Author Topic: stunning_greta – Adultwork (formerly Autumn/Aura of agencies)  (Read 3765 times)


2 review(s) for stunning_greta (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Jason

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
MEETING DETAILS:
Escort name: Greta (AW nickname: stunning_greta; former agency names: Autumn, Aura)
Website: External Link/Members Only (image form External Link/Members Only)
Former agency profile: External Link/Members Only
Phone: 07521426060
Date of Visit: August 2015, Type of Visit: Incall (W2, Paddington)
Incall price structure: 0.5h: £90, 1h: £140, 1.5h: £180, 2h: £250, 3h: £350
Time Spent: 1.5 hour, Fee Paid: £180

PREABLE:
Greta was formerly working for type A agencies (see definition of type A External Link/Members Only) in the neighbouring escort flat in the same building (oh yes, in that building there are two *unrelated* flats with working girls, one with girls advertising on agencies and one with girls advertising on adultwork – read this) but she recently jumped ship and joined the Adultwork group – a move that was also associated with a significant reduction in price. A good punt overall with a few negatives but in my judgement my meeting with Greta is overall marked as positive.

ABOUT THE VENUE: (mostly positive)
I won't re-describe that flat for a third time. Read my previous descriptions here and here but for completeness I would only say that Greta’s bedroom is the same the one Cindy used to use which is shown in this External Link/Members Only of Cindy. 

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE: (positive)
Greta is a young and pretty Lithuanian girl currently 19y.o. (soon to become 20 later this year – born in 1995). The pictures are genuine but as they are glammed up in photoshop, in the flesh she is a bit different albeit the resemblance is still there. I would say the pics are 75% accurate regarding her face and 70% accurate regarding her body. She has shoulder length brown hair, pillow lips and nice almond eyes. She didn't wear any make-up but anyway she is a naturally attractive girl facially even with zero make-up. She is 5ft7in (1.69m to be exact) tall (barefoot), slim (although not fit) dress size 8-10, with a nice peachy bum and a good pair of 34B/C boobs. In person, compared to the pics, her boobs are not as perfectly shaped and not as big - in the pics they appear as cup D but they are cup C at the very most – my estimation is full cup B. Also she is has some *very minor* puppy fat in her tummy area. Overall two clicks below the appearance in her best picture (External Link/Members Only) but more natural nonetheless. I am more than sure that for the majority of punters Greta would be regarded as stunning as per her nickname (especially considering the praise that some forum darlings receive). According to my beauty scale which you can read External Link/Members Only (version 2.0) Greta’s face score is between 7.8/10-8.2/10 and her body score is 8.0/10. Overall 8.0/10

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PERSONALITY AND OTHER FACTS: (mostly positive)
She is a friendly and polite girl but like most Baltic girls she is quite a proud girl with fiery temperament despite the collected exterior she presents initially. She is mentally mature for her young age and she's fairly smart and capable of constructing logical arguments (except from one due to denial ... you will find out which one soon). She is new to this line of work and she maintains her freshness by not overworking - according to her claims “the total amount of sex she has per day is 2-3 hours and she won't take more than a total of 3 normal bookings per day”. Having previously worked for agencies she has acquired some rich clients and she is mostly making money from overnights and dinner dates with them than from Adultwork and by the way she considers herself “an escort and not a hooker” (I think by now you understood the argument I was referring to previously. Anyhow…). Her spoken English level is currently B1-B2 as that is defined by External Link/Members Only.

ABOUT THE MEETING:
(A) Meeting arrangement: (mostly positive)
I booked Greta for 1.5hour as a follow up from my meeting with Natt. I booked both girls with a single interaction with the receptionist who handled the comms efficiently.

(B) During the meeting: (mostly positive)
After I finished my booking with Natalie (Naughty-Natt) I had a shower and moved to Greta’s bedroom. Greta was dressed in a lovely greyish-striped dress and after quickly sorting the “paperwork” we started.
 
Services that I made use of: Deep French kissing, body kissing, protected vaginal penetration sex in several positions, OW, ball licking/sucking, cunnilingus, 69, facesitting, clit stroking, handjob, COB.

POSITIVES :
1. VERY passionate, non-stop, full-on DFK. We kissed like lovers.
2. Very passionate sex. She was willing to get into multiple positions (even advanced one such as the lotus) without complaining. She also took a prolonged pounding.
3. Good GFE illusion and she is gets into it during sex.
4. Enjoyable ball licking/sucking
5. Tight pussy
6. No clockwatching. In fact after the end of our session we waited each other and left the flat together (she had finished her shift).
7. I had her full attention (no fiddling of her phone or other timewasting tactics etc).
8. No back to back bookings (so it seems)
9. Punctual (meeting started on time).

NEUTRALS :
1. No fingering (no fingers inside her vagina). Clit stroking is fine though.
2. Average handjob.
3. No shower together.
4. No CIM despite listed in the enjoys list. Its absence doesn't bother me though so it is listed as neutral.
5. No COF – not listed anyway so fair enough.
6. Towards the end she slightly reacted to the prolonged fucking but to be fair from the 90mins about 82mins were sexual (penetration/oral sex+foreplay and kissing).
7. Out of the 4 times I changed condoms I had to wear the condom on my cock by myself half of the times. It didn't bother me as I am quite experienced in placing the condom on my cock quickly but previous threads in this forum suggest that quite a few punters are not fast, fumble around and lose erection during the process.  So if you are one of them you may find this point particularly negative.
8. She failed to meet a uniform request (I explained in detail about what happened in Natalie’s review here)

NEGATIVES:
1. Poor blowjob. Covered as well. I don't bother about OW or OWO but the technique was quite amateurish. For the record her profile says she does offer OWO but she declined citing an ulcer at the back of her gums near the back of her mouth...
2. Slight smell of BV which though was rectified after I baby wiped her. She was showered but the smell resulted after her visiting the toilet to pee during our meeting. Anyway…
3. Although she took COB she originally asked for £40 extra and only offered it for free it as a compensation to make up for the lack of OWO.

CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL VERDICT:
Reviews written in the positives-neutrals-negatives format often fail to convey the perspective of the reviewer as people overlook the fact that different points carry different weighting. It is not about word count under the positives and negatives. For me the looks, the attitude, the quality of penetration sex and the passionate French kissing carry much more weighting than blowjob quality, OWO or CIM. As such I rate this review positively. What others may think is irrelevant to the rating of my review - it is only relevant in their own decision of whether they would like to meet this girl or not.

Q. Do I recommend her? If you are happy with the available services and the price tag I would not hesitate to recommend Greta for a 90minute booking at £2/minute (£180 for 90minutes). I wouldn't go for an hour or a two hour booking though.
Q. Would I meet her again (going back in time)? A. Yes. I had an enjoyable time with her despite the negatives.
Q. Will I meet her again in the future? A. Yes but I may wait for her to gain some more experience and improve her oral skills.

DETAILED SCORES ABOUT THE ESCORT:
Attractiveness/Beauty: 8.0/10 (face score: 8.0/10; body score 8.0/10) – ratings are based on External Link/Members Only (version 2.0)
Patience & Politeness/Friendliness: 8.5/10
GFE illusion: 9.2/10
Willingness to please: 8.0/10
Energy: 8.8/10
Participation & Enthusiasm: 9.8/10
Expression of enjoy: 8.4/10
Available services: 7.8/10
Quality of available services: 7.6/10
Hygiene Standard: 7.0/10
English level: 7.0/10
Smoker status: Smoker (social smoker; uses mouthwash)
Tattoos: Yes, one on the lower back (fairly discreet).
Non-ear piercings: Navel (as shown in the pics).
Pubic hair: Fully shaven
Quality/price ratio: Fair

NONMENCLATURE OF SUBSECTIONS RATINGS:
positive=4.5 or 5 stars, mostly positive=3.5 or 4 stars, mixed=2 or 3 stars, negative=0 or 1 stars
neutral=something that either doesn't bother me personally generally or didn't bother me at the time although it would be preferable if it were available or avoided (depending on the subject). It might be decisive for others though that is why is mentioned.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2015, 12:01:49 pm by Jason »

Offline tantric talents

Thanks for the review Jason. Thorough as ever  :thumbsup:
I take it the BV wasn't pronounced enough to put you off the cunnilingus? Did you make her aware of it?

Offline poi

Thanks you Mr.Jason for a great review ,   :drinks:

Surly you enjoined your time while she has few misleading ,

I would go for natural review as she charging £140 P/H while she listed OWO and CIM and she wouldn't provide her like list .

is her tits big as showing in her picture ? also is natural ?  :drinks:

Thanks .

Jason

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I take it the BV wasn't pronounced enough to put you off the cunnilingus? Did you make her aware of it?
As I said in the review the smell resulted after her toilet visit and was faint. After I baby wiped her it subsided completely so I proceeded with cunnilingus. I didn't make her aware of her BV. What I did instead was to apply lube and move briefly to sex, THEN I had the excuse to baby wiped her to death “in order to remove all the lube”.  I think the lube also served as a deodorant as it contains alcohol too.  It’s a neat trick that so far has worked half of the times I experienced sings of BV with girls including civvies without causing offense (the other trick is to have a shared shower). When it doesn't work I don't perform reverse oral at all.

I would go for natural review as she charging £140 P/H while she listed OWO and CIM and she wouldn't provide her like list . Is her tits big as showing in her picture? also is natural?
The effective cost for 1.5hr is £120 (not £140) and in this review I judged her as £120ph provider. That is why in my conclusion I didn't recommend her for a 1hr booking. As for her actual tits size I commented in detail in the review (as I said they are full cup B - not D as appearing in the pics, cup B< cup D) and, yes, her tits are natural.

Offline poi

As I said in the review the smell resulted after her toilet visit and was faint. After I baby wiped her it subsided completely so I proceeded with cunnilingus. I didn't make her aware of her BV. What I did The effective cost for 1.5hr is £120 (not £140) and in this review I judged her as £120ph provider. That is why in my conclusion I didn't recommend her for a 1hr booking. As for her actual tits size I commented in detail in the review (as I said they are full cup B - not D as appearing in the pics, cup B< cup D) and, yes, her tits are natural.

Thanks Jason,  :hi:

If you have only one choice ,which one you will re visit ?

External Link/Members Only Natalie

OR

External Link/Members Only Greta

 :drinks:

Jason

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Difficult decision but in such a scenario I would probably go for Natalie. Both girls have their merits though. First their vaginal sex skills and enthusiasm during sex are roughly on par with Greta perhaps being the one that gets more into it. Greta also has better physical appearance, has stronger personality, she speaks better English and she is the better DFKisser. Natalie on the other hand is more easy going and smiley, she gives a much much much better blowjob (although she had that tongue stud which I would prefer she hadn’t) , her pussy was “delicious” (although that may be a result of the shared shower), she has a greater service repertoire and she is cheaper by £20.

Offline poi

Difficult decision but in such a scenario I would probably go for Natalie. Both girls have their merits though. First their vaginal sex skills and enthusiasm during sex are roughly on par with Greta perhaps being the one that gets more into it. Greta also has better physical appearance, has stronger personality, she speaks better English and she is the better DFKisser. Natalie on the other hand is more easy going and smiley, she gives a much much much better blowjob (although she had that tongue stud which I would prefer she hadn’t) , her pussy was “delicious” (although that may be a result of the shared shower), she has a greater service repertoire and she is cheaper by £20.

Thank you Jason,

I have seen Nat and other girls which previously worked in this place but I always thinking Nat is the one I can go and re visit her,  ;)