do, surely by having a problem with this your the wanker?

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
If I wasn't clear, "trying to give some perspective too" is in reference to my own reviews: if a review or series of reviews by the same punter mentions several prossies together, comparatively (excellent, good, average, below average, whatever) it gives the reader (hopefully) an idea of where that reviewers standards are. When I read reviews where the prossie is rated positive, I immediately think "compared to what/who?" Sometimes that is clear if one knows the reviewer or the reviewer has at least included a range of ratings in his reviews. So I try to do the same, if possible, distinguishing what I mean by top class from pretty well above average (as I have tried to do here).

Of course some people might project their worries about what they suspect are their own shortcomings or whatever... you can't help all the people all the time. I gave an advance thumbs up on these to a couple of people, which is also a good way of passing on info. If the PMs or reviews help some genuine punters I'm not too bothered about wankers and name callers. Giving critical reviews doesn't do me any good. They're for fellow punters.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
We're are honored that you're "trying to give some perspective too".
Wanker.
You seem to have taken offence unnecessarily. Chill out, mate. ;)

JazzMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Tell us about your last real date?
Hidden Image/Members Only

Now you're just being a cunt. I'm not going to recount my civvy experiences to feed your twattishness. Grow up ffs. If you want to pick an argument, try poking a fluffie or doing something useful.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
and btw, frequently spending 150 and hour on a prossie and thinking that is good, only livened up with a steady diet of saunas, smacks a bit of desperation mate. You could learn to use AW properly . . . oh, but that needs a bit of thought . . . never mind, carry on playing with animated gifs, overpaying prossies, whatever floats your single braincell in a sea of sludge.

 :hi: have a nice day  :P

RandyF

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
The Jizzster flaunting that winning personality again is he :rolleyes:

Sadly, you don't really get many hoors of Sweet Lola's type appearing on Glasgow's AW results anymore ken  :unknown: She looks good for 70/80.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
The Jizzster flaunting that winning personality again is he :rolleyes:

Sadly, you don't really get many hoors of Sweet Lola's type appearing on Glasgow's AW results anymore ken  :unknown: She looks good for 70/80.

Initial punts with her were excellent. Now she's getting a bit well-poked and has lost some of her initial shine. I'd rate her as neutral now based on more recent meets. But try to stick my neck out and see what I get on here. Sometimes it's really not worth the bother.

Lola's French and isn't thick as shit. She's never rushed me out even on an occasion when I know she had other things planned, she still ran over, relaxing and chatting after the appointment time fucking. She's moved location -- now nearer Easter Road. -- but still a breath of fresh air compared to most EEs on offer.

Offline walter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Did you ever find out what the "other finger" inside was Marmalade? I'm tempted to see her but that bit was slightly off putting!
Banned reason: Multiple accounts. (Walter White)
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
No. But I never noticed it subsequently. (It could even be anatomical with such a petite build.)

I was looking to include any minor downside to balance what might be seen as a very enthusiastic review. She has an attractive pussy. I gave her a positive, which I don't do lightly, and generally implies I'll see her again, which I did.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2015, 11:05:35 pm by Marmalade »

Roger De Her

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
New photos now.

 Accurate (as before) and give a closer likeness than previously I'd say.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
New photos now.

 Accurate (as before) and give a closer likeness than previously I'd say.

You've seen her? The one in the matching purple set is certainly more beautiful. I maybe looked at her PG at one time but it's priced too expensively to keep checking IMO. Good looking girl.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 12:27:45 am by Marmalade »

Roger De Her

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have, yes, and repeated!  Does it for me this lass. VERY French and "girl next door" I'd say. Only thing that bugs me is she sets her phone timer and observes it religiously!!  Other than that, a good reliable service.  Sexy, not filthy in my experience.  A recommend for me!

Roj

Offline backofthenet

This girl has seemingly moved from auld reekie to the big smoke.

Marmalade (and others) - what score would you assign her facially on the Jason scale? - External Link/Members Only

Cheers me old mucker.