Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: List of post-op trans who advert on AdultWork as female  (Read 216177 times)



Offline collector

the only way is to take her up on 'period play' which is in her enjoys list. If she agrees then how can s\he have been a tranny?
Someone should ask for that  :sarcastic:

Offline akauya

Title of this post should be

List of post-op trans who advert on AdultWork as female and ugly women who look like blokes.

I would say the title of this thread should be "List of prossies I would like to fuck because I'm obsessed with trannies but I haven't got the guts to admit it"

Quite a lot of these links are of particularly ugly women accused of being trannies. Unless I knew for a fact that a particular prossie is a tranny I would never accuse one as being a tranny just because she looks a ugly or her feminine features are not that feminine.

 :rolleyes:

Offline claretandblue

I would say the title of this thread should be "List of prossies I would like to fuck because I'm obsessed with trannies but I haven't got the guts to admit it"

Quite a lot of these links are of particularly ugly women accused of being trannies. Unless I knew for a fact that a particular prossie is a tranny I would never accuse one as being a tranny just because she looks a ugly or her feminine features are not that feminine.

 :rolleyes:
It's just a bit of fun,if only things which are a 100% fact were discussed on here it would be quite a dull place :hi:

As for this thread there is no doubt some of those listed are post ops, alerting people of that so they can make a decision as to whether they want to see them on that basis can only be a good thing

Offline pumps

I would say the title of this thread should be "List of prossies I would like to fuck because I'm obsessed with trannies but I haven't got the guts to admit it"

Quite a lot of these links are of particularly ugly women accused of being trannies. Unless I knew for a fact that a particular prossie is a tranny I would never accuse one as being a tranny just because she looks a ugly or her feminine features are not that feminine.

 :rolleyes:


Then you start a thread with that title and add your own links...it's clearly what you want.

People need to open there eyes and think outside the box, 1 or 2 genuine ugly women might get caught in the cross fire but there's no doubt most of these women are tranny . ...

I have no problem with trannys  or fucking them as I did with dessy...I just don't like them advertising as women when really they're not.

I think the title should remain the same but with the addition of " fluffys need not look in here as it may cause butt hurt"

 :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: September 28, 2015, 07:28:23 am by pumps »

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
I think the title should remain the same but with the addition of " fluffys need not look in here as it may cause butt hurt"

I'm all for a naming and shaming list based on reasonable evidence; but, as you yourself have stated, your analyses are gut feeling based on appearance in dodgy photos. What happens then, down the line, is every time someone does a UKP search on an AW ID number, up pops your subjective comment in this post labelling her a post-op. Sometimes wading through UKP is like chinese whispers; me I'd just prefer clear data, not all the noise.

 :timeout:

Offline Jerboa

Thanks Pumps, all blacklisted  :lol:
Anyway I need to ask you the probality you think these prossies can be post op. Not sure if you are guessing or what. For example, I know Gina Snake, never met as WG before, but I know her because she used to work at my favourite pub in Central London few years ago. She always looked female born to me. She just has an ugly face.

Of course he's guessing, a couple of the profiles look TS, but just because a latina bird has a set of fake tits don't make them Post-op.

Offline Jerboa

I`m pretty sure this one is a male posing as female on aw, what you guys think?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Yes she is, if you read her profile it states I'm a t-girl and a ladyboy.  ;)

Offline Jerboa

You are the expert on this subject  :hi:
Of my reviews the only one who could be I reckon is the butch taller one of the "blondies", it did cross my mind briefly

Of the others I really don't think so, if you think otherwise don't be coy and name names!you know I won't do a doobes in you  :D

I disagree, he's no expert, he's just guessing, some women do look a bit manly, I can usually spot a TS from a photo, but it's not 100%, the only real way to know is to get them to to parallel park a car, or call her, and hear her voice, 99% of TS speak with a falsetto.

Offline pumps

I'm all for a naming and shaming list based on reasonable evidence; but, as you yourself have stated, your analyses are gut feeling based on appearance in dodgy photos. What happens then, down the line, is every time someone does a UKP search on an AW ID number, up pops your subjective comment in this post labelling her a post-op. Sometimes wading through UKP is like chinese whispers; me I'd just prefer clear data, not all the noise.

 :timeout:

It's not exactly naming and shaming, it's an opinion on good grounds and always stated as that.

We're not exactly picking random pictures of women from facebook etc and trying to name and shame them, that is out of order.

Now here is where most folks get blur the fine line between respecting a woman and a transaction with a business.

Escorts are businesses, They advertise there services globally on the internet, And charge us (the punter) a lot of money. Businesses are always open to scrutiny - That's essentially what UKP was designed for......






Offline pumps

I disagree, he's no expert, he's just guessing, some women do look a bit manly, I can usually spot a TS from a photo, but it's not 100%, the only real way to know is to get them to to parallel park a car, or call her, and hear her voice, 99% of TS speak with a falsetto.


I don't ever claim to be an expert, I clearly state it's just an opinion, Just as I cannot prove 100% its a TS, Nobody can prove 100%  it's a genetic woman.

So your saying in a thread specifically designed for this purpose, I should say nothing at all?

In my eyes its better to mention it, and give others the opportunity to make the mind up themselves.


Personally I believe the majority will read this thread and it won't make a blind bit of difference to their decision.....If they like the look of the escort they'll still see her anyway. If they had suspicions....it'll only add more weight to them and they will probably cautiously steer clear.

Offline Jerboa


I don't ever claim to be an expert, I clearly state it's just an opinion, Just as I cannot prove 100% its a TS, Nobody can prove 100%  it's a genetic woman.

So your saying in a thread specifically designed for this purpose, I should say nothing at all?

In my eyes its better to mention it, and give others the opportunity to make the mind up themselves.


Personally I believe the majority will read this thread and it won't make a blind bit of difference to their decision.....If they like the look of the escort they'll still see her anyway. If they had suspicions....it'll only add more weight to them and they will probably cautiously steer clear.

The problem is some easily led punters will take it as gospel, your right that guys should make a decision, In the past I have stated on old threads that Posties are out there advertised as genetic women, but many you can spot, or when you walk in the door you can suss them in 10 seconds the way they speak and mannerisms.

Offline pumps

The problem is some easily led punters will take it as gospel, your right that guys should make a decision, In the past I have stated on old threads that Posties are out there advertised as genetic women, but many you can spot, or when you walk in the door you can suss them in 10 seconds the way they speak and mannerisms.

That's not really a problem, It's just life.

The same easily led you speak off will read a totally fluffy review, take that as gospel then come back to the forums and write their own neutral/neg review claiming they were mislead because the wg didn't meet expectations.

Where as more experienced members sort of know what they're looking at when it comes to reviews... ;)



Offline lewishamguy

I disagree, he's no expert, he's just guessing, some women do look a bit manly, I can usually spot a TS from a photo, but it's not 100%, the only real way to know is to get them to to parallel park a car, or call her, and hear her voice, 99% of TS speak with a falsetto.

I know you're an experienced punter but I don't think you're expert than pumps in this case. :sarcastic:

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
. . . it's an opinion on good grounds. . .

This is the fundamental Pumps. The grounds are not 'good';  it's your subjective opinion. You've made some dodgy calls; maybe your hit rate is only 50%. In this case you're contributing to forum noise, and not creating any sound decision making data. IMO ;)

Collect some real data - email them and ask them if they have menstruating gash or a man-gash  :D

 :timeout:

Offline claretandblue

This is the fundamental Pumps. The grounds are not 'good';  it's your subjective opinion. You've made some dodgy calls; maybe your hit rate is only 50%. In this case you're contributing to forum noise, and not creating any sound decision making data. IMO ;)

Collect some real data - email them and ask them if they have menstruating gash or a man-gash  :D

 :timeout:
He knows the Latin market well which we all know has a high proportion of post ops, within these profiles of course some are post ops and some are not but I don't see how highlighting these profiles so punters can make their own minds up can be anything but a good thing

Deviant

  • Guest
It is an interesting thread and really useful (I never want to see trannies) but it does kind of look like a witch hunt. If you label the wrong woman as a transexual and she then reads this or her business suffers as a result then you are doing more harm than good.

vw

  • Guest
He knows the Latin market well which we all know has a high proportion of post ops, within these profiles of course some are post ops and some are not but I don't see how highlighting these profiles so punters can make their own minds up can be anything but a good thing
Just the glee on faces when his perceived 100% accuracy is used to mock other reviewers, can be off putting and maybe drive people off site,  a thread like this is better rather than hijacking reviews with suspicions.

Offline pumps

This is the fundamental Pumps. The grounds are not 'good';  it's your subjective opinion. You've made some dodgy calls; maybe your hit rate is only 50%. In this case you're contributing to forum noise, and not creating any sound decision making data. IMO ;)

Collect some real data - email them and ask them if they have menstruating gash or a man-gash  :D

 :timeout:

Anyway thanks for your forum noise, sorry i mean input.


Let move on with this thread and get back on topic folks

Offline claretandblue

Just the glee on faces when his perceived 100% accuracy is used to mock other reviewers, can be off putting and maybe drive people off site,  a thread like this is better rather than hijacking reviews with suspicions.
I don't see anyone mocking anyone, does anyone really give a fuck whether they may have poled a post op or not,it's an occupational hazard of punting! :hi:

Offline pumps

I don't see anyone mocking anyone, does anyone really give a fuck whether they may have poled a post op or not,it's an occupational hazard of punting! :hi:

exactly what mocking???



TheNewSeeker

  • Guest

Offline azrael

It is an interesting thread and really useful (I never want to see trannies) but it does kind of look like a witch hunt. If you label the wrong woman as a transexual and she then reads this or her business suffers as a result then you are doing more harm than good.

The whole point was to see which guys where pretending to be women, i dont have a problem with ts's it those ts's that are pretending to be women, some of those that have been mentioned in this thread i have contacted with "the question"  but have not recieved a reply back. Yet there are other threads where they have been mentioned and others have agreed. I personally dont like being duped, rather they say they are what they are, which is t.s's  :hi:


TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
another one suspected ladyboy :cool:
 External Link/Members Only

So, do explain, how do you arrived at that 'suspicion' ?

I'm intrigued that's all.



 :timeout:







brolin_76

  • Guest
So, do explain, how do you arrived at that 'suspicion' ?

I'm intrigued that's all.



 :timeout:

observe clearly her anus area. I`m 90% sure it`s a ladyboy.  :cool:

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
observe clearly her anus area. I`m 90% sure it`s a ladyboy.  :cool:

Have you got access to her PG? From what I see in the public one, nah, have you never seen bum fluff on a woman? Her hands are small so unless she went on hormones pre-puberty I'm 90% sure this is a woman.   :cool:


Offline Jerboa

another one suspected ladyboy :cool:

 External Link/Members Only

From first look it's a lady, her face and hands are feminine, just because a Thai has a fake rack don't make her a Ladyboy.

Offline jofrenchy69

 :timeout: :timeout: :timeout:

i don t know why some guys get upset and felt like it s a hunt, the subject here is clear...post op who advertise on aw as female....simple.
I have no issue with post op, but I am 100% attract by women and women only...when I pay to meet a wg I expect to meet a real woman...not a bloke who had a sex change...is not my things ...and I don t like to be fooled...
peace and good punt
 :drinks:
« Last Edit: September 29, 2015, 07:51:20 pm by jofrenchy69 »

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
i don t know why some guys get upset and felt like it s a hunt, the subject here is clear...post op who advertise on aw as female....simple.

 ...and I don t like to be fooled...


Who is upset? Yes the subject is simple, just the data stream is full of junk rendering it useless. I don't want to be fooled either, far better to have a post on actual known dishonest post-opps rather than some random "fluffy bum hole = bloke" type thinking.


 :timeout:


Offline claretandblue

Who is upset? Yes the subject is simple, just the data stream is full of junk rendering it useless. I don't want to be fooled either, far better to have a post on actual known dishonest post-opps rather than some random "fluffy bum hole = bloke" type thinking.


 :timeout:
Why is it full of junk?who made you judge and jury as to who is or isn't a post op?


Offline pumps

Why is it full of junk?who made you judge and jury as to who is or isn't a post op?

my thoughts too. It's much easier to just ignore the "noise" mate.

There's no need to justify anything to certain folks.

Offline jofrenchy69

Why is it full of junk?who made you judge and jury as to who is or isn't a post op?
Nobody is a judge or jury...just looking for other punter opinion... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline jofrenchy69

my thoughts too. It's much easier to just ignore the "noise" mate.

There's no need to justify anything to certain folks.

agree on that one mate...

Offline claretandblue

my thoughts too. It's much easier to just ignore the "noise" mate.

There's no need to justify anything to certain folks.
Of course mate,just a shame that an interesting and entertaining thread has been derailed to some extent by certain punters who for whatever reason can't entertain the thought they may have bagged a post op

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
Why is it full of junk? who made you judge and jury as to who is or isn't a post op?

No one did, that's the point - what has been posted is just too subjective. The 'junk' is not a reference to the all the data being wrong; but a data stream becomes as useful as a chocolate teapot when it has too many errors to make it worthwhile using.

But carry on, looking for fluffy bums, large cheek bones and whatever else you're invoking for your post-opp detection algorithm.  You're clearly enjoying yourselves :drinks:
« Last Edit: September 29, 2015, 09:06:22 pm by TheNewSeeker »

Offline pumps

No one that's the point - what has been posted is just too subjective. The 'junk' is not a reference to the all the data being wrong; but a data stream becomes as useful as a chocolate teapot when it has too many errors to make it worthwhile using.

But carry, on looking for fluffy bums, large cheek bones and whatever else you're invoking for your post-opp detection algorithm.  You're clearly enjoying yourselves :drinks:


stop clicking on this thread then as it's useless to you, and quite frankly your boring me with data stream this and data stream that lol

Offline claretandblue


stop clicking on this thread then as it's useless to you, and quite frankly your boring me with data stream this and data stream that lol
+1 thenewseeker needs to find a new thread as he isn't interested in the topic so why bother,I wonder if he has "done a doobes"? :D

Offline pumps

+1 thenewseeker needs to find a new thread as he isn't interested in the topic so why bother,I wonder if he has "done a doobes"? :D


I may of found just the thread

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28500.0

 :drinks:
just abit of fun ol chap  :hi:


Offline webpunter

Ha you sure mate?I've fucked this one  :D
C&B is referring to   External Link/Members Only  Gina Snake seems to be a well know pornstar.  I doubt it if previously meat & 2 veg in place.  She's on my non AW HL & was until recently @ Guildford Gems once a week External Link/Members Only   Although not at the mo    Although 30 years old might be stretching it, not the bell-end  tho'

Rather worryingly Gabriela looks fit   External Link/Members Only   No doubt will be good at BJ's.  The Brazilian trannies seem to be able to carry it off.  The british ones still look like their 1st name is something such as Derek
« Last Edit: September 29, 2015, 10:54:28 pm by webpunter »

Offline pumps

C&B is referring to   External Link/Members Only  Gina Snake seems to be a well know pornstar.  I doubt it if previously meat & 2 veg in place.  She's on my non AW HL & was until recently @ Guildford Gems once a week External Link/Members Only   Although not at the mo    Although 30 years old might be stretching it, not the bell-end  tho'

Rather worryingly Gabriela looks fit   External Link/Members Only   No doubt will be good at BJ's.  The Brazilian trannies seem to be able to carry it off.  The british ones still look like their 1st name is something such as Derek

I'm pretty sure C&B was referring to External Link/Members Only NIKKI DEVINE.

Offline claretandblue

I'm pretty sure C&B was ref :hi:I'm going down the job centre tomorrow see what they can offer me? I know how to fight have sex & count cash!

Offline pumps

Webpunter is right,in that instance I was referring to Gina but same difference really as I have done them both!  :hi:


you know how to punt mate  :hi: pick all the best ones!

Offline webpunter

Webpunter is right,in that instance I was referring to Gina but same difference really as I have done them both!  :hi:
Brilliant.   Once - to tick off my bucket list will be enuf for me.  Pumps seems to have some detailed knowledge in this market segment  :lol:

Offline Cuntminion

Webpunter is right,in that instance I was referring to Gina but same difference really as I have done them both!  :hi:

One for the grandkids there

Offline pumps

Brilliant.   Once - to tick off my bucket list will be enuf for me.  Pumps seems to have some detailed knowledge in this market segment  :lol:


yes - I've experienced it first hand on a large scale, I can't let this shit slide when I 'think' I see it any-more  :drinks:

brolin_76

  • Guest
From first look it's a lady, her face and hands are feminine, just because a Thai has a fake rack don't make her a Ladyboy.

yeah right it looks a lady. but did you notice how much time Mr. Jet Li has spent in editing.? It's not a rocket science mate. most of this ladyboys look exactly as real women even sometimes more beautiful than that. :cool: