Current Profilekim glenn External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only Previous profileskim glenni External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only Kim Glennis External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyPrevious feedbackfrom HughJardon https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=60908.0Location ---
9/10 + Easy to access and find location in Central Cambridge. Near the river.
+ Modern private one-bedroom flat in a contemporary discreet block of serviced apartments.
+ Spacious room. Very good bed.
+ Everything was immaculate clean. Please note that I met her about 30-40mins after she received the flat key and I was her first client of the day.
+ Modern clean bathroom.
Comms ---
5/10 + Spoke to her on the phone. When I first called her she was in her car driving so we communicated again once she arrived in Cambridge.
≡ I believe you need to call before you can exchange texts. At least that was my experience.
x She didn't answer any service related text. Avoided confirmation of services by text when asked and avoided again on the phone. Perhaps though the whole thing of being in the car and then waiting to get the key from the reception contributed to this.
Physical ---
Looks: 7.5/10, Body: 9/10 + 21 years old stated in the profile seems legit. Definitely early 20s.
+ Pics are genuine and not heavily photoshopped.
+ Very hot body. Smooth tanned skin, slim, toned size 8, great curves, peachy bum, magnificent 34D boobs. Height about 5 feet 7 inches I think. The pictures like this
External Link/Members Only show her with lingerie but you have to see her naked to really appreciate the greatness of her body.
+ She is definitely from South America. Whether she is lying about being Venezuelan remains to be seen when her profile gets verified (if it ever does). For what is worth she says she is from Caracas. She is
not a Romanian falsely advertising to be Latin. Also I believe she is really independent.
≡ Facially she is good-looking but her specs detract from her appeal and yes some pics make her specs look better on her than they really do. The most accurate face shots are the following
External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only ≡ She doesn’t remove her glasses as she says she can't see without them although she did remove them temporarily for me to check out her looks after request. She is better looking without the glasses. I give her 7.5/10 with glasses and 8/10 without.
x She has 2-3 piercings on her navel. Also she has a few tattoos. Most are of these are shown in this picture
External Link/Members Only Note also she has a large tattoo on her lower left arm which is not shown in the pics.
Experience ---
5.5/10 + Sex was good. I penetrated her rigorously and she didn't complain. Her favourite position is doggy. We also positioned ourselves in such a way to see the action in the mirrors. During sex she was reasonably active.
+ Good covered blowjob and handjob.
+ She was clean and her pussy tasted nice when I licked it. But bear in mind that was her very first client of the day.
+ She didn't check her phone or had other distractions.
+ She is polite.
≡ Rather distant personality. Not warm or cheerful for sure.
≡ Conversational English. She says she in the UK for 2 years.
≡ OWO, CIM are extra. It is stated on her profile but it doesn't say how much and she didn't respond to this question when asked by texts. In person she said OWO is £20 extra. In the other review it is stated that CIM is another £40.
x No French kissing at all. Not even on the lips. Zero kissing from above the neck although neck is permitted. Don't get fooled by the 'at discretion' on her profile. She even admitted that it is completely off the menu before taking the money. But when asked by text she avoided to answer.
x I was rushed to cum. See more below.
x Clock-watching and time short-changing. First after getting paid she felt the need to tell me that my time started the moment I entered the flat. She also gave me a time warning after just 10mins (from the moment I entered the flat) that I am allowed to only cum once, that my time would be up in 9 minutes, and that I have to factor 5 minutes to dress up. Seriously? She also gave me a couple of more warnings during shagging. And if you add 10+9+5=24. Indeed I was in and out of the flat in even less. Exactly 23 minutes. I entered at 3.50pm and I was out on the road on 4.13pm. Times given are indicative and not the actual ones but the exact durations are.
x She runs a conveyor belt. Although I was the first client and hygiene was immaculate when I asked about 1hr or 30mins at the beginning she showed me a text of the next client coming immediately afterwards. No wonder she kicks you out with 7minutes to spare. Also 2 minutes before the start of our booking and while I was waiting outside her building I received a text 'we have a booking babe in 2mins. If you are not here in time another client is waiting'. WTF?!
Final wordsA very basic, limited, rushed and at-arms-length service combined with a cracking body, good looks, youth, rare nationality and a good venue. Overall a neutral bordering to negative experience. I won't revisit and I wouldn't recommend this ultra money-oriented Latin prostitute. That said I believe that quite a few punters will anyway be tempted to try her out and I will agree that she is not a terrible option for £60 for ‘30minutes’. Note the quotation marks though as you will get much less time than that.
Hidden Image/Members Only External Link/Members Only
Topic: kim glenn Adultwork #3055320. Touring Cambridge (Read 1599 times)