@LondonLucyXXX price Hike 25% - thoughts?

[Dirty Harry]

Her price has gone up from £160 p/h to £200 p/h - thoughts?

I totally get the "she can do what she likes - it is supply and demand" argument - that isn't the point of my post.

This puts her in the MissDKK price bracket so can anyone, who has seen both, make any comparisons maybe?

How elastic is the market - has this now put anyone off?

To confirm - I totally get the rationale behind charging as much as you possibly can so that demand for your services matches the available supply (i.e. how much the girl wants to work)

[vw]

Lots of people search with the hourly rate price maximum as a variable so profile will get less views and maybe less dick. Might be just for summer holidays as amount of holes available on AW is reduced  much like hotel prices during the Olympics.

[Jamesmadden]

She used to be £130 before I remember. She then went up to £160 and now £200

[Sheer Tights]

I stop visiting a girl if she increases her price.

[winkywanky]

In actual fact, if you like anal (and all the other wonderful, filthy things that Miss KDD likes to get up to) then she's £250/hr and still not as nearly as good.

[Dirty Harry]

In actual fact, if you like anal (and all the other wonderful, filthy things that Miss KDD likes to get up to) then she's £250/hr and still not as nearly as good.

Oh I see of course the extras of £50...

It's a shame that if you are not into anal then you can't get a reduction from a girl who offers it as part of the standard rate! 

[tantric talents]

She used to be £130 before I remember. She then went up to £160 and now £200

Yes she was still in my HL at £130 pse
Clearly I was not totally persuaded even at that price.
Off the hotlist now. Move along. Plenty of Fish!

[winkywanky]

Oh I see of course the extras of £50...

It's a shame that if you are not into anal then you can't get a reduction from a girl who offers it as part of the standard rate! 

Regarding MissKDD, I think you're looking at it the wrong way - for her fee you can do pretty well anything you want to, and there'll be no extra charge whatsoever. This includes a perfect GFE with a lovely, happy, bright, intelligent girl (of course though, the sheer filth is bubbling away nicely just under the surface, and always available at a moment's notice).

[The_Don]

Are you referring to this these W/G (links help)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Her price has gone up from £160 p/h to £200 p/h - thoughts?

I totally get the "she can do what she likes - it is supply and demand" argument - that isn't the point of my post.

This puts her in the MissDKK price bracket so can anyone, who has seen both, make any comparisons maybe?

How elastic is the market - has this now put anyone off?

To confirm - I totally get the rationale behind charging as much as you possibly can so that demand for your services matches the available supply (i.e. how much the girl wants to work)

I've not punted  'MissDKK' nor this W/G so I can't compare in this reference.

I said before, it up to the W/G what price she set/charges. Some punters will pay, others will not and move on.

Many other W/G out there, that want to provide services, for punter funds.

And at £200 P/H for me its simple maths:

2x£100
1x£120 + 1x£80
2x£80 + £40
etc you get my point   

The fact is, price means very little and guarantees nothing. When it comes down to service, attitude and VFM.

Some of the best W/G I've punted, have been priced at or under £100. Currently for me, £200 P/H is to much for any W/G.

So ultimately only you can chose to pay or not 



 

[Dirty Harry]

Regarding MissKDD, I think you're looking at it the wrong way - for her fee you can do pretty well anything you want to, and there'll be no extra charge whatsoever. This includes a perfect GFE with a lovely, happy, bright, intelligent girl (of course though, the sheer filth is bubbling away nicely just under the surface, and always available at a moment's notice).

hehe - I know - my comment was tongue in cheek.  It's a bit like "why charge extras" - someone either does it or doesn't. They obviously want a base rate to be lower than added extras. Both pricing structures have merits ...

[Dirty Harry]

Are you referring to this these W/G (links help)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I've not punted  'MissDKK' nor this W/G so I can't compare in this reference.

Many other W/G out there, that want to provide services, for punter funds.

And at £200 P/H for me its simple maths:

2x£100
1x£120 + 1x£80
2x£80 + £40
etc you get my point   

The fact is, price means very little and guarantees nothing. When it comes down to service, attitude and VFM.

Some of the best W/G I've punted, have been priced at or under £100. Currently for me, £200 P/H is to much for any W/G.

So ultimately only you can chose to pay or not 

Good answer thank you - and I agree with you - it's down to service, attitude and VFM.

[yumyum3]

Good post OP. I saw Lucy more than a few times a few years ago (which is unusual for me). She is a great service provider and back then I gave her £80 or £90 and often stayed for a drink after. I haven't seen her since then because I will not pay the inflated prices.
I also notice generally on AW prices seem to be creeping up and IMO the members on here who pay inflated prices only encourage price hikes.
However, I do raise a glass to the regulars on here who keep posting reviews in the £60 to £100 price bracket and warn us of the scammers  To those who are suckered into the price hikes I say stop thinking only with your balls 

[winkywanky]

hehe - I know - my comment was tongue in cheek.  It's a bit like "why charge extras" - someone either does it or doesn't. They obviously want a base rate to be lower than added extras. Both pricing structures have merits ...

True...I'm a dirty, horny fucker though, so to find someone who doesn't charge extra for anything is right up my street  .

[tantric talents]

However, I do raise a glass to the regulars on here who keep posting reviews in the £60 to £100 price bracket and warn us of the scammers  To those who are suckered into the price hikes I say stop thinking only with your balls 

+100
Well said 

[Persie]

I don't think she is worth 200
She does RIM and CIM but is a little bit flabby.
Last time I saw her, it was pretty lack lustre

[Jimmyredcab]

I stop visiting a girl if she increases her price.

A sensible business woman would hold her prices for regulars.     

At the end of the day it is all down to market forces, £200 an hour is a very high rate even for London, hopefully she will end up with a dusty phone.     

[385North]

I was a regular client of Lucy’s for ages before I quit earlier on in the year. She’s was £130 an hour when I first booked her and then her price went up to £160 the week after. If/when I start escorting again (I’ve had a few wobbly moments) I would book her again without a second thought, based on the everlasting, grin-inducing level of service she provided before. I wouldn’t have a problem paying £200, but maybe she would still consider me a regular in which case her £160 rate would still apply, I believe.

Lucy’s not a cheap date by any means, but when I read back through my reviews it’s clear I can’t get that level of service elsewhere for £100, £130 or even £150 an hour. I guess you need to have punted with her to understand where I’m coming from. £200 is high, but we all have different perceptions on what constitutes value for money, although price is certainly no guarantee of quality. While I wouldn’t call £200 per hour premium rate (I consider that to be the £275 plus mark), for me Lucy is/was always a benchmark of what a premium service should be like. You can pay £200 per hour at the London Retreat for domination services and from what I’ve read recently it’s not all that.

[what-a man]

I saw her when, she was charging 120/hour. She is very good but not worth 200/hr IMO.

[jesus_jones]

£200ph is a pisstake - i would expect a slim model-type for that money.

Sadly, as has already been stated, it looks like the old standard of £60/30mins and £80-£100ph has steadily crept up over the past year. You have to travel quite a bit out of the city centre for real vfm punts.

This Lucy bird obviously has a set of naive regulars who are happy to accept a price hike. Mugs.

[Tony_Red]

She was on my hotlist, but off now. It's actually a good thing because there are quite a few ladies to see and by putting her price up she has made it easier for me to narrow my list down by removing her. Thank you, Lucy.

[jcdmj12]

A sensible business woman would hold her prices for regulars.     

At the end of the day it is all down to market forces, £200 an hour is a very high rate even for London, hopefully she will end up with a dusty phone.     

That's what Lucy is doing, as far as I know. Holding her price for regulars, and increasing for new clients. 

[jcdmj12]

I was a regular client of Lucy’s for ages before I quit earlier on in the year. She’s was £130 an hour when I first booked her and then her price went up to £160 the week after. If/when I start escorting again (I’ve had a few wobbly moments) I would book her again without a second thought, based on the everlasting, grin-inducing level of service she provided before. I wouldn’t have a problem paying £200, but maybe she would still consider me a regular in which case her £160 rate would still apply, I believe.

Lucy’s not a cheap date by any means, but when I read back through my reviews it’s clear I can’t get that level of service elsewhere for £100, £130 or even £150 an hour. I guess you need to have punted with her to understand where I’m coming from. £200 is high, but we all have different perceptions on what constitutes value for money, although price is certainly no guarantee of quality. While I wouldn’t call £200 per hour premium rate (I consider that to be the £275 plus mark), for me Lucy is/was always a benchmark of what a premium service should be like. You can pay £200 per hour at the London Retreat for domination services and from what I’ve read recently it’s not all that.

+1 I have only ever found a couple of girls who can provide consistently good service + mix of sex / bdsm + professionalism (no flaking, reliable comms etc).  Always around the £160/hr mark.    She has found herself a very good niche.

[yumyum3]

£200ph is a pisstake - i would expect a slim model-type for that money.

Sadly, as has already been stated, it looks like the old standard of £60/30mins and £80-£100ph has steadily crept up over the past year. You have to travel quite a bit out of the city centre for real vfm punts.

This Lucy bird obviously has a set of naive regulars who are happy to accept a price hike. Mugs.

Spot on.

I was a regular client of Lucy’s for ages before I quit earlier on in the year. She’s was £130 an hour when I first booked her and then her price went up to £160 the week after. If/when I start escorting again (I’ve had a few wobbly moments) I would book her again without a second thought, based on the everlasting, grin-inducing level of service she provided before. I wouldn’t have a problem paying £200, but maybe she would still consider me a regular in which case her £160 rate would still apply, I believe.

Lucy’s not a cheap date by any means, but when I read back through my reviews it’s clear I can’t get that level of service elsewhere for £100, £130 or even £150 an hour. I guess you need to have punted with her to understand where I’m coming from. £200 is high, but we all have different perceptions on what constitutes value for money, although price is certainly no guarantee of quality. While I wouldn’t call £200 per hour premium rate (I consider that to be the £275 plus mark), for me Lucy is/was always a benchmark of what a premium service should be like. You can pay £200 per hour at the London Retreat for domination services and from what I’ve read recently it’s not all that.

Talk up prices why don't you. I've always said Lucy's a great service provider but it isn't value for money at all and if you pay those prices you encourage the price hikes.

it’s clear I can’t get that level of service elsewhere for £100, £130 or even £150

Yes you can. I and others do (and remember I've seen Lucy 4 or 5 times and stopped for drinks after) at normal prices. You only have to look at reviews from regular members to see that. Prices have nothing to do with quality of service as many experienced members here will tell you. In my opinion, what you've written looks like cheerleading and encouraging price hikes. And if you've quit what about the rest of us who are still paying? This is a punter's forum so why not think about the interests of punters?

[385North]

Yumyum: looking through you posts I see costs are a major concern for you and if you can punt on a budget then I applaud you, but please do not tell me what I should consider value for money or where I should go looking for it. That's for me to decide and no one else. Personally I really dont care what you or any other punter on here can or cannot afford, all I'm interested in is an honest account of how they've gone about it, regardless.

[yumyum3]

Yumyum: looking through you posts I see costs are a major concern for you and if you can punt on a budget then I applaud you, but please do not tell me what I should consider value for money or where I should go looking for it. That's for me to decide and no one else. Personally I really dont care what you or any other punter on here can or cannot afford, all I'm interested in is an honest account of how they've gone about it, regardless.

Please can I ask you to actually consider what I've written, rather than make up stuff because you missed the points. What I can afford is not the issue.  I've no personal animosity toward you and from what I remember you're a good contributor on this forum. However and as this is a punter's forum:
You do not punt.
You've happily supported Lucy's price rise and suggested you would be willing to pay more.
You also wrote that

I guess you need to have punted with her to understand where I’m coming from.

I have punted with her multiple times and still managed to find ladies who give as good a service for under half of Lucy's price.
As a customer, I'd rather not encourage prices to go up, especially as it is quite an expensive hobby. As you're not now paying to indulge in that hobby, I'd prefer it if you didn't come on a punter's forum suggesting price rises are fine.
You can pay what you like. You can pay Lucy £1000 for 15 minutes for all I care, but if you come on a punter's forum and suggest steep prices are fine, especially as the lady's services are so special and unique, don't expect me as a regular paying punter not to take issue with it.
Some on here may even send your post to the UKP fluffy watch section.
Enjoy your retirement. 

 

[385North]

Fluffy watch? You have my blessing, but please be man enough to do it yourself rather than inciting others to do it for you. The Op asked for thoughts on the subject at hand and I gave my opinion, based on experince, to present a balance to the debate.

Happy punting

 

[yumyum3]

Fluffy watch? You have my blessing, but please be man enough to do it yourself rather than inciting others to do it for you. The Op asked for thoughts on the subject at hand and I gave my opinion, based on experince, to present a balance to the debate.

Happy punting

 

No worries if you can't address the points made or have a think about what was actually written. When all else fails, you can always start a pissing competition with the "be man enough" ruse. Easy to do on an anonymous forum. It will go nowhere and bore everyone.
I can see what you thought you were doing and of course a fool and his money are soon parted but on a website that's designed in the customer's interest supporting price rises as a conceit to "present balance" to a "debate" is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard. 

[Persie]

In the end Lucy has a wobbly area and a jelly belly - we don't need to pay 200 notes for that - plenty of heffalumps down the local nightclubs who.would be grateful for attention!

[385North]

No worries if you can't address the points made or have a think about what was actually written. When all else fails, you can always start a pissing competition with the "be man enough" ruse. Easy to do on an anonymous forum. It will go nowhere and bore everyone.
I can see what you thought you were doing and of course a fool and his money are soon parted but on a website that's designed in the customer's interest supporting price rises as a conceit to "present balance" to a "debate" is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard. 

Yummy, you really are going for glory in playing to the crowd on this.

You accuse me of starting a pissing contest, but make the incendiary comment about others wishing to report me to Fluffy Watch which prompted my response, which I stand by.

In response to not understanding your comments; yes I read them, but just because we’ve seen the same WG doesn’t mean we’ve paid for the similar services. In fact I’m pretty sure you’re not into the kind of stuff which I previously partook in. Plus, I know that I would waste more money try to find another service provider that I would be happy with, hence my initial comment. And please don’t patronise me any further by telling me where my expectations can be met elsewhere for less, because you quite frankly you have no idea of what my expectations are.

[tazz]

Maybe she wants less clients and more cash from them. Ive noticed quite a few WG's hiking their prices. English Emily used to be £120 an hour, now its £250 which is way over priced as shes hardly a model.

[Bigus Dickus]

I blame all the Prossie TV shows recently for the spiral of price increases and lots of newbie girls who think that we'll pay over the odds because they are new to the game!

There are only a handful of girls who deserve being paid more than £130 per hour IMHO. Whilst a handful of wealthy clients will pay whatever is demanded, most guys won't. When the rich guys get bored and move on to pastures green phones will get dusty.

I've taken a few of my favourite ladies off my HL because I think the price hikes are taking the piss a bit!

I have paid £200 ph before but the service wasn't any better than most £120 ph girls

I am sure things will balance out. I see more and more green lights on these days!

[firemansam]

Ii gather its because she is mainly doing bdsm and roleplay meetings and that is more involved than the usual gfe and pse stuff most on here (including myself) go for.