Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: London - Kathryn Foxx - Notting Hill Gate Station  (Read 4995 times)


3 review(s) for English Kathryn (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Hi Guys,

Please bare with me, as this is my first but one of many reviews to be posted

Saw Kathryn yesterday and have to say I was very happy with the service that was provided, I am going to try and use the same format as a lot of the reviews posted

Communications
Excellent. I am generally a shy person so all communications with Kathryn was done through text with prompt and professional responses. I contacted Kathryn early in the day for a same day booking.

Venue
Kathryn Has her own place very close to Notting Hill Station if I am not mistaken, although I drove there late in the evening and had no trouble finding parking on her street. The inside of her Flat is very impressive, very chic, and I am sure very expensive.

Appearance
As mentioned by an earlier reviewer, Kathryn is so much more sexy in person than her photos do her justice. I would rate her 8/10. Personally I find her very hot, but I do like the slight alternate look in women.

Meeting
She is a very open friendly person, and made me feel comfortable right from the start.
Kathryn offers all the services in her likes list and I feel that she is someone that likes to experiment a lot. I texted her what I would like to occur and she complied with every request.

I was not able to test all the services on offer, I am not very good at reviews, please feel free to ask me any questions you may have in this thread or even via PM.

Kathryn is expensive, and definitely did make me hesitant to make booking. I am going to see Kathryn again as soon as I can get some cash saved again. All I can say is Beauty, venue, services, experience, the feel good factor and more is what you pay for.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

zundabar

  • Guest
Glad to hear you had a good time, I think most people would agree with you about her being very attractive though not many would be able to justify a longer booking with her costs.


Offline Dicky

Thank you for the review, Katherine  :kissgirl:

Online PLeisure

How long was the booking and what services did you receive?
Would you like to provide more detail on her body, please.

Welcome to UKP  :hi:

Offline tantric talents

Thank you for the review, Katherine  :kissgirl:
+1  :lol: :lol:
Dusty phone? Try charging less?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2015, 09:25:31 pm by tantric talents »

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Thank you for the review, Katherine  :kissgirl:

Like I said guys, this is my first review and I did expect some criticism, not Katherine dude, but you make up your mind.

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Glad to hear you had a good time, I think most people would agree with you about her being very attractive though not many would be able to justify a longer booking with her costs.

Yes, I agree, longer bookings are much more expensive, than compared to others here, she's gives you all that you would want in that hour, but I did feel to want to extend it had it not been for the cost, maybe point for her to consider. But, we did over shoot by a few minutes as she is not a clock watcher, and even when we realised, there was no hurry to get me out the door, even offered a shower which I declined.

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
How long was the booking and what services did you receive?
Would you like to provide more detail on her body, please.

Welcome to UKP  :hi:

The booking was only 1 hour long, and her body is slim, small bobs which I prefer but some may not,  some tats, again I prefer the slight alternate look, but some may not, skin as smooth as butter and a round as that is gorgeous to look at



Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Why so reticent ?  :unknown:

Well, it is my first time reviewing, and I feel as though it's ungentleman like to go into such details in an open forum with regards to my shinanigans with another lady. This may change, who knows.

Call it as you wish, I may be hypocritical by saying this, but yes, I do read the details other users of this forum provide, not just to get me excited in anticipation of meeting the same person, but I mainly read the details for inspiration and as a sort of eroticism fiction, with the added spice that it is reality and i can make my reality also.

For me, it's enough that a credible person has said that they have enjoyed the presence of another person and that they do most of the services listed. For me personally, to go into details of what happened so openly, does not sit with me well, and that is just my opinion, and not something I used to demean others.

Yes, I said credible, and I am not a credible reviewer at the moment with my one review. Please, take this at face value, I am who I am, and there's very little at present i can further do to prove this, only time will tell.

That is not to say that I think badly of those that do write in depth reviews, like I said, I do read them with great admiration. Each person has created their own world in which they are happy with, and that is how to live life, your own way, and not to point fingers at others doing something different and you don't like it.

Please excuse my philosophy, I am but a simple man.

Now that I have explained why I won't give you precise details of our activities, there's something that I omitted from my OP that is a fair enough point to pick up on. Kathryn has highlighted that she can gurantee to give the best fuck a guy could have; was it the best fuck I had? Sorry the juries still out on that one. But I will tell you this, kathryn is both naughty, sweet with the way she treats you. She can switch from vanilla gfe experience with lots of tender cuddles, to a more talented girl with all her naughty tricks and pretty seamlessly to.

I have stated earlier, and will be happy to provide any further details, or questions you may have in PM if you are not happy with the level of information provided on the genre forum.

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Why so reticent ?  :unknown:

Sorry for my last outburst, it's late at night and i had gotten carried away.

The simpler answer to give is as follows;

I received a variety of services listed, but as the time was limited, i had not had the chance to experience them all, but I do intend do. The staple services we've come to expect, were provided of course, with enthusiasm and I suspect her likes list is not exhaustive, she seems open to ideas and experiments.

And, look, I have already changed my view, any specifics that you would like to ask, like how deep was her french kissing? I'm happy to answer, global village and that, kathryn offers a delightful service, and wants to do so with many other like minded people, who am I to hold back. And for everyone who is now wondering as I've brought it up,   kathryns french kissing was very enjoyable, but I know i am not a great kisser, so that was a let down on my part. For me, dfk is subjective, but there were tongues involved.

Please if I caused anyone offence I apologise.

Offline HappyLarry

Ohh god, if this isn't the girl itself then I'm the queen of England.....

Offline HipsterNoBeard

Sorry for my last outburst, it's late at night and i had gotten carried away

Managed to squeeze in a customer before replying to your own comment Katryn?

Sorry, don't buy your story for one second. You're simply too eager to show all of us you're NOT Kathryn.

Offline flouch

I'll pile in here.  I saw her recently.  She's got a pretty face, small boobs, great ass with shortish black/dark brown hair - an alternative look for sure.  You don't see in the photos so much, but she has big hips.  Probably a size 12, but carries it very well.  In fact, she epitomises the phrase "more cushion for the pushin'" when fucking doggy style.  She's not at all fat, similar to Jasmine from Bunnies (before she whacked her prices up to £300/hr).

I can imagine she's going to burn out quickly though.

Offline flouch


LL

  • Guest
Please bare with me, as this is my first but one of many reviews to be posted
I don't know what you've heard but there's no need to get naked with us for your first review. We have no such initiation ceremony.

Sylvester

  • Guest
You have to question whether anyone who gives them self the name 'flipping_newbie' is planning on hanging around on here for long.

Aussiecrocsss

  • Guest
I see two glaring red flags right in her profile name: 'high class' (nobody ever is when they blurt it out like that) and 'model'. Not....even....close.

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
I don't know what you've heard but there's no need to get naked with us for your first review. We have no such initiation ceremony.

You guys dont realise the negative impact you words have on people writing reviews, i completely understand that you have to be cautious, of the scam artists out there, I too have fallen victim to such ukpunting reviews, which turnt out not to be as written by the reviewer. 

So fair dues, but to also mock the way a person writes,  i hope it's just jostling between like minded friends, and not a personal jab 'LL'-
, im telong you from a flipping newbies perspective, it's is very daunting to try and not overly praise the person you are reviewing, as well as not writing poor English.

Offline finn5555

If the OP is genuine then he has a shit taste in pro$$ies  :vomit:

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
You have to question whether anyone who gives them self the name 'flipping_newbie' is planning on hanging around on here for long.

Sorry Sylvester mate, you are kind of right,  there was a point that ukpunting wouldn't let me view anymore of the reviews unless I became a member, never wanted to be a member, and hence the name, your right, I did choose the name coz in hadn't planned on staying on that long, or even reviewing, but I'm starting to like posting my comments, no one is overtly being horrible,  just questioning things they not sure about.

Online PLeisure

I'll properly review soon.
Good stuff  :thumbsup:

Just, please don't follow the OP's 'review' style...... please.  :hi:

Online PLeisure

OP, you truly are the biggest waste of space I've come across on this forum since joining - truly spectacularly pathetic

Your 'review' belongs on AW, not UKP.  :hi:  :thumbsdown:  :diablo:

SuitedandBooted

  • Guest
Sorry OP but you had one job to do and you fucked it up.
If you are not the lady in question then I am impressed how you can choose a style of writing that makes you seem so super sensitive.

All new members (I am one) should have the sense to understand the style of this forum and if they are not willing to follow the lead, then perhaps better not to write a review that gives the rest of us no new information.

Offline Arar77

A little unfair, I think.  Let's jump on the guy when he doesn't come through with the other reviews he's promised.  But as you've promised them, Flipping Newbie, it's time to shit or get off the pan.

slow and low

  • Guest
OP, you truly are the biggest waste of space I've come across on this forum since joining - truly spectacularly pathetic

Your 'review' belongs on AW, not UKP.  :hi:  :thumbsdown:  :diablo:
Spot on. Everyone has a different review style but if you are going to submit one, at least try and put some essential information in it i.e what actually occurs in the punt ( if it happened)  so the rest of us can make a judgement call re future bookings.

zundabar

  • Guest
The thread does have this in it "Kathryn is expensive, and definitely did make me hesitant to make booking".

Which, unless she wants to be seen as "high class and worth it" :vomit: makes very little sense to put in if it is her.

"please feel free to ask me any questions you may have in this thread or even via PM" does suggest the opposite though, I can only think of a handful of people friendly or experienced enough on UKP that would be able to add that much in PM's that they would not be able to do in the review (poor review skills taken into account).

From my best guess I'd say he either has a bit of EAS or is Kathrynn/a friend or regular of her's who is doing her a favour. OP, if you aren't any of these things then I do apologise but with what you've said so far not much of a defence has been put up - can you think of any negatives at all, even small ones, to point out? very difficult to believe the only problem was the pricing and mentioning even the little things that might have happened could give you some credibility.

+ looking through the few posts the OP has in other threads the writing style and attitude stays the same but the most noticeable thing is that they were made in June a couple of months before Kathryn's profile was made on AW. If she has had past profiles then this of course means nothing but if not then the chances of it being her go down a bit.

« Last Edit: September 23, 2015, 10:30:33 am by zundabar »

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Sorry guys, have taken all on board, and will ensure future reviews are better.

zundabar

  • Guest
It isn't the quality that's being questioned, it's your legitimacy because of various bits and bobs that have been outlined.

Even the best of punts will have a couple of small problems to point out but other than you hesitating at the pricing you don't mention any.

Offline flouch

posted my review now.  warning - i tend towards "fluffy"...

Online PLeisure

Sorry guys, have taken all on board, and will ensure future reviews are better.
You could focus on improving this review before attempting any future ones  :hi:

To recap - and this is being reproduced from External Link/Members Only so that you don't feel you are being personally attacked:
1. Write a review in order to allow other punters to make an informed choice about whether they want to visit the WG, not in order to “promote” the girl because you think “she deserves it”.
4. Make your review informative and accessible [...] If you write a long review then a good summary highlighting the positive, neutral and negative points can be very helpful
8. Write your review keeping in mind your audience. Answer the questions that you might want answered about a girl that you are interested to meet for first time: (i) whether her pictures are authentic and accurate, (ii) what is her attitude during the meeting, (iii) whether her place is safe, discreet, clean etc. (iv) whether she clock-watches or not, (v) whether she is rushing you or not, (vi) whether she provides all the listed services or she tries to avoid them, (vii) whether she will meet a dress request, (viii) whether she will meet an unusual service request.
9. Aim for balance and include aspects that could deter other punters. You may downplay them if they didn't bother you but you should mention them. For example, you may not care much about CIM so if it’s not offered you don’t see it as a negative but for others this may be important. Similarly, not offering kissing, french kissing or deep french kissing, not allowing "fingers", or only providing covered service may be decisive for other punters. Likewise, for appearance (having tattoos, piercings, saggy tits, fake tits, full waist, some belly, stretch-marks, slightly fat arse, etc) particularly where it is not obvious in the profile photographs, being smoker, speaking only very basic English are all worth mentioning.
12.  It can be very helpful to point out areas of distinctive or outstanding service from a WG for readers whose tastes may be similar to your own. Particularly - point out "nice surprises" at the opening of your review to catch the attention of others who share your interests.


If the purpose of UKP is still eluding the OP, as I understand it - and, indeed, appreciate it - it is to provide essential information that will enable other punters to make an informed decision as to whether they should meet with the WG under review.
OP has said:
I feel as though it's ungentleman [sic] like to go into such details in an open forum with regards to my shinanigans [sic] with another lady.

 - and admits he is being hypocritical in enjoying the vivid details that other punters provide.
He understands that he lacks credibility, as this is his first review.

Well, OP - the general consensus here (again, this is only my understanding) is that punters gain credibility by filing decent reviews. Not shying away from going "into such details in an open forum" for fear of being "ungentleman"-ly.

Then, we get his one concession to 'lurid' detail.....
And, look, I have already changed my view, any specifics that you would like to ask, like how deep was her french kissing? I'm happy to answer, global village and that, kathryn offers a delightful service, and wants to do so with many other like minded people, who am I to hold back. And for everyone who is now wondering as I've brought it up,   kathryns french kissing was very enjoyable, but I know i am not a great kisser, so that was a let down on my part. For me, dfk is subjective, but there were tongues involved.
- Except there is negligible information. A lil' tongue kung fu..... woo hoo ! Except, he isn't a great kisser so a let down.

OP is at least honest in revealing the reason he joined UKP:
there was a point that ukpunting wouldn't let me view anymore of the reviews unless I became a member, never wanted to be a member, and hence the name [...] I did choose the name coz in hadn't planned on staying on that long, or even reviewing, but I'm starting to like posting my comments.


How about liking the inaugural review you have posted, OP?  :music:

In just three lines, flouch has provided valuable intel:
I saw her recently.  She's got a pretty face, small boobs, great ass with shortish black/dark brown hair - an alternative look for sure.  You don't see in the photos so much, but she has big hips.  Probably a size 12, but carries it very well.  In fact, she epitomises the phrase "more cushion for the pushin'" when fucking doggy style.  She's not at all fat[...]

And, SuitedandBooted gets the UKP ethos:
All new members (I am one) should have the sense to understand the style of this forum and if they are not willing to follow the lead, then perhaps better not to write a review that gives the rest of us no new information.


What's with the, "you can PM me for further details" nonsense? wtf !

Offline tantric talents

I don't know what you've heard but there's no need to get naked with us for your first review. We have no such initiation ceremony.
That's not what I was told! Something about a pig's head ?.....

Offline tantric talents

It isn't the quality that's being questioned, it's your legitimacy because of various bits and bobs that have been outlined.

Even the best of punts will have a couple of small problems to point out but other than you hesitating at the pricing you don't mention any.
+1
Yes but speaking about hesitation at the pricing could simply be another ploy to make it seem legit and justify the overpricing?

zundabar

  • Guest
could be, won't probe any further as I'm sure if we analysed every phrase to death we would end up with something far from the truth (as much as I love analysis).

OP - the main point of the review is not to make the escort look good, it is to show the UKP community what the experience was like so they know what they would get if they were to follow in your footsteps. Omitting information for the sake of preserving your spiffy button polish is downright counter-productive and does more harm than good - if you were telling a friend about a book including spoilers would you deliberately miss out the bad bits or would you explain that it has it's problems?.

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Guys I'm sorry, I haven't had time to amend the review, I was hesitant to leave a review for Kathryn, or anyone else for that matter, I don't know how to leave a review nicely, they were all excuses about not being gentlemen like, i will amend the review appropriately and put a bit of thought into it, thank you for voicing your frustration, i will take all highlighted issues on board.

Online PLeisure

Cheers for taking all the above comments on board, F_n

fyi - once posted, you have a small window of about 60secs to revise a post. Which may be why you encountered some frustration in this thread. You cannot amend this review now, hence the recommendation that each reviewer consults the Punting Wiki for appropriate guidelines when posting a review.
You can, however, add a new post to this thread with any useful information you'd like to share.

Offline JamesRockford

Aw come on Kathryn.  We love the way that you look.  Just talk normally to us for fuck's sake.  We don't mind a WG visiting the site - just don't do it via a fake review.  It has a woman's fingerprints all over it - take that as a compliment honey.

Online PLeisure

- take that as a compliment honey.
You have such a way with the laydeez, JR  :D

reddoor1119

  • Guest
You have such a way with the laydeez, JR  :D

For Fuck sake. I am Kathryn Foxx. I did not write this review... For one I wouldn't rate myself an 8 out of 10 for looks I'd have given myself a 9... I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I. And a lovely guy for that matter. It means sweet Fuck all to me if you think I wrote this, I'm busy, I have plenty of clients and already have another popularity without relying on writing my own reviews you dip stick. That aside. Thanks for all the .... You're not a model bollocks from another punter on here. Yes. I am. I'm a published model and am also a suicide girl though I shouldn't really be justifying myself to some random keyboard warrior whom I've never met!

Good day to you all!

reddoor1119

  • Guest

Offline JamesRockford

Huh!  Women are plain hard to understand.

Online PLeisure

For Fuck sake. I am Kathryn Foxx. I did not write this review... For one I wouldn't rate myself an 8 out of 10 for looks I'd have given myself a 9... I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I. And a lovely guy for that matter. It means sweet Fuck all to me if you think I wrote this, I'm busy, I have plenty of clients and already have another popularity without relying on writing my own reviews you dip stick. That aside. Thanks for all the .... You're not a model bollocks from another punter on here. Yes. I am. I'm a published model and am also a suicide girl though I shouldn't really be justifying myself to some random keyboard warrior whom I've never met!

Good day to you all!

Why is she venting her frustration at me  :D  :unknown:  :scare:
I was merely commending Jim Rockford on his special way with the lay-deez...... sheesh
Think I need to tear up a lil'..  :cry:

Sexy kxx

  • Guest
I'm sure it was a mistake she doesn't know how to highlight quotes properly... I can imagine is what Kathryn would say... And she would apologise If her account hadn't been banned for defending herself
....  ;)

Offline finn5555

I have upset her  :blush:

She sent me a PM

I'm Kathryn Foxx aka the 'shit prossie' that you've dubbed me without even meeting me. Just want you to know your comments hurt me. Think carefully in future. I'm just a normal girl with feelings and you upset me

 :manhater:

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Her public post:
I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I.

But the PM she sent above:
Quote
Think carefully in future. I'm just a normal girl with feelings and you upset me

Which one is it then.

Sexy kxx

  • Guest
I wouldn't say I was sensitive I'd say I was human. The client who wrote this was a lovely gentlemen and I am also a nice girl and both of my accounts were banned for trying to defend myself
 Being called a shit prossie hurts. Being laughed at for saying I'm a model which also is true hurts
 I didn't abuse anyone
 I respect all my clients and I respect all uk punters so sorry if I offended anyone I just wanted you to see that your words have effects on us 'prossies' I'm
A tough cookie but seeing this thread today made me sad
Sorry again
 

Flipping_newbie

  • Guest
Guys,  I'm not kathryn, this is all my fault for writing so sentiment,  will butch up more for my future reviews.

zundabar

  • Guest
we now know you almost certainly aren't, look at the more recent posts in this thread.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
I didn't abuse anyone

you dip stick.

But that is abusive and not acceptable on UKP.
It might be on other forums, where girls can freely abuse punters without a banning, but not on here.