Author Topic: TallHotKim - Touring Oxford [Fake self-promotion review]  (Read 7194 times)

RalphMouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
[Changed from Positive to Negative rating by admin - The below is a fake review written by the prostitute herself]

I wanted to see Kim when she was in Heathrow weeks ago but she was booked up. I had to be in Abingdon a few weeks later and had some time to kill in the afternoon and she was nearby in Oxford.

She is very pleasant on the phone -- a bit professional. Met her at a good hotel just outside of Oxford town centre. Very clear directions although it was a long trek from reception.

I thought she looked as her photos on her profile but I was surprised at how tall she was. Her profile says that she is 5'10" and I don't doubt it but I wasn't prepared for that in heels. She was very friendly and smiley and chatty and I found her attractive so her height didn't put me off.

She gave me a big kiss as soon as I walked in the door which got things off to a good start. She asked me to sit down by her on the bed and kissed me some more, unbuttoned my shirt, chatted and then kissed even more.

I undressed her in turn with her help. Her body is good but you can tell that she has given birth by the skin on her belly. Pretty much what you see in her private gallery really. I liked her legs and bum. Her tits aren't saggy but they're not big bags of fun to get lost in.

She kissed her way down my chest and tugged at my pants saying "Let me see that cock! I need to kiss it hello!" She gave me excellent OWO. She uses her tongue a lot and gets sloppy. Plenty of eye contact and smiling and I got the feeling that she really enjoys doing it. She did pause to ask me how many times I wanted to cum in the hour and when I said twice she said OK.

She teased me a bit and joked that I couldn't cum "yet" and she licked my balls while wanking me -- she remarked that I shaved and said that such good hygiene deserved a reward.

I came in her mouth and she kept licking and sucking but she didn't swallow -- she let the cum sort of dribble down with the spit.

She cuddled me and we talked. We talked about her visit to a museum in town but she kept stroking my chest and cuddling. After a few minutes she started stroking my cock and seemed happy that I was hard again. I told her that I would like to make her cum and she paused a second and then asked me if I thought that I could stay hard while going down on her. She explained that she liked to be fucked just as she started to cum so if she put a condom on first and I stayed hard I could fuck her right away. I thought that sounded like fun. She sucked me a while to get me very hard and then put the condom on with her mouth -- nice trick. Then she laid back and I licked her pussy.

She told me how she likes it -- lightly at first -- and then said, "OK, you're good at this so I may go a bit quiet for a while." Other than telling me to put a finger in her and then saying later "more tongue, less finger please" she didn't say much of anything but she seemed to be enjoying it and then she came and it was a surprise as she started bucking and cursing and making incoherent noises then she pulled me up practically by my ears stuck her tongue in my mouth and demanded that I fuck her. I thought this was pretty hot and I fucked her while she said things like "pound it!" and "fuck that hole!" So I did and I came pretty quick for a second pop.

We cuddled a while after (I may have even gone overtime a little) and we talked some more. She seemed to open up and told me a lot of funny stories.

 I think she may have a marmite personality. She seems to like to be in control. I don't know if every guy wants to be told what to do but I thought it was horny and fun and she was very nice about it not demanding or bitchy. She is also very intelligent -- she said she worked at a parlour in California when she went to Berkeley. She is very funny and makes a lot of jokes and is the sort who can tell a really good story. I think if you are looking for someone sweet and  passive you will not like her. I also think that your experience with her may come down to how much she likes you. I guess she liked me even though I am not a hot young stud.  :dance:


RalphMouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Was waiting for you to post a fake review about yourself, knew it would eventually happen.
Not only have you now been exposed as a desperate prossie who pretends to be a punter and posts reviews about herself (and fake reviews about other girls, now deleted), you're now also on the blacklist for abusing UKP members using your troll Twitter account - "Penelope Calliope".
You probably thought you're clever and would never be caught, reality is you're just another clueless whore.


Offline cueball

Devious, desperate trick, into my dustbin she goes.

Offline sir wanksalot


reality is you're just another clueless whore.

Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?


OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?

Another clueless whore who's slagged off this site, it's members, myself off. Creating false identities on this site, other forums, on Twitter and think they won't be discovered, that they've "got one over UKP". There's another clueless spineless whore doing it right now using a false name to try discredit me.

I can also post what I like on my site, if you have issue then I'm sure there is a little fluffy "punting" forum you may already be on that you can spend your time, where the owner only bans / abuses / threatens punter members. Never prossies or agency pimps of course, who instead get the royal treatment, which is basically like all the other "punting" forums :rolleyes:

Offline cueball

There's another clueless spineless whore doing it right now using a false name

Do we have a name for said deviant? Plenty of room in my bin for more.

Offline NIK

Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?

We don't favour the word 'courtesan' on here and it's hardly a profession is it?

yorkshire123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So a prossie joins up & pretends to be a punter with the sole intention of writing a positive review about herself.

She gets found out & is banned.

She then writes a sob story on another forum, verbally cries & supposedly removes her membership with the sole intention of gaining a few virtual cuddles.
That's what she got but what she wasn't ready for was for a few guys to openly ridicule her, one at least is a member on here who I don't mind saying has gone up in my estimation.

Wasn't this the same prossie that was part of the infosneaker outing episode?

Note - If you don't know what forum I'm talking about then don't bother asking me for a link as I have no intention of breaking the rules of this forum nor getting in the bad books with admin.

Offline cueball

Yorky

I too saw the pathetic apology, which by the way wouldn't have existed if she hadn't been busted. But, as you say some did ridicule her but some licked her toes too, and they're members on here too.

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She thought posting reviews about other girls before she posted one about herself would make her appear less suspect.
She thought wrong.

She still hasn't admitted to being "Penelope Calliope" and her ranting blogs slagging myself and the members on here, or sending abuse to other UKP members on Twitter. An account she quickly abandoned after she suspected the fake identity was compromised. Not touched it for more than a month.
She thought using "Anonymous" blogging services meant she wouldn't be caught. Again she thought wrong.

Offline finn5555

She is a typical pro$$ie who,is way past her sell by date  :wackogirl:

Her Twitter account makes me laugh  :sarcastic:

Penelope Calliope
Jun 12
Penelope Calliope ‏@UKCunter
@Softatheart0 There are miners on UKP?

Dont she know all the mines are either closed or closing  :sarcastic:

DogFace36

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?

  Noble Sir Wanksalot rides to the rescue of the Fair Maiden:

Hidden Image/Members Only



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline con-a-ser

She thought posting reviews about other girls before she posted one about herself would make her appear less suspect.
She thought wrong.

Who where the other reveiws on & is there any conection to her? or benifits to them

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Who where the other reveiws on & is there any conection to her? or benifits to them

Link for all threads she's created: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;sa=topics;u=29948
They won't show up in Reviews section, only in Regional discussion section because I move fake reviews there rather than deleting. All now labelled as fake.
They're not exactly short reviews. Pretty sad to spend all that time writing long fantasy reviews.

Offline arthur

She thought posting reviews about other girls before she posted one about herself would make her appear less suspect.
She thought wrong.

She still hasn't admitted to being "Penelope Calliope" and her ranting blogs slagging myself and the members on here, or sending abuse to other UKP members on Twitter. An account she quickly abandoned after she suspected the fake identity was compromised. Not touched it for more than a month.
She thought using "Anonymous" blogging services meant she wouldn't be caught. Again she thought wrong.

Im wondering how you knew it was her, and the blogs/twitter too. Or would that be giving away too much info to the scammers

Offline con-a-ser

Link for all threads she's created: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;sa=topics;u=29948
They won't show up in Reviews section, only in Regional discussion section because I move fake reviews there rather than deleting. All now labelled as fake.
They're not exactly short reviews. Pretty sad to spend all that time writing long fantasy reviews.

Thanks
I assummend been banned & showing just one review in post count it would have been this one & others deleted

Tony Montana

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Was waiting for you to post a fake review about yourself, knew it would eventually happen.
Not only have you now been exposed as a desperate prossie who pretends to be a punter and posts reviews about herself (and fake reviews about other girls, now deleted), you're now also on the blacklist for abusing UKP members using your troll Twitter account - "Penelope Calliope".
You probably thought you're clever and would never be caught, reality is you're just another clueless whore.

Now, are you sure it wasn't her sister that hijacked her account and wrote those posts  :lol:

What a stupid bint.

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We have 'fattim' (friend of hers?) crying about being "unfairly" banned along with her.
Nothing to do with the fact you created a second account is it? Something you knew for certain would get you a ban.

Don't even bother saying it was someone else sharing your internet connection, it was the same Android phone version on the same broadband connection. You were online at the time and all of a sudden went inactive and mins later new account was created.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline dboy74

Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?

Don't think you will be here much longer with that attitude  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 06:49:20 am by dboy74 »

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We don't favour the word 'courtesan' on here and it's hardly a profession is it?
A courtesan was originally a courtier, which means a person who attends the court of a monarch or other powerful person.

She certainly does not attend the court of a monarch or other powerful person, just overcharges the garden variety punter.

Offline MrMog

Not my type at all. Glad shes been outed as a bullshitter though. If memory serves she tried to out Info a while back with that other lass.

Offline Happyjose

Admin,

I have no connection to Kim at all but please can you elaborate on your comment "another clueless whore" ?

I would like to think I am not the only one on this board who finds that type of comment degrading to women in this profession and definitely does not represent the views of most punters.......but then again maybe it's just me ?

Probably not just you, but if any more fluffy turkeys want to vote for Xmas this would be a good place to do it.

Anyone thinking of giving this devious whore a second chance/booking should ponder this, she posted on the Glasgow review


I've seen her and was waiting to write a review when some time has elapsed -- it will be positive but I think she's the sort to remember details and I think she communicates with other girls a lot.


foreverandever

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Seems like I swerved one here. She was one of the birds who came 'on their period' whilst chatting on the phone with her the other week. Shame really as she looked pretty do able.

Offline threechilliman

Seems like I swerved one here. She was one of the birds who came 'on their period' whilst chatting on the phone with her the other week. Shame really as she looked pretty do able.

I saw her about 12 months ago and had a good time. She does seem infatuated with these boards though.

tcm

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Says a lot if a site decides not to ban her. Despite what the owner might claim of them treating both punter and prossie the same, the reality is anything but.
Look how fast they moderate and threaten (and even with violence) a punter compared to a prossie or agency pimp. Yet they have the gall to attack UKP moderation.

There's been big changes recently on other sites, trying to copy various things, technically and otherwise, about UKP to stop their decline. A certain voyeur site owner always reading and talking about UKP has had a massive change in personality recently. Look at his post history from previous years compared to now. No more "I am the hardman" who gets involved in every thread threatening with bannings / violence / outing, running to the rescue of every prossie who he feels needs a white-knight hero, or boasting how he has or will punch someone, general treating punters with contempt and acting like half of Greater Manchester Police are his mates who feed him inside info about pending and past parlour raids. Why the sudden change in personality? Maybe because he knows his site is a sinking ship and behavior such as that will put off the punters so now he's playing it 'cool'. Instead the only time he posts on his site these days of course is to talk about UKP and give his 'expert' opinion about this site and it's members. He obviously spends a fair bit of time reading this site, not surprising given his own site is devoid of much activity or interest given he's banned everyone who has said anything controversial or offended the prossies because he wants to remain the "big alpha male", so he comes on UKP to read a forum with life and energy, where real punting info is exchanged (not much use to the voyeur himself), to read exactly what those he banned or would ban are now posting. Given he has such interest in NIK's book, he has more than enough to write about UKP to fill his own book. I wonder how long the chapter of his punting experiences will be, will it be anywhere near as long as his chapters on James999, Jimmyredcab, NIK or infoseeker :rolleyes:

Prossies get the right of reply on UKP, it's happening right now in another review in another region. As long as prossie doesn't get abusive, make threats or make serious allegations against the punter, then they can respond. Unlike others where all it takes is for the prossie to claim "you're a stalker" or return accusation against the punter's integrity and all of a sudden they are rounded up on by the fluffies and the site owner threatening them both online and offline.

The defense of posting fake reviews about herself and other girls is because she didn't have reply to her to a review about her. Yet in fact she did reply to it:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=35132.msg481644#msg481644
She eventually got banned, not because of her rebuttal, but she had previously been banned. Punters get banned for same reason.

If a UKP punter admitted to posting fake review on any site, even the ones full of fake reviews by fluffies, fanboys and pimps, they'll be banned. Quite simply that goes against the ethos.

yorkshire123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Says a lot if a site decides not to ban her. Despite what the owner might claim of them treating both punter and prossie the same, the reality is anything but.

Yes its a strange situation, surprisingly from my point of view the major criticism has come from the girls (with the exception of a few punters) when I would have thought they would rally around her.

Just goes to show if a fellow prossie (who have nothing but disdain for UKP) thinks what you have done is shit the chances are its really shit.

Thanks for the link I remember the review quite well as it was the start on mine & infosneakers bromance  :D

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not just just favouring prossies, but also whole parlours (who's pimp owners happen to be mates of the site owner, or where his prossie girlfriends and prossie mates happen to work).

Take for example "Sandys", I was told by a well-established and trusted UKP member (who lives outside North West) that he joined some (minor) forum and was instantly put in moderation for criticizing Sandys. Presumably had he written glowing gushing bollocks about the place or something bad about Arabesque he would had a different reception from the "unbiased" owner and the fanclub  :rolleyes:

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
To the fake-nick 'forum expert' (who started posting 8 months ago yet seems to know many years worth of history) and his theories about infoseeker, you're obviously not so smart yourself to realize, as I told NIK a year ago when he asked why I hadn't banned him yet, the reason infoseeker was tolerated was despite the negative drama he caused, his punting posts and reviews with actual punting info (which you of course have plenty off, like "your" voyeur site owner) and his encouragement and efforts to build up the North West section on UKP from a quiet to active place actually benefited the site and helped punters have a proper platform to exchange info. Something "your" site owner can't stand as he thinks he and his site are the only ones that control and regulate the North West scene, that any site that could be competing with his status will have it's owner beaten up and the site handed over to him (acting like a typical thug drug dealer not wanting anyone on his patch, or maybe a mafia boss who wants all businesses like parlours in the area to have his seal of approval or else be shutdown). Plenty objected to infoseeker but didn't get themself banned because of him, that's because they're not as daft as you. Just as I told NIK a year ago, infoseeker will eventually be gotten rid off when he becomes past his useful point, not taking my instruction to him to go away was it. Or wait a minute, maybe the conspiracy theories by the fluffies who believe infoseeker is actually still here and the whole banning was staged is true. Regardless, I wonder what he'd make of this thread. He must be laughing his ass off.