Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Trios won't be going ahead hahahahaha  (Read 5757 times)

Offline rthunderbird

I'm sorry when I read this I burst out laughing, somehow I knew the trios with Tori, Brooke and Lily wouldn't be going ahead. Guys this is a new record for the shortest time Brooke and Tori have worked together. Hahahaha  :D

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

It also appear Tori has removed her name from the blogpost as well.

Offline dino1990

haha tori is full of shit sometimes.

themademan2

  • Guest
Couldn't see it happening with the way their diaries work. I'm sure pressure on them not to fuck about and cancel existing appointments went a long way too. :timeout:

Offline AnthG

It seems there is a contradiction going on for the reason why between them though.

Brookes reason

Quote from: Brooke'sBlog
I've just been informed both the duo's and the trio won't be going ahead :-( Such a shame, I was looking forward to getting my tongue stuck in, pardon the pun.

And Tori's reason.

Quote from: Tori'sBlog
The reasoning behind why Brooke is now not involved in the trio is nothing sinister it is simply because she is too busy! Everyone say what you like about Brooke Knights however from my opinion (and I know her almost too well ;) ) she is the most hard working, genuine, gorgeous person I've ever met and will continue to stay one of my closest friends. So sorry lads, no drama here! She's also offering duos with a lady from a different agency so I'm simply keeping my loyalties with Amour.

How can Brooke be too busy, her entire involvement in this trio was only with guys she has already got booked for solo bookings and it was an added extra?

I get the feeling of who is telling the truth and the real reason it is this on the last line of Tori's Blog - "She's also offering duos with a lady from a different agency so I'm simply keeping my loyalties with Amour."

Amour and Allure hate one another - as in like England & Germany 1939-1944 type stuff it seems. And I get the feeling when Brooke was working with Allure's girls Tori and Lilly probably felt that's it cannot work with her now.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline foreverchanges


Amour and Allure hate one another - as in like England & Germany 1939-1944 type stuff it seems. And I get the feeling when Brooke was working with Allure's girls Tori and Lilly probably felt that's it cannot work with her now.

Ah that may explain it..the last time I saw the Heaton minxes and they felt the earth move it was probably not down to my sexual prowess but more likely a V1 fired from Allure HQ.
Bloody hell Anth man!

Offline AnthG

Bloody hell Anth man!

I am not kidding Allure and Amour seriously hate one another.

I am not going into details on the forum. But trust me hate is actually a polite word for it.

I thought this was public knowledge? Its all been drawn out in public by them in other places.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2015, 08:54:43 am by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline foreverchanges

I am not kidding Allure and Amour seriously hate one another.

I am not going into details on the forum. But trust me hate is actually a polite word for it.

I thought this was public knowledge? Its all been drawn out in public by them in other places.

I am aware..you only have to view this forum to see the Ministers of Propaganda in action.

greychap

  • Guest
I am not kidding Allure and Amour seriously hate one another.

I am not going into details on the forum. But trust me hate is actually a polite word for it.

I thought this was public knowledge? Its all been drawn out in public by them in other places.

It is public knowledge with a lot of people, Amour/Stacey apparently tried to get Allure closed down by going to the local police but it back fired as Allure brought up the fact Stacey boasts about having police in her pocket and they were told they are not friends with Stacey one bit they were only interested in encouraging the escorts that have had trouble with punters or been attacked to report it to police.

So just to clarify apparently Stacey is not in with the local police it was just a ploy her end to scare some people.

greychap

  • Guest
I'm sorry when I read this I burst out laughing, somehow I knew the trios with Tori, Brooke and Lily wouldn't be going ahead. Guys this is a new record for the shortest time Brooke and Tori have worked together. Hahahaha  :D

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

It also appear Tori has removed her name from the blogpost as well.

I just thought it was another marketing ploy to get everyone talking about them, never thought it would really work with the three of them.

Offline AnthG

It is public knowledge with a lot of people, Amour/Stacey apparently tried to get Allure closed down by going to the local police but it back fired as Allure brought up the fact Stacey boasts about having police in her pocket

To be fair to them though. It really depends on which version you hear as like any dispute both have their side of what has happened.

And I didn't say what I said for everyone to now start a - which version do you believe argument. It was just to say no way would two Amour girls work with someone in a duo who is clearly in the Allure camp.

I just thought it was another marketing ploy to get everyone talking about them, never thought it would really work with the three of them.

Agree. I never thought it would work either. I don't mean this to be nasty, but WGs are very narcissistic by nature. Its a trait of what causes the good ones to be good in my opinion. And the forum darlings are like crazy narcissistic and noway could they possibly team up together as it will be some massive competition and one upmanship type thing.

It will end only up as a Kettlegate mark 2 type thing (As in the epic duo of when Teen Kylie and Impossible Princess decided to duo up which for those who were around then is still the best thing ever to result in the history of punting :) ).
« Last Edit: July 13, 2015, 10:44:17 am by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

greychap

  • Guest
To be fair to them though. It really depends on which version you hear as like any dispute both have their side of what has happened.

And I didn't say what I said for everyone to now start a - which version do you believe argument. It was just to say no way would two Amour girls work with someone in a duo who is clearly in the Allure camp.

Agree. I never thought it would work either. I don't mean this to be nasty, but WGs are very narcissistic by nature. Its a trait of what causes the good ones to be good in my opinion. And the forum darlings are like crazy narcissistic and noway could they possibly team up together as it will be some massive competition and one upmanship type thing.

It will end only up as a Kettlegate mark 2 type thing (As in the epic duo of when Teen Kylie and Impossible Princess decided to duo up which for those who were around then is still the best thing ever to result in the history of punting :) ).

Yes but what I heard from a few good sources and one being a girl in the amour team is that Stacey was jealous that Allure are building up a good reputation and gaining a lot of punters and wanted rid of them so went to the police about them to get them shut down but it back fired as allure owners brought up the fact Stacey is boasting about being in with the police.

Just because there is a new agency in town doing competitions like them, same price, some good girls on there books and trying to run things reliable does not mean the rivals should try and get them closed down but its typical of this type of industry full of criminals who fight for there patch.

Offline AnthG

Just because there is a new agency in town doing competitions like them, same price, some good girls on there books and trying to run things reliable does not mean the rivals should try and get them closed down but its typical of this type of industry full of criminals who fight for there patch.

Like I say though, it takes two to have a turf war. Both doing stuff to each other.

For every list Allure say Amour has done to them. Amour has their own list of stuff they say Allure has done to them. They probably both have done stuff that maybe in the heat of the moment they regret.

So like I said above England vs Germany was a good analogy IMHO. And the reason why two Amour darlings would never-ever work with someone who is duoing with a bunch of Allure girls. They'd either not want to out of risk of offending. Or have been asked not to.

I am kind of hoping a new can of worms doesn't get opened here as I have already been ticked off by Lily for saying 'what about Eva'. I don't really want her coming along giving me another ticking off about Amour/Allures arguments making no apparent motive for their decision to no longer work with Brooke (when it likely really did  ;) )
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

greychap

  • Guest
Like I say though, it takes two to have a turf war. Both doing stuff to each other.

For every list Allure say Amour has done to them. Amour has their own list of stuff they say Allure has done to them. They probably both have done stuff that maybe in the heat of the moment they regret.

So like I said above England vs Germany was a good analogy IMHO. And the reason why two Amour darlings would never-ever work with someone who is duoing with a bunch of Allure girls. They'd either not want to out of risk of offending. Or have been asked not to.

I am kind of hoping a new can of worms doesn't get opened here as I have already been ticked off by Lily for saying 'what about Eva'. I don't really want her coming along giving me another ticking off about Amour/Allures arguments making no apparent motive for their decision to no longer work with Brooke (when it likely really did  ;) )

I don't see why a new agency would start trouble with another agency that has been around a while its usually the players that have been around a while don't like a new agency taking its punters especially if there gaining a good reputation, apart from the chest sitters agency that go to this level but we all know about him.

Diamonds reputation is quite bad now as is adore escorts, naughty northern are ok but price is a little more so it makes sense that amour see allure as competition especially as they seem to be following the same route as Stacey with the competitions and exactly the same prices. Hardly surprising there is a war going on between the two of them.

greychap

  • Guest
Like I say though, it takes two to have a turf war. Both doing stuff to each other.

For every list Allure say Amour has done to them. Amour has their own list of stuff they say Allure has done to them. They probably both have done stuff that maybe in the heat of the moment they regret.

So like I said above England vs Germany was a good analogy IMHO. And the reason why two Amour darlings would never-ever work with someone who is duoing with a bunch of Allure girls. They'd either not want to out of risk of offending. Or have been asked not to.

I am kind of hoping a new can of worms doesn't get opened here as I have already been ticked off by Lily for saying 'what about Eva'. I don't really want her coming along giving me another ticking off about Amour/Allures arguments making no apparent motive for their decision to no longer work with Brooke (when it likely really did  ;) )

I never saw the trio lesbo sessions working out with how busy they are there would have been a lot of let downs and blaming each other, its hard enough getting to see 1 escort let alone 3 together at the same time.

They know everything they write on there blog appears on here so more publicity for all of them as usual!!!!!

themademan2

  • Guest
haha tori is full of shit sometimes.
What a complete shit stirrer she is and caught out...

Trios were for LilyD aka lily delphine of amour, Tori Taylor aka Cassie of Amour and Brooke Knights.

The duos were for Brooke Knights and Sarah Jane of Allure.

They would not have even met each other as there was never a combination of sj with any one except Brooke Knights.

So why cassie of amour aka Tori Taylor is talking shite about loyalty, fuck knows.

In fact I'm sure Brooke Knights dumped LilyD and Tori Taylor for the baggage that comes with them  :music:

themademan2

  • Guest
Tori, I'm sure your reading this, this track is just for you  :cool:

External Link/Members Only

Offline daveev

lol that's a bit like who's on first base, with abbot and costello sorry it's my age

Offline rthunderbird

If they want to compete maybe amour should lower their prices ;) a cold day in hell etc

greychap

  • Guest
If they want to compete maybe amour should lower their prices ;) a cold day in hell etc

Yes to £30 for 30 mins and £70 for 1hr. :D :D

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Amour and Allure hate one another

The Amour pimp supports a troll Twitter account calling for the shutting of this site.
None of the other North East agency owners do.
That alone speaks volumes.

greychap

  • Guest
The Amour pimp supports a troll Twitter account calling for the shutting of this site.
None of the other North East agency owners do.
That alone speaks volumes.

Yes because the other agency owners in the northeast just want a quiet life and to earn there money even if they don't like this site or certain things said on it they seem to keep out of revenge and arguments they just get on with running the girls and keep the cash flowing where as if you do anything or say anything against Stacey/amour your in for it, your not allowed to disagree with her or if you do expect war from her!


ManBat

  • Guest
Yes because the other agency owners in the northeast just want a quiet life and to earn there money even if they don't like this site or certain things said on it they seem to keep out of revenge and arguments they just get on with running the girls and keep the cash flowing where as if you do anything or say anything against Stacey/amour your in for it, your not allowed to disagree with her or if you do expect war from her!

Back in the day Stacey gave an amazing blowjob. Not sure she has many other qualifications for being is 'business' though

Mackydees

  • Guest
It is public knowledge with a lot of people, Amour/Stacey apparently tried to get Allure closed down by going to the local police but it back fired as Allure brought up the fact Stacey boasts about having police in her pocket and they were told they are not friends with Stacey one bit they were only interested in encouraging the escorts that have had trouble with punters or been attacked to report it to police.

So just to clarify apparently Stacey is not in with the local police it was just a ploy her end to scare some people.

Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Both the Amour supporters and the Allure supporters send me PMs with accusations what the other side has done.
There's a war going on, UKP being the prime platform to carry it out, because so many punters read it.

The problem with the North East is that agencies are more popular than independents (unlike other parts of UK, e.g. London)
This needs to be resolved by their local police force, just like Avon and Somerset Constabulary did with BathBabes.

And in case anyone doesn't know about BathBabes, he had a massive fanclub here on UKPunting, he also boasted of police protection, but after a week of me making this post: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=459.msg230335#msg230335
He was arrested and his agency shutdown.
I know because the police contacted me needing my co-operation in building a case against him (which enraged his fanclub even further).

greychap

  • Guest
Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.

I don't really no much about the owners of Allure to comment on if there considered nice or not I only know about my experience with Amour and what I have been told about Stacey trying to get the police to close down Allure.

greychap

  • Guest
Both the Amour supporters and the Allure supporters send me PMs with accusations what the other side has done.
There's a war going on, UKP being the prime platform to carry it out, because so many punters read it.

Im certainly not a supporter for Stacey/amour as most people know on here but neither a supporter for Allure either as I do not know much about them or the owners only what I read on here or what I have been told so could not vouch for them either.

Mackydees

  • Guest
Both the Amour supporters and the Allure supporters send me PMs with accusations what the other side has done.
There's a war going on.
You're not wrong there and some of the names involved are quite scary

greychap

  • Guest
Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.

Really???? do tell???

Offline AnthG

Both the Amour supporters and the Allure supporters send me PMs with accusations what the other side has done.
There's a war going on, UKP being the prime platform to carry it out, because so many punters read it.

I just personally think the agencies should be given the benefit of the doubt over when someone comes up with stuff about them, which I get the feeling somestimes some of the people in the region don't give.

Newcastle is an agency town, I think it always will be. It used to be Diamonds and Amour who were in competition. But now Diamonds has went to pretty much rubbish basically.

So now its Allure and Amour who are involved in the competition and I get the feeling maybe the fan clubs of both are maybe trying to do unfair competition as opposed to fair competition. As in just bashing the rivals to the one they like here.

Personally I am in the amour camp. Hence why I am saying this, as it does seem a lot of the allure camp are just bashing amour maybe thinking it will bring favour with the girls on Allure or whatever (I am just guessing this, so no offence to anyone).

Maybe people should just stop talking about the agencies, and just talking about the girls themselves on the books?
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline stanleyjohn

Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.


I have never been a real agency user so I am really interested in the above comments, how do punters get to to know such detailed information ?

greychap

  • Guest
I just personally think the agencies should be given the benefit of the doubt over when someone comes up with stuff about them, which I get the feeling somestimes some of the people in the region don't give.

Newcastle is an agency town, I think it always will be. It used to be Diamonds and Amour who were in competition. But now Diamonds has went to pretty much rubbish basically.

So now its Allure and Amour who are involved in the competition and I get the feeling maybe the fan clubs of both are maybe trying to do unfair competition as opposed to fair competition. As in just bashing the rivals to the one they like here.

Personally I am in the amour camp. Hence why I am saying this, as it does seem a lot of the allure camp are just bashing amour maybe thinking it will bring favour with the girls on Allure or whatever (I am just guessing this, so no offence to anyone).

Maybe people should just stop talking about the agencies, and just talking about the girls themselves on the books?

Well I have bashed Amour for good reason and to do with Allure I don't know enough about them only what I have read on here really.

Offline smiths

Well I have bashed Amour for good reason and to do with Allure I don't know enough about them only what I have read on here really.

I see admin has posted above that the amour pimp supports a troll twitter account that's calling for the closing of UKP. Now if I was informed of a provider I punted with was doing that I would boycott them from that point onwards, its called supporting UKP in my book.

greychap

  • Guest
Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.

With what your saying about what you know am I right in thinking as you have a review of Amy of Newcastle who is one of Stacey's best friends maybe you have heard this from her maybe or someone else from amour? problem is to my understanding she is very anti this site so they would not be admitting to people they do bad things to punters.

In fact no agency would admit such things without damaging there business and to clarify i don't know enough about allure to comment on how they are as people.

greychap

  • Guest
I see admin has posted above that the amour pimp supports a troll twitter account that's calling for the closing of UKP. Now if I was informed of a provider I punted with was doing that I would boycott them from that point onwards, its called supporting UKP in my book.

Exactly, when i had threats from them and my car smashed to bits some punters obviously thought it was no big deal and i should "get over it and stop mentioning it" why should i hide what has happened especially if new people want to know!

Offline smiths

Exactly, when i had threats from them and my car smashed to bits some punters obviously thought it was no big deal and i should "get over it and stop mentioning it" why should i hide what has happened especially if new people want to know!

If that had happened to me I would be shouting it from the rooftops on here and quite right that this might make a difference to some new punters on here.

greychap

  • Guest
If that had happened to me I would be shouting it from the rooftops on here and quite right that this might make a difference to some new punters on here.

Yes that's why i do, least it gives any new punters especially ones wanting to do outcalls to there homes the choice if they want to take the risk or avoid. Its the whole point of the site to warn others if they don't listen then up to them.

themademan2

  • Guest
The Amour pimp supports a troll Twitter account calling for the shutting of this site.
None of the other North East agency owners do.
That alone speaks volumes.
Your right here. And if it's the one I'm thinking off, the stupid fucker being bad mouthing me on there too. mackydees, your only reviews seem to come from that same idiot, and same with your duff info, so obviously your only going to spout out the crap you have been fed  :dance:



themademan2

  • Guest
Hugely one sided reasoning there.

No mention of Allure stealing Amours client list, outing amour girls to families, changing passwords on Amour email accounts, the list is endless. As no doubt there's many things been done the other way.

Personally I'm steering clear of both, the fights getting to ugly now to not involve the clients and somewhere a client will get dragged into it and, at best outed, at worst hurt.

Ps Greychap I'm fairly certain I know who called you that time (because you're not the only one it's happened to however the last person recognised the voice) and you are so far off the mark with your thoughts on who it is.

Quote direct from amour site....

"...My husband (then fiancé) has had words with another previous client due to a difference in opinion in the past. This was due to a lady who used to work on my phones on an evening ringing my husband and asking him to ring the client, as she'd been very upset with the way she'd been spoken to.
My husband has had no need to try and make any contact with you, nor has he been asked to."

What a self contradicting statement, he had a 'word' with punter, but then he has not been 'asked to'

There's your answer greychap. Straight from the horses mouth and on her website  :wackogirl:

WTF is fiancé getting involved in HER business and ringing clients to threaten them?? That threat was to me at the time... Same guy rang you. Hope your reading this AnthG and look at the camp your supporting as you have stated. Evidence on her own posts :timeout:
« Last Edit: July 13, 2015, 10:33:16 pm by themademan2 »

Offline smiths

Yes that's why i do, least it gives any new punters especially ones wanting to do outcalls to there homes the choice if they want to take the risk or avoid. Its the whole point of the site to warn others if they don't listen then up to them.

As I have always posted I have never and would never do an Outcall to my own home, too risky for my liking, and it makes no difference to me how many other punters might say they have never had a problem, it only takes one dodgy WG and/or pimp.

Offline AnthG

Quote direct from amour site....

"...My husband (then fiancé) has had words with another previous client due to a difference in opinion in the past. This was due to a lady who used to work on my phones on an evening ringing my husband and asking him to ring the client, as she'd been very upset with the way she'd been spoken to.
My husband has had no need to try and make any contact with you, nor has he been asked to."

What a self contradicting statement, he had a 'word' with punter, but then he has not been 'asked to'

There's your answer greychap. Straight from the horses mouth and on her website  :wackogirl:

WTF is fiancé getting involved in HER business and ringing clients to threaten them?? That threat was to me at the time... Same guy rang you. Hope your reading this AnthG and look at the camp your supporting as you have stated. Evidence on her own posts :timeout:

But that is a confusing argument you are making.

She is admitting she did this with you. But saying she didn't do it with GC.

You would naturally think she would deny both if trying to lie to get away with things. And you have no direct proof it happened to you to force her to admit this occurred with you.

So this implies she is telling the truth. She did it with you, but not GC? In my eyes at least. I am not sure about anyone elses.

And I feel I better say, that its not me saying I don't believe what GC says. I am saying it could have been someone else.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2015, 10:38:31 pm by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline MagpieJohn

Both the Amour supporters and the Allure supporters send me PMs with accusations what the other side has done.
There's a war going on, UKP being the prime platform to carry it out, because so many punters read it.

The problem with the North East is that agencies are more popular than independents (unlike other parts of UK, e.g. London)
This needs to be resolved by their local police force, just like Avon and Somerset Constabulary did with BathBabes.

And in case anyone doesn't know about BathBabes, he had a massive fanclub here on UKPunting, he also boasted of police protection, but after a week of me making this post: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=459.msg230335#msg230335
He was arrested and his agency shutdown.
I know because the police contacted me needing my co-operation in building a case against him (which enraged his fanclub even further).

Just out of curiosity, was he arrested for making threats or for running a brothel? Just 'cos I noticed one of the posts on that thread said the place was "a collective of independents using the same house for incalls" and that sounds like a brothel to me.

Offline stanleyjohn

I don't really no much about the owners of Allure to comment on if there considered nice or not I only know about my experience with Amour and what I have been told about Stacey trying to get the police to close down Allure.

I am a bit naive regarding agencies as I have only used Allure in recent times, all the girls were great but I only met them as a result of reviews

greychap

  • Guest
But that is a confusing argument you are making.

She is admitting she did this with you. But saying she didn't do it with GC.

You would naturally think she would deny both if trying to lie to get away with things. And you have no direct proof it happened to you to force her to admit this occurred with you.

So this implies she is telling the truth. She did it with you, but not GC? In my eyes at least. I am not sure about anyone elses.

And I feel I better say, that its not me saying I don't believe what GC says. I am saying it could have been someone else.

Why would anyone admit they got a bloke to phone up a punter and threaten them saying they would post letters and tell neighbours there a pedo and cause them a lot of trouble, why would any agency really admit to that???

The phone call the mademan had from her bloke was ages ago before this happened and it was a case the receptionist had a moan and he got on the phone to the punter to have a go a little bit different to what happened to me but still very bad.

The fact is your team Stacey like you said earlier so its difficult for you to understand as it has not happened to you and don't forget you have been on ukp a long time near the start so I doubt many agencies would threaten you as it would be all over the site!

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Just out of curiosity, was he arrested for making threats or for running a brothel? Just 'cos I noticed one of the posts on that thread said the place was "a collective of independents using the same house for incalls" and that sounds like a brothel to me.

I didn't report him for making threats apart from posting publicly. He was arrested for brothel keeping / controlling prostitution for gain. The police officer then got in touch to ask me for a copy of his threat and provide a statement, which I happily provided. She also asked for all data held on his account (IP, email address, etc.).
The police officer told me they were not interested in punters or girls who worked there, only the owner.

Like many other agency owners (e.g. Amour) he claimed what he wasn't wasn't illegal, how the police knew and made regular check-up visits, etc.

Some of the girls who worked for him are now independent (I understand proper independent, e.g. handling all their own calls, etc.).

OldAdmin

  • Guest
I didn't report him for making threats apart from posting publicly. He was arrested for brothel keeping / controlling prostitution for gain. The police officer then got in touch to ask me for a copy of his threat and provide a statement, which I happily provided. She also asked for all data held on his account (IP, email address, etc.).
The police officer told me they were not interested in punters or girls who worked there, only the owner.

Like many other agency owners (e.g. Amour) he claimed what he wasn't wasn't illegal, how the police knew and made regular check-up visits, etc.

Some of the girls who worked for him are now independent (I understand proper independent, e.g. handling all their own calls, etc.).

And just to add, I accused him of having a fake account on here posing as punter and touting his agency.
I was told how I was wrong by his fanclub and how they knew 'perfectpunter' account was a genuine punter (you can see the posts from the account on that thread I linked to earlier).

Well turned out I was right, because the police officer told me they seized his iPad and this 'perfectpunter' account was on it. So they wanted all IP info, etc. about it.

Offline MagpieJohn

I think I'll just stick with the indies, it seems not only the safer option but means that I don't get involved with arguments like this.

greychap

  • Guest
I didn't report him for making threats apart from posting publicly. He was arrested for brothel keeping / controlling prostitution for gain. The police officer then got in touch to ask me for a copy of his threat and provide a statement, which I happily provided. She also asked for all data held on his account (IP, email address, etc.).
The police officer told me they were not interested in punters or girls who worked there, only the owner.

Like many other agency owners (e.g. Amour) he claimed what he wasn't wasn't illegal, how the police knew and made regular check-up visits, etc.

Some of the girls who worked for him are now independent (I understand proper independent, e.g. handling all their own calls, etc.).

It just shows you a lot of the agencies that boast about having police mates end up being done by the same force they boast about, I too have seen this before with others in the past.

Nobody is untouchable.

greychap

  • Guest
I think I'll just stick with the indies, it seems not only the safer option but means that I don't get involved with arguments like this.

The problem is too many agencies are run by criminals and they don't like competition so think its normal to try and get rid of there rivals and it can get heavy where punters and girls can be in the cross fire.

Offline MagpieJohn

Thanks for that admin, the thread was an interesting read and I see what you mean about the fan club, some of them seemed obsessed. But I don't think the guy who made the quote I mentioned above did his friend any favours with the police lol

Offline rthunderbird

The problem is too many agencies are run by criminals and they don't like competition so think its normal to try and get rid of there rivals and it can get heavy where punters and girls can be in the cross fire.

Hence why all but one of my punts have been through indies.